Jump to content

Talk:Francis Schuckardt: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
2006 Edit Wars: new section
Line 22: Line 22:
I have noticed that the previous version of this article, which [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francis_Schuckardt&oldid=35644782 dates as far back as January 2006] (before I started radially reorganising it), was mostly present word-for-word [http://www.bishopschuckardt.com/biography.html here]. Same goes for the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francis_Schuckardt&oldid=54375697 May 2006 version] and its additions.
I have noticed that the previous version of this article, which [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francis_Schuckardt&oldid=35644782 dates as far back as January 2006] (before I started radially reorganising it), was mostly present word-for-word [http://www.bishopschuckardt.com/biography.html here]. Same goes for the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francis_Schuckardt&oldid=54375697 May 2006 version] and its additions.
<br>I have no idea who copied whom. The [https://web.archive.org/web/20150220084712/http://www.bishopschuckardt.com/biography.html archive of bishopschuckardt.com] only goes as far as 2015. [[User:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[User talk:Veverve|talk]]) 11:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
<br>I have no idea who copied whom. The [https://web.archive.org/web/20150220084712/http://www.bishopschuckardt.com/biography.html archive of bishopschuckardt.com] only goes as far as 2015. [[User:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[User talk:Veverve|talk]]) 11:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

:This is a lie, there was a huge amount of work done by numerous people, citing books, articles, and pamphlets. You've done a great job gutting the article to incoherent arbitrary snippets. Thankfully, you're helping to make wikipedia irrelevant, which will help people to find better sources elsewhere. [[User:G4wa5r4gasag|G4wa5r4gasag]] ([[User talk:G4wa5r4gasag|talk]]) 05:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)


== 2006 Edit Wars ==
== 2006 Edit Wars ==

Revision as of 05:23, 20 August 2022

WikiProject iconBiography B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCatholicism B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconFrancis Schuckardt is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconUnited States: Washington / Seattle B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

"Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church".

There seems to be no source for Bishop Schuckardt's alleged formation of this "Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church." In fact, this is the only place where it is even mentioned. If nobody provides a source I think it should be removed. --172.0.115.0 (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for your remark. Veverve (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have found a reliable source mentioning this group. I will add the nformation I found. Veverve (talk) 10:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CMRI page vs Schuckardt page

Most information regarding the TLRC/CMRI between 1967 and 1984 should be moved to the main CMRI page, especially concerning issues of real estate purchases or Mount St. Michael. This bio page should be reserved for his personal information and potentially the TLRC from 1984 to 2006. Detailed information regarding his consecration should be moved from the CMRI page to this personal page. The CMRI page assumes the history of the Chicoine faction following the 1984 split, so everything after the 1984 split should probably remain on the Schuckardt page since there is very little information after 1984 and his group appears to have peaked at 100 members, so there's no need to track it on the larger CMRI page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G4wa5r4gasag (talkcontribs) 19:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is on bishopschuckardt.com ?

I have noticed that the previous version of this article, which dates as far back as January 2006 (before I started radially reorganising it), was mostly present word-for-word here. Same goes for the May 2006 version and its additions.
I have no idea who copied whom. The archive of bishopschuckardt.com only goes as far as 2015. Veverve (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lie, there was a huge amount of work done by numerous people, citing books, articles, and pamphlets. You've done a great job gutting the article to incoherent arbitrary snippets. Thankfully, you're helping to make wikipedia irrelevant, which will help people to find better sources elsewhere. G4wa5r4gasag (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Edit Wars

Go back and look at the pages and talk from 2006. There was a tremendous amount of work done, and it's all been chopped out down to nothing. The best place to get information is by reading the previous versions & looking into the archives. A ton of good information has been removed due to personal preferences. All the sources from newspapers & books used to be on this page, but were removed by hostile editors. The page really should just be deleted, it's absolutely pointless now. Thankfully, wikipedia saves all these previous edits, so these can be posted on the web elsewhere, since there are some hostile editors who follow these Catholic pages (FSSP, CMRI, Schuckardt, etc.) G4wa5r4gasag (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]