Talk:LAN gaming center: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:19, 27 February 2007

Video games Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Re LAN Gaming Center

The terms Center or Centre means the same thing. Just depends on where you live. Canadians use Centre while Americans use Center. --Arobertson 21:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

The external links should stay. iGames and the other LAN Center listing sites provide valuable information. If you are trying to prevent businesses from promoting themselves, then you should also remove the photographs of any existing LAN Gaming Businesses. Also remove the all of the links in the LAN Gaming Description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.106.129 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about the value of external links that don't supplement the encyclopedic content of an article. Wikipedia is not a link repository. It may be helpful to review the external links guidelines and, again, discuss individual links here before adding them back into the article. JonHarder 13:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JonHarder We all disagree with you and your link removal, the links provide a huge resource of information about LAN centers.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.251.114 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument isn't with me so much as with Wikipedia guidelines. First, Wikipedia is not a link repository. That means articles shouldn't be a collection of links like say, DMOZ. Wikipedia needs more content (article text), not links. The other factors are the guidelines concerning external links and linking to commercial sites. I don't have a problem with you adding the encyclopedic links back, but first verify that they fit the previous guidelines and then add those that pass the test back one by one. There are several in that list that have no other purpose but to promote a site or business. Do not continue to revert, as you are destroying work that has happened inbetween. Finally, there have been two other editors also reverting your attempts to replace the links and there will be others if you continue to put the spam back in. JonHarder 22:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The external links should stay, the links blend with the article and provide a valuble resource to all of us. Do not continue to revert, as you are destroying work that has happened and I'm also sick of coming to find you have blanked this article. Freakdomination

And I'm tired of seeing unhelpful links added and put back into the article! I'm an old guy and not very bright, but to me, all of those links, including one used as a citation, just look like the kind of blatantly promotional sites discouraged by Wikipedia guidelines. They don't help me understand more about LAN Gaming Centers. Can you explain to me, and the several other editors who have been removing them, how they fit into the WP:EL guidelines? I prefer to see the links come out and that you and other editors concentrate on expanding the content of the article, including adding the source of your information. If by "destroying work" you mean removing the street address of a particular center, that is a level of detail that is not helpful in an encyclopedia. It should come out! JonHarder 23:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Blending with the article" is not one of the criteria of WP:EL; you might want to actually read it. And there are now three experienced editors calling for removal of these links. Anyone who wants to find gaming centers can do so via a Google search. -- Mwanner | Talk 23:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call yourself experienced considering you have no idea what your doing when it comes to editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakdomination (talk • contribs) 23:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Please sign your posts with ~~~~.) I may not be very bright, but I still prefer other editors to be civil, even when they disagree with my point of view. You are not building the kind of trust that is needed to work collaboratively. Do you want to try that response again? I know you can do better. And it's OK to admit that just maybe the concensus is building against you and it is time to contribute to Wikipedia in other ways than linking to external sites. JonHarder 03:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The LAN center links are simply a directory listing, which Wikipedia is not. --Siobhan Hansa 02:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that, but the other links, such as to iGames, are still a good resource. Kopf1988 19:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right Kopf1988 - I should have been less trigger happy on the revert of those links. Sorry. --Siobhan Hansa 21:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree all the links should stay the all offer something unique and they aren't trying to sell anything. 4.234.15.242 19:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All sorts of things are unique and useful to someone, but they don't add encyclopedic value. And a directory is definitely not what Wikipedia is supposed to be. If you want to ignore Wikipedia policy you need to show why the LAN center article is different from other subjects in Wikipedia that could do the same, and how allowing a directory of LAN centers would make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. --Siobhan Hansa 21:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the way this discussion is moving, but I suggest that the remaining links be replaced with

This site also has many of the deleted links and anyone should be free to add their favorite links to that site. It is the solution used in many articles to solve this sort of problem. Does anyone see a problem going in this direction? JonHarder 00:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that's a lot better then listing them here, at any rate. Kopf1988 20:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DMOZ is completely unreliable considering they are always down and is not worth even listing here, the external links should be put back. If your looking to stir up more link trouble head over to LAN party Freakdomination 04:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I've cleaned it up. JonHarder 05:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the DMOZ index now and it looks fine and works fine. Suggest you try again. Your attempted deletion of a discussion on the administrators noticeboard could however be construed as stirring up trouble. Please don't do that again. — Moondyne 06:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe you should look again, so you can find out dmoz is broken indefintly and those pages are only static. check the forums at dmoz Freakdomination 07:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

using the igames directory should be sufficient since the dmoz directory doesn't work. Freakdomination 07:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you have a problem with your computer. I checked again and its working fine. Your link to igames has been removed as it is spam. — Moondyne 08:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you are just looking hard enough... http://www.resource-zone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45325 Freakdomination 08:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(resetting indent) dmoz not working isn't a reason to add the links back in - Wikpipedia is not a directory. The dmoz link is a sop. If it's not working there's no problem with getting rid of it and having this simply be an encyclopedia article, instead of a place for LAN gaming participants to use as a directory. External links should be to sites that add encyclopedic value, a list of currently open gaming centers isn't encyclopedic information. --Siobhan Hansa 12:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a certain few editors are looking to single out this article for some reason take a look at LAN party and see if that article follows the wikipedia guidelines. 66.93.251.126 06:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think folks are trying to single this article out. If there are problems with LAN party, they should be fixed, too. What are your concerns about LAN party? Links? If so, which ones? --A. B. ^(talk) 09:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DMOZ is preferred over "no links". "No links" are preferred over bad links. Wikipedia is not responsible for the functioning of DMOZ at any given moment. So bad links don't go in this article. --A. B. ^(talk) 09:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has enveloped the LAN Party page which, until JonHarder got involved, had a small and relevant selection of links, the purpose of which was decided 3 years ago and had been well maintained up until then. Again, the arguement of linking to DMOZ was brought up despite the same arguements presented here - DMOZ being unreliable and of low quality. I know some of you are on your crusade against external links, but there are some external links which are indeed relevant to an article and as you can see from the response here and over in the LAN Party discussion page, there is support for these external links. Thanks for reading, Murray-Mint-UK 10:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

editprotected

Someone should:

Add {{vprotected}} to it.
Possibly lowercase the last two words, as they are not proper nouns.

Thanx. 68.39.174.238 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template has been added. Are you referring to the title? Makes sense to me. Anyone know of a valid reason why it should be capitalised? And the same question about Video Game Center ? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links revisited

There is renewed disagreement about the value and appropriateness of a link to the iGames website. Over the last several months, a link to that website plus others have been added and removed at least two dozens times. The activity has been quite contentious at times, with deceptive edit summaries, personal attacks and other unfortunate behavior. A majority of reinsertions (18) have been done by five IP addresses assigned to Games Plus, Inc (the 66.93.251.112/28 block), editors demonstrating affiliation with Games Plus and other users who have appeared only or mainly to edit this article. The latest reinsertion is to iGames search forms for "finding a center."

I continue to believe that the DMOZ site is sufficient, that the iGames link is not a helpful addition and should be removed. The iGames site has an objectionable amount of advertising and prominently solicits signup. The iGames site is easily found in the DMOZ listing, so it is doesn't need to be duplicated here. The article mentions nothing about searching for or finding a center, so apparently that aspect is not particularly relevant; the article does not demand the link. In a sense, the main text of the article should drive the links or the links section just becomes a repository. As the policy states, Wikipedia is not the white pages or the yellow pages. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 19:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wholeheartedly agree with JonHarder. The continued insertion of this link violates WP:External links, WP:Conflict of interest, and WP:Spam, among others. The link is already included via the DMOZ template, which is a link repository. But even if the site were not at DMOZ, there is simply no good reason for such a link to be in this encyclopedia article. -- Satori Son 20:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link to iGames does not violate WP:External links or WP:Conflict of interest because it is being added from a neutral POV and I have nothing to do with iGames. the only reason I edit here at the cybercafe from this IP is because the school is blocked! 66.93.251.114 03:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank goodness we have JonHarder to save us from ourselves! Time to award another WikiMedal! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.34.228 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sarcasm above is brought to us from the same IP whose major contributions have been to spam for Chris Bryant of bryantadvantage.com and to remove competitors' links. Your comment is neither constructive nor helpful for improving this article. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 16:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revisting the Exterenal Links. iGames is of unequivical value to this artcile. iGames is the ONLY way to get licenses to run EA, Micrsoft, Sony, Ubisoft, etc Games. Beyond that iGames is an alliance of lan centers that has over 500 lan centers in it and holds competitive events, etc. I also added links to the Valve Cyber Cafe Program from Valve Games and the Blizzard Game Center program- these programs only offer licensing though. Do not delete the links again.

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 {{unsigned|68.57.34.228|03:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)}}
 :The sarcasm above is brought to us from the same IP whose major contributions have been to spam for Chris Bryant of bryantadvantage.com and to remove competitors' links. Your comment is neither constructive nor helpful for improving this article. <font color="purple">✤</font> [[Special:Contributions/JonHarder|JonHarder]] <sup>[[User talk:JonHarder|talk]]</sup> 16:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
+Revisting the Exterenal Links. iGames is of unequivical value to this artcile. iGames is the ONLY way to get licenses to run EA, Micrsoft, Sony, Ubisoft, etc Games. Beyond that iGames is an alliance of lan centers that has over 500 lan centers in it and holds competitive events, etc. I also added links to the Valve Cyber Cafe Program from Valve Games and the Blizzard Game Center program- these programs only offer licensing though. Do not delete the links again.