Jump to content

User talk:SounderBruce: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sakanaya (talk | contribs)
Line 76: Line 76:
Any guidance you might be able and willing to provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time!--[[User:Sakanaya|Sakanaya]] ([[User talk:Sakanaya|talk]]) 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Any guidance you might be able and willing to provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time!--[[User:Sakanaya|Sakanaya]] ([[User talk:Sakanaya|talk]]) 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|Sakanaya}} Seattle Southside seems to be a marketing term more than an actual geographic distinction. Most reliable sources (like the Seattle Times, News Tribune, various Reporter papers) use "South King" except in sponsored pieces from the tourism agency. I'd be opposed to mentioning it in the articles at all, let alone the lead. '''[[User:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">Sounder</span>]][[User talk:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>]]''' 02:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|Sakanaya}} Seattle Southside seems to be a marketing term more than an actual geographic distinction. Most reliable sources (like the Seattle Times, News Tribune, various Reporter papers) use "South King" except in sponsored pieces from the tourism agency. I'd be opposed to mentioning it in the articles at all, let alone the lead. '''[[User:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">Sounder</span>]][[User talk:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>]]''' 02:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
::Respectfully, I have to disagree with your assessment of Seattle Southside as a pure marketing term. First, the area's business interests are represented by the Seattle Southside Chamber of Commerce ([https://www.seattlesouthsidechamber.com/about]https://www.seattlesouthsidechamber.com/about), a completely separate organization from the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority. This indicates a regional recognition separate from the marketing organization. Further, the Soundside Alliance ([https://soundsidealliance.org/about-soundside-alliance/]https://soundsidealliance.org/about-soundside-alliance/), a business development organization and partnership of the five cities of Burien, SeaTac, Des Moines, Tukwila, and Normandy Park describes the region as the Seattle Southside region repeatedly across their site. I do agree that placing it in the lead was a bad choice, and that I recognize. I am merely working to improve the articles by linking them to their shared regional identity, which while the name, yes, was originally chosen by a marketing organization, it was done with consent, input, and funding from the governments of the cities it markets. [[User:Sakanaya|Sakanaya]] ([[User talk:Sakanaya|talk]]) 20:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


==DYK nomination of Phở Bắc==
==DYK nomination of Phở Bắc==

Revision as of 20:47, 15 November 2022

What is the Problem?

Hi, Sports event article need symbol section like 1998 FIFA World Cup. Only 1998 FIFA World Cup had a symbol section. So I added a sympbol section in 1990 FIFA World Cup, 1994 FIFA World Cup, 2002 FIFA World Cup and I added reliable source from FIFA Official Website.

I don't understand that What Problem is ?

Besides, Inserting a non-free image at 2002 FIFA World Cup article is just a mistake.

Footwiks (talk) 07:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Footwiks: Please communicate when editing and only save when necessary. There's dozens of your summary-less edits in the watchlists of many editors. Your edits are being reverted when a suitable source is not provided, or you've left something incomplete; I highly recommend using your own sandbox or draftspace to work on chunks that can be submitted properly at one time. SounderBruce 07:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

  • England Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
  • New York City Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
  • Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
  • Chicago PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
  • Toronto Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
  • Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
  • Toronto Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
  • SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
  • Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
  • Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MLS Cup 2022

Super
Hi,

Can you improve the color of the Philadelphia team shorts? They played in yellow shorts (I was watching the match on TV). I wanted to improve myself, but I can't ...

Thank you greetings Artur Realista74 (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Realista74: Fixed them by swapping out the shorts pattern part of the template. In the future, please use edit summaries when making changes; we'd be able to help. SounderBruce 23:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup awards

The featured topic prize, awarded to SounderBruce for four featured topic articles in round 1 of the 2022 WikiCup.

Congratulations on this award. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'm the user who added links to the Seattle Southside page for the city pages for Tukwila, SeaTac, and Des Moines. I'm discussing here since there are three different pages in question, so it wouldn't make sense to repeat the talk across three pages. I wanted to reach out to make sure we don't go back and forth on edits on these three pages and can instead find a solution that makes sense for both of us. The Seattle Southside regional designation is recognized across all three cities, and the cities are marketed as a tourist destination under the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority DMO. I can understand wanting citation and marking the additions as citation needed - I'm happy to find reliable sources as needed, in fact, the Tukwila page already links to Seattle Southside's website in a link that far predates my edits. I just want to find a way to include this regional link across the three cities in a way that makes sense. I recognize your expertise in this arena - while my account has been around a while, you'll see I haven't made a ton of edits in Wikipedia, so I definitely have a lot to learn. I do think this information is valuable and worthy of inclusion on all three pages - perhaps not in the summary area at the top of the article as I had originally placed them.

Any guidance you might be able and willing to provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time!--Sakanaya (talk) 17:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakanaya: Seattle Southside seems to be a marketing term more than an actual geographic distinction. Most reliable sources (like the Seattle Times, News Tribune, various Reporter papers) use "South King" except in sponsored pieces from the tourism agency. I'd be opposed to mentioning it in the articles at all, let alone the lead. SounderBruce 02:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully, I have to disagree with your assessment of Seattle Southside as a pure marketing term. First, the area's business interests are represented by the Seattle Southside Chamber of Commerce ([1]https://www.seattlesouthsidechamber.com/about), a completely separate organization from the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority. This indicates a regional recognition separate from the marketing organization. Further, the Soundside Alliance ([2]https://soundsidealliance.org/about-soundside-alliance/), a business development organization and partnership of the five cities of Burien, SeaTac, Des Moines, Tukwila, and Normandy Park describes the region as the Seattle Southside region repeatedly across their site. I do agree that placing it in the lead was a bad choice, and that I recognize. I am merely working to improve the articles by linking them to their shared regional identity, which while the name, yes, was originally chosen by a marketing organization, it was done with consent, input, and funding from the governments of the cities it markets. Sakanaya (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Phở Bắc

Hello! Your submission of Phở Bắc at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Adog (TalkCont) 06:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear SounderBruce,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for MLS Cup 2022

On 14 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article MLS Cup 2022, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the most valuable player of MLS Cup 2022, John McCarthy, only played once in the regular season? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MLS Cup 2022. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, MLS Cup 2022), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of the city.

I removed the incorrect pronunciation of the city of Boise for the same reason other Wikipedia pages do not include their respective, and perhaps understandable, mispronunciations. For example, "Arkansas," and, "Mackinac Island." The mispronunciation of Boise is less understandable, and just as incorrect.

If I should have explained it the first time, then that's on me. Friarbax (talk) 01:29, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Friarbax: Given that reliable sources also use the other pronunciation, and there isn't a consensus on which is correct, both should stay. It's not unusual for articles to have multiple pronunciations in their lead, such as Toronto and Chicago. Removal requires consensus, so start a talk page discussion per the BRD cycle. SounderBruce 01:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. BRD sounds good. Friarbax (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]