Hilf al-Fudul: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Historical background== |
==Historical background== |
||
The pact, or {{transliteration|ar|hilf}} in Arabic, took place at the end of the [[Fijar War]], with the battle having taken place in the month of [[Shawwal]] and the {{transliteration|ar|Hilf al-Fudul}} in the following mont [[Dhu al-Qi'da]]. [[Montgomery Watt]] notes that the war resulted in Meccan control of the commercial road between [[Yemen]] and [[al-Hirah]]. |
The pact, or {{transliteration|ar|hilf}} in Arabic, took place at the end of the [[Fijar War]], with the battle having taken place in the month of [[Shawwal]] and the {{transliteration|ar|Hilf al-Fudul}} in the following mont [[Dhu al-Qi'da]]. [[Montgomery Watt]] notes that the war resulted in Meccan control of the commercial road between [[Yemen]] and [[al-Hirah]]. |
||
Martin Lings notes the historical importance of a justice system in Mecca. In the years preceding the pact, the [[Quraysh (tribe)|Quraysh]] were involved in intermittent conflicts. The war, as usual, was a result of an unsettled murder. The effect was growing discontent with the form of justice that required sacrilegious war. Many Quraysh leaders had travelled to Syria, where they found relative justice prevailed. Similar conditions also existed in Abyssinia. No such system, however, existed in Arabia.<ref name = Lings>Lings, Martin (1983). ''Muhammad: His Life based on the earliest Sources''. p. 31-2</ref> |
Martin Lings notes the historical importance of a justice system in Mecca. In the years preceding the pact, the [[Quraysh (tribe)|Quraysh]] were involved in intermittent conflicts. The war, as usual, was a result of an unsettled murder. The effect was growing discontent with the form of justice that required sacrilegious war. Many Quraysh leaders had travelled to Syria, where they found relative justice prevailed. Similar conditions also existed in Abyssinia. No such system, however, existed in Arabia.<ref name = Lings>Lings, Martin (1983). ''Muhammad: His Life based on the earliest Sources''. p. 31-2</ref> |
||
| Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
==Clans involved== |
==Clans involved== |
||
The following clans joined this pact : [[Banu Hashim]], Banu Zuhra, Banu |
The following clans joined this pact : [[Banu Hashim]], [[Banu Zuhra]], [[Abd al-Muttalib|Banu Muttalib]], [[Banu Asad]] and [[Banu Taym]]. Montgomery Watt notes the continuity with the previous ''hilf al-Muthayyabun'' during the conflict for [[Qusay]]'s succession. It featured the same opposing groups of clans, with a group of clans known as the {{transliteration|ar|Hilf al-Muthayyabun}} opposing the Banu Makhzum and the Banu Sahm, grouped in the {{transliteration|ar|Ahlaf}}. An exception to this were the [[Banu Nawfal]] and the powerful 'Abd Shams ([[Banu Umayya]]), whose success now drew them closer to the {{transliteration|ar|Ahlaf}}. |
||
According to Watt, the fact that Makhzum and 'Abd Shams had taken control of the trade routes with Yemen following the Fijar war meant that lesser clans would be excluded from commerce with Yemen if Yemeni merchants were to stop coming to Mecca. This would explain the necessity for them to defend the Yemeni merchant. He also notes that the same clans remained in conflict until the [[Battle of Badr]], where all Meccan leaders belonged to the same clans who opposed the {{transliteration|ar|Hilf al Fudul}} |
According to Watt, the fact that Makhzum and 'Abd Shams had taken control of the trade routes with Yemen following the Fijar war meant that lesser clans would be excluded from commerce with Yemen if Yemeni merchants were to stop coming to Mecca. This would explain the necessity for them to defend the Yemeni merchant. He also notes that the same clans remained in conflict until the [[Battle of Badr]], where all Meccan leaders belonged to the same clans who opposed the {{transliteration|ar|Hilf al Fudul}}<ref name = Social/><ref name = Watt/>. |
||
==Legacy== |
==Legacy== |
||
Revision as of 19:35, 24 November 2022
| Part of a series on |
| Muhammad |
|---|
Hilf al-Fudul (Arabic: حلف الفضول) was an alliance or confederacy created in Mecca in the year 590 AD,[1] to establish justice for all through collective action, especially for those who where not under the protection of any clan. Because of Muhammad's role in its formation, the alliance plays a significant role in Islamic ethics. Because fudul commonly means "virtuous" the alliance is often translated as League of the Virtuous.[2]
Historical background
The pact, or hilf in Arabic, took place at the end of the Fijar War, with the battle having taken place in the month of Shawwal and the Hilf al-Fudul in the following mont Dhu al-Qi'da. Montgomery Watt notes that the war resulted in Meccan control of the commercial road between Yemen and al-Hirah. Martin Lings notes the historical importance of a justice system in Mecca. In the years preceding the pact, the Quraysh were involved in intermittent conflicts. The war, as usual, was a result of an unsettled murder. The effect was growing discontent with the form of justice that required sacrilegious war. Many Quraysh leaders had travelled to Syria, where they found relative justice prevailed. Similar conditions also existed in Abyssinia. No such system, however, existed in Arabia.[3]
The principle of hilf was established previously by Hashim ibn Abd Manaf as a way to set up new alliances between merchants of similar power, whether they be Meccans or foreigners. It allowed the formation of alliances outside of Mecca and the modification of the balance of power with respect to trade inside Mecca. Hilf sometimes resulted in the formation of new tribes, as with the Banu Fihr.[2] Those transformations reshaped the traditional tribe socialisation and the social relations in Mecca. [4]
Formation
A Yemeni merchant from Zabid had sold some goods to al-As ibn Wa'il al-Sahmi (the father of Amr ibn al-As). Having taken possession of the goods, the Qurayshi refused to pay the agreed price, knowing that the merchant had no confederate or kinsman in Mecca whom he could count upon for help. The Yemeni merchant, instead of letting it pass, appealed to the Quraysh to see that justice was done.[3] But due to al-As ibn Wa'il's preeminent place among the Quraysh, they refused to help the Yemeni merchant. So the merchant went to the mountain Abi Qays to recite poems asking for justice.
Al-Zubayr ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib, Muhammad's uncle, is believed to have been the first to call for a pact.[5] Muhammad, the future prophet of Islam, took part in the hilf. A few clans met in Dar al-Nadwa, a building north of the Kaaba, the gathering place of the clan's leader (malaʾ), where they decided to take up the defense of the Yemeni merchant and to cover his losses. A meeting was hosted at the house of Abd Allah ibn Jad'an.[6] At the meeting, various chiefs and members of tribes pledged to assist anyone who was treated unjustly, to collectively intervene in conflicts to establish justice and to defend people who were foreigners in Mecca or who were not under the protection of a clan:[7]
To make the pact imperative and sacred, the members went into the Ka'aba and poured water into the receptacle so it flowed on the black stone. Thereupon each man drank from it. Then they raised their right hands above their heads to show they would stand together in this endeavor.[3] The pact was written and placed inside the Ka'aba, the place where the participants believed it would be under the protection of God.[8]
They succesfully retrieved the goods from al-As ibn Wa'il. Another aspect of the pact was that it would open up the Meccan market to Yemenite merchants, who were hitherto excluded.[9]
Clans involved
The following clans joined this pact : Banu Hashim, Banu Zuhra, Banu Muttalib, Banu Asad and Banu Taym. Montgomery Watt notes the continuity with the previous hilf al-Muthayyabun during the conflict for Qusay's succession. It featured the same opposing groups of clans, with a group of clans known as the Hilf al-Muthayyabun opposing the Banu Makhzum and the Banu Sahm, grouped in the Ahlaf. An exception to this were the Banu Nawfal and the powerful 'Abd Shams (Banu Umayya), whose success now drew them closer to the Ahlaf.
According to Watt, the fact that Makhzum and 'Abd Shams had taken control of the trade routes with Yemen following the Fijar war meant that lesser clans would be excluded from commerce with Yemen if Yemeni merchants were to stop coming to Mecca. This would explain the necessity for them to defend the Yemeni merchant. He also notes that the same clans remained in conflict until the Battle of Badr, where all Meccan leaders belonged to the same clans who opposed the Hilf al Fudul[2][9].
Legacy
That pact marked the beginning of some notion of justice in Mecca, which would be later repeated by Muhammad when he would preach Islam.[10] Later on, after proclaiming Islam, Muhammad still acknowledged the validity and value of the pact, despite most of its members being non-Muslim.[7] Abu Bakr is also said to have agreed to this pact.[7] This presumption is based on the fact that Abd Allah ibn Jad'an, whose house was the venue for this pledge, was Abu Bakr's fellow clansman.[11]
In the time of the first Umayyad caliph Mu'awiya, the governor of Medina al-Walid ibn Utba ibn Abi Sufyan ('Abd Shams), who was a nephew of the caliph, committed an injustice to Husayn ibn Ali. Husayn threatened to take the case to the members of Hilf al-Fudul. As influential Meccans like Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr (Assad), al-Miswar ibn Makhrama (al-Zuhri) and Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf (al-Taymi) swore to help Husayn in agreement with the pact, the Umayyad governor stepped back, afraid of the possible consequences.[12] · [13]
Islamic ethics
Anas Malik sees the pact as an example of libertarianism in Islam,[14] and Anthony Sullivan considers it as a support for Muslim democrats.[15]
The pact holds significance in Islamic ethics. According to Anthony Sullivan, the pact represents Islam's interest in human rights and protection of such rights.[15] Muhammad, later as a Muslim, accepted the substance of the agreement made by primarily non-Muslims. Tariq Ramadan draws three principles from this:[7]
- Islam embraces values derived from the human conscience, that are outside of the Islamic tradition. This is because Muhammad had acknowledged a pact before revelation, in the pre-Islamic era.
- Islam acknowledges the righteousness of non-Muslims. In this case, the non-Muslims had defended justice and the oppressed.
- Islam, instead of building allegiance to a closed community, requires allegiance to a set of universal principles. The message of Islam is not a closed value system, or at variance or conflict with other value systems.
See also
References
- ^ Guraya, Muhammad Yusuf (1979). "JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS IN PRE-ISLAMIC ARABIA". Islamic Studies. 18 (4): 338. ISSN 0578-8072.
- ^ a b c Ibrahim, Mahmood (Aug. 1982). "Social and Economic Conditions in Pre-Islamic Mecca." International Journal of Middle East Studies, 14(3): 355. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ a b c Lings, Martin (1983). Muhammad: His Life based on the earliest Sources. p. 31-2
- ^ Wolf, Eric R. "The social organization of Mecca and the origins of Islam." Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 7.4 (1951).
- ^ OBAIDULLAH FAHAD (2011). "Tracing Pluralistic Trends in Sīrah Literature: A Study of Some Contemporary Scholars". Islamic Studies. 50 (2): 221. JSTOR 41932590.
- ^ Najeebabadi, Akbar Shah. The History of Islam. Darussalam publishers. p. 101.
- ^ a b c d Ramadan, Tariq (2007). In the footsteps of the prophet. p. 20-2
- ^ Chelhod, Joseph (Nov. 1991). "La foi jurée et l'environnement désertique." Arabica, 38(3): 301.
- ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
Wattwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Peterson (2006), p. 43
- ^ Khalifa Abu Bakr. "Before and after Conversion to Islam."
- ^ Caetani, Annali del Islam, paragraphes 146 et 147 et notes
- ^ By M Th Houtsma. E.J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1913-1936. p. 307
- ^ Malik, Anas. The Case for Minarchist Libertarian Political Islam Archived 2008-03-11 at the Wayback Machine. Presented at Yale University’s Critical Islamic Reflections conference.
- ^ a b Sullivan, Antony T. Islam, America, and the political economy of liberty