Jump to content

Kleptocracy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Textminer (talk | contribs)
less opinionated, more accurate & succinct def'n of term; opinion statement removed in subsequent paragraph
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forms of government}}
{{Forms of government}}
'''Kleptocracy''' (sometimes '''Cleptocracy''') (''root: Klepto+cracy'' = ''rule by [[theft|thieves]]'') is a [[pejorative]], informal [[Term (language)|term]] for a [[form of government|government]] that is primarily designed to sustain the personal wealth and political power of government officials and their [[cronyism|cronies]] (collectively, '''kleptocrats''').
'''Kleptocracy''' (sometimes '''Cleptocracy''') (''root: Klepto+cracy'' = ''rule by [[theft|thieves]]'') is a [[form of government|government]] that extends the personal wealth and political power of government officials and the ruling class (collectively, '''kleptocrats''') at the expense of the lower classes.


== Characteristic ==
== Characteristic ==
Kleptocracies are often [[dictatorship]]s or some other form of [[autocracy|autocratic]] government, or lapsed democracies that have transformed into [[oligarchy|oligarchies]], since [[democracy]] makes outright thievery for direct personal gain slightly more difficult to sustain in the long term and still remain in power, more subtlety is employed. Some kleptocracies are a reponse to [[jingoism]], and frequent [[bullying]] in the government place itself.
A kleptocracy is fundamentally premised on the [[Leviathan_(book)|Hobbseian social contract]], whereby the people give up some rights to an authoratative body in exchange for the perception of basic protections. Basic protections such as defense must be funded by resources provided by the masses to the ruling elite, thus providing the core mechanism for transfer of resources from the masses to the ruling elite. Kleptocracies are often [[dictatorship]]s or some other form of [[autocracy|autocratic]] government, or lapsed democracies that have transformed into [[oligarchy|oligarchies]], since [[democracy]] makes outright thievery for direct personal gain slightly more difficult to sustain in the long term and still remain in power, more subtlety is employed. Some kleptocracies are a reponse to [[jingoism]], and frequent [[bullying]] in the government place itself.


Kleptocratic governance means that the economy is subordinated to the interests of the kleptocrats. Distributive states that derive their wealth from the extraction of [[natural resource]]s (e.g. diamonds and oil in a few prominent cases) can be particularly prone to kleptocracy. Redistributive economies that derive their wealth through [[taxation]] of their population have a natural limitation on how far they can extend the kleptocratic policies on their population without destabilizing their government through extending their grab to their own supporters or driving the income producers away from the country or making them withdraw their labor or capital.
Kleptocratic governance means that the economy is subordinated to the interests of the kleptocrats. Distributive states that derive their wealth from the extraction of [[natural resource]]s (e.g. diamonds and oil in a few prominent cases) can be particularly prone to kleptocracy. Redistributive economies that derive their wealth through [[taxation]] of their population have a natural limitation on how far they can extend the kleptocratic policies on their population without destabilizing their government through extending their grab to their own supporters or driving the income producers away from the country or making them withdraw their labor or capital.
Line 11: Line 11:
The classic case of kleptocracy – in this sense – often given, is the regime of [[Mobutu Sese Seko|Marshall Mobutu Sese Seko]], who ruled the [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] (which he renamed [[Zaire]]) from 1965 to 1997. It is said that usage of the term kleptocracy gained popularity largely in response to a need to accurately describe Mobutu's regime.
The classic case of kleptocracy – in this sense – often given, is the regime of [[Mobutu Sese Seko|Marshall Mobutu Sese Seko]], who ruled the [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] (which he renamed [[Zaire]]) from 1965 to 1997. It is said that usage of the term kleptocracy gained popularity largely in response to a need to accurately describe Mobutu's regime.


Some observers use the term 'kleptocracy' to disparage political processes which permit corporations to influence political policy. [[Ralph Nader]] called the [[United States]] a kleptocracy in this sense of the word during the [[U.S. presidential election, 2000|2000 presidential campaign]]. A more accurate term for this type of corporate influence over a state is [[plutocracy]].
Some observers use the term 'kleptocracy' to disparage political processes which permit corporations to influence political policy. [[Ralph Nader]] called the [[United States]] a kleptocracy in this sense of the word during the [[U.S. presidential election, 2000|2000 presidential campaign]]. Others however refer to this type of corporate influence over a state merely as a [[plutocracy]].


The protection society has against kleptocracy is largely dependent on the effectiveness of the [[rule of law]] to prevent political leaders abusing their powers, the free flow of information (necessary to properly identify kleptocrats) and ability of the population to remove corrupt leaders from office. Many such protections are included in legal documents such as a [[constitution]] or a [[bill of rights]] and are also found in the [[United Nations]] [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], Article 17.
The protection society has against kleptocracy is largely dependent on the effectiveness of the [[rule of law]] to prevent political leaders abusing their powers, the free flow of information (necessary to properly identify kleptocrats) and ability of the population to remove corrupt leaders from office. Many such protections are included in legal documents such as a [[constitution]] or a [[bill of rights]] and are also found in the [[United Nations]] [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], Article 17.

Revision as of 15:56, 17 March 2007

Kleptocracy (sometimes Cleptocracy) (root: Klepto+cracy = rule by thieves) is a government that extends the personal wealth and political power of government officials and the ruling class (collectively, kleptocrats) at the expense of the lower classes.

Characteristic

A kleptocracy is fundamentally premised on the Hobbseian social contract, whereby the people give up some rights to an authoratative body in exchange for the perception of basic protections. Basic protections such as defense must be funded by resources provided by the masses to the ruling elite, thus providing the core mechanism for transfer of resources from the masses to the ruling elite. Kleptocracies are often dictatorships or some other form of autocratic government, or lapsed democracies that have transformed into oligarchies, since democracy makes outright thievery for direct personal gain slightly more difficult to sustain in the long term and still remain in power, more subtlety is employed. Some kleptocracies are a reponse to jingoism, and frequent bullying in the government place itself.

Kleptocratic governance means that the economy is subordinated to the interests of the kleptocrats. Distributive states that derive their wealth from the extraction of natural resources (e.g. diamonds and oil in a few prominent cases) can be particularly prone to kleptocracy. Redistributive economies that derive their wealth through taxation of their population have a natural limitation on how far they can extend the kleptocratic policies on their population without destabilizing their government through extending their grab to their own supporters or driving the income producers away from the country or making them withdraw their labor or capital.

The creation of a kleptocracy powered by dictatorship typically results in many years of general hardship and suffering for the vast majority of citizens as civil society and the rule of law disintegrate. In addition, kleptocrats routinely ignore economic and social problems in their quest to amass ever more wealth and power.

The classic case of kleptocracy – in this sense – often given, is the regime of Marshall Mobutu Sese Seko, who ruled the Democratic Republic of the Congo (which he renamed Zaire) from 1965 to 1997. It is said that usage of the term kleptocracy gained popularity largely in response to a need to accurately describe Mobutu's regime.

Some observers use the term 'kleptocracy' to disparage political processes which permit corporations to influence political policy. Ralph Nader called the United States a kleptocracy in this sense of the word during the 2000 presidential campaign. Others however refer to this type of corporate influence over a state merely as a plutocracy.

The protection society has against kleptocracy is largely dependent on the effectiveness of the rule of law to prevent political leaders abusing their powers, the free flow of information (necessary to properly identify kleptocrats) and ability of the population to remove corrupt leaders from office. Many such protections are included in legal documents such as a constitution or a bill of rights and are also found in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17.

Transparency International ranking

In early 2004, the anti-corruption Germany-based ngo Transparency International released a list of what it believes to be the ten most self-enriching leaders in recent years.[1]

In order of amount allegedly stolen (in USD), they are:

  1. former Indonesian President Suharto ($15 billion – $35 billion)
  2. former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos ($5 billion – $10 billion)
  3. former Zairian President Mobutu Sese Seko ($5 billion)
  4. former Nigerian President Sani Abacha ($2 billion – $5 billion)
  5. former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević ($1 billion)
  6. former Haitian President Jean-Claude Duvalier ($300 million – $800 million)
  7. former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori ($600 million)
  8. former Ukrainian Prime Minister Pavlo Lazarenko ($114 million – $200 million)
  9. former Nicaraguan President Arnoldo Alemán ($100 million)
  10. former Philippine President Joseph Estrada ($78 million – $80 million)

Kleptocracy in fiction

In fiction, kleptocracy has sometimes been portrayed as an actual part of the government or an important city guild, such as in Fritz Leiber's "Ill Met in Lankhmar" and Terry Pratchett's Discworld series.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Plundering politicians and bribing multinationals undermine economic development, says TI" (pdf). Transparency International. 2004. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |month= and |coauthors= (help); Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)