Jump to content

Matthew Goodwin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
not sufficiently sourced.
→‎Academic career: WP:RS, WP:SPS WP:BLP. As applicable everywhere in Wikipedia, these are not acceptable sources and shouldn't be used to source information in articles, especially in living people biography people.
Line 65: Line 65:
Goodwin is on the advisory panel of the [[Free Speech Union]], a group founded by [[Toby Young]] that "stands up for the speech rights of its members"<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://freespeechunion.org/about/who-we-are/|title=Who We Are}}</ref> and seeks to "counter Twitter mobs that drown out opinions they dislike".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/free-speech-union-fights-twitter-witch-hunts-3sptq65bk|title=Free speech union fights Twitter 'witch‑hunts'|first=John|last=Simpson|via=www.thetimes.co.uk}}</ref> He has also served as specialist adviser to the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] [[Education Select Committee]] on left-behind pupils and has given evidence to a [[Public bill committee|Public Bill Committee]] on the importance of defending academic freedom in universities.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theyworkforyou.com/pbc/2021-22/higher_education_%28freedom_of_speech%29_bill/03-0_2021-09-13b.87.3|title=They work for you|access-date=3 February 2022}}</ref>
Goodwin is on the advisory panel of the [[Free Speech Union]], a group founded by [[Toby Young]] that "stands up for the speech rights of its members"<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://freespeechunion.org/about/who-we-are/|title=Who We Are}}</ref> and seeks to "counter Twitter mobs that drown out opinions they dislike".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/free-speech-union-fights-twitter-witch-hunts-3sptq65bk|title=Free speech union fights Twitter 'witch‑hunts'|first=John|last=Simpson|via=www.thetimes.co.uk}}</ref> He has also served as specialist adviser to the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] [[Education Select Committee]] on left-behind pupils and has given evidence to a [[Public bill committee|Public Bill Committee]] on the importance of defending academic freedom in universities.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theyworkforyou.com/pbc/2021-22/higher_education_%28freedom_of_speech%29_bill/03-0_2021-09-13b.87.3|title=They work for you|access-date=3 February 2022}}</ref>


In response to Goodwin tweeting "We either believe in academic freedom or we don’t" in support of [[Kathleen Stock]] in October 2021, his former coauthor Rob Ford highlighted "alleged legal threats Goodwin had sent to an academic writing about him on website [[OpenDemocracy]]" and told the Evening Standard "I consider such behaviour — issuing legal threats to scholars who critique your work — to be totally inconsistent with claims to support academic freedom". The academic concerned was [[Umut Özkirimli]], who had labelled Goodwin, Eric Kaufmann and David Goodhart the "academic alt-right".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Özkırımlı |first1=Umut |title=White is the new black: populism and the academic alt-right |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/white-is-new-black-populism-and-academic-alt-right/ |access-date=12 July 2023 |work=openDemocracy |date=2 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Özkırımlı |first1=Umut|title=The responsibility for publishing a redacted version of this email is mine, and mine only! They have simply informed me of a legal threat. That is standard practice. If you are willing to take legal action, go ahead. oD is not responsible and you know it! |url=https://twitter.com/UOzkirimli/status/1362113124602679296 |website=Twitter |access-date=12 July 2023}}</ref> Goodwin responded, "I did not issue legal threats to scholars. My e-mail was sent to the outlet which offered no right of reply and should have done."<ref name="Smith" /> According to Özkirimli, Goodwin threatened to sue openDemocracy for defamation.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Özkırımlı |first1=Umut |title=The Ingenious Gentleman Matthew Goodwin of Hertfordshire |url=https://umutozkirimli.substack.com/p/the-ingenious-gentleman-matthew-goodwin |access-date=12 July 2023 |date=26 May 2023}}</ref>
In response to Goodwin tweeting "We either believe in academic freedom or we don’t" in support of [[Kathleen Stock]] in October 2021, his former coauthor Rob Ford highlighted "alleged legal threats Goodwin had sent to an academic writing about him on website [[OpenDemocracy]]" and told the Evening Standard "I consider such behaviour — issuing legal threats to scholars who critique your work — to be totally inconsistent with claims to support academic freedom". The academic concerned was [[Umut Özkirimli]], who had labelled Goodwin, Eric Kaufmann and David Goodhart the "academic alt-right".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Özkırımlı |first1=Umut |title=White is the new black: populism and the academic alt-right |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/white-is-new-black-populism-and-academic-alt-right/ |access-date=12 July 2023 |work=openDemocracy |date=2 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Özkırımlı |first1=Umut|title=The responsibility for publishing a redacted version of this email is mine, and mine only! They have simply informed me of a legal threat. That is standard practice. If you are willing to take legal action, go ahead. oD is not responsible and you know it! |url=https://twitter.com/UOzkirimli/status/1362113124602679296 |website=Twitter |access-date=12 July 2023}}</ref> Goodwin responded, "I did not issue legal threats to scholars. My e-mail was sent to the outlet which offered no right of reply and should have done."<ref name="Smith" />

In July 2023 he posted a video on Twitter, stating that he was "building a community of people" wanting to combat the rise of a "new elite". This video became the subject of ridicule following his incorrect claim that he had been "a university professor for more than 20 years" (in 2023 he had been a university professor for only 8 years; 20 years prior he was still completing his undergraduate degree).<ref>{{cite web |title=Matt has been a university professor for 8 years |url=https://twitter.com/PrfAndrwRssll/status/1676151410616877057 |access-date=5 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-04 |title=Matt Goodwin ridiculed over bizarre claim in new video |url=https://leftfootforward.org/2023/07/matt-goodwin-ridiculed-over-bizarre-claim-in-new-video/ |access-date=2023-07-12 |website=Left Foot Forward: Leading the UK's progressive debate |language=en-GB}}</ref>

==Books==
=== ''Revolt on the Right'' (2014) ===
=== ''Revolt on the Right'' (2014) ===
* {{Cite book|last1=Ford|first1=Robert|title=Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain |last2=Goodwin|first2=Matthew|publisher=Routledge|year=2014|isbn=9780415661508}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Ford|first1=Robert|title=Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain |last2=Goodwin|first2=Matthew|publisher=Routledge|year=2014|isbn=9780415661508}}

Revision as of 14:59, 18 August 2023

Matthew Goodwin
Goodwin at Chatham House in 2011
Born
Matthew James Goodwin

(1981-12-17) 17 December 1981 (age 42)
Academic background
Alma mater
Doctoral advisorRoger Eatwell
Academic work
DisciplinePolitical science
Institutions
Websitemattgoodwin.org Edit this at Wikidata

Matthew James Goodwin (born 17 December 1981) is a British academic who is Professor of Politics in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of Kent. As of September 2022 he is a commissioner of the Social Mobility Commission.[1] He is the author of a Substack with nearly 18,000 subscribers [2]

Early life and education

Goodwin graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree with first-class honours in politics and contemporary history from the University of Salford in 2003 and obtained a Master of Arts degree in political science from the University of Western Ontario in 2004. He completed his Doctor of Philosophy degree under the supervision of Roger Eatwell at the University of Bath in 2007.[3]

Academic career

Goodwin was Associate Professor of Politics at the University of Nottingham from 2010 to 2015, Research Fellow at the Institute for Political and Economic Governance (IPEG) at the University of Manchester from 2008 to 2010, and, between 2010 and 2020, Associate Fellow at Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) where he authored numerous research reports on the rise of populism,[4] Euroscepticism ahead of the Brexit vote,[5] the different political tribes of Europe,[6] and the future of Europe.[7]

Since 2015, he has been Professor of Politics in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of Kent.[8] Goodwin is also a former senior fellow for the think tank UK in a Changing Europe, and was the founding director of the Centre for UK Prosperity within the Legatum Institute.[9]

His research focuses on British politics, radical-right politics, and Euroscepticism.[10]

He is the co-editor of The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (Routledge),[11] and co-author (with Roger Eatwell) of National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy.[12] He is also the author of New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party (Routledge)[13] and co-author (with Robert Ford) of Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain (Routledge, 2014). His research has appeared in the New Statesman,[14] The Guardian,[15] The Westminster Hour[16] and Prospect magazine.[17]

On 27 May 2017, he predicted that Labour would not reach 38 per cent of the vote in the 2017 general election and he would eat his book if they did.[18] Labour did (the party won 40.0% of the popular vote) and, on 10 June, Goodwin chewed one page out of his book, live on Sky News.[19]

In 2018, Goodwin along with other commentators including Eric Kaufmann, Claire Fox, Trevor Phillips and David Aaronovitch was due to take part in an event titled "Is Rising Ethnic Diversity a Threat to the West?" Some researchers criticised Goodwin and the other participants, arguing that the event would encourage "normalisation of far right ideas" and criticising the framing of the title.[20][21][22] The debate was subsequently retitled "Immigration and Diversity Politics: A Challenge to Liberal Democracy?"[23]

Goodwin is on the advisory panel of the Free Speech Union, a group founded by Toby Young that "stands up for the speech rights of its members"[24] and seeks to "counter Twitter mobs that drown out opinions they dislike".[25] He has also served as specialist adviser to the House of Commons Education Select Committee on left-behind pupils and has given evidence to a Public Bill Committee on the importance of defending academic freedom in universities.[26]

In response to Goodwin tweeting "We either believe in academic freedom or we don’t" in support of Kathleen Stock in October 2021, his former coauthor Rob Ford highlighted "alleged legal threats Goodwin had sent to an academic writing about him on website OpenDemocracy" and told the Evening Standard "I consider such behaviour — issuing legal threats to scholars who critique your work — to be totally inconsistent with claims to support academic freedom". The academic concerned was Umut Özkirimli, who had labelled Goodwin, Eric Kaufmann and David Goodhart the "academic alt-right".[27][28] Goodwin responded, "I did not issue legal threats to scholars. My e-mail was sent to the outlet which offered no right of reply and should have done."[29]

Revolt on the Right (2014)

  • Ford, Robert; Goodwin, Matthew (2014). Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. Routledge. ISBN 9780415661508.

This "sparky academic study of the rise of Ukip" was selected by The Guardian as one of the best politics books of 2014,[30] and was named as Paddy Power political book of the year for 2015.[31] Writing in the Financial Times, Kiran Stacey described it as "rich in analytical data" and containing "the occasional anecdotal gem",[32] while in The Spectator Vernon Bogdanor wrote that "This rigorous analysis of the rise of Ukip is the most important books [sic] on British politics for years".[33]

Since the publication of their book together, Goodwin and Ford have "publicly drifted apart".[29]

UKIP (2015)

Writing in The Times, Philip Collins said that "Goodwin and Milazzo tell their tale with brio and a fine journalistic eye for the good story" and that "they are particularly good on the Ukip threat to Labour".[34]

Brexit (2017)

  • Clarke, Harold; Goodwin, Matthew; Whiteley, Paul (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781316605042.

This "illuminating analysis of the many factors that swayed the referendum" was selected by Danny Dorling as Times Higher Education book of the week.[35]

National Populism (2018)

  • Eatwell, Roger; Goodwin, Matthew (2018). National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. Pelican Books. ISBN 9780241312001.

This book attempts to explain national populism using a '4D model': destruction of the national culture due to large-scale international migration; deprivation of opportunities due to globalization and in the post-industrial economy with its frequent disruptions and slow growth; growing distrust by working-class and rural voters who feel increasingly alienated by liberal cosmopolitan city-dwelling political and media elites; and de-alignment from traditional allegiances, which can be seen in high levels of voter volatility, or people switching from one party to another between elections.[36][37]

Values, Voice and Virtue (2023)

  • Goodwin, Matthew (2023). Values, Voice and Virtue: The New British Politics. Penguin Books. ISBN 9780141999098.

Values, Voice and Virtue, published by Penguin in 2023, was a Sunday Times Bestseller, entering the non-fiction chart on 9 April 2023 at Number 2 in general paperbacks.[38] It was also listed among the Financial Times books of 2023 to watch.[39]

In the Financial Times, Nick Pearce noted: "Goodwin's central thesis is that the rise of the radical right, the Brexit referendum and Johnson's general election victory of 2019 are expressions of a deeper realignment in UK politics that pits the marginalised white working class, socially conservative older voters and the 'non-graduate majority' against a new elite of university-educated progressives".[40] Chris Jarvis for Left Foot Forward described Goodwin's argument as being that "a ‘new elite’ has emerged in Britain, which is central to the running of the country’s political and media institutions. His core contention is that this ‘elite’ is drawn from a particular class in society and that its supposed liberalism on issues like migration and LGBTIQA+ rights are divorced from the values of most of the electorate". Jarvis noted that this "thesis has been highly contentious, not least because the government of the day has shown itself to be anything but liberal on these issues". He noted that "Goodwin has also faced criticism for appearing to suggest that left wing liberals have more influence over British society than – for example – landlords, billionaires or the right wing press."[41]

Reviewing the book in The Times, Sebastian Payne described the book as "forceful", writing: "The fundamental thrust of Goodwin's argument is right ... a new centre ground of British politics is being formed - even if both parties have yet to fully comprehend it".[42]

Reviewing the book in the New Statesman, Oliver Eagleton wrote that its "argument is wearily familiar: that the UK's elite stratum has become divorced from the conservative instincts of the majority; that the commanding heights of our culture – media, universities, political parties – have been captured by cosmopolitans who impose their outlook on the rest of the country; and that this woke mob has cultivated a censorious political climate to silence its opponents". Eagleton argued that Goodwin had become "part of the right-populist movement he once sought to explain".[43]

Sunder Katwala wrote that "Matthew Goodwin's argument is that the vote for Brexit in 2016 and the general election result of 2019 were just part of a broader rebellion against the 'new ruling class and the political project they have imposed on the country over the last fifty years'. ... Goodwin empathises strongly with the revolt and is a cheerleader for the realignment. He probably knows the data as well as anybody, but he deploys that evidence selectively, more in the style of a prosecuting barrister than a dispassionate judge, for this is a book as much of advocacy as analysis. The central message of Values, Voice and Virtue is that the liberals still don't get it. He argues that the dominant response of those on the losing side of the 2016 referendum was to 'deride' much of the country as 'ignorant bigots, racists, fascists, Nazis and gammons'. The wish to rebut one-dimensional caricatures of the Leave tribe is a valid one, but Goodwin is not above dishing out caricatures of the other half of the country all the same."[44]

Responding to an article that Goodwin wrote for The Sun to accompany the book, David Aaronovitch wrote that "Goodwin's strange but doubtless lucrative journey from respected political analyst to tabloid columnist - from David Butler to Kelvin McKenzie [sic] – is a wonder in itself".[45]

Kenan Malik wrote that Goodwin's argument that members of what he portrays as the "new elite", including Gary Lineker, Mehdi Hasan and Sam Freedman, "shape our lives more than Rishi Sunak or Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England is, to put it politely, stretching credulity". Malik further stated: "One could plausibly argue that someone like Goodwin himself shapes public debate more than most of the "new elite" to whom he points".[46]

Martin Shaw wrote that the book is "a debasement of social-scientific elite theory".[47] Former Conservative cabinet minister David Willetts wrote that "Goodwin is right that white, working-class men have had a tough time, but the book is almost entirely about culture wars and lacks any serious account of economic pressures".[48] Nick Pearce noted that "for the most part, his story is one of culture wars, not class conflict. Goodwin’s new ruling class is composed of “woke” liberal professionals, rather than owners of capital or bankers".[49] Gerry Hassan wrote that Goodwin "has little of substance to say on the state of the economy and poor wages, employment conditions and endemic poverty as contributors to dissatisfaction", arguing that "it suits his validation of right-wing populism to prioritise “culture war” issues and charge that an out-of-touch liberal elite does not care about working-class or north-of-England concerns. Goodwin has gone from an observer to a participant."[50]

Honours

In 2014, aged 33, Goodwin was awarded the Richard Rose Prize by the Political Studies Association, which is given to one early-career academic each year for their contribution to research.[51]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Seven new Social Mobility Commissioners appointed". Government Equalities Office. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
  2. ^ "Matt Goodwin Substack". Matt Goodwin Substack. Retrieved 16 August 2023.
  3. ^ "Matthew Goodwin". The Conversation. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  4. ^ "Right Response" (PDF). Chatham House. 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  5. ^ "What Drives Euroscepticism?" (PDF). Chatham House. 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  6. ^ "Europe's political tribes" (PDF). Chatham House. 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  7. ^ "future of Europe" (PDF). Chatham House. 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  8. ^ "Professor Matthew Goodwin". Chatham House. 2016. Retrieved 6 October 2016.
  9. ^ "Legatum Institute launches new Centre for UK Prosperity". Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  10. ^ "Matthew Goodwin". School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham. Archived from the original on 15 July 2012.
  11. ^ "The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain". Routledge. 22 February 2010. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  12. ^ Cowley, Jason (21 October 2018). "Review: National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy by Roger Eatwell and Matthew Goodwin – it's not going away any time soon". The Times. Retrieved 2 November 2018.
  13. ^ Goodwin, Matthew (28 April 2011). "New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party". Routledge. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  14. ^ "The BNP's breakthrough". New Statesman. London. 16 April 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  15. ^ Goodwin, Matthew; Ford, Robert (13 February 2009). "Prejudice is declining, but there is still huge support for the BNP". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  16. ^ "BNP". BBC News. 25 July 2010. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  17. ^ Goodwin, Matthew (July 2010). "Life after Griffin". Prospect. London. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  18. ^ "Matthew Goodwin on Twitter".
  19. ^ Media Mole (11 June 2017). "Watch: Politics expert Matthew Goodwin eats his own book on live TV after underestimating Labour". New Statesman. London.
  20. ^ Smith, Evan (30 April 2020). No Platform: A History of Anti-Fascism, Universities and the Limits of Free Speech. Routledge. ISBN 978-1138591677. Concerned about the increasing normalisation of far right ideas, over 200 scholars wrote an open letter criticising the event
  21. ^ "Framing ethnic diversity as a 'threat' will normalise far-right hate, say academics". openDemocracy. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  22. ^ Freedland, Jonathan (26 October 2018). "Don't normalise the far right. But sometimes we must take it on". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  23. ^ "Reflections on the 'open letter' debate: a middle way to approaching the radical right?". openDemocracy. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  24. ^ "Who We Are".
  25. ^ Simpson, John. "Free speech union fights Twitter 'witch‑hunts'" – via www.thetimes.co.uk.
  26. ^ "They work for you". Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  27. ^ Özkırımlı, Umut (2 January 2019). "White is the new black: populism and the academic alt-right". openDemocracy. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  28. ^ Özkırımlı, Umut. "The responsibility for publishing a redacted version of this email is mine, and mine only! They have simply informed me of a legal threat. That is standard practice. If you are willing to take legal action, go ahead. oD is not responsible and you know it!". Twitter. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  29. ^ a b Smith, Robbie (14 October 2021). "Londoner's Diary: Professors at loggerheads over academic freedom". Evening Standard. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  30. ^ Lewis, Helen (3 December 2014). "The best politics books of 2014". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  31. ^ Flood, Alison (29 January 2015). "Two new books explain the Brexit revolt". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  32. ^ Stacey, Kiran (14 March 2014). "'Revolt on the Right', by Robert Ford and Matthew Goodwin". Financial Times. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  33. ^ Bogdanor, Vernon (5 April 2014). "White, blue-collar, grey-haired rebels". The Spectator. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  34. ^ Collins, Philip (28 November 2015). "UKIP: Inside the campaign to redraw the map of British politics by Matthew Goodwin and Caitlin Milazzo". The Times. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  35. ^ Dorling, Danny (4 May 2017). "Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union, by Harold D. Clarke, Matthew Goodwin and Paul Whiteley". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 9 August 2020.
  36. ^ "Two new books explain the Brexit revolt". Britain. The Economist. 3 November 2018. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  37. ^ Goodwin, Matthew (3 October 2018). "Why national populism is here to stay". Politics. The New Statesman. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  38. ^ "The Sunday Times Bestsellers List — the UK's definitive book sales chart". The Sunday Times. 9 April 2023. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
  39. ^ {{url=https://www.ft.com/content/e89a942a-3922-4aaf-bcd3-a9eaeb45a512
  40. ^ "Masters of reinvention — where next for the Conservative party?". Financial Times. 22 March 2023.
  41. ^ "Matt Goodwin ridiculed over bizarre claim in new video". Left Foot Forward: Leading the UK's progressive debate. 4 July 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  42. ^ Payne, Sebastian. "Values, Voice and Virtue by Matthew Goodwin review — has the Tory party bungled the post-Brexit realignment?".
  43. ^ "Going native". 25 March 2023.
  44. ^ "Sunder Katwala - Realignment Lost".
  45. ^ ""Some are whispering it in Westminster"".
  46. ^ Malik, Kenan (16 April 2023). "This obsession with a 'new elite' hides the real roots of power". The Observer. Retrieved 24 April 2023.
  47. ^ Shaw, Martin (25 April 2023). "Professors, Power and Projection: the Case of Matthew Goodwin". Byline Times. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  48. ^ Willetts, David. "The populism of Matthew Goodwin—and its many problems". www.prospectmagazine.co.uk. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  49. ^ "Masters of reinvention — where next for the Conservative party?". Financial Times. 22 March 2023.
  50. ^ "Gerry Hassan : Matthew Goodwin's take on the current state of Britain is flawed". The National. 11 April 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  51. ^ "Conference Highlights 2014". Political Studies Association.

External links