User talk:JohnnyYeet

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jagjit (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jagjit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jagjit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen Folf (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, JohnnyYeet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jalen Folf (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jagjit

Hello, JohnnyYeet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jagjit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2016 NBA Finals, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

"LeGM" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect LeGM and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#LeGM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 01:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 1997 NBA draft—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, the information I changed on the page was wrong. It said that the draft included a person named "Curt McConney", who doesn't even exist. I added the real name of the 54th overall draft pick, Mark Blount. It is the correct information and is constructive. I don't understand the rationale for labeling this as "unconstructive". JohnnyYeet (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

"Saladin Campaign" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Saladin Campaign and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 5 § Saladin Campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Toddst1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to FTX Scam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Kai. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Donald Albury 01:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 76ers–Lakers rivalry

Hello, JohnnyYeet,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Actualcpscm and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 76ers–Lakers rivalry, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 18:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)