Jump to content

User talk:Jeraxmoira: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎For Help: new section
Line 403: Line 403:
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Thanks again, and happy editing!
<b>[[User talk:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#028A0F"><sup>141</sup></span>]][[User:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#A32CC4">Pr</span>]] {[[Special:Contributions/Praseodymium-141|contribs]]}</b> 17:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC talk-->
<b>[[User talk:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#028A0F"><sup>141</sup></span>]][[User:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#A32CC4">Pr</span>]] {[[Special:Contributions/Praseodymium-141|contribs]]}</b> 17:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC talk-->

== For Help ==

Salute to you, elder brother, on the page created by me, Ruhaan Rajput, Mr. CNMall41 had put a quick deletion on it, which you had deleted by saying that it was wrong. Now again they have deleted the page edited by me. Please help me. Thank you [[User:TechsonNet|TechsonNet]] ([[User talk:TechsonNet|talk]]) 10:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:36, 26 December 2023

Welcome!

Hi Jeraxmoira! I noticed your contributions to Gameplay of Pokémon and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Blaze, Thank you for the warm welcome :) Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Good work adding references to Destiny (2006 film) J04n(talk page) 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you J04n, this means a lot <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Records to the page of Parul Chaudhary

I added the results and the reference has been mentioned in external links as well. I will move it towards references section now (Faith Kipyegon - Wikipedia) I used the this page as a point of reference.

Thank You@Jeraxmoira! AR98211 (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @AR98211, you can proceed to undo my revert and build further on it. Do provide an edit summary on each your edits so other editors may not revert them for possible unreferenced additions to BLP. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On Achi, Enugu

Hi @Jeraxmoira: I saw your message. If what I added is not allowed, no issues. I happen to come from that town and the things I added were things I know for sure - the notable people and a school. I don't readily have references for such. Azunna4u (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Azunna4u, please go through No original research policy once. Per Verifiability, there needs to be a reliable source supporting the information that you are adding. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks note

Thank you very much Supriyomj16022008 (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent Prod

Hello, Just letting you know I deproDed Annie (Telugu actress). She might be notable considering the awards she received. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Mushy Yank, that makes sense. I guess that's how it passed the AfC. Is there any guideline that I can look into with respect to awards? Please advise, thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, thanks for the reply; yes, awards are briefly mentioned here for example. But then, unless it's a Grammy Award or Nobel Prize, for instance, one might ask: What is a "well-known and significant award"; that is the question. In general, I think that users agree that if the award is part of a notable festival or ceremony (or/and has itself received some sort of coverage, which may amount to just the same), it is enough to help establish notability. Here, I'd say the Nandi Award unquestionably is well-known and significant. But if the award is really significant, in general, coverage follows somehow. Cheers. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanation. Does that mean I can create articles for all the people listed on 69th National Film Awards? I feel there is a loophole that can be exploited here! Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I would say that it depends on what you call "listed". If it is an individual award that was won by that person and you can provide sources, I'd say yes, absolutely.
Example: Best director, Nikhil Mahajan, is obviously absolutely OK. (And I am sure he received coverage for that, anyway). Paint it blue. (and if you check all the recipients so far have their pages)
Example 2: Niraj Kumar Mishra, Atul Pandey, producers of a film that won the award. If it's just this, I'd say no. Stays black or red.
Other users might not share my views and challenge the importance of certain awards, so maybe ask at the talk page of the Project Film or Project India if you have real doubts.
PS-I don't think this is exploiting a loophole, I do hope it is following the letter and spirit of the guidelines, rather. Unless you meant to exploit the time between the announcement of winners and the ceremony? Sure.
PS2-(ping me if you wish me to know you replied, please) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

In the future, please don’t claim that the article fails GNG and SIGCOV until you’ve at least done a simple Google search. As I understand it, WP:PRODNOM implies at least a subset of WP:BEFORE.

Such a use of the PROD process, even though done in good faith, is extremely concerning.

Thanks, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey RadioactiveBoulevardier, The page was created by a sock user, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bibin996/Archive. Per WP:EVASION, instead of G5 CSD, I only ProDed the article. Before that, I did a search here [1] which returned with a single news article. There was also a Tea house discussion that happened regarding the article, where I mentioned "Feel free to make a redirect if anyone thinks otherwise" [2]. I have made a lot of articles from being unreferenced for years to referenced ones, so I do have an idea of how this works.
The good thing is, the CSE I am using has some RS restrictions placed I guess, that's why the other relevant articles didn't show up on my search. Safe to say that I wont be using this CSE anymore. Also, I did a simple google search now, which only had 5 short articles with 3 Press releases, so my point still stands. I think you are confusing Indian Super League and Kerala Blasters FC with Kerala Super League. No offence meant anywhere <3 happy editing <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Suresh Selvarajan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Suresh Selvarajan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Selvarajan has been accepted

Suresh Selvarajan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook Posts

Facebook posts can be misleading and cannot be considered reliable. AarushSinha10 (talk) 06:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep article content discussion in a central place, the article's talk page at Talk:Navadurga. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ferdinand Jan Ormeling Sr. has been accepted

Ferdinand Jan Ormeling Sr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Gunter has been accepted

Jack Gunter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanka Bandaranayake has been accepted

Lanka Bandaranayake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I think you deleted some important information such as Privy Court case information which was highly supported by Sufi Saint and pirs of Sind book. SaneFlint (talk) 05:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SaneFlint, Sufi Saints and State Power book is not reliable per WP:RAJ Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
they have references the most:) and some other books as well SaneFlint (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any book that is written by a British author during and after Raj Era are considered unreliable. And please do not create multiple reply threads. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I get it and there are more sources from non British writer SaneFlint (talk) 06:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any source/book published during Raj era will not be accepted unless it has scholarly articles peer reviewing it. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and these books were published after Raj era:)) as well SaneFlint (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'During and after' is what I tried to convey. Any content that you want to add from a book should be peer reviewed. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I understand you're right on this.
can you help me with some advanced templates? SaneFlint (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Teahouse will be the right place. And kindly take all the conversation w.r.t the article to the article talk page Talk:Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sure I will do that thanks again SaneFlint (talk) 06:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
can you check if this link is fine to be added on references?
heritage.eftsindh.com/site/992/matiari/pir-jhando SaneFlint (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) That looks like a user edited website so would NOT be considered reliable. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if you see their about page, it clearly mentions that the information is crowdsourced and also at the bottom of the article it is mentioned Source: Sufi Saints and State Power The Pirs of Sindh 1843-1947. As discussed already, the book falls under WP:RAJ. Jeraxmoira (talk) 11:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I won't add those links which you reject. I won't let you down no worries. I will try to stay out of it and will ask you before doing anything SaneFlint (talk) 11:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
that book First published in January 31, 1992is it considered to fall under WP:RAJ? just asking to be sure) SaneFlint (talk) 11:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The author and publisher are British. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. anything I'll post will be asking you first then will post. I don't want any misunderstanding anymore. I appreciate your stance. I'll follow suggestions and feedbacks to improve myself. I'm still getting to know already learned many things thanks to you guys. SaneFlint (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
platform.almanhal.com/Files/2/101155 This link is fine? SaneFlint (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong thank you. I'll ask you things then i will only post. your help means alot to me thanks SaneFlint (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong thanks SaneFlint (talk) 11:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how can we post any picture on this article? SaneFlint (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
also here is mentioned about well known Privy court case {{http://archive.org/details/6.syedAhsan}} SaneFlint (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You wouldn't need that book if the same is available on the above link. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
both are different books. this one mentions more information about Ihsanullah rashdi
you can check and assist me with Privy Case information please:) SaneFlint (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I won't be able to assist you here, sorry. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no problem wish you had checked about Privy Court case before deleting SaneFlint (talk) 06:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have only deleted the source you mentioned and nothing else, please check again. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how can we post pictures on this article? SaneFlint (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please ask in the WP:Teahouse Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sure I will SaneFlint (talk) 06:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
with due respect. I don't know if I have bothered you with anything still I'm here for apologies. I want you and other seniors to help me and other community members with full support. I can assure you references + citations doesn't lie and are 100% genuine I can provide you real books which I have in my own hand they show same information. also I can show you things if you want to see to be sure. everything is real i removed praise type article it was difficult for me due to English not being my first language. really it took me over 5 days to work on things I'm here to contribute and expend Wikipedia more🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I want to make some things clear first. A editor cannot be helped if he is not willing to listen and follow-through with the suggestions from other editors! Not all references and citations are 100% genuine, some examples can be found at WP:RAJ. Only scholarly peer reviewed journals are accepted as BLP is from Raj era. Well done with removing the praise, but it was just a small part of the problem. It really does not matter how many days you took to work on this draft as no one is on a deadline here. And I don't think your main purpose is to contribute, I see no others edits of yours on other articles. Jeraxmoira (talk) 09:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to hear the suggestions that's why I have improved a lot from the feedbacks of you guys. Also my next topic page will be made later which is also about a religious figure. my aim is to create English pages which helps people to read in English though urdu and sindhi are easily available for such topics. You can go through urdu wikipedia, there will be such topics available. SaneFlint (talk) 09:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm all the way here to listen your suggestion I will work on them I will really improve things and won't let anyone down. promise. SaneFlint (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for pointing out numeral errors.
١٨٩٢ translates to 1892 SaneFlint (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hi
check this in reference number 4.
Yad-e-Raftagan By Syed Sulaiman Nadvi
https://ibb.co/vhB6Vs SaneFlint (talk) 09:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
<a href="https://ibb.co/vhB6VsQ"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Qkc3p8C/Yad-e-Raftegan-by-Syed-Sulaiman-Nadvi.jpg" alt="Yad-e-Raftegan-by-Syed-Sulaiman-Nadvi" border="0" /></a>
this one might be helpful to know where to see in ref 4 Yad-e-Raftegan to confirm SaneFlint (talk) 09:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://ibb.co/vhB6VsQ SaneFlint (talk) 09:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Images that you have just uploaded are NOT valid references. Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong hi I posted screenshots to point it out for you to find this on the main reference number 4
https://archive.org/details/YaadERaftaganByShaykhSyedSulaimanNadvir.a
those screenshots weren't references but pointing out to look on those places in main 4th references writen as https://archive.org/details/YaadERaftaganByShaykhSyedSulaimanNadvir.a
SaneFlint (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification

I knew that was what you meant. I felt it important to depersonalise anything that might be construed as personal.

Thank you as well for your collegial approach to this new article. Whatever the outcome I am pleased to have met you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding, Tim. Fair to say that I've learned a lot in the last couple of days. I'm really glad we crossed paths through this article. Your patience in guiding newcomers is truly admirable. <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Lovely Professional University. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You removed Template:Not verified in body and added the very same reference with the very same (no mention in body) problem. See: Talk page of article. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User4edits, When you can verify that Dr. Preeti Bajaj is the Vice-Chancellor, you can add it back. Until then, it will be archived in the edit history. The source cited does not mention her name. Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftification

Hey! I noticed that you draftified G Squad to draftspace. WHen doing so, please remember to tag the redirect that is left behind for speedy deletion under R2 of the speedy deletion criteria. I believe there is a script that will do all of this for you however i don't have the link for it at the moment. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 14:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have just installed the tool. Thank you for letting me know. I'm not sure if you remember, but you were the first one to welcome me on Wikipedia. Hope you are doing good <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
scrolls up Huh, so I was! What a coincidence lol. I am doing well. Glad to see that you installed the tool. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 15:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

Hey, I saw you G5'ed List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh and then an edit conflict on my AfD nomination resulted in me overwriting your CSD tag with twinkle. I thought I'd let you know that you're welcome to add anything at the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh but if you wanted to throw the tag back on the page, I'm not opposed to that either.

Cheers, microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 21:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ended up retagging myself. microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 21:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi MicrobiologyMarcus. It's all good, no worries. I think it was only moved from draft but not created during the block so I guess G5 doesn't apply here. I'll drop a comment on the AfD, thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 21:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi

I think there is a typo on a website about that quote I'm trying to get exact quote link🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ibb.co/Q9pRsgz
check search like this In a page. quote will appear like this
Hope it helps SaneFlint (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hi
There was mention of subject. he's Ihsanullah also known by his second name fazalullah. SaneFlint (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In which image "fazalullah" was mentioned out of the 2 I removed? Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
second one had fazalullah mentioned third one had as his main name Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi. and it was in Sindhi language SaneFlint (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
of second one had sayyid Ihsanullah third one had Fazalullah SaneFlint (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not able to find it on the translation. Only the image I left out has the name of the subject. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i can translate them and send it to you? just to point out it may help SaneFlint (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask how you plan to translate it? Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can read Sindhi bro
second one has mentioned as sayyid Ihsanullah Shah rashdi while third one has just tributary words like this Khilafat is transfered as rashidun 4 caliphs etc and had mention of Madirsah etc SaneFlint (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Google translate or yandex translate ? SaneFlint (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I'll be okay with any of your translations, given the way you interpreted the quote on Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi [3]. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
about quote you can see this tweet
https://twitter.com/Sahih_Albany/status/1518518547328413698?t=gYW1Fy2v_xmvND0npASijQ&s=19
it was correct one but I don't know why website had misplaced it there with error SaneFlint (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Twitter is not a reliable source. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yes but when you search quote reference there will be 5 to 10 posts but it's OK
here is translation of second page of qasida
https://ibb.co/p4ZS4jd SaneFlint (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
please check reference number 1 page number 10, there you'll be able to confirm the term Pir of jhando or Pir jhandey Wala, Is also used for Ihsanullah rashdi, SaneFlint (talk) 18:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW you can share google translation image with the name mention. Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
let me try wait SaneFlint (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remember Ihsanullah was also known as Pir of Jhando or Pir Jhandey Waley,
this how it is mentioned https://ibb.co/ckV9FPP SaneFlint (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and Pir rushdullah Shah was also known as Pir Turab Ali Shah * hope it helps 🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
have you saw this translation of qasida number 2
https://ibb.co/p4ZS4jd ? SaneFlint (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
can I repost picture number 2? waiting for your confirmation. 🙂 SaneFlint (talk) 20:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your contribution on the article, I need more of your help on the Stub tags you added on the talk page. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for more contributions you just made. Always looking for guidance for experienced people like you. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see from your userpage that you own a media agency and suspect a 'undisclosed paid' to have created that article. To make it clear, I am not helping you but only trying to save Rizwan Sajan from AfD as he is notable. I would suggest you to not make any more edits on that article rather go through WP:COIREQ and make only edit requests to it. Happy Editing <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeraxmoira That's not media AGENCY, it's a news media company and we run a cricket news website under the name of it. Someone unnecessarly adding AGENCY word with it. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And sure I'll keep these things in mind, will not make any changes anymore on this article. Thanks <3 iVickyChoudhary (talk) 07:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what you mean by that. An article is a WP:STUB when its deemed too short and incomplete to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject. Though I feel it does not fall under the stub category at this point. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Someone added Stub class tags on the talk page of the article. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 07:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added it. Feel free to change/remove it, if you think otherwise. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this isnt stub then please remove it yourself. :D iVickyChoudhary (talk) 08:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeraxmoira What's about removal of Afd tag ? iVickyChoudhary (talk) 11:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:CLOSEAFD. At this point, I don't think the article will be deleted. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm talking about that tag on top of article iVickyChoudhary (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CLOSEAFD. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Jeraxmoira, we need experienced volunteers.
  • New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
  • If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
  • If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
  • Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Jeraxmoira. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. signed, Rosguill talk 04:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeraxmoira,
I'm pinging Rosguill because I'm concerned that you have this user right. You just took a stub article, blanked the page and tagged it as a CSD G7, which it was not, was a completely inappropriate tagging. I don't think you fully understand the criteria for speedy deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And in the discussion below this one, I see another admin removed a tag you placed on an article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly sure if this is about Blossom Maduafokwa. The revdel was completed by an admin on this. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Liz. The stub article created by the same editor was already declined at Draft:Chandler Redmond 3 days back and it only has a single database entry. I couldn't move it since it already exists as a draft, and I didn't want to leave a redirect, so I chose to G7 it. I opted for a G7 deletion because when I moved Mark Maasen previously, it was deleted under G7. Could you please let me know which criteria accurately applies here? Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
G7 is not appropriate here, that's for self-requested deletion of an article you created. It also arguably wasn't appropriate for the move cleanup of Mark Maasen--G6 would have been more appropriate here. In the case of Chandler Redmond, unless you specifically suspect undisclosed COI/UPE editing, you should not insist that an editor (even a new editor) use AfC and should instead proceed to AfD if the subject does not meet notability guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 15:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi Friend Jeraxmoira, Noticed the tag you placed on the article I just created, How do you wish I improved on it? I have done some copyediting to reduce the infringement. Can you kindly help on areas you think to improve on it? Or do you suggest I do more copyediting?Odirichi2024 (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Odirichi2024, The {{Copyvio-revdel}} tag, which will notify the administrators to delete the revision history containing the copyrighted text. I've already removed the copyrighted content from the article.
Regarding the improvement, I believe you've already rephrased it. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BasiGo draft review request.

Hello could you kindly review Draft:BasiGo. It was declined last week but after making changes the reviewer said it was fine but couldn't review again and accept to be fair to everyone else. It has been a week now I don't know what to do. Apologies if I have not followed any correct protocols. Kindly assist. Thank you. Serrwinner (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serrwinner. Thank you for reaching out to me, but I am not an AfC reviewer. You can see from the notice at the top of the draft that there are 565 pending submissions waiting for review, and they are reviewed in no particular order. Right now, all we can do is wait. Cheers <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thanks for the reply and helping out by editing it. Cheers Serrwinner (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello once more. Thanks for helping out in improving the article. It really means a lot. I found a few articles linked to it in other pages as shown in the talk page. Is it now safe to remove the tag indicating it's an orphan article? Serrwinner (talk) 06:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed it. It will be easier if you have Twinkle installed. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of sock's page

I'm going to leave it un-salted for now. It's an easy honeypot. DMacks (talk) 05:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, thank you <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Magdi Al Muqbel

This is my third article i created the person achieve the notability read about him in arabic articles and arabic sources. بافلي مجدي (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi بافلي مجدي, The article is completely unsourced except for the last section. You can add the Arabic sources to show notability, please see WP:THREE and WP:NACTOR. Jeraxmoira (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes i see the sources are littlie so i add more sources and also categories. بافلي مجدي (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid tag on Rizwan Sajan

Hey, you have placed Undisclosed paid tag on my article Rizwan Sajan with mentioning that I'm working for an media agency, I want to clarify that's it's not an media agency, it's my own news media company(we run cricket news website under it) you can check it on google search. It has nothing to do with media agency work.

This thing creating confusion regarding my contributions on wikipedia in the past,so I'm providing proper info about the work of my company which has nothing do to with agency work etc. Hope you will understand my point and remove the tag. Thanks iVickyChoudhary (talk) 19:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even it's already mentioned there "Now I am CTO of one of Biggest Cricket Website CricSpirit.com under Optimal Square Media Pvt. Ltd.". iVickyChoudhary (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, Rizwan Sajan is not your article. The "undisclosed paid" tag does not state that you are working for a media agency. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But you mention that media agency work while placing the tag. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 18:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aubrey Sekhabi has been accepted

Aubrey Sekhabi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

141Pr {contribs} 17:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Help

Salute to you, elder brother, on the page created by me, Ruhaan Rajput, Mr. CNMall41 had put a quick deletion on it, which you had deleted by saying that it was wrong. Now again they have deleted the page edited by me. Please help me. Thank you TechsonNet (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]