User talk:TechsonNet

Welcome!

Hello, TechsonNet, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ajit Menon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jeraxmoira (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajit Menon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ajit Menon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jeraxmoira (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

never mind you know better than me.. Thanks TechsonNet (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malti Chahar (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malti Chahar (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Malti_Chahar_(3rd_nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajit Menon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajit Menon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Menon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jalaj Kumar Anupam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalaj Kumar Anupam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalaj Kumar Anupam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dheeraj Jorwal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dheeraj Jorwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Jorwal. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. A412 (Talk • C) 10:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Ajit Menon while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Stop removing the AfD templates Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ramdas Athawale—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 23:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ruhaan Rajput. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 08:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruhaan Rajput

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ruhaan Rajput requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhaan Rajput (3rd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CNMall41 (talk) 06:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The written article is true. Ruhaan's Wikipedia page is already present on the Hindi Wikipedia page and his organization's page is also present on Wikipedia, so this page should also be made permanent. TechsonNet (talk) 06:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to read WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosures. Your editing appears that you have a strong connection with the pages you are creating. If you would like to do so then please do prior to further editing. Otherwise, will need to discuss at WP:COIN. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no relation with this person, I saw his Hindi Wikipedia page and I read about this person, that is why I have created his page on Wikipedia. Can you tell me what is the reason due to which you have put this page on speedy deletion? TechsonNet (talk) 06:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindi article is deleted for promtion [1]. Here, it was deleted thrice Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhaan Rajput, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhaan Rajput (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhaan Rajput (3rd nomination) and moved to draft recently Draft:Ruhaan Rajput. This looks more like WP:MEAT. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira:, likely sock. Not worried about the notification. They know the drill. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, I had not seen their deleted article. Thanks a lot for giving the information. TechsonNet (talk) 06:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ruhaan Rajput

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruhaan Rajput, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruhaan Rajput for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruhaan Rajput is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhaan Rajput (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be deleted because... (WP:Notablity) TechsonNet (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because...

TechsonNet (talk) 10:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 11:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do try to unblock me. If I have made any mistake then let me know so that I don't make the same mistake in future and unblock me. Thanks. TechsonNet (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned about removing the AfD notice from the article Ruhaan Rajput and continued doing so. Removing the notice is disruptive and does not stop the discussion from taking place, it only stops people interested in the article from being aware of the deletion discussion. Given that Vishalwikiji (talk · contribs) is an account whose only edit was to repeat this same behavior there appears to be a pattern of disruption. Until you can convince an administrator the block is no longer needed, and explain the connection to Vishalwikiji (talk · contribs), your account will not be unblocked. - Aoidh (talk) 11:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for my mistake, please unblock me, I will follow the guidelines from now on. TechsonNet (talk) 12:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me TechsonNet (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ruhaan Rajput

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruhaan Rajput, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bikrookanpurgangster per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bikrookanpurgangster. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]