Jump to content

1989 Polish parliamentary election: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1225207615 by FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) The electoral system was Multiple non-transferable vote, enabling voters to cast multiple votes for different candidates in one constituency.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Restored revision of 23 May 2024: no source + figures exceed the total adult population of Poland in 1989
Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 18: Line 18:
| seats1 = 173 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seats1 = 173 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seat_change1 = {{decrease}} 72
| seat_change1 = {{decrease}} 72
| percentage1 = 37.6% (fixed)
| popular_vote1 = 22,734,348
| percentage1 = 37.6%
| image2 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Lech Wałęsa prezydent RP.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| image2 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Lech Wałęsa prezydent RP.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| leader2 = [[Lech Wałęsa]]
| leader2 = [[Lech Wałęsa]]
Line 28: Line 27:
| seats2 = 161 (''Sejm''){{-}}99 (''Senate'')
| seats2 = 161 (''Sejm''){{-}}99 (''Senate'')
| seat_change2 = ''New''
| seat_change2 = ''New''
| popular_vote2 = 16,369,237
| percentage2 = 35.0%
| percentage2 = 35.0%
| image3 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Roman_Malinowski.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| image3 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Roman_Malinowski.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
Line 38: Line 36:
| seats3 = 76 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seats3 = 76 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seat_change3 = {{decrease}} 41
| seat_change3 = {{decrease}} 41
| percentage3 = 16.5% (fixed)
| popular_vote3 = 8,865,102
| percentage3 = 16.5%
| image4 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| image4 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| leader4 = Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak
| leader4 = Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak
Line 48: Line 45:
| seats4 = 27 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seats4 = 27 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seat_change4 = {{decrease}} 12
| seat_change4 = {{decrease}} 12
| percentage4 = 5.8% (fixed)
| popular_vote4 = 3,961,124
| percentage4 = 5.8%
| image5 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Zenon Komender.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| image5 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Zenon Komender.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| leader5 = Zenon Komender
| leader5 = Zenon Komender
Line 59: Line 55:
| seats5 = 10 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seats5 = 10 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seat_change5 = {{increase}} 1
| seat_change5 = {{increase}} 1
| popular_vote5 = 1,216,681
| percentage5 = 2.1%
| percentage5 = 2.1%
| image6 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Kazimierz Morawski.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
| image6 = {{CSS image crop|Image =Kazimierz Morawski.jpg|bSize = 120|cWidth = 120|cHeight = 150|oTop = 0|oLeft = 0}}
Line 70: Line 65:
| seats6 = 8 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seats6 = 8 (''Sejm''){{-}}0 (''Senate'')
| seat_change6 = ''New''
| seat_change6 = ''New''
| popular_vote6 = 907,901
| percentage6 = 1.7%
| percentage6 = 1.7%
| map_image = 1989 Polish parliamentary election.svg
| map_image = 1989 Polish parliamentary election.svg

Revision as of 00:50, 24 May 2024

1989 Polish parliamentary election

← 1985 4 June 1989 (1989-06-04) (first round)
18 June 1989 (1989-06-18) (second round)
1991 →

All 460 seats in the Sejm
231 needed for a majority
161 up for free election
All 100 seats in the Senate
Turnout62.7% (first round)
25% (second round)
  Majority party Minority party Third party
 
Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.JPG
Lech Wałęsa prezydent RP.jpg
Roman_Malinowski.jpg
Leader Wojciech Jaruzelski Lech Wałęsa Roman Malinowski
Party PZPR KO "S" ZSL
Leader since 18 October 1981 18 December 1988 (of political party) 1981
Last election 255 seats Outlawed 117 seats
Seats won 173 (Sejm)
0 (Senate)
161 (Sejm)
99 (Senate)
76 (Sejm)
0 (Senate)
Seat change Decrease 72 New Decrease 41
Percentage 37.6% (fixed) 35.0% 16.5% (fixed)

  Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party
 
Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak.jpg
Zenon Komender.jpg
Kazimierz Morawski.jpg
Leader Tadeusz Witold Młyńczak Zenon Komender Kazimierz Morawski
Party SD PAX UChS
Leader since 1976 1982 1989
Last election 39 seats 9
Seats won 27 (Sejm)
0 (Senate)
10 (Sejm)
0 (Senate)
8 (Sejm)
0 (Senate)
Seat change Decrease 12 Increase 1 New
Percentage 5.8% (fixed) 2.1% 1.7%

Results by constituency, shaded according to the winner's vote share in the competitive seats in each district. Solidarity won all of the 161 competitive races.

Government before election

Rakowski cabinet
PZPRZSLSD (Communist regime)

Government after election

Mazowiecki cabinet[a]
SolidarityZSLSD (Contract Sejm)

In June 1989 a parliamentary election was held in Poland to elect members of the Sejm and the recreated Senate. The first round took place on 4 June with a second round on 18 June. This was the first election in the country since the Communist government abandoned its monopoly of power in April 1989 and the first ever election in the Eastern Bloc as a result of which the communist government fell out of power.

Not all seats in the Sejm were allowed to be contested, but the resounding victory of the Solidarity opposition in the freely contested races (the rest of the Sejm seats and all of the Senate) paved the way to the end of communist rule in Poland. Solidarity won all of the freely contested seats in the Sejm, and all but one seat in the Senate, which was scored by an independent candidate. Most crucially, the election served as a litmus test showing how extremely anti-government the attitude of the nation was. In the aftermath of the election, Poland became the first country of the Eastern Bloc in which democratically elected representatives gained real power.[1] Although the elections were not entirely democratic, they led to the formation of a government led by Tadeusz Mazowiecki and a peaceful transition to democracy in Poland and elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe.[2][3][4]

Background

In May and August 1988 massive waves of workers' strikes broke out in the Polish People's Republic. The strikes, as well as street demonstrations, continued throughout spring and summer, ending in early September 1988. These actions shook the communist regime of the country to such an extent that it decided to begin talking about recognising Solidarity (Polish: Solidarność), an "unofficial" labor union that subsequently grew into a political movement.[5] As a result, later that year, the regime decided to negotiate with the opposition,[6] which opened the way for the 1989 Round Table Agreement. The second, much bigger wave of strikes (August 1988) surprised both the government and top leaders of Solidarity, who were not expecting actions of such intensity. These strikes were mostly organized by local activists, who had no idea that their leaders from Warsaw had already started secret negotiations with the communists.[7]

An agreement was reached by the communist Polish United Workers' Party (PZPR) and the Solidarity movement during the Round Table negotiations. The final agreement was signed on 4 April 1989, ending communist rule in Poland. As a result, real political power was vested in a newly created bicameral legislature (the Sejm, with the recreated Senate), whilst the office of president was re-established. Solidarity became a legitimate and legal political party: On 7 April 1989 the existing parliament changed the election law and changed the constitution (through the April Novelization), and on 17 April, the Supreme Court of Poland registered Solidarity.[8][9] Soon after the agreement was signed, Solidarity leader Lech Wałęsa travelled to Rome to be received by the Polish Pope John Paul II.[9]

Constituencies used in the election

Perhaps the most important decision reached during the Round Table talks was to allow for partially free elections to be held in Poland.[10] (A fully free election was promised "in four years").[9] All seats in the newly recreated Senate of Poland were to be elected democratically, as were 161 seats (35 percent of the total) in Sejm.[10] The remaining 65% of the seats in the Sejm were reserved for the PZPR and its satellite parties (United People's Party (ZSL), Alliance of Democrats (SD), and communist-aligned Catholic parties). These seats were still technically elected, but only government-sponsored candidates were allowed to compete for them.[10] In addition, all 35 seats elected via the country-wide list were reserved for the PZPR's candidates provided they gained a certain quota of support.[9] This was to ensure that the most notable leaders of the PZPR were elected.

The outcome of the election was largely unpredictable, and pre-electoral opinion polls were inconclusive.[11] After all, Poland had not had a truly fair election since the 1920s, so there was little precedent to go by.[9] The last contested elections were those of 1947, in the midst of communist-orchestrated violent oppression and electoral fraud.[10] This time, there would be open and relatively fair competition for many seats, both between communist and Solidarity candidates, and, in some cases, between various communist candidates.[10] Although censorship was still in force, the opposition was allowed to campaign much more freely than before, thanks to a new newspaper, Gazeta Wyborcza, and the reactivation of Tygodnik Solidarność.[8] Solidarity was also given access to televised media, being allocated 23% of electoral time on Polish Television.[12] There were also no restrictions on financial support.[10] Although the Communists were clearly unpopular, there were no hard numbers as to how low support for them would actually fall. A rather flawed survey carried out in April, days after the Round Table Agreement was signed, suggested that over 60% of the surveyed wanted Solidarity to cooperate with the government.[11] Another survey a week later, regarding the Senate elections, showed that 48% of the surveyed supported the opposition, 14% supported the communist government, and 38% were undecided.[11] In such a situation, both sides faced another unfamiliar aspect - the electoral campaign.[11] The communists knew they were guaranteed 65% of the seats, and expected a difficult but winnable contest; in fact they were concerned about a possibility of "winning too much" - they desired some opposition, which would serve to legitimize their government both internally and internationally.[11] The communist government still had control over most major media outlets and employed sports and television celebrities as candidates, as well as successful local personalities.[12] Some members of the opposition were worried that such tactics would gain enough votes from the less educated[citation needed] segment of the population to give the communists the legitimacy that they craved. Only a few days before June 4, the party Central Committee was discussing the possible reaction of the Western world should Solidarity not win a single seat. At the same time, the Solidarity leaders were trying to prepare some set of rules for the non-party MPs in a communist-dominated parliament, as it was expected that the party would not win more than 20 seats. Solidarity was also complaining that the way electoral districts were drawn was not favourable towards it.[10]

Electoral System

The Sejm was elected using a two-round version of plurality block voting. The Council of State was responsible for drawing out constituencies, which would have between two and five seats. Each seat was elected on its own separate ballot. In addition, up to 10% of the seats in the Sejm would be reserved to the national list.

In the constituencies, only the PZPR and its satellite parties were allowed to nominate candidates in their own name; Solidarity candidates had to formally run as independents. The seats in each constituency would be reserved to candidates of one of the PRON member parties or to independent candidates (a category which de facto also included Solidarity candidates), based on an allocation predetermined by the Council of State. At least one seat in each constituency was guaranteed for independent candidates.[13] Within each seat, the elections were multi-candidate, but only between candidates of the category to which the seat was reserved.

The National list was elected in a similar format to previous Polish elections; voters were presented with a single slate of candidates, all belonging to the PZPR and its satellite parties. However, unlike previous elections, voters could vote against individual candidates on this slate by striking out their name from the ballot, rather than having to reject the slate in its entirety. To be elected, a candidate on the national list had to be supported by at least 50% of the vote. The electoral law made no provision what would happen in case a candidate is rejected; for that reason, in the second round of the election, new seats, having the same party reservations as the rejected national list candidates, were allocated to the constituencies.

Results

"High Noon, June 4, 1989."
Solidarity Citizens' Committee election poster by Tomasz Sarnecki.

The outcome was a major surprise to both the PZPR and Solidarity.[14] Solidarity's electoral campaign was much more successful than expected.[15] It won a landslide victory, winning all but one of the 100 seats in the Senate, and all of the contested seats in the Sejm; the sole seat in the Senate which was not won by Solidarity was won by an independent candidate.[16] Out of 35 seats in the country-wide list in which Solidarity was not allowed to compete, only one was gained by PZPR candidate (Adam Zieliński) and one by a ZSL satellite party candidate in the first round; none of the others attained the required 50% majority.[9] The communists regained some seats during the second round, but the first round was highly humiliating to them,[17] the psychological impact of it has been called "shattering".[9] Government-supported candidates competing against Solidarity members gained 10 to 40% of votes in total, varying by constituency.[18] Altogether, out of 161 seats eligible, Solidarity took all 161 (160 in the first round and one more in the second). In the 161 districts in which opposition candidates competed against pro-government candidates, the opposition candidates obtained 71.3% of the vote (16,369,237). [19][16] In the Senate, which was fully up to free election, Solidarity took all seats but one; the remaining seat was won by Henryk Stokłosa, a non-partisan businessman aligned with the communists.[20]

While Solidarity having secured the 35% of seats available to it, the remaining 65% was divided between the PZPR and its satellite parties (37.6% to PZPR, 16.5% to ZSL, 5.8% to SD, with 4% distributed between small communist-aligned Catholic parties, PAX and UChS).[10] The distribution of seats among the PZPR and its allies was known beforehand.[10]

Voter turnout was surprisingly low: only 62.7% in the first round and 25% in the second.[16] The second round, with the exception of one district, was a contest between two most popular pro-government candidates. This explains low turnout in the second round as pro-opposition voters (the majority of the electorate) had limited interest in these races.

Sejm

Votes for Solidarity by constituency
Votes for government coalition by constituency
Party or allianceConstituency (competitive)Consitutency (reserved)National listTotal
seats
Votes%SeatsVotes%SeatsVotes%Seats
Patriotic Movement for National RebirthPolish United Workers' Party22,734,34859.26156132,845,38547.1917173
United People's Party8,865,10223.116774,921,23026.62976
Democratic Party3,961,12410.322424,814,9038.82327
PAX Association1,216,6813.17724,269,7618.62310
Christian-Social Union907,9012.37616,601,8965.9028
Polish Catholic-Social Association681,1991.7848,029,9112.8515
Independents6,591,01428.7100
Solidarity Citizens' CommitteeIndependents16,369,23771.29161161
Total22,960,251100.0016138,366,355100.00264281,483,086100.0035460
Source: [21]

By constituency

No. Constituency Total
seats
Seats won
PZPR KO "S" ZSL SD PAX UChS PZKS
1 Warszawa-Śródmieście 3 1 1 1
2 Warszawa-Mokotów 5 2 1 1 1
3 Warszawa-Ochota 4 2 1 1
4 Warszawa-Wola 5 2 2 1
5 Warszawa-Żoliborz 3 2 1
6 Warszawa-Praga-Północ 5 2 1 1 1
7 Warszawa-Praga-Południe 5 3 2
8 Biała Podlaska 4 2 1 1
9 Białystok 4 1 1 1 1
10 Bielsk Podlaski 4 1 1 1 1
11 Bielsko-Biała 5 2 2 1
12 Andrychów 5 2 2 1
13 Bydgoszcz 5 3 1 1
14 Chojnice 5 1 1 1 1 1
15 Inowrocław 4 1 2 1
16 Chełm 4 1 1 2
17 Ciechanów 5 2 1 1 1
18 Częstochowa 5 2 1 1 1
19 Lubliniec 4 1 2 1
20 Elbląg 5 2 1 1 1
21 Gdańsk 5 2 2 1
22 Gdynia 4 1 2 1
23 Tczew 4 2 1 1
24 Wejherowo 4 1 1 1 1
25 Gorzów Wielkopolski 5 1 2 1 1
26 Choszczno 2 1 1
27 Jelenia Góra 3 1 1 1
28 Bolesławiec 3 1 2
29 Kalisz 4 2 2
30 Ostrów Wielkopolski 4 2 1 1
31 Kępno 2 1 1
32 Katowice 5 2 1 1 1
33 Sosnowiec 4 2 1 1
34 Jaworzno 4 2 1 1
35 Dąbrowa Górnicza 4 2 1 1
36 Bytom 5 2 3
37 Gliwice 5 3 2
38 Chorzów 5 3 1 1
39 Tychy 5 2 3
40 Rybnik 5 3 2
41 Wodzisław Śląski 5 2 2 1
42 Kielce 5 1 2 1 1
43 Skarżysko-Kamienna 5 3 2
44 Pińczów 4 1 2 1
45 Konin 5 2 2 1
46 Koszalin 4 3 1
47 Szczecinek 4 2 1 1
48 Kraków-Śródmieście 5 2 1 2
49 Kraków-Nowa Huta 5 1 2 1 1
50 Kraków-Podgórze 5 2 2 1
51 Krosno 5 2 2 1
52 Legnica 3 1 1 1
53 Lubin 3 1 2
54 Leszno 4 1 2 1
55 Lublin 5 1 1 1 1 1
56 Kraśnik 3 2 1
57 Puławy 3 1 1 1
58 Lubartów 2 1 1
59 Łomża 5 2 2 1
60 Łódź-Bałuty 4 2 1 1
61 Łódź-Śródmieście 5 3 1 1
62 Łódź-Górna 3 1 2
63 Łódź-Widzew 2 1 1
64 Nowy Sącz 5 2 1 1 1
65 Nowy Targ 4 1 2 1
66 Biskupiec 3 1 1 1
67 Olsztyn 5 1 2 1 1
68 Opole 5 2 1 1 1
69 Kędzierzyn-Koźle 4 1 1 1 1
70 Brzeg 2 1 1
71 Ostrołęka 5 1 2 2
72 Piła 5 2 2 1
73 Piotrków Trybunalski 5 2 2 1
74 Bełchatów 3 1 1 1
75 Płock 4 1 2 1
76 Kutno 4 1 1 1 1
77 Poznań-Grunwald 5 2 2 1
78 Poznań-Nowe Miasto 5 2 1 1 1
79 Poznań-Stare Miasto 5 2 2 1
80 Przemyśl 5 2 2 1
81 Radom 5 2 1 1 1
82 Białobrzegi 4 1 1 1 1
83 Rzeszów 5 2 1 1 1
84 Mielec 4 2 1 1
85 Garwolin 4 1 2 1
86 Siedlce 4 1 1 2
87 Sieradz 5 1 3 1
88 Skierniewice 5 2 2 1
89 Słupsk 5 2 2 1
90 Suwałki 5 2 2 1
91 Szczecin 5 2 2 1
92 Świnoujście 3 1 1 1
93 Stargard Szczeciński 3 1 1 1
94 Tarnobrzeg 4 1 2 1
95 Stalowa Wola 3 1 2
96 Tarnów 5 1 2 2
97 Dębica 3 1 1 1
98 Toruń 5 1 2 1 1
99 Grudziądz 3 1 1 1
100 Wałbrzych 5 3 1 1
101 Świdnica 4 1 2 1
102 Włocławek 5 2 1 1 1
103 Wrocław-Psie Pole 5 2 2 1
104 Wrocław-Fabryczna 4 2 1 1
105 Wrocław-Krzyki 4 1 1 1 1
106 Zamość 5 2 2 1
107 Zielona Góra 4 1 1 1 1
108 Żary 3 1 2
National list 2 1 1
Total 460 173 161 76 27 10 8 5
Source: Sejm, Sejm, Sejm

Senate

PartyFirst roundSecond roundTotal
seats
Votes%SeatsVotes%Seats
Solidarity Citizens' Committee20,755,31271.2892959,92761.19799
Patriotic Movement for National Rebirth8,364,05528.720608,94638.8111
Total29,119,367100.00921,568,873100.008100
Source: Sejm (first round),[22] Sejm (second round)[23]

By voivodeship

Voivodeship Total seats KO "S" PRON
Biała Podlaska 2 2
Białystok 2 2
Bielsko 2 2
Bydgoszcz 2 2
Chełm 2 2
Ciechanów 2 2
Częstochowa 2 2
Elbląg 2 2
Gdańsk 2 2
Gorzów 2 2
Jelenia Góra 2 2
Kalisz 2 2
Katowice 3 3
Kielce 2 2
Konin 2 2
Koszalin 2 2
Kraków 2 2
Krosno 2 2
Legnica 2 2
Leszno 2 2
Lublin 2 2
Łomża 2 2
Łódź 2 2
Nowy Sącz 2 2
Olsztyn 2 2
Opole 2 2
Ostrołęka 2 2
Piła 2 1 1
Piotrków 2 2
Płock 2 2
Poznań 2 2
Przemyśl 2 2
Radom 2 2
Rzeszów 2 2
Siedlce 2 2
Sieradz 2 2
Skierniewice 2 2
Słupsk 2 2
Suwałki 2 2
Szczecin 2 2
Tarnobrzeg 2 2
Tarnów 2 2
Toruń 2 2
Wałbrzych 2 2
Warsaw 3 3
Włocławek 2 2
Wrocław 2 2
Zamość 2 2
Zielona Góra 2 2
Total 100 99 1
Source: Sejm, Sejm, Senate

Aftermath

The magnitude of the Communist coalition's defeat was so great that there were initially fears that either the PZPR or the Kremlin would annul the results. However, PZPR general secretary Wojciech Jaruzelski allowed the results to stand.[24] He and his colleagues felt secure with the 65% of the seats it was guaranteed for itself and its traditional allies.[16] On 19 July the Sejm elected Jaruzelski as president by only one vote. In turn, he nominated General Czesław Kiszczak for prime minister; they intended for Solidarity to be given a few token positions for appearances.[16] However, this was undone when Solidarity's leaders convinced the PZPR's longtime satellite parties, the ZSL and SD (some of whose members already owed a debt to Solidarity for endorsing them during the second round)[17] to switch sides and support a Solidarity-led coalition government.[16] The PZPR, which had 37.6% of the seats, suddenly found itself in a minority. Abandoned by Moscow, Kiszczak resigned on 14 August. With no choice but to appoint a Solidarity member as prime minister, on 24 August Jaruzelski appointed Solidarity activist Tadeusz Mazowiecki as head of a Solidarity-led coalition, ushering a brief period described as "Your president, our prime minister".[1][9][16][17]

The elected parliament was known as the Contract Sejm,[16] from the "contract" between the Solidarity and the communist government which made it possible in the first place.

Although the elections were not entirely democratic[citation needed] they paved the way for the Sejm's approval of Mazowiecki's cabinet on 13 September and a peaceful transition to democracy, which was confirmed after the presidential election of 1990 (in which Lech Wałęsa replaced Jaruzelski as president) and the parliamentary elections of 1991.

On the international level, this election is seen as one of the major milestones in the fall of communism ("Autumn of Nations") in Central and Eastern Europe.[1][2][3][4]

However, Solidarity did not stay in power long, and quickly fractured, resulting in it being replaced by other parties. In this context, the 1989 elections are often seen as the vote against communism, rather than for Solidarity.[25]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Ronald J. Hill (1 July 1992). Beyond Stalinism: Communist political evolution. Psychology Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-7146-3463-0. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  2. ^ a b Geoffrey Pridham (1994). Democratization in Eastern Europe: domestic and international perspectives. Psychology Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-0-415-11063-1. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  3. ^ a b Olav Njølstad (2004). The last decade of the Cold War: from conflict escalation to conflict transformation. Psychology Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-7146-8539-7. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  4. ^ a b Atsuko Ichijō; Willfried Spohn (2005). Entangled identities: nations and Europe. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-7546-4372-2. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  5. ^ Andy Zebrowski Turning the tables?
  6. ^ Pushing back the curtain. BBC News, Poland 1984 - 1988
  7. ^ Andrzej Grajewski, Second August
  8. ^ a b (in Polish) Wojciech Roszkowski: Najnowsza historia Polski 1980–2002. Warszawa: Świat Książki, 2003, ISBN 83-7391-086-7 p.102
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Norman Davies (May 2005). God's Playground: 1795 to the present. Columbia University Press. pp. 503–504. ISBN 978-0-231-12819-3. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i Marjorie Castle (28 November 2005). Triggering Communism's Collapse: Perceptions and Power in Poland's Transition. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 146–148. ISBN 978-0-7425-2515-3. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  11. ^ a b c d e Marjorie Castle (28 November 2005). Triggering Communism's Collapse: Perceptions and Power in Poland's Transition. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 154–115. ISBN 978-0-7425-2515-3. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  12. ^ a b Marjorie Castle (28 November 2005). Triggering Communism's Collapse: Perceptions and Power in Poland's Transition. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 168–169. ISBN 978-0-7425-2515-3. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  13. ^ [1]
  14. ^ Samuel P. Huntington (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-0-8061-2516-9. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  15. ^ Marjorie Castle (28 November 2005). Triggering Communism's Collapse: Perceptions and Power in Poland's Transition. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 189. ISBN 978-0-7425-2515-3. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h Piotr Wróbel, Rebuilding Democracy in Poland, 1989-2004, in M. B. B. Biskupski; James S. Pula; Piotr J. Wrobel (25 May 2010). The Origins of Modern Polish Democracy. Ohio University Press. pp. 273–275. ISBN 978-0-8214-1892-5. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  17. ^ a b c George Sanford (2002). Democratic government in Poland: constitutional politics since 1989. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-333-77475-5. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  18. ^ Polish National Electoral Commission report on the results of 4 June 1989 legislative election, published on 8 June 1989, Retrieved 23 September 2015
  19. ^ "Obwieszczenie Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej z dnia 8 czerwca 1989 r. o wynikach głosowania i wynikach wyborów do Sejmu Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej przeprowadzonych dnia 4 czerwca 1989 r." prawo.sejm.gov.pl. Retrieved 2019-11-20.
  20. ^ Paulina Codogni (2012). Wybory czerwcowe 1989 roku. Polish Institute of National Remembrance. p. 297. ISBN 978-83-7629-342-4.
  21. ^ "Obwieszczenie Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej z dnia 8 czerwca 1989 r. o wynikach głosowania i wynikach wyborów do Sejmu Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej przeprowadzonych dnia 4 czerwca 1989 r." prawo.sejm.gov.pl. Retrieved 2019-11-20.
  22. ^ [2]
  23. ^ [3]
  24. ^ Sarotte, Mary Elise. The Collapse: The Accidental Opening of the Berlin Wall. New York City: Basic Books. p. 23. ISBN 9780465064946.
  25. ^ Arista Maria Cirtautas (1997). The Polish solidarity movement: revolution, democracy and natural rights. Psychology Press. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-415-16940-0. Retrieved 4 June 2011.
  1. ^ Following the election, Czesław Kiszczak of PZPR was designated Prime Minister by the Communist regime of President Wojciech Jaruzelski, however in a surprising move the satellite parties ZSL and SD, together forming 1/5th of the Sejm, broke away and gave support to Solidarity which won 1/3rd of seats in the Sejm - all it was allowed to contest - and Tadeusz Mazowiecki was designated and sworn in as Prime Minister.