Jump to content

Patriarchy (anthropology): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
History: Kurgan hypothesis
Zondi (talk | contribs)
m Correcting spelling: appearence->appearance
Line 12: Line 12:
In [[China]], for example, the [[National People's Congress]] consists of an equal number of men and women. There are, however, no women within the ruling [[Politburo of the Communist Party of China]]. Prior to its dissolution, the [[Soviet Union]]'s [[Congress of People's Deputies]] likewise consisted, by law, of equal numbers of men and women. However, the successor Russian [[Duma]], which unlike the predecessor Congress actually has power and is not a rubber-stamp organization, presently has only 35 woman deputies among the 450 members.[http://www.eng.yabloko.ru/Forums/Main/posts/1376.html]
In [[China]], for example, the [[National People's Congress]] consists of an equal number of men and women. There are, however, no women within the ruling [[Politburo of the Communist Party of China]]. Prior to its dissolution, the [[Soviet Union]]'s [[Congress of People's Deputies]] likewise consisted, by law, of equal numbers of men and women. However, the successor Russian [[Duma]], which unlike the predecessor Congress actually has power and is not a rubber-stamp organization, presently has only 35 woman deputies among the 450 members.[http://www.eng.yabloko.ru/Forums/Main/posts/1376.html]
==History==
==History==
According to [[Robert M. Strozier]], historical research has not yet found an "initiating event" of the origin of patriarchy.<ref name="Strozier">Strozier, Robert M. (2002) ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=fuDdNSLXPI8C Foucault, Subjectivity, and Identity: : Historical Constructions of Subject and Self]'' p.46</ref> Already in 3100 [[B.C.E.]] of [[Ancient Near East]], we find sexual domination on woman, a restriction on their reproductive capacity, and their exclusion from "the process of rapresenting or the construction of history".<ref name="Strozier"/> With the appearence of the [[Hebrew]] cult, there is also "the exclusion of woman from the God-humanity covenant".<ref name="Strozier"/><ref>Lerner, Gerda (1986) ''[http://books.google.com/books?&id=Zc318kI-TPMC The Creation of Patriarchy]'' 8-11</ref> The hegemonic spread of patriarchy is linked with the [[Kurgan hypothesis]], widely accepted among scholars.
According to [[Robert M. Strozier]], historical research has not yet found an "initiating event" of the origin of patriarchy.<ref name="Strozier">Strozier, Robert M. (2002) ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=fuDdNSLXPI8C Foucault, Subjectivity, and Identity: : Historical Constructions of Subject and Self]'' p.46</ref> Already in 3100 [[B.C.E.]] of [[Ancient Near East]], we find sexual domination on woman, a restriction on their reproductive capacity, and their exclusion from "the process of rapresenting or the construction of history".<ref name="Strozier"/> With the appearance of the [[Hebrew]] cult, there is also "the exclusion of woman from the God-humanity covenant".<ref name="Strozier"/><ref>Lerner, Gerda (1986) ''[http://books.google.com/books?&id=Zc318kI-TPMC The Creation of Patriarchy]'' 8-11</ref> The hegemonic spread of patriarchy is linked with the [[Kurgan hypothesis]], widely accepted among scholars.


==Appendix==
==Appendix==

Revision as of 20:26, 21 August 2007

Margaret Mead
Margaret Mead

Patriarchy (from Greek: patria meaning father and arché meaning rule) is the anthropological term used to define the condition where male members of a society tend to predominate in positions of power; with the more powerful the position, the more likely it is that a male will hold that position. The term "patriarchy' is distinct from patrilineality and patrilocality. "Patrilineal" defines societies where the derivation of inheritance (financial or otherwise) originates from the father's line; a society with matrilineal traits such as Judaism, for example, provides that in order to be considered a Jew, a person must be born of a Jewish mother. "Patrilocal" defines a locus of control coming from the father's geographic/cultural community. In a matrilocal society, a woman will live with her father and/or brothers after marriage, and those males will hold a higher influence on the women's offspring to the detriment of the children's father. Most societies are predominantly patrilineal and patrilocal, but this is not a universal.

Human societies can be described in anthropology in terms of being patriarchal, matriarchal or equiarchal (where gender is unrelated to attainment) systems. All societies have been defined as patriarchal, varying only in the degree that the society allows variance from the strict norm. Noted anthropologist Margaret Mead later acknowledged that she was misquoted when she stated that a "patriarchy was defined as one in which women take their husband's name and the children bear the father's name" whereas a matriarchal society" is one in which some if not all the legal powers relating to the ordering and governing of the family - power over property, inheritance, marriage are lodged in women rather than in men." (Mead 1950, p. 275). Mead was actually distinguishing a patrilocal from a matrilocal society. Mead observed that "[a]ll the claims so glibly made about societies ruled by women are nonsense. We have no reason to believe that they ever existed....Men have always been the leaders in public affairs and the final authorities at home."[1]

The majority of the higher economic, political, industrial, financial, religious, and social positions of the world today are held by men. However, There are no known exceptions to this rule recognized by the American Anthropological Association. Anthropologist Donald Brown has listed patriarchy to be a "human universal" (Brown 1991, p. 137), which includes characteristics such as age gradation, personal hygiene, aesthetics, food sharing, rape, and other sociological aspects, implying that patriarchy is innate to the human condition.

All advanced industrial societies are variations of patriarchy. In countries such as Saudi Arabia, patriarchy is distinctly visible, and in the European nations patriarchy remains the underlying social structure in spite of some changes creating wider possibilities for both women and men. In both cultures, men still dominate public life. In Marxist cultures, there has also been an attempt to create an impression of egalitarian organizations based on gender equality.

In China, for example, the National People's Congress consists of an equal number of men and women. There are, however, no women within the ruling Politburo of the Communist Party of China. Prior to its dissolution, the Soviet Union's Congress of People's Deputies likewise consisted, by law, of equal numbers of men and women. However, the successor Russian Duma, which unlike the predecessor Congress actually has power and is not a rubber-stamp organization, presently has only 35 woman deputies among the 450 members.[2]

History

According to Robert M. Strozier, historical research has not yet found an "initiating event" of the origin of patriarchy.[1] Already in 3100 B.C.E. of Ancient Near East, we find sexual domination on woman, a restriction on their reproductive capacity, and their exclusion from "the process of rapresenting or the construction of history".[1] With the appearance of the Hebrew cult, there is also "the exclusion of woman from the God-humanity covenant".[1][2] The hegemonic spread of patriarchy is linked with the Kurgan hypothesis, widely accepted among scholars.

Appendix

Patriarchies in dispute

This appendix provides one table and one list. The table shows all patriarchal societies that have been alleged at one time or another to be matriarchal. The list gives, where available, quotes from the anthropologists who originally studied them (ethnographers). In nearly every case it is clear from what the women and men who studied them report, that the societies were patriarchal not matriarchal, even before changes brought by contact with western culture. What some of the societies do typify, however, is matrilinearity or matrilocality, not matriarchy, because of clear features of male dominance, see the main entry Patriarchy (anthropology). This is the evidence that verifies the statements made by Encyclopaedia Britannica, Margaret Mead, Cynthia Eller and Steven Goldberg elsewhere in this article, and has been mainly located using their bibliographies. There are a lot of cultural groups in this appendix. No bias is intended against the more than 1,000 uncontroversially patriarchal cultural groups, nor against the few matrilocal or matrilineal cultural groups not mentioned here.

Table

Autonym Continent Country Marriage Property Government Ethnographer Date F/M
Alor Asia Indonesia patriarchy Cora du Bois 1944 female
Bamenda Africa Cameroon patrilocal only Kom matrilineal patriarchy Phyllis M Kaberry 1952 female
Bantoc Asia Philippines patriarchy Albert S Bacadayan 1974 male
Batek Asia Malaysia patrilocal patriarchy Kirk Michael Endicott 1974 male
Boyowan Australasia Papua New Guinea patrilocal matrilineal patriarchy Bronisław Malinowski 1916 male
Bribri North America Costa Rica matrilocal matrilineal patriarchy William Moore Grabb 1875 male
Çatalhöyük Asia Turkey na na na James Mellaart 1961 male
Chambri Australasia Papua New Guinea patriarchy Margaret Mead 1935 female
Filipino Asia Philippines patriarchy Chester L Hunt 1959 male
Gahuku-Gama Australasia Papua New Guinea patriarchy Shirley Glasse (Lindenbaum) 1963 female
Hopi North America United States of America matrilocal both patriarchy Barbara Freire-Marreco 1914 female
Iban Asia Borneo both neither patriarchy Edwin H Gomes 1911 male
Imazighen Africa North Sahara patriarchy George Peter Murdock 1959 male
Iroqois North America North East North America matrilocal matrilineal patriarchy Lewis Henry Morgan 1901 male
Jivaro South America West Amazon patriarchy R Karstan 1926 male
Kenuzi Africa Sudan patriarchy Ernest Godard 1867 male
Kibutzim Asia Israel neither neither patriarchy Judith Buber Agassi 1989 female
!Kung San Africa Southern Africa patriarchy Marjorie Shostak 1976 female
Maliku Asia India separate matrilineal patriarchy Ellen Kattner 1996 female
Minangkabau Asia Indonesia both patriarchy PJ Veth 1882 male
Naxi Asia China only Mosuo separate only Mosuo matrilineal patriarchy Joseph Francis Charles Rock 1924 male
Nayar Asia India patriarchy E Kathleen Gough 1954 female
Tlingit North America United States of America matrilocal matrilineal patriarchy Aurel Krause 1885 male
Vanatinai Australasia Papua New Guinea patriarchy Maria Lepowski 1981 female
Wemale Australasia Papua New Guinea patriarchy Adolf E Jensen 1939 male
Woorani South America Ecuador patriarchy John Man 1982 male
Yegali Africa Madagascar na na na na na na

List

Template:Patriarchy (ethnographies)

See also

References

  • Brown, Robert. (1991). Human Universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
  • Mead, Margaret. (1950). Male and Female, Penguin, London.