User talk:Mimibianca

Touch My Body video

Hello there!

First of all, welcome and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you get established as well as anything I can do to help you in your contributions.
I had earlier removed the plot description of the music video for the above mentioned article because it is not neccessary to be included as it really is not encyclopedic. In one of the official Wikipedia guidelines titled What Wikipedia is not, a policy that deals with what should and what shouldn't be listed in Wikipedia, there is a section that deals with plot summaries. In order to not turn Wikipedia into an indiscriminate collection of information, creating plot summaries should be reserved for categories of articles such as TV shows, works of fiction and film and even then it should contain real-world context and sourced analysis instead of being solely a detailed summary of that work's plot. For that and other reasons, there are no plot summaries for music videos on Wikipedia. Some songs have more than one video. For example, U2's One has 3 videos and numerous live recorded performances that could take up several pages of an article if we were to write plot summaries about them. So, until we (Wikipedians, that is) can agree on how to insert music video plots into articles, they should stay out. Remember, as Wikipedians, we use consensus on how things work around here. It's not the popular vote that lets us do something differently, we must generally agree upon certain things if we're all going to work constructively.
I will remove that plot description and, if you disagree with me, feel free to contact me at my talk page or Touch My Body's talk page so we can discuss it and let someone else join in on the discussion as well. One more thing, it's considered good practice and good Wiki-etiquette to include an edit summary with every edit you make. If you disagree with a previous edit of mine, it would be considered courteous if you would include a short edit summary to let me know why you reverted me so nobody accidentally suspects you as a vandal.

Thanks for listening and feel free to let me know if you have any questions.

Peace! SWik78 (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Further editing concerns

Hi Mimibianca, could you please explain why you reverted my edit? You should not use the undo function to revert good faith edits, as mine clearly was. You should use edit summaries to explain why you believe my edit should be undone. I will point out that your version of this description is full of your own interpretations and is too informal for a Wikipedia article. It also contains grammatical errors. I have edited the description to address at least some of these issues, as I explained in my edit summary. Simply reverting my improvements without comment is not appropriate. Please do not revert me again without discussing why you believe your version is superior. Thanks, Gwernol 14:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Again here you reverted my good faith edit without an edit summary. Please do not continue to abuse the undo tool. If you continue to act in this manner, you may be blocked from editing. Please address the issues raised, particularly Wikipedia:NFC#3 which clearly shows that excessive use of fair use images is not permitted in articles. Thanks, Gwernol 15:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Brexx for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete SWik78 (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

listen dude....im not in the mood for u wikipedians and ur suspicions....i'm just gonna say this once:im not that user and i dont know who he/she is or what that user did in the past,so please just stop accusing me...go annoy someone else.......just leave me alone man........please dont bring this subject again to me...and stop harassing me...the other wiki admins will be told to block u if u continue to accuse innocent users of doing something they didnt do...

good day  ;).....Mimibianca (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Brexx, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 10:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use images on M (fragrance)

Mimibianca, I have again removed the two fair use images from the article M (fragrance). These images cannot be used in that way in the article. Please read the very clear notices on the image pages. These state that the images may be used "to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration" (my emphasis). The images cannot be used in an article simply to show what the poster or the fragrance looks like. Please do not add these images back to the articles. Thanks, Gwernol 17:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

ok,but how come those images on "Curious" by britney spears are being kept... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimibianca (talk • contribs)

They can't I've removed them. Gwernol 18:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your edits on M (fragrance)

Please use an edit summary if you are going to revert someone's edit the way you did my edit here. I explained why I did what I did, you should do the same.
Thanks. SWik78 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Mimibianca, I've mentioned this to you twice above. Please stop abusing the undo tool in this way. If you continue to use undo to revert good faith edits from other users I will have to take further action. It is very important that you explain your edits using an edit summary especially when undoing someone else's work. Thanks, Gwernol 21:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ELIZARDEN-M.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ELIZARDEN-M.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mariah_carey392_47c55dd6021b4.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mariah_carey392_47c55dd6021b4.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rettetast (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

M (fragrance)

Please read WP:External links#Links normally to be avoided. In that list, item number 5 states: Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. The primary reason for the existance of the website http://shop.elizabetharden.com is to sell products. It is not an appropriate external link so I have removed it again. Please don't reinsert it.
Thanks. SWik78 (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, saying With every purchase of M by Mariah Carey Eau de Parfum Spray,customers will Receive a free Mini Eau de Parfum Rollerball is advertising for the product. Wikipedia's purpose is not advertising. I have removed it. Please read WP:NOT if you're having a hard time deciding whether or not something should be included in a Wikipedia article. SWik78 (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariahtouch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariahtouch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariah carey387 47c55dd5ee6d2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariah carey387 47c55dd5ee6d2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariah carey390 47c55dd5f311c.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariah carey390 47c55dd5f311c.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariah carey401 47c55dd611074.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariah carey401 47c55dd611074.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mariah carey393 47c55dd60392d.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariah carey393 47c55dd60392d.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mc800.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mc800.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Goldmariah.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goldmariah.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Push (movie)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Push (movie), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/71332. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

WHY

why am i blocked....i dont do anything wrong or violated any laws...the reason given was that another user with the same ip address as mine has been blocked,so they had to block me to...,and that the block will expire tomorrow......but still that doesnt justify wikipedia blocking me...there are many users with same ip addresses,and other users shouldnt get punished and suffer the consequences of the person who violated laws just becuase he/she has the same ip address.....please i request u to unblock me ;).... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimibianca (talk • contribs)

You have been caught in an autoblock. Please follow the instrution on the block notice to properly request an unblock. You cannot be unblocked unless you follow the instruction since there is no way for us to know which IP address has been blocked and is causing you to be autoblocked. Gwernol 13:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please fill in the required information below. You must provide the blocked IP address and other relevant information as clearly instructed in the block notice. Without this information admins don't know how to unblock your account. Gwernol 13:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

did i put the blocked ip adress in the right in the right place?Mimibianca (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC).........

heloo,answer me.....did i put the information in the correct place —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimibianca (talk • contribs)

No you didn't. "...Blocked ip address:"Connortt9"" is not an IP address. An IP address is a set of four number, for example 19.345.334.332. Unless you provide the IP address you cannot be unblocked. Gwernol 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

E=MC² (Mariah Carey album)

Can you please explain, why you are adding the Promotion section, although I deleted. There is not reliable for the data, because Mariah Daily Journal is a homepage administrated and written by fans.Reidlos (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Whats written there is accurate,for example,the part about the BET march,7 special is more than accurate...cause the info was written by the audience that was actually there....also mariah mentioned the site....and on several occasion the site puts news before it even is confirmed,and it turns out to be true...

I know that, I'm a huge fan of the site, but that doesn't change the fact that it's only a fan site. It's not like these persons are well known professional writers or official Mariah Carey staff members. More at: Wikipedia:Reliable source examples Reidlos (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bg teasersplash.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bg teasersplash.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Civility

You posted this comment on Talk:Touch My Body but you were not logged in so it doesn't say your username, rather your IP.

I am fully convinced that you have absolutely no concept of many of Wikipedia's major policies or guidelines, including WP:CIVIL, as evidenced by the above comment, nor does it seem like you have ever once read WP:N to actually find out what notability means in a Wikipedia article seeing that you throw the term around so recklessly without anything to back up your claims of supposed notability. You don't seem to understand Wikipedia:Consensus either since you so often incorrectly speak of voting as being the primary means to settle a dispute. Who voted to include those quotations before you inserted them? Why do I have to get people to vote to remove them? Read WP:BOLD to get an answer to your question of "who am I to just march in and delete stuff". If you have more comments to make on talk pages, make sure you comment on the content, not the editor. And before you accuse me of making this up (as you have before), what I said in the previous sentence is clearly stated in one of the links I provided above but I won't tell you which one so you maybe read all of them before accusing people of doing innappropriate things. SWik78 (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

um sorry,i didnt mean to hurt u in anyway...i just felt strongly about that section,and though they should be there...anyway...all i said is u should have discussed it with the other users first,before u completely removed them....again..sorry....peace...;)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Touch My Body. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 11:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Revert warring on Touch My Body

This is a direct quote from an official Wikipedia policy titled Wikipedia:Three-revert rule:

An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time. Any editor who breaches the rule may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours in the first instance, and longer for repeated or aggravated violations.

Since 21:31 UTC yesterday, you have made 4 reverts ([1], [2], [3], [4]) on Touch My Body. This is unconstructive. The next revert you make on that article, I will report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and ask that you be blocked from editing. Please try to come to an agreement with editors you don't agree with rather than try to change their mind and then doing whatever you please if they disagree. This is not consensus. SWik78 (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

u shouldnt be saying this to be and threating me with blocking,u should be saying this to the editors who are reverting my reverts,i didnt put anything that doesnt belong to the page nor did i did put anything unnessesary....and i put sources to.....so,please stop thereating me for no reason......

RE: YouTube as a reliable source

Click here to find an answer to the question you asked me "says who youtube is not a reliable source,its showing u mariah saying those exact words". SWik78 (talk) 14:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

did u read this part mr.

"video clips published on YouTube may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher, but even then should be used with caution. They may also be used as a convenience link for material originally published elsewhere, such as Wesley Autrey's appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman".

and this...

Particularly in the case of hard to find, but still verifiable sources, such as public court documents, local or older newspapers, or related information, a convenience link permits users to access the original information easily.

In some cases, the original editor may only have read the "convenience link," rather than the original source. Explicitly identifying the link promotes honesty. (Note, however, that: (a) under such circumstances, editors are actually required to identify any "intermediate sources" upon which they relied, and (b) such intermediate sources must themselves be reliable. See here.)

If the editors did read the original source, and edit based on that, the reliability of the convenience link is unimportant. However, for the reliability of the convenience link to be unimportant, no edits must be based on it.

They can save editors a lot of money and time when they do not (again) have to find or buy or borrow the book or article

Yes, but the YouTube clip you linked to is a video of an unidentified person playing the song on his piano. It has nothing to do with the quote, does not show Mariah Carey at all and it therefore in no way supports of the quote you have edit warred to include in the article. How on earth do you think that video justifies the quote since it doesn't contain it? It absolutely is not a [{WP:V|source]] for that quote. Gwernol 14:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

ya,sorry about that.......i changed it now.....Mimibianca (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Miminotbianca.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Miminotbianca.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert ruleat Touch My Body. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) (trivial vote) 19:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mimibianca (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

excuse me,i wasnt putting anything that didnt belong to the article....just because other random editors think otherwise and start removing my edits,that doesnt mean im wrong and theyre right...in fact, u should be blocking them for reverting my edits several times,not the opposite.......if u check touch my body page,the part where i kept adding,which is about why she choose the first single,part of it was put again,so thats proof that i wasnt violating anything and didnt do anything wrong...the fact that its there is more than enough proof that im just contributing resourceful data not to mention my time to wiki......U-N-B-L-O-C-K >>>>>>>>i'm innocent.........

Decline reason:

Just because you think the addition is good does not give you license to violate WP:3RR. Note that nobody else violated this policy in reverting your edits. — Yamla (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mimibianca (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i didnt know about that rule,well im sorry darling that i didn't read the 10000000000000000000+ USER-created police

i did what i did,i said sorry,wont happen again,now move on ,and unblock me....stop being so strict,this is not a site created by the law or something for those polices to be taken so seriously and strictly.....theyr'e all made by other random users, aka,so called "administrators"......so,they're not real polices......nevertheless,i wont do it again...and i will follow the 1000000+ rules ...;)....now unblock me......

Decline reason:

Don't lie, you've been warned about 3RR. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 08:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mimibianca (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i swear on my soul,i havent been warned about it before..........do u see anything on the page warning me about it before it happend...no...........so im not lying......stop putting allegations on me......look at what were discussing,ur gonna laugh....there more important things in life....like,chill out....this is a site where anyone can edit,u cant control every small edit,and put 10000000 of polices,the point of a site that anyone can edit,is that there shouldnt be so many rules....there are people who are truly vandalizing wiki and ur wasting ur time on me for all i did was add more info about the song,which is resourceful......,than blocking someone for an innocent contribution .....look at the way ur acuususing me and blocking me,i feel like im in court....even court itself,wont be that strict.....and stop talking about the sockpupperty RUMOR.......its so false,and the person who said that should be reported for false alligations......i didnt do anything wrong,the part that i added was put again on the page,so what i contributed wasnt wrong......i didnt know about rule #189399494954935934 .....helooo,is anybody even reading this...........

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i swear on my soul,i havent been warned about it before..........do u see anything on the page warning me about it before it happend...no...........so im not lying......stop putting allegations on me......look at what were discussing,ur gonna laugh....there more important things in life....like,chill out....this is a site where anyone can edit,u cant control every small edit,and put 10000000 of polices,the point of a site that anyone can edit,is that there shouldnt be so many rules....there are people who are truly vandalizing wiki and ur wasting ur time on me for all i did was add more info about the song,which is resourceful......,than blocking someone for an innocent contribution .....look at the way ur acuususing me and blocking me,i feel like im in court....even court itself,wont be that strict.....and stop talking about the sockpupperty RUMOR.......its so false,and the person who said that should be reported for false alligations......i didnt do anything wrong,the part that i added was put again on the page,so what i contributed wasnt wrong......i didnt know about rule #189399494954935934 .....helooo,is anybody even reading this........... |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i swear on my soul,i havent been warned about it before..........do u see anything on the page warning me about it before it happend...no...........so im not lying......stop putting allegations on me......look at what were discussing,ur gonna laugh....there more important things in life....like,chill out....this is a site where anyone can edit,u cant control every small edit,and put 10000000 of polices,the point of a site that anyone can edit,is that there shouldnt be so many rules....there are people who are truly vandalizing wiki and ur wasting ur time on me for all i did was add more info about the song,which is resourceful......,than blocking someone for an innocent contribution .....look at the way ur acuususing me and blocking me,i feel like im in court....even court itself,wont be that strict.....and stop talking about the sockpupperty RUMOR.......its so false,and the person who said that should be reported for false alligations......i didnt do anything wrong,the part that i added was put again on the page,so what i contributed wasnt wrong......i didnt know about rule #189399494954935934 .....helooo,is anybody even reading this........... |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i swear on my soul,i havent been warned about it before..........do u see anything on the page warning me about it before it happend...no...........so im not lying......stop putting allegations on me......look at what were discussing,ur gonna laugh....there more important things in life....like,chill out....this is a site where anyone can edit,u cant control every small edit,and put 10000000 of polices,the point of a site that anyone can edit,is that there shouldnt be so many rules....there are people who are truly vandalizing wiki and ur wasting ur time on me for all i did was add more info about the song,which is resourceful......,than blocking someone for an innocent contribution .....look at the way ur acuususing me and blocking me,i feel like im in court....even court itself,wont be that strict.....and stop talking about the sockpupperty RUMOR.......its so false,and the person who said that should be reported for false alligations......i didnt do anything wrong,the part that i added was put again on the page,so what i contributed wasnt wrong......i didnt know about rule #189399494954935934 .....helooo,is anybody even reading this........... |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

and by the way,i got a warning for this earlier see:

"Since 21:31 UTC yesterday, you have made 4 reverts ([1], [2], [3], [4]) on Touch My Body. This is unconstructive. The next revert you make on that article, I will report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and ask that you be blocked from editing. Please try to come to an agreement with editors you don't agree with rather than try to change their mind and then doing whatever you please if they disagree. This is not consensus. SWik78 (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

and it says "The next revert you make on that article, I will report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and ask that you be blocked from editing. "

and after that i didnt revert anything again......so,why suddnely ur blocking me.......u gave me a warning i understood it and didnt do it again....explain yourself.......

For reviewing admin: revert 1 at 11:36. revert 2 at 11:43, revert 3 at 13:42, Swik78's 3RR warning at 13:56, then three minutes later: revert four at 13:59. Mimibianca was warned about 3RR and reverted a fourth time anyway. Gwernol 21:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, counting this one from last night (but still withing 24 hours), my warning was given after 4 reverts and Mimibianca reverted for the 5th time 3 minutes later. SWik78 (talk) 01:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I strongly suggest that the reviewing admin see the alleged sockpuppetry allegations opened by Swik78 before granting unblock; in fact, a longer block is surely necessary. The Evil Spartan (talk) 07:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

i cant believe ur still talking about the sockpupetry rumor again...........user:the evil spartan,go away...ur not involved in all of this...

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Miminerd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Miminerd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mctmbhot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mctmbhot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)