Jump to content

Talk:Mission San Juan Capistrano: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 76.242.91.206 (talk) to last version by Mdhennessey
Line 27: Line 27:


----
----

== The Precontact section should be a separate article ==

Virtually all of the Precontact section belongs in some other article. You have not discussed the ethnic prehistory of the Spanish settlers. You have not elaborated on how the Spanish themselves came to the Catholicism they brought to the New World. You have not discussed how the Spanish made their voyages. A few brief comments on who the native peoples were AT THE TIME OF THE MISSIONS might be relevant. Such a detailed discussion, going back to land bridges 13,000 years ago, is not. [[Special:Contributions/71.163.37.245|71.163.37.245]] ([[User talk:71.163.37.245|talk]]) 04:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza

Revision as of 04:22, 21 March 2008

Good articleMission San Juan Capistrano has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 24, 2006Good article nomineeListed
Archive
Archives

Previous discussions, which have been archived:



The Precontact section should be a separate article

Virtually all of the Precontact section belongs in some other article. You have not discussed the ethnic prehistory of the Spanish settlers. You have not elaborated on how the Spanish themselves came to the Catholicism they brought to the New World. You have not discussed how the Spanish made their voyages. A few brief comments on who the native peoples were AT THE TIME OF THE MISSIONS might be relevant. Such a detailed discussion, going back to land bridges 13,000 years ago, is not. 71.163.37.245 (talk) 04:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza[reply]