Talk:Bombing of Darwin: Difference between revisions
→Requested move: oppose |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
*'''Oppose''' As Darwin was bombed dozens of times the name of the article should be clear that this is only about a single raid. Some of the later raids were large and could support their own article, and there's scope to write an article on the entire series of raids. [[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' As Darwin was bombed dozens of times the name of the article should be clear that this is only about a single raid. Some of the later raids were large and could support their own article, and there's scope to write an article on the entire series of raids. [[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
*:If a split ever occurs you can rename it then. For now this article covers all of the bombings of Darwin and does not require a misleading qualifier. [[Special:Contributions/199.125.109.107|199.125.109.107]] ([[User talk:199.125.109.107|talk]]) 14:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:48, 4 November 2008
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II B‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Japan B‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
Australia: Northern Territory / Military history B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The columns in the battlebox are off-centre; this doesn't seem to be happening with other pages. Can anyone fix it? Thanks. Grant65 (Talk) 10:48, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
Decisive Battle
Since when was a air raid killing less then 250 a Decisive battle in WW2.
Flags
I added small flags to the infobox which was reverted, I thought they were common to use in infoboxes such as in Vietnam War or Korean War --- Astrokey44 13:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Warboxes maybe, but battleboxes no. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Battles. Gdr 13:25, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Merging in Darwin 1942
To me there doesn't appear to be anything at Darwin 1942 which is not in this article, except for the figure of "40 ships", which I haven't checked. What do others think? 12:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- If there is anything in it that can be used, fine. Otherwise, delete it. I included the merge tag because it looked like someone was working on it. Bjelleklang - talk 13:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Insignificant Attack?
The article states that the attack was less that significant, yet over 250 people still lost their lives in this attack, and any loss of life can be deemed significant. Talk User:Fissionfox 11:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- The article actually states that the attack was less significant than the attack on Pearl Harbour. Seeing as the attack on Pearl started the Pacific War and crippled much of the US fleet I think that this is a fair statement. Darwin was a significant Allied base in February 1942, but the attack on Pearl Harbour led to a greater loss of life and had a much bigger impact on the war. --Nick Dowling 12:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
Change title from Bombing of Darwin (February 1942) to Bombing of Darwin. Later redirects to former. No reason for two articles, one about all bombings of Darwin (which this should be) and one specific bombing. 199.125.109.107 (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Moved from RM:
- Darwin has only been bombed once. No need for the date in the title. — Ben (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- The 2nd paragraph of page Bombing of Darwin (February 1942) says that Darwin was attacked from the air 58 other times. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I ended up writing a mini essay on why the article should be at Bombing of Darwin, and quickly chopped it down and hit submit without checking before I had to run off. There were many bombings, but only one of particular note. All the attacks are discussed in the current article, and it's unlikely separate articles will ever be created for subsequent bombings. At the moment, Bombing of Darwin redirects to the current article, and since no other articles are every likely to be created, it really should be the other way around. Ben (talk) 20:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.125.109.107 (talk)
- The 2nd paragraph of page Bombing of Darwin (February 1942) says that Darwin was attacked from the air 58 other times. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Darwin was bombed dozens of times the name of the article should be clear that this is only about a single raid. Some of the later raids were large and could support their own article, and there's scope to write an article on the entire series of raids. Nick Dowling (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- If a split ever occurs you can rename it then. For now this article covers all of the bombings of Darwin and does not require a misleading qualifier. 199.125.109.107 (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- B-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- B-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Unknown-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- High-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Northern Territory articles
- High-importance Northern Territory articles
- WikiProject Northern Territory articles
- High-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- WikiProject Australia articles