Jump to content

User talk:Coren: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vicantu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
==[[Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions]]==
==[[Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions]]==
The text "detected" by the bot is the quoted speech of the judge in the case, Lord Justice Sedley, which makes up his ruling. [[User:Keristrasza|Keristrasza]] ([[User talk:Keristrasza|talk]]) 18:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
The text "detected" by the bot is the quoted speech of the judge in the case, Lord Justice Sedley, which makes up his ruling. [[User:Keristrasza|Keristrasza]] ([[User talk:Keristrasza|talk]]) 18:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

==[[Vidal Cantu Garza]]==

Hi, incorrectly tagged http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidal_Cantu_Garza as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vidal_Cantu_Garza; I'd appreciate your input. Regards, [[User:Vicantu|Vicantu]] ([[User talk:Vicantu|talk]]) 22:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:38, 12 August 2009

Archives
2015
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2016
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

I remain active to answers queries related to CSBot, which I intent to keep operational as long as it is still useful and welcome.

Tom Racer

I was in the throes of editing the page and mistakenly saved it before finalising etc. You can check by later and inspect. All is well now with no copyright problems. Thanks (George-Archer (talk) 15:29, 8 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

User:Tajik

Tajik (talk · contribs), a very racist, controversial and disruptive editor with long history of blocks, is still vandalizings pages of groups of people he doesn't like [1], he's edit-warring, he uses sockpuppets and annon IPs to curse, abuse, attack, insult, and offend people of other races. Here he is cursing at other editors and also adding in the article that the mother of a politician in Afghanistan was raped by ethnic Tajiks He did the recent vandalisms on Kabul, Afghan (name), Abdullah Abdullah (politician), Talk:Jamal-al-Din_Afghani, Sher Shah Suri, and others. He is constantly editing articles pertaining to Afghanistan and its people with very negative view. By trying to evade from admins, he first edits with his usual user name and then vandalizeand edit-war with a set of IP # but all appear to be in the same location in Germany where he lives. He and the IPs share the same view, always refusing to accept Afghanistan's existance in the 18th century [2], [3], giving Tajiks a good name and the people that he hates (the Pashtuns) a very negative image almost every page he visits. He is trying to change Afghanistan into Iran and remove the Pashto language from every article, which is the one of the official languages of the country. I'm pretty sure he is using those IPs and socks, he is trying to change his writings when he uses IPs to fool admins.119.73.1.41 (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same post as here. The IP is that of banned User:NisarKand (and his 100+ sockpuppets). Checkuser evidence has been presented. Cheers. Tajik (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What a speedy bot you have - it picked up a similarity with a web page that only has the track listing for this album. As there is more info in the article than the web page referred to and because the track listing is (I think) public domain I've delted the tag. DISEman (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CSBot...

...absolutely rules. Notwithstanding the inevitable false positives, it is an amazingly useful tool. Truly, I regard it as essential to helping maintain a legal website. Just wanted to say. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, Coren! Not sure why but the bot tagged the beginnings of this article and my handwritten article entry as being a copyvio. I tried to compare it to what it found but didn't really see anything too similar. Thought I'd drop you a note letting you know. Cheers!!! Basket of Puppies 15:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Coakley

Hi, your wee bot has incorrectly tagged this article as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's talk page; I'd appreciate your input. Regards, GiantSnowman 15:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is confused

See here and here. --candlewicke 15:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Home of heroes

Thanks for trying but again the home of heroes site is not subject to copyright because all the data is contained on government sources and repackaged. I know that your bot catches a lot of copyright problems but I have as I have mentioned time and again this info isn't subject to copyright. I admit I put the "tag" but I SOULDN'T NEED TOO. Since I have mentioned this nicely and rudely, every time corenbot erroneously spams my talk page with the copyright tags I will just return the favor notify you. My recommendation would be to add logic or something that skips the HOH site. Cheers and happy spamming. --Kumioko (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ponce City Hall

Thanks for the message. I will work on the article to improve it substantially. Should be finished shortly.Rob99324 (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy again. Article is CONSIDERABLY re-worded and large portions of previously incorporated text from the copywrited article has been removed. All other sentences borrowed from the c/r artcile has been re-worded. Article is now clean. Please re-bot as appropriate. Regards, Rob99324 (talk) 19:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New exclusion parameters for Corenbot?

Re: the listing of Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2005, admittedly no Magna Carta, as a copyright violation of Theorator.com text. Theorator lists bills with text from, say, the Library of Congress; IHFA '05 contains a bill, transcribed by an editor, with text from, say, Library of Congress. Is it possible to exclude Theorator.com and other such sites from results? Anarchangel (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The text "detected" by the bot is the quoted speech of the judge in the case, Lord Justice Sedley, which makes up his ruling. Keristrasza (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, incorrectly tagged http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidal_Cantu_Garza as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vidal_Cantu_Garza; I'd appreciate your input. Regards, Vicantu (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]