Talk:Super Mario World

Super Mario All-Stars

I'm pretty sure this game was NOT included with Super Mario All-Stars, so I think the article needs updating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.51.122 (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The article correctly states that Mario World was packaged with Mario All-Stars. It was released late in the SNES' lifetime, and is quite rare from what I understand. My brother got it when he bought his SNES. Darrek Attilla (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

There were two versions of Super Mario All-Stars, one with SMW and one without.Dadaesque (talk) 06:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Manual Secret

In the manual, It says "Can you find the secret of the star road!" What does this mean? Also, does anybody know anything about the secret test area? Can you put it in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.39.56.236 (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

In the Advance version the "secret of the star road" no longer happens at the end of the star road. Instead you have to find ALL the exits to get the secret. 84.59.124.244 (talk) 23:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The secret of Star Road is the Special World. About the Test area, there is a Pro Action Replay code (in fact, too many steps) in here http://themushroomkingdom.net/lostbytes.shtml ,but, believe me, it's not a big deal.--205.155.22.145 22:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LakituAl (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Super Mario Advance 2.jpg

Image:Super Mario Advance 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

notability of LUEshi?

I added a brief section about the Internet meme "LUEshi" to this article, but another editor removed it, saying that it was "not notable." However, since this meme is already mention on the articles about GameFAQs and ASCII art, it seems rather silly not to include it on the article about Super Mario World, the game that inspired "LUEshi" in the first place. --Ixfd64 (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Exactly, LUEshi is a symbol of probly one of the most wellknown forum users in the, english speaking world. --Jakezing (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Different Versions?

The cartridge my grandma has is different then my cartridge. on my grandma's cartridge, the words "Super mario world" are just one line across the top of the label, whereas on mine, the text on the label has the words "mario world" underneath "super". is this significant? Maiq the liar (talk) 22:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Different ways to make the image on the front, its no more important then ther gold and normal color versions of zelda games.--Jakezing (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Why does Rom Hacking have no notability?

Why? Its also kinda stupid that the Hacking section was removed because Lunar Magic still leads to Super Mario World. YamiMario (talk) 19:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Next time, please put new sections of a talk page at the end of the page, rather than the top. Thanks! Also, I can't really explain how fan-hacking isn't notable since I don't know all of the policies behind it, thought it's probably because it's just that, fan-hacking. It doesn't really support the actual product itself. But I'll let someone else explain that part. To the Lunar Magic thing...how is that stupid at all? In fact, it's incredibly smart. Since fan-hacking isn't notable, a program that's all about fan-hacking of this one particular game isn't notable enough either, hence why the page was redirected to Super Mario World. ---Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Fan-hacking can be notable, but there are no sources for notability. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

But why does it redirect here? What's the connection between the term "Mario Adventure" and Super Mario World?96.253.123.213 (talk) 04:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability? SMW Central is a SMW hacking community with over 5000 members. But no, it's "not notable" because Wikipedia admins hate the subject and just delete any mention of it on sight. 75.159.101.125 (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps some of the more well-known hacks would be worth a passing mention, at least? Some things, like Kaizo Mario World or Brutal Mario World seem to be rather popular, considering how many videos and pages about them can be found floating about the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MazelTav (talk • contribs) 05:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

As with everything on Wikipedia, a hacking section would require verifiable coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. If you think the article deserves such a section, you're encouraged to find reliable coverage and insert the information with its sources. —Ost (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Shell and Yoshi Colors

I've noticed this being edited a bit lately, but the official color of one of the Yoshi and of one of the shells is blue. I agree, it looks more purple than blue, but in the manual it's blue, in the game it's called the blue switch palace. Therefore, it should be referred to as blue in the article.DJKingpin (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

This is largely due to the color differences back in the day between japanese and american television sets. If you look at mario in super mario world youll notice that he is maroon/purple rather than his iconic red and blue. On the japanese television sets he was colored correctly 199.111.183.207 (talk) 03:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Music Sample

That is NOT the overworld theme, that is part of the in-level music for many of the "plains" levels. Someone better at wiki than I should remedy this. Effsee (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Plot Summary Added

I added a summary of the game's plot to the article; any suggestions on how it could be improved? I was thinkg the addition of the world map might be good. Here's what I had in mind: [1] The only problem with it is that the upper part of the Chocolate bridge area and the Vanilla Dome secret levels are not unlocked. --TRegnier2795 (talk) 02:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

IT'S THE WRONG NAME FOR THE PRINCESS

the page said that princess name was Peach , But it clearly says that her name Toadstool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.237.226 (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

The "secret hidden castle"

This video on YouTube claims that there is a secret castle in the game that you can access by starting a new game, moving Mario to Yoshi's Island 1, pressing Select 666 times, and then holding Start and pressing A. The level that you supposedly enter (which is basically a castle with stone blocks in the air spelling out the Nazi symbol and "Heil Hitler" and a boss fight where you supposedly have to kill Woody Allen, who is portrayed as an unmodified Iggy Koopa sprite) is obviously fake, but whenever I comment to say that it's fake, my comments get thumbs-downed by morons who think it's real!! Can someone please get this video taken down?! --74.167.107.134 (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I am really curious why you came to Wikipedia to complain about content on YouTube. What do you possibly think this would accomplish? Lumaga (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)