Jump to content

Maltese nobility: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m minor edit (saverio crispo)
adding images
Line 1: Line 1:
[[image: Emmanuel_de_Rohan-Polduc.jpg |thumb|200px|right| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc]]. He created many new titles, including the first Maltese title of [[marquis]] (Scriop el Hagin). The Royal Commissioners remarked that not all titles created by him were hereditary and that of the rest some have much wider [[remainders]]. In 1795 Rohan amended the legislation previously enacted by Grand Master Despuig.]]
[[Image:BnietBuq.JPG |thumb|250px|right|An early [[photograph]] of Baroness Sceberras d'Amico-Inguanez, circa 1890, in [[Malta]]]]

[[image: AntonioManuelVilhena.jpg|thumb|200px|left| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Manoel de Vilhena]]. In 1725, he curtailed the abuse of the titles of "Most Illustrious" and "Noble". Vilhena also created the new titles of Barone della Marsa, Barone di San Marciano and Barone della Tabria. The Royal Commissioners credited Vilhena with being the first to directly recognize the titles of Barone di Djar il-Bniet et Bucana, Barone di Cicciano and Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri.]]

''' The Maltese Nobility ''' was a complex structure of documented titles of nobility and other hereditary rights favouring certain local families which was governed by a system of grants, registrations and other recognitions made by the Grand Masters of the [[Order of Saint John]] during its Government of [[Malta]] (1530-1798).
''' The Maltese Nobility ''' was a complex structure of documented titles of nobility and other hereditary rights favouring certain local families which was governed by a system of grants, registrations and other recognitions made by the Grand Masters of the [[Order of Saint John]] during its Government of [[Malta]] (1530-1798).


Line 9: Line 12:


As for the remaining category (the fourth), the Commission also concluded that the Grand Masters assigned no place to title-holders who had obtained titles from foreign sovereigns, but whose patents were not duly registered or at least directly recognised by the Grand Masters during their government of the Maltese Islands. The third and fourth category make up the original [[Foreign titles of nobility in Malta]].
As for the remaining category (the fourth), the Commission also concluded that the Grand Masters assigned no place to title-holders who had obtained titles from foreign sovereigns, but whose patents were not duly registered or at least directly recognised by the Grand Masters during their government of the Maltese Islands. The third and fourth category make up the original [[Foreign titles of nobility in Malta]].
[[image: Europe_1740.jpg|thumb|300px|centre| Political map of Europe circa 1740 showing the Maltese Islands as independent of Sicily and Spain. At that time, the Grand Master was [[Ramon Despuig]] to whom is credited the new titles of Barone di Culeja, Barone di Benuarrat and Barone di Frigenuini and the 1739 rules of precedence amongst the Maltese Nobility. He also oversaw the succession of the title of Barone di Gomerino.]]


The Grand Masters legislated on matters relating to the Maltese Nobility as a general body on [[16 September]] [[1739]] (Despuig) and the [[17 March]] [[1795]] (Grand Master Rohan). The legislation of the [[30 April]] [[1725]] (Vilhena) is regarded as specific to the individual beneficiaries mentioned further below. These legislations are all mentioned in the Commissioners’ Report.

The Grand Masters legislated on matters relating to the Maltese Nobility as a general body on [[16 September 1739]] (Despuig) and the [[17 March 1795]] (Grand Master Rohan). The legislation of the [[30 April 1725]] (Vilhena) is regarded as specific to the individual beneficiaries mentioned further below. These legislations are all mentioned in the Commissioners’ Report.


The nobility was abolished by [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] but some 80 years later it regained an official status. The Maltese Nobility is unique in the British Commonwealth because it is the only European nobility to have been examined by a British Royal Commission appointed for that purpose. A handful of [[Foreign]] titles are regarded as considering part of the Maltese Nobility. Nowadays Malta is a Republic and titles of Nobility are officially no longer recognized.
The nobility was abolished by [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] but some 80 years later it regained an official status. The Maltese Nobility is unique in the British Commonwealth because it is the only European nobility to have been examined by a British Royal Commission appointed for that purpose. A handful of [[Foreign]] titles are regarded as considering part of the Maltese Nobility. Nowadays Malta is a Republic and titles of Nobility are officially no longer recognized.
Line 91: Line 94:


== Titles of Nobility in Malta - First Category ==
== Titles of Nobility in Malta - First Category ==
[[image: Raimondo_Perellos_y_Roccafull.jpg|thumb|100px|right| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Ramon Perellos y Roccaful]]. He created the titles of Barone di Gomerino and Barone di Budacco which are the oldest of the titles in the first category later considered by the British Royal Commissioners. The Royal Commissioners did not consider a claim by Giuseppe De Piro that the title of Budacco was extinct.]]


With little exception, each title created by the Grand Masters is regulated by its own grant. Some grants were made in perpetuity, others on a personal basis, some allow females to hold them and some limit succession to males only. Most of the hereditary ones are subject to [[investiture]]. However Montalto reports that although some successors failed to get invested, this did not always bring about a forfeiture.
With little exception, each title created by the Grand Masters is regulated by its own grant. Some grants were made in perpetuity, others on a personal basis, some allow females to hold them and some limit succession to males only. Most of the hereditary ones are subject to [[investiture]]. However Montalto reports that although some successors failed to get invested, this did not always bring about a forfeiture.
Line 110: Line 114:
! Title of Nobility || Created/invested by || In favour of || Date of creation/succession || A.O.M. Reference || Date of Investiture
! Title of Nobility || Created/invested by || In favour of || Date of creation/succession || A.O.M. Reference || Date of Investiture
|-
|-
| Barone Testaferrata di Gomerino || created by Grand Master Perellos || in favour of Paolo and Beatrice Testaferrata (jointly) || on the 24 December 1710 || Reference A.O.M. 514, ff. 129v-134v. || They were invested on the 10 January 1711
| Barone Testaferrata di Gomerino || created by Grand Master Ramon Perellos y Roccaful|| in favour of Paolo and Beatrice Testaferrata (jointly) || on the 24 December 1710 || Reference A.O.M. 514, ff. 129v-134v. || They were invested on the 10 January 1711
|-
|-
| Barone De Piro di Budac || created by Grand Master Perellos || in favour of Gio Pio De Piro || on the 23 April 1716 || Reference A.O.M. 520, ff. 151r, 161r-161v. || He was invested on 25 April 1716
| Barone De Piro di Budac || created by Grand Master Ramon Perellos y Roccaful || in favour of Gio Pio De Piro || on the 23 April 1716 || Reference A.O.M. 520, ff. 151r, 161r-161v. || He was invested on 25 April 1716
|-
|-
| right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile || conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena || on Milite Barone Marc' Antonio Inguanez and his wife Baroness Inguanez || on the 30 April 1725 || Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 || (Investiture not contemplated)
| right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile || conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena || on Milite Barone Marc' Antonio Inguanez and his wife Baroness Inguanez || on the 30 April 1725 || Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 || (Investiture not contemplated)
Line 226: Line 230:


== Titles of Nobility in Malta – Second Category ==
== Titles of Nobility in Malta – Second Category ==

[[image: Martin_de_Redin_SOM.jpg‎|thumb|100px|left| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Martin de Redin]]. In 1658, he invested the Magnificus Pietro Cassia in the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia. Nothing in the text supports the view that this fief was regarded as a barony at that date]]

[[image: Fra_Ferdinand_von_Hompesch_G.M._Palace_.jpg |thumb|100px|right| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim]]. He was the last Grand Master to rule Malta. In 1797, he invested Felicita Chiara Sant in the baronial fief of Ghariescem et Tabia. This was the fourth time that the fief was formally acknowledged as baronial by the Grand Masters.]]


Following the Royal Commissioners’ Report, it does not appear that any titles of Nobility claimed in 1878, actually existed in Malta as titles created by grant or patent before the advent of the Knights: Undoubtedly there were [possessors] of land in Malta who held by military tenure, under the [[Kings of Sicily]]. But mere military tenure even by tenants ‘in capite’ whether in England or Sicily, did not and does not constitute a privilege of honour (“peerage”). The Grand Masters upheld this view by practically [[creating]] a new title as a recognition of established [[custom]], in a case where a holder of land by military service had [[vulgarly]] come to be known as a [[Baron]], and the [[Sovereign]] had been induced to [[acquiesce]]. Large landowners in Sicily were often called “Barons” without any justification, and obsequious [[lawyers]] and [[officials]] habitually called their clients as they desired to be addressed; Malta was no [[exception]].
Following the Royal Commissioners’ Report, it does not appear that any titles of Nobility claimed in 1878, actually existed in Malta as titles created by grant or patent before the advent of the Knights: Undoubtedly there were [possessors] of land in Malta who held by military tenure, under the [[Kings of Sicily]]. But mere military tenure even by tenants ‘in capite’ whether in England or Sicily, did not and does not constitute a privilege of honour (“peerage”). The Grand Masters upheld this view by practically [[creating]] a new title as a recognition of established [[custom]], in a case where a holder of land by military service had [[vulgarly]] come to be known as a [[Baron]], and the [[Sovereign]] had been induced to [[acquiesce]]. Large landowners in Sicily were often called “Barons” without any justification, and obsequious [[lawyers]] and [[officials]] habitually called their clients as they desired to be addressed; Malta was no [[exception]].


Thus, although according to [[strict]] [[law]], no titles are traceable in Malta created by an existing title of Nobility previous to the rule of the Grand Masters, the effect of the Royal Commission was that certain titles having their legal foundation in a recognition by the Grand Masters were [[ante-dated]], for purposes of [[precedence]] only, to [[coincide]] with the date of grants of land under a military tenure which is [[inferior]] to a [[baronial]] tenure.
Thus, although according to [[strict]] [[law]], no titles are traceable in Malta created by an existing title of Nobility previous to the rule of the Grand Masters, the effect of the Royal Commission was that certain titles having their legal foundation in a recognition by the Grand Masters were ante-dated, for purposes of [[precedence]] only, to [[coincide]] with the date of grants of land under a military tenure which is [[inferior]] to a [[baronial]] tenure.


In their Report the Royal Commissioners made a distinction between a noble fief and a simple fief. The latter is granted without entitlement of any honour whatsoever, whilst the holder of the former is by Custom held to be a Baron. In addition to this, a money grant was made in lieu of a fief. In return for the fief or money grant the recipient was to render services to the crown, usually by way of military service or supplies of horses and weapons.
In their Report the Royal Commissioners made a distinction between a noble fief and a simple fief. The latter is granted without entitlement of any honour whatsoever, whilst the holder of the former is by Custom held to be a Baron. In addition to this, a money grant was made in lieu of a fief. In return for the fief or money grant the recipient was to render services to the crown, usually by way of military service or supplies of horses and weapons.
Line 237: Line 245:
The Commissioners identified only one [[extant]] fief which devolved directly from the [[Aragonese]] sovereigns of Malta, namely the fief of Djar el-Bniet et Bucana. A 19th century claim maintained that the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia was also granted by the Aragonese kings. However, it was proven that the original fief had been extinguished and that the claimant could only make a claim on the basis of a later grant in fief made by the Grand Masters. The Commissioners did not consider any of the other fiefs which had been made by the Kings of Sicily and the Grand Masters. Moreover the Commission did not consider any money grants granted in lieu of a property tenure.
The Commissioners identified only one [[extant]] fief which devolved directly from the [[Aragonese]] sovereigns of Malta, namely the fief of Djar el-Bniet et Bucana. A 19th century claim maintained that the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia was also granted by the Aragonese kings. However, it was proven that the original fief had been extinguished and that the claimant could only make a claim on the basis of a later grant in fief made by the Grand Masters. The Commissioners did not consider any of the other fiefs which had been made by the Kings of Sicily and the Grand Masters. Moreover the Commission did not consider any money grants granted in lieu of a property tenure.


In the report we find reference to the fief of Budack as one being of a very old erection granted out to the Proto Medico Nicolo Cilia, by whose death it had reverted to the Crown, and was on the 22 December 1646 reconferred by [[Grand Master Juan de Lascaris-Castellar]] upon Silvestro Fiteni (on behalf of his wife Generosa daughter of Cesare Passalacqua, see also A.O.M. 471, ff. 273r-273v). Fiteni was invested on the 22 December 1646. Similar reference is made to the fief of Gomerino described as granted out by [[Frederick King of Sicily]] to Guglielmo Surdo, and after having been purchased by [[Grand Master Giovanni La Valette]], it was conferred not as a [[fief]] but as [[allodial]] property by [[Grand Master Wignacourt]] to Gio Maria Cassia, from whom they were conveyed to Beatrice Cassia. Beatrice was later together with her husband Paolo Testaferrata to be granted a title (Baron) by the name of that property.
In the report we find reference to the fief of Budack as one being of a very old erection granted out to the Proto Medico Nicolo Cilia, by whose death it had reverted to the Crown, and was on the 22 December 1646 reconferred by [[Grand Master Juan de Lascaris-Castellar]] upon Silvestro Fiteni (on behalf of his wife Generosa daughter of Cesare Passalacqua, see also A.O.M. 471, ff. 273r-273v). Fiteni was invested on the 22 December 1646. Similar reference is made to the fief of Gomerino described as granted out by [[Frederick King of Sicily]] to Guglielmo Surdo, and after having been purchased by Grand Master [[Jean Parisot de la Valette]], it was conferred not as a [[fief]] but as [[allodial]] property by Grand Master [[Alof de Wignacourt]] to Gio Maria Cassia, from whom they were conveyed to Beatrice Cassia. Beatrice was later together with her husband Paolo Testaferrata to be granted a title (Baron) by the name of that property.


Modern historians note that the oldest known fief in Malta was that of Tabria held by the Barba family in 1316. However, data (see Table 7) is incomplete and there may be even older fiefs.
Modern historians note that the oldest known fief in Malta was that of Tabria held by the Barba family in 1316. However, data (see Table 7) is incomplete and there may be even older fiefs.
Line 271: Line 279:
In terms of the 1739 legislation, as confirmed in 1795, for any foreign title to enjoy precedence it had to be registered in Malta against payment of a fee.
In terms of the 1739 legislation, as confirmed in 1795, for any foreign title to enjoy precedence it had to be registered in Malta against payment of a fee.


[[image: Cappella_dei_magi,_giovanni_viii_paleologo.jpg‎ |thumb|100px|right| The byzantine emperor [[John VIII Palaiologos]] (1392-1448). In 1744, Grand Master [[Manuel Pinto de Fonseca]] allowed the registration of documents proving the descent of the Maltese Wzzini Paleologo family from the most august Paleologo family of Comneno Angelo Lascaris and Duca, of the Emperors of the East.]]


{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
Line 278: Line 287:
! Title || Created/invested by || In favour of || Date of creation/succession || A.O.M. Reference || Date of Registration
! Title || Created/invested by || In favour of || Date of creation/succession || A.O.M. Reference || Date of Registration
|-
|-
| Conte Preziosi || created by [[Victor-Amadeus]], [[King of Sicily]], [[Duke of Savoy]] &c, and [[Perpetual Vicar of the Empire]] || in favour of Giuseppe Preziosi || on the 19th October 1718 || Reference A.O.M. 524, f. 139r || registered in Malta on the 20 June 1720
| Conte Preziosi || created by Victor-Amadeus, [[King of Sicily]], [[Duke of Savoy]] &c, and Perpetual Vicar of the Empire || in favour of Giuseppe Preziosi || on the 19th October 1718 || Reference A.O.M. 524, f. 139r || registered in Malta on the 20 June 1720
|-
|-
| Conte Piscopo di Mont' Alto in the [[Duchy of Parma]] , together with the fief of Monte Alto || created by [[Francis I (Farnese)]], [[Duke of Parma]] at [[Piacenza]] || at the request of Bernardo Piscopo || on the 8 July 1720 || Reference A.O.M. 525, f. 111r-112r || registered in Malta on the 2 September 1721
| Conte Piscopo di Mont' Alto in the [[Duchy of Parma]] , together with the fief of Monte Alto || created by Francis I (Farnese), [[Duke of Parma]] at [[Piacenza]] || at the request of Bernardo Piscopo || on the 8 July 1720 || Reference A.O.M. 525, f. 111r-112r || registered in Malta on the 2 September 1721
|-
|-
| Marchese De Piro || created by [[Philip V, King of Spain] || in favour of the Barone Gio Pio De Piro || on the 6 November 1742 || Reference A.O.M. 627, unpaginated || registered in Malta on the 8 October 1743.
| Marchese De Piro || created by [[Philip V, King of Spain] || in favour of the Barone Gio Pio De Piro || on the 6 November 1742 || Reference A.O.M. 627, unpaginated || registered in Malta on the 8 October 1743.
Line 300: Line 309:


== Colonial Malta – The Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility ==
== Colonial Malta – The Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility ==
[[ image: Adeodata_Pisani.jpg‎|thumb|100px|left| A [[portrait]] of The [[Blessed]] [[Maria Adeodata Pisani]] (1806-1855) daughter of the Baron Pisani of Frigenuini]]
[[image: Palazzo_del_Grande_Maestro.esterno.jpg |thumb|100px|right| Detail of the Grand Master’s Palace in [[Valletta]] Malta. The only title granted by Grand Master [[Francisco Ximenes de Texada]] was the regrant of Barone di Frigenuini. This title was not considered by the Royal Commission.]]


After Malta became a Colony of Britain, the unregulated and improper use of titles of nobility and other honours was tolerated by the local authorities who were themselves found to be at fault for encouraging such improper use. Throughout this period, a group known as the Assembly of Maltese Nobles is known to have functioned at this time but it did not enjoy any official role.
After Malta became a Colony of Britain, the unregulated and improper use of titles of nobility and other honours was tolerated by the local authorities who were themselves found to be at fault for encouraging such improper use. Throughout this period, a group known as the Assembly of Maltese Nobles is known to have functioned at this time but it did not enjoy any official role.
Line 550: Line 561:
== Separate recommendations of a Committee of Privileges of the Maltese Nobility ==
== Separate recommendations of a Committee of Privileges of the Maltese Nobility ==


[[image: Emmanuel_Pinto_de_Fonseca.jpg |thumb|100px|right| A [[portrait]] of Grand Master [[Manuel Pinto da Fonseca]]. He created the first Maltese [[comital]] titles of Bahria and Catena. He granted anew the title of Barone della Marsa and also oversaw the succession of the title of Barone di San Marciano. In 1883, a separate committee credited Pinto with having created the marchional titles of Testaferrata Olivier and Cassar Desain.]]


By a Despatch dated 16 August 1882, issued by the British Secretary of State for the Colonies, through the intervention of Sir George Bowyer, a Special Committee was set up namely a Committee “with functions analogous to those of the Committee of Privileges in the House of Lords (of the United Kingdom)”. The first Committee was composed of the Conte Ciantar Paleologo, the Marchese Apap Bologna di Gnien is-Sultan, the Marchese de Piro, the Marchese Delicata di Ghajn Qajjet and the Monsignor Count Manduca di Mont’ Alto. The stated purpose of the committee was to take into consideration the cases of those title-holders ('Titolati') who were not included by the Commissioners Judges Naudi and Pullicino, in the list of Titolati prepared by them for the local government. In addition the Committee was allowed to report from time to time to the Secretary of State for the Colonies on any matter affecting the Maltese Nobility or their rights, claims or privileges, or to bring such matter to the foot of throne by petition to the British Sovereign.
By a Despatch dated 16 August 1882, issued by the British Secretary of State for the Colonies, through the intervention of Sir George Bowyer, a Special Committee was set up namely a Committee “with functions analogous to those of the Committee of Privileges in the House of Lords (of the United Kingdom)”. The first Committee was composed of the Conte Ciantar Paleologo, the Marchese Apap Bologna di Gnien is-Sultan, the Marchese de Piro, the Marchese Delicata di Ghajn Qajjet and the Monsignor Count Manduca di Mont’ Alto. The stated purpose of the committee was to take into consideration the cases of those title-holders ('Titolati') who were not included by the Commissioners Judges Naudi and Pullicino, in the list of Titolati prepared by them for the local government. In addition the Committee was allowed to report from time to time to the Secretary of State for the Colonies on any matter affecting the Maltese Nobility or their rights, claims or privileges, or to bring such matter to the foot of throne by petition to the British Sovereign.
Line 629: Line 641:


== Later changes to the Maltese Nobility ==
== Later changes to the Maltese Nobility ==
[[Image:BnietBuq.JPG |thumb|100px|right| A [[photograph]] , circa 1890, of The Baroness of Djar el Bniet et Bucana, Maria Francesca Sceberras D'Amico Inguanez (1865-1947) wife of Colonel [[Alexander Chalmers McKeon]]. The Royal Commissioners ante-dated the title of Djar il-Bniet et Bucana to 1350 and awarded it to her great-aunt Maria D’Amico.]]


Historians criticize the final list approved by the British Colonial Administration for being various reasons including anachronisms, perpetuation of some extinct titles, and historically inaccurate and/or incomplete data, e.g. although it results (see table 7 below) that the fief of Djar il-Bniet was held by the Gacto family in 1350/51, that same fief appears to have been held by the Osa family in 1376.
Historians criticize the final list approved by the British Colonial Administration for being various reasons including anachronisms, perpetuation of some extinct titles, and historically inaccurate and/or incomplete data, e.g. although it results (see table 7 below) that the fief of Djar il-Bniet was held by the Gacto family in 1350/51, that same fief appears to have been held by the Osa family in 1376.
Line 649: Line 662:


== Present day ==
== Present day ==
[[ image: Gerald Strickland 1930s.jpg|thumb|100px|right| A [[photograph]] of Lord [[Gerald Strickland]] (1861-1940). In 1883, the [[Privy Council]] upheld his claim to the private entail governing the title of Conte della Catena by reason of his being the most senior male descendant in terms of the grant, thereby dismissing claims based only on proximity to the last holder.]]


The last vestiges of the nobility under the Grand Masters, were steadily done away with. In 1950, succession by entail was abolished in Malta under the [[Premiership]] of [[Paul Boffa]] by Act 12 of 1950 dated 5 May 1950. This was followed in 1969, under the Premiership of [[Giorgio Borg Olivier]] by an abolition of succession by fief by Act 30 of 1969 dated 21 November, 1969. Provision is made in the later law that nothing shall affect any title of nobility, and the laws in force concerning any such titles shall continue to have effect.
The last vestiges of the nobility under the Grand Masters, were steadily done away with. In 1950, succession by entail was abolished in Malta under the [[Premiership]] of [[Paul Boffa]] by Act 12 of 1950 dated 5 May 1950. This was followed in 1969, under the Premiership of [[Giorgio Borg Olivier]] by an abolition of succession by fief by Act 30 of 1969 dated 21 November, 1969. Provision is made in the later law that nothing shall affect any title of nobility, and the laws in force concerning any such titles shall continue to have effect.
Line 656: Line 670:
Montalto reports that although the nobles still exist, their numbers have certainly dwindled, and some titles have fallen into abeyance – for instance the Counts of Bahria and Senia and Marquises of Taflia and Ghajn Qajjet. He continues, saying that it is usual for Petitions to be presented to the Committee of Privileges by claimants, but it is unusual for decisions to be taken. He reports that the Committee still meets, but its function is now a little obscure.
Montalto reports that although the nobles still exist, their numbers have certainly dwindled, and some titles have fallen into abeyance – for instance the Counts of Bahria and Senia and Marquises of Taflia and Ghajn Qajjet. He continues, saying that it is usual for Petitions to be presented to the Committee of Privileges by claimants, but it is unusual for decisions to be taken. He reports that the Committee still meets, but its function is now a little obscure.


A revival of interest in the subject was noted in the early 1980s with a feted publication by [[John (Attard-) Montalto]] and a series of articles and books by [[Charles A. Gauci]], and since then it appears that that Committee has revived a number of titles. Moreover, the Gauci publications reports how that Committee has revisited the criteria of recognition of other titles which did not form part of the list approved by the British Colonial Authorities.
A revival of interest in the subject was noted in the early 1980s with a feted publication by [[John Attard Montalto]] and a series of articles and books by [[Charles A. Gauci]], and since then it appears that that Committee has revived a number of titles. Moreover, the Gauci publications reports how that Committee has revisited the criteria of recognition of other titles which did not form part of the list approved by the British Colonial Authorities.


Two related lawsuits decided in the early 21st century, one “Ramsay vs Bugeja” the other “Bugeja Viani vs Attorney General” regarding claims to the title of Barone della Tabria highlights the obligation not to recognize any title of nobility.
Two related lawsuits decided in the early 21st century, one “Ramsay vs Bugeja” the other “Bugeja Viani vs Attorney General” regarding claims to the title of Barone della Tabria highlights the obligation not to recognize any title of nobility.

Revision as of 10:46, 10 November 2009

A portrait of Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc. He created many new titles, including the first Maltese title of marquis (Scriop el Hagin). The Royal Commissioners remarked that not all titles created by him were hereditary and that of the rest some have much wider remainders. In 1795 Rohan amended the legislation previously enacted by Grand Master Despuig.
A portrait of Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena. In 1725, he curtailed the abuse of the titles of "Most Illustrious" and "Noble". Vilhena also created the new titles of Barone della Marsa, Barone di San Marciano and Barone della Tabria. The Royal Commissioners credited Vilhena with being the first to directly recognize the titles of Barone di Djar il-Bniet et Bucana, Barone di Cicciano and Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri.

The Maltese Nobility was a complex structure of documented titles of nobility and other hereditary rights favouring certain local families which was governed by a system of grants, registrations and other recognitions made by the Grand Masters of the Order of Saint John during its Government of Malta (1530-1798).

Although suzerainty over Malta was retained by the King of Sicily in the sense that the annual payment of a falcon was made as a feudal due, in reality Malta, under the Knights, had the principal attributes of a sovereign state, and therefore the power to bestow titles.

The Maltese Nobility

According to the Report of the Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility (published 1878), there were three categories of titles of nobility which enjoy precedence in Malta, the first being those created by the Grand Masters of the Order of Saint John during its Government of Malta (1530-1798), the second are those created by previous sovereigns of the islands but were accepted by the government of the Order, and the third are those which were bestowed upon Maltese in foreign jurisdictions but were accepted by the government of the Order. The three categories are described below.

As for the remaining category (the fourth), the Commission also concluded that the Grand Masters assigned no place to title-holders who had obtained titles from foreign sovereigns, but whose patents were not duly registered or at least directly recognised by the Grand Masters during their government of the Maltese Islands. The third and fourth category make up the original Foreign titles of nobility in Malta.

Political map of Europe circa 1740 showing the Maltese Islands as independent of Sicily and Spain. At that time, the Grand Master was Ramon Despuig to whom is credited the new titles of Barone di Culeja, Barone di Benuarrat and Barone di Frigenuini and the 1739 rules of precedence amongst the Maltese Nobility. He also oversaw the succession of the title of Barone di Gomerino.

The Grand Masters legislated on matters relating to the Maltese Nobility as a general body on 16 September 1739 (Despuig) and the 17 March 1795 (Grand Master Rohan). The legislation of the 30 April 1725 (Vilhena) is regarded as specific to the individual beneficiaries mentioned further below. These legislations are all mentioned in the Commissioners’ Report.

The nobility was abolished by Napoleon Bonaparte but some 80 years later it regained an official status. The Maltese Nobility is unique in the British Commonwealth because it is the only European nobility to have been examined by a British Royal Commission appointed for that purpose. A handful of Foreign titles are regarded as considering part of the Maltese Nobility. Nowadays Malta is a Republic and titles of Nobility are officially no longer recognized.

The 1739 legislation reads as follows:

The Master of the Hospital at Jerusalem and of the Holy Sepulchre – To remove
       differences about precedency among the persons who will be appointed to the  
       Juratships of the Universities of Notabile and Valletta, it is our will and 
       pleasure, and we ordain and command, that they shall all be preceded by the 
       undermentioned and that among the latter the precedency be regulated in the 
       following order, namely:
          First: Any person who was Capitano della Verga of the said City Notabile and of 
          our Island of Malta.
          Second: the 'Titolato having a title founded on a fief really existing here,  
          though he may not be in possession of it'.
          Third: The Titolato who has not a title founded upon a fief really existing in 
          our dominions, on the registration of the title in the Chancery of our 
          Religion, and in the High Court of the Castellania, and the payment, for the 
          respective registrations, of 116 scudi of our money, to be divided in equal 
          shares between the said Chancery and Castellania.
          Fourth: A 'descendant in the male line from any person who was Capitano della 
          Verga, if he lives on rents of his own property, and if his intermediate 
          ancestors lived also on the rents of their own property'.
          Fifth: A 'descendant in the male line from a Titolato, with title founded on 
          a fief really existing here, if he lives on rent of his own property, and if his 
          intermediate ancestors lived also on such rent.
          Sixth: Any person who was First Jurat of Notabile.
          Seventh: Any person who was First Jurat of Valletta.
          Eighth: The most senior Jurat of the University to which he belongs.
          Ninth: Any person who was Judge of Appeal, Criminal Judge, or Civil Judge of 
          the Court of the Castellania, or the Courts Capitanale and Governatoriale.
          Tenth: A Doctor of Law, or a Doctor of Medicine. 
       We declare that, among persons of equal rank, the antiquity of the original 
       title must be attended to, and that a person who was a Jurat, if he be appointed 
       Console di Mare, shall have precedence over other Consoli, and amongst the latter 
       the precedency shall be regulated by the antiquity of the appointment.
       Given at the Palace, 16th September 1739 (Signed) Despuig

The 1795 legislation reads as follows:

The Master of the Hospital at Jerusalem, of the Holy Sepulchre and of the Order  
        of St. Anthony of Vienna – It being a principle universally acknowledged that the 
        lustre of Nobility principally depends on its greater antiquity, nothing is more 
        just and reasonable than that the older Nobles should have precedence over the more 
        recent. We have therefore determined to ordain that, in regulating the precedency 
        among the Nobles of this our dominion, whether first-born or cadets 
        indiscriminately, regard shall be had only to the greater or lesser 
        antiquity of the title by which their family was ennobled, whether that title had 
        been granted by ourselves or by our predecessors, or by foreign princes, provided 
        however, it was registered in our Chancery, and in the High Court of the 
        Castellania. In cases, however, of grants bearing the same date, the person 
        possessing two or more titles, shall have precedence over another who has less 
        titles, according to the rule established by the magisterial decree of our 
        lamented predecessor, Grand Master Despuig of the 16th September 1739, which in any 
        part not inconsistent with our present enactment, we confirm in its entirety. Given 
        at the Palace, 17th March 1795 (signed) Rohan.”

The 1725 legislation reads as follows:

        “Of Titles – Prammatica – His Most Serene Highness in virtue of the present 
        enactment, about to be of perpetual value, wishing to remedy the abuses and 
        inconveniences for time introduced in the matter of title, - orders and commands 
        that from today henceforth, no Advocate, Notary, or Registrar of this our 
        Dominion, shall dare to give the title of “Most Illustrious” or “Noble” in 
        writings, contracts, or public documents to any of our vassals, with the exception 
        of the “Capitano della Verga”, pro tempore, and the two Jurats of our city of 
        Notabile and Valletta, and the Milite Barone Marco Antonio Inguanez, our Feudatory, 
        with the Baroness Inguanez, his wife, and their descendants, under pain in case of 
        contravention, as regards advocates of suspension, and as regards Notaries and 
        Registrar, of privation of office, and other penalties at pleasure of His Most 
        Serene Highness, 30th day of the month of April 1725. 
        The present enactment was read and published in the usual and customary public 
        places in the cities of Valletta, Vittoriosa, Senglea and Burmula with sound of 
        trumpet, the people in part assembled, listening and understanding, the Registrar 
        himself M.C. Castelle reading, and Joseph Vella, crying in a loud and intelligible 
        voice.”


Titles of Nobility in Malta - First Category

A portrait of Grand Master Ramon Perellos y Roccaful. He created the titles of Barone di Gomerino and Barone di Budacco which are the oldest of the titles in the first category later considered by the British Royal Commissioners. The Royal Commissioners did not consider a claim by Giuseppe De Piro that the title of Budacco was extinct.

With little exception, each title created by the Grand Masters is regulated by its own grant. Some grants were made in perpetuity, others on a personal basis, some allow females to hold them and some limit succession to males only. Most of the hereditary ones are subject to investiture. However Montalto reports that although some successors failed to get invested, this did not always bring about a forfeiture.

Of those grants which provided for a remainder , the earlier ones allow only singular succession whilst some of the later ones (notably creations by Grand Master Rohan) had wider remainders.

The remainder of some grants was made subject to private entails or primogenitura (a type of Trust which determines the mode of succession of certain properties) already held by the grantees, e.g. In their Report the Royal Commissioners identified the title of Conte della Catena as one which was to follow the order of succession stated in a masculine primogeniture established by the Canon Alessandro Perdicomati Bologna.

The Royal Commission remarked that very few titles of this category require the tenure of the property, explaining that in most cases the titles were merely honorific, the property/fief remaining in possession of the Government or of its allodial owner, e.g. although the title of Barone di Budac was created in 1716 in favour of Gio Pio De Piro, the property by that name – the fief of Budac - which had previously been enfeoffed in favour of Nicolo Cilia in 1644 was not granted to the Depiro family.

Even if possession of the property coincided in the person of the possessor of the title of nobility of the same name, the later transfer of that property did not affect the tenure of the title of nobility, e.g. when Beatrice Testaferrata transferred the allodial fief of Gomerino unto her son Fabrizio in 1713, she remainded officially in possession of the title of Barone di Gomerino and was succeded by her other son Ercole Martino as results from the acts of 1725 and 1737.

The titles and investitures made by the Grand Masters are detailed in Table 1 below:-

TABLE 1 (First Category). List of titles and investitures made by the Grand Masters (source: Montalto ‘Nobles of Malta’ and 'Copies or Extracts of Correspondence with reference to the Maltese Nobility (In Continuation of C-3812) presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty, May 1886, sub-Enclosure in Enclosure No. 3 in the letter from Governor Simmons to The Earl of Derby dated 28 October 1884':- NOTE: there are variances of 1 year in regard to some titles: This is because in the libri bullarum and libri conciliorum of the Archives of the Order, the reckoning of time differs from other dating. The years begin on the 25 March for the new year, and therefore between Christmas (25 December) and Lady Day (25 March), the reckoning of time just proceeds with the current year, adding the term ‘ab Incarnatione’. Thus 1 January 1501 would be reckoned as 1 January 1500 ab Incarnatione and so on until 24 March next day will be 25 March 1501.) .
Title of Nobility Created/invested by In favour of Date of creation/succession A.O.M. Reference Date of Investiture
Barone Testaferrata di Gomerino created by Grand Master Ramon Perellos y Roccaful in favour of Paolo and Beatrice Testaferrata (jointly) on the 24 December 1710 Reference A.O.M. 514, ff. 129v-134v. They were invested on the 10 January 1711
Barone De Piro di Budac created by Grand Master Ramon Perellos y Roccaful in favour of Gio Pio De Piro on the 23 April 1716 Reference A.O.M. 520, ff. 151r, 161r-161v. He was invested on 25 April 1716
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Milite Barone Marc' Antonio Inguanez and his wife Baroness Inguanez on the 30 April 1725 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Barone di Cicciano Fabritio Testaferrata and his mother the Baronessa di Gomerino Beatrice Cassia Testaferrata on the 11 May 1725 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Barone Castelletti della Marsa created by Grand Master Antonio Manoel de Vilhena in favour of Ferdinando Castelletti on the 12 June 1725 Reference A.O.M. 529 ff. 140r-140v He was invested on 19 June 1725.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri Mario Testaferrata on the 9 July 1725 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Carlo Falzon and Eleonora Testaferrata on the 13 June 1726 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Barone Galea Feriolo di San Marciano created by Grand Master Antonio Manoel de Vilhena in favour of Diego Antonio Galea Feriolo on the 14 June 1726 A.O.M. 530, ff. 135r-135v He was invested on the 17 August 1726.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Barone di San Marciano Diego Galea Feriolo on the 2 September 1726 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Barone Barone Gio Pio de Piro on the 19 March 1727 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Barone Viani della Tabria created by Grand Master Antonio Manoel de Vilhena in favour of Isidoro Viani on the 11 December 1728 Reference A.O.M. 532, ff. 139v-140r He was invested on the 21 December 1728.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Canon Giuseppe di Costanzo and Donna Rosa widow of Gio Battista di Costanzo on the 24 May 1729 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Barone Isidoro Viani on the 27 June 1730 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Baldassare Bonnici on the 13 January 1732 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on Calcerano Mompalao, Giuseppe and Caterina Cuschieri on the 6 March 1732 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Manoel de Vilhena on D. Vincenzo Platamone and Antonio Bonnici sometime between 27 June 1730 and 13 January 1732 (implied: see Copies or Extracts of Correspondence with reference to the Maltese Nobility (In Continuation of C-3812) presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty, May 1886, sub-Enclosure in Enclosure No. 3 in the letter from Governor Simmons to The Earl of Derby dated 28 October 1884) Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
title of Barone di Gomerino invested by Grand Master Ramon Despuig in favour of the Noble Ercole Martino Testaferrata created by Perellos on the 24 December 1710 (see above). The investiture refers to a private deed dated 1734. Reference A.O.M. 541, ff. 184r He was invested on the 1 May 1737
Barone Bonnici della Culeja created by Grand Master Ramon Despuig in favour of Ignazio Bonnici on the 2 June 1737 Reference A.O.M. 541, ff. 188r-188v He was invested on the same day.
Barone Gatto di Benuarrat created by Grand Master Ramon Despuig in favour of Saverio Gatto on the 18 August 1737 Reference A.O.M. 541, ff, 191r-191v. He was invested on the same day.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Ramon Despuig on Barone Saverio Gatt on the 23 August 1737 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Barone Mompalao di Frigenuini (First Creation) created by Grand Master Ramon Despuig in favour of Alessandro Mompalao on the 17 September 1737 Reference A.O.M. 541, ff. 197r-197v He was invested on the same day.
right to be styled Illustrissimo conferred by Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca on Signor Ludovico Bianchi on the 25 October 1741 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Conte Muscati Falsone Navarra della Bahria created by Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca in favour of Ignazio Muscati Falsone Navarra on the 16 May 1743 Reference A.O.M. 547, ff. 165r-166r He was invested on the 23 May 1743.
Conte Perdicomati Bologna della Catena created by Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca in favour of Pietro Gaetano Perdicomati Bologna on the 20 January 1745. The grant subjected the title to a private agnatic entail established by Canon Don Alessandro Perdicomati Bologna Reference A.O.M. 549, ff. 174r-174v He was invested on the 20 January 1745.
title of Barone di San Marciano invested by Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca in favour of the Noble Lorenzo Galea Feriol created by Vilhena on the 14 June 1726 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 553, ff. 133v He was invested on the 9 June 1749
Barone Azzopardi Casteletti della Marsa (Second creation) created by Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca in favour of Giovanni Antonio Azzopardi Castelletti on the 4 December 1753 Reference A.O.M. 557, ff. 175r-176v. He was invested on the 13 January 1754.
Barone Pisani di Frigenuini (Second creation) created by Grand Master Francisco Ximenes de Texada in favour of Gaetano Pisani on the 17 June 1773 Reference A.O.M. 577, ff. 195v-196r. He was invested on the 21 June 1773.
Marchese Muscati Xiberras di Sciorp il-Hagin created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Claudio Muscati Xiberras on the 8 March 1776 Reference A.O.M. 579, ff 344r-344v. He was invested on the 14 March 1776.
Barone Dorell Falzon della Marsa (Third creation) created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Gio Francesco Dorell Falzon on the 10 March 1776 Reference A.O.M. 579, ff. 345r-346v. He was invested on the 14 March 1776.
Barone Azzopardi di Buleben created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Gaetano Azzopardi on the 23 July 1777 Reference A.O.M. 581, ff. 246v-247r. He was invested on the 27 July 1777.
title of Barone di Buleben extended by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc - created by Rohan on the 23 July 1777 (see above) Extended on the 25 April 1778 -
Marchese Barbaro di San Giorgio created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Carlo Antonio Barbaro on the 6 September 1778 Reference A.O.M. 582, ff. 282v-283v He was invested on the 23 September 1778.
title of Marchese di San Giorgio extended by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc - created by Rohan on the 6 September 1778 (see above) Extended on the 2 February 1779 -
Barone Gauci created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Francesco Gauci on the 23 December 1781 Reference A.O.M. 585, ff. 107r.). No record of investiture.
title of Barone di Benuarrat invested by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Emmanuele Muscati on behalf of his wife[Paola created by Despuig on the 18 August 1737 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 1194, ff. 49r-50r, 52r-57r He was invested on the 20 February 1783
Conte Gatt di Beberrua created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Luigi (Ludovico) Gatt on the 23 October 1783 Reference A.O.M. 587, ff. 294r-299r.). He was invested on the 14 December 1783.
Marchese Mompalao della Taflia created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Gio Battista Mompalao on the 25 October 1783 Reference A.O.M. 587, ff, 294v, 299r.). He was invested on the 24 December 1783.
title of Barone della Tabria invested by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Giuseppe Testaferrata Viani created by Vilhena on the 11 December 1728 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 589, ff, 323r He was invested on the 22 October 1784
Marchese Mallia Tabone del Fiddien created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Salvatore Mallia Tabone on the 15 October 1785 Reference A.O.M. 591, ff. 263r-264r.). He was invested on the 3 November 1785.
title of Barone di Buleben invested by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Calcedonio Azopardi created by Rohan on the 23 July 1777 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 582, ff. 264r He was invested on the 10 August 1788
Marchese Alessi della Taflia created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Saverio Alessi on the 15 October 1785 Reference A.O.M. 609, ff, 183v-184r.). He was invested on the 17 November 1790.
title of Barone di San Marciano invested by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of the Noble Giovanni Galea Feriolo created by Vilhena on the 14 June 1726 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 627, unpag He was invested on the 24 November 1791
Conte di Ghain Toffieha created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc, by rescript, in favour of Ferdinando Teuma Castelletti on the 7 January 1792 Reference A.O.M. 612, f. 198r. He was invested on the 19 December 1792.
title of Marchese di San Giorgio extended again by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc - created by Rohan on the 6 September 1778 (see above) Extended on the 5 June 1792 -
Barone Calleja di San Cosmo created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Ugolino Calleja on the 27 November 1792 Reference A.O.M. 613, f, 187v. He was invested on the 19 December 1792.
Marchese Apap di Gnien Is-Sultan created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Filippo Apap on the 1 December 1792 Reference A.O.M. 613, ff. 188r He was invested on the 19 December 1792.
title of Marchese del Fiddien extended in part by a rescript of Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc - created by Rohan on the 15 October 1785 (see above) Extended on the 15 June 1793 -
Conte Barbaro di Santi created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Romualdo Barbaro on the 14 January 1794 Reference A.O.M. 615, ff, 127v-127v He was invested on the 12 February 1794.
Conte Marchesi di Meimun created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Saverio Marchesi on the 8 March 1794 Reference A.O.M. 615, ff, 134v-135r He was invested on the 2 April 1794.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc on Dr. Ugolino Bonnici on the 5 September 1794 Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
Barone Carbott Testaferrata della Grua created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Saverio Carbott Testaferrata on the 30 December 1794 Reference A.O.M. 617, ff. 135r He was invested on the 4 February 1795.
Conte Fontani della Senia created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Vincenzo Fontani on the 6 June 1795 Reference A.O.M. 619, ff. 87v-88r No record of investiture.
Marchese Delicata di Ghain Kajet created by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Geronimo Delicata on the 4 June 1796 Reference A.O.M. 621, f. 75-75v He was invested on the 13 June 1796.
right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred by Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc on Dr. Saverio Crispo sometime between 5 September 1794 and 11 June 1798 (implied: see Copies or Extracts of Correspondence with reference to the Maltese Nobility (In Continuation of C-3812) presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty, May 1886, sub-Enclosure in Enclosure No. 3 in the letter from Governor Simmons to The Earl of Derby dated 28 October 1884) Refer to Decree of 30 April 1725 (Investiture not contemplated)
To this list one adds the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia (see Second Category, below). (see Second Category, below) (see Second Category, below). (see Second Category, below). (see Second Category, below).


Titles of Nobility in Malta – Second Category

File:Martin de Redin SOM.jpg
A portrait of Grand Master Martin de Redin. In 1658, he invested the Magnificus Pietro Cassia in the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia. Nothing in the text supports the view that this fief was regarded as a barony at that date
A portrait of Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim. He was the last Grand Master to rule Malta. In 1797, he invested Felicita Chiara Sant in the baronial fief of Ghariescem et Tabia. This was the fourth time that the fief was formally acknowledged as baronial by the Grand Masters.

Following the Royal Commissioners’ Report, it does not appear that any titles of Nobility claimed in 1878, actually existed in Malta as titles created by grant or patent before the advent of the Knights: Undoubtedly there were [possessors] of land in Malta who held by military tenure, under the Kings of Sicily. But mere military tenure even by tenants ‘in capite’ whether in England or Sicily, did not and does not constitute a privilege of honour (“peerage”). The Grand Masters upheld this view by practically creating a new title as a recognition of established custom, in a case where a holder of land by military service had vulgarly come to be known as a Baron, and the Sovereign had been induced to acquiesce. Large landowners in Sicily were often called “Barons” without any justification, and obsequious lawyers and officials habitually called their clients as they desired to be addressed; Malta was no exception.

Thus, although according to strict law, no titles are traceable in Malta created by an existing title of Nobility previous to the rule of the Grand Masters, the effect of the Royal Commission was that certain titles having their legal foundation in a recognition by the Grand Masters were ante-dated, for purposes of precedence only, to coincide with the date of grants of land under a military tenure which is inferior to a baronial tenure.

In their Report the Royal Commissioners made a distinction between a noble fief and a simple fief. The latter is granted without entitlement of any honour whatsoever, whilst the holder of the former is by Custom held to be a Baron. In addition to this, a money grant was made in lieu of a fief. In return for the fief or money grant the recipient was to render services to the crown, usually by way of military service or supplies of horses and weapons.

The honours implied in noble fiefs are succeeded by qualified descent, not necessarily by Primogeniture: to succeed the honour, one must be in possession of the same fief originally granted to the ancestor who first received it. Fiefs could not be owned but held: they could at times be forfeited, confiscated or extinguished. If the property is lost then the honours are extinguished. Table 7 shows how many fiefs in Malta were held by different families at short time intervals.

The Commissioners identified only one extant fief which devolved directly from the Aragonese sovereigns of Malta, namely the fief of Djar el-Bniet et Bucana. A 19th century claim maintained that the fief of Ghariescem et Tabia was also granted by the Aragonese kings. However, it was proven that the original fief had been extinguished and that the claimant could only make a claim on the basis of a later grant in fief made by the Grand Masters. The Commissioners did not consider any of the other fiefs which had been made by the Kings of Sicily and the Grand Masters. Moreover the Commission did not consider any money grants granted in lieu of a property tenure.

In the report we find reference to the fief of Budack as one being of a very old erection granted out to the Proto Medico Nicolo Cilia, by whose death it had reverted to the Crown, and was on the 22 December 1646 reconferred by Grand Master Juan de Lascaris-Castellar upon Silvestro Fiteni (on behalf of his wife Generosa daughter of Cesare Passalacqua, see also A.O.M. 471, ff. 273r-273v). Fiteni was invested on the 22 December 1646. Similar reference is made to the fief of Gomerino described as granted out by Frederick King of Sicily to Guglielmo Surdo, and after having been purchased by Grand Master Jean Parisot de la Valette, it was conferred not as a fief but as allodial property by Grand Master Alof de Wignacourt to Gio Maria Cassia, from whom they were conveyed to Beatrice Cassia. Beatrice was later together with her husband Paolo Testaferrata to be granted a title (Baron) by the name of that property.

Modern historians note that the oldest known fief in Malta was that of Tabria held by the Barba family in 1316. However, data (see Table 7) is incomplete and there may be even older fiefs.

The investitures of the seventeenth century were not only made the Grand Masters but also by the Council of the Order, as show in Table 2 below:-

TABLE 2 (Second Category). List of grants and investitures of fiefs by the Council of the Order (source: Montalto ‘Nobles of Malta’):- (N.b. For explanations of variances of 1 year, see Table 1 above)
Fief Created/invested by In favour of Date of creation/succession A.O.M. Reference Date of Investiture
land ta ghariescem ceded in fief Grand Master Juan de Lascaris-Castellar in favour of Giacinto Cassia on the 14 April 1638 Reference A.O.M. 467, ff. 265r He was invested on the 16 April 1638.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Juan de Lascaris-Castellar in favour of Magnificus Gio. Antonio Cassia originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 475, ff. 283r He was invested on the 11 January 1655.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Martin de Redin y Cruzat in favour of Magnificus Pietro Cassia originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 476, ff. 208r). He was invested on the 13 August 1658.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Gregorio Carafa in favour of Domenica Cassia, wife of Stanislao Xara, filia vero quondam Magnifici Petri Cassia J.U.D. olim Baronis de Ghariescem et Tabia originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) - She was invested on the 21 August 1689.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Marcantonio Zondadari in favour of quod quidem Pheudum ad eum uti dicta quondam Nobilis Baronissae Domonicae Cassia et Xara filium primogenitum pervenit, ad quod supradictum Nobilem Petrum Paulum Xara originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 525, ff. 119v He was invested on the 28 August 1721.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc in favour of Nobilis Stanislaus Xara quondam Nobilis Petri Pauli Xara Pheudi de Ghariescem et Tabia Baronis filius primogenitus originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 553, ff. 132r He was invested on the 8 April 1749.
the fief Ghariescem et Tabia Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim in favour of Felicita Chiara Sant filia vero primogenita quondam Magnificae Antoniae Bonnici sororis secundogenita quondam Magnifici Stanislai Xara olim Baronis De Ghariescem et Tabia originally granted in fief on the 14 April 1638 (see above) Reference A.O.M. 627 She was invested on the 20 August 1797.


Titles of Nobility in Malta – Third Category

In terms of the 1739 legislation, as confirmed in 1795, for any foreign title to enjoy precedence it had to be registered in Malta against payment of a fee.

The byzantine emperor John VIII Palaiologos (1392-1448). In 1744, Grand Master Manuel Pinto de Fonseca allowed the registration of documents proving the descent of the Maltese Wzzini Paleologo family from the most august Paleologo family of Comneno Angelo Lascaris and Duca, of the Emperors of the East.
TABLE 3 (Third Category). List of foreign titles registered at the Cancelleria of the Grand Masters (source: Montalto ‘Nobles of Malta’):- (N.b. For explanations of variances of 1 year, see Table 1 above)
Title Created/invested by In favour of Date of creation/succession A.O.M. Reference Date of Registration
Conte Preziosi created by Victor-Amadeus, King of Sicily, Duke of Savoy &c, and Perpetual Vicar of the Empire in favour of Giuseppe Preziosi on the 19th October 1718 Reference A.O.M. 524, f. 139r registered in Malta on the 20 June 1720
Conte Piscopo di Mont' Alto in the Duchy of Parma , together with the fief of Monte Alto created by Francis I (Farnese), Duke of Parma at Piacenza at the request of Bernardo Piscopo on the 8 July 1720 Reference A.O.M. 525, f. 111r-112r registered in Malta on the 2 September 1721
Marchese De Piro created by [[Philip V, King of Spain] in favour of the Barone Gio Pio De Piro on the 6 November 1742 Reference A.O.M. 627, unpaginated registered in Malta on the 8 October 1743.
Documents (including proof of descent from the “most august Paleologo family of Comneno Angelo Lascaris and Duca, of the Emperors of the East”) concerning to the reception of the Patrician of Rome Don Salvatore Wzzini Paleologo, a professed knight of the Military Order of Saint James in Portugal, and the Count Ignazio Francesco Wzzini Paleologo into the Military Order of Saint James and the Order of the House of Avis in the Kingdom of Portugal - in favour of the Wzzini Paleologo and Ciantar Paleologo families - Reference A.O.M. 548 registered in Malta on the 4th July 1744, exempted of payment of the fee.
title of Conte Piscopo di Mont' Alto amendment is assented by the Duke of Parma - on the 19 September 1724 Reference A.O.M. 548, f. 161v registered in Malta on the 14 July 1744
Conte Fenech Bonnici granted by Pope Benedict XIV in favour of Baldassare Fenech Bonnici on the 12th June 1748 Reference A.O.M. 554, ff. 173r-173v registered in Malta on the 27 April 1750
Conte Fournier in the Kingdom and Provinces of Germany conferred by Empress Maria Theresa by a patent given at Vienna to Giorgio Fournier de Pausier on the 29 January 1770 Reference A.O.M. 579, f. 349v registered in Malta on the 2 December 1775
Conte Sant in the Italian Provinces annexed to the German Empire conferred by Empress Maria Theresa by a patent given at Vienna to Salvatore Baldassare Sant on the 22 December 1770 Reference A.O.M. 579, f. 351v registered in Malta on the 12 December 1775
Barone Ciantar di San Giovanni created by Ferdinand I. King of the Two Sicilies, by a patent given at Palermo to Serafino Ciantar on the 16 July 1777 Reference A.O.M. 581, ff. 278v-279r. registered in Malta on the 17 January 1778.


Colonial Malta – The Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility

A portrait of The Blessed Maria Adeodata Pisani (1806-1855) daughter of the Baron Pisani of Frigenuini
Detail of the Grand Master’s Palace in Valletta Malta. The only title granted by Grand Master Francisco Ximenes de Texada was the regrant of Barone di Frigenuini. This title was not considered by the Royal Commission.

After Malta became a Colony of Britain, the unregulated and improper use of titles of nobility and other honours was tolerated by the local authorities who were themselves found to be at fault for encouraging such improper use. Throughout this period, a group known as the Assembly of Maltese Nobles is known to have functioned at this time but it did not enjoy any official role.

In 1876, an incident arose in connection with a visit by the Prince of Wales. Having felt slighted by the welcoming party, some members of the Assembly of Maltese Nobles led by the secretary the Marchese Cassar Desain retaliated by boycotting the reception.

After this incident a formal enquiry (the Royal Commission) was appointed to identify those Maltese who claimed a title of nobility which was granted, registered or otherwise recognised by the Grand Masters during their government of the Order. The Report was to be addressed to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.

The Commission was composed of two Maltese judges (Pullicino and Naudi) who received most of the claims through the Secretary of the Assembly of Nobles but ostensibly as the “Secretary of the Committee of Nobles originally formed on the occasion of the late visit of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales”. Claims to 3 other titles were received separately. The report and supplemental Report of the Royal Commission were completed by May 1878 and these were together with correspondences, formally presented to the British House of Commons.

The Commission’s Report specifically considers various titles of nobility. The titles claimed included some which were not formally registered in the Registry during the government of the Order. Some titles created by the Grand Masters were not claimed.

All the titles claimed were subjected to an investigation whether such titles were created by the Grand Masters (first category) ere noble fiefs (second) or foreign titles which were duly registered, or at least directly recognized (third) by the Grand Masters. Not all were found to satisfy this criterion.


TABLE 4. Noble titles listed by “a Committee of Nobles, originally formed on the occasion of the late visit of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales”: (source: Report of the Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility):- (N.b. For explanations of variances of 1 year, see Table 1 above)
Description of title claimed Name of Claimant Basis of claim
the aforesaid title of Barone di Gomerino claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela Moroni invoking the aforesaid grant dated 24th December 1710.
The same title of Barone di Gomerino claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Augusto Testaferrata Abela invoking a grant by Frederick II of Sicily and Aragon dated 13th November 1317 as well as the aforesaid grant dated 24th December 1710, as well as the will of his father Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela and that of his brother Francesco.
the aforesaid title of Barone di Budac claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Monsignor Salvatore Grech Delicata Testaferrata Cassia, Domestic Prelate to H.H. the Pope and Hon. Canon of the Gozo Cathedral invoking the aforesaid grant dated 23rd April 1716.
the aforesaid title of Barone della Marsa (First creation) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Alessandro Sceberras Testaferrata Damico Inguanez invoking the aforesaid grant dated 12 June 1725.
the aforesaid title of Barone di San Marciano claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Galea, whose father was appointed C.M.G on the 9th February 1833 invoking the aforesaid grant dated 14th June 1726.
the aforesaid title of Barone della Tabria claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giuseppe Testaferrata Viani invoking the aforesaid grant dated 11th December 1728.
the aforesaid title of Barone della Culeja claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Vincenza Bonici, wife of Baron Galea invoking the aforesaid grant dated 2nd June 1737.
the aforesaid title of Conte della Bahria claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Antonio Stagno Navarra Muscati Falsoni invoking the aforesaid grant dated 16th May 1473 (recte: 1743).
the aforesaid title of Conte della Catena claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Felicissimo Apap Pace Bologna, whose grandfather was a C.M.G invoking the aforesaid grant dated 20th January 1745 but the Committee noted that claim was “Sub judice”.
the aforesaid title of Barone di Buleben claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Calcedonio Azopardi Zamitt, whose father was appointed C.M.G. on the 28th March 1842, invoking the aforesaid grant dated 23rd July 1777 and the aforesaid act dated 25th April 1778.
the aforesaid title of Marchese di San Giorgio claimed by the Committee of Nobles by its English translation Marquis of St. George on behalf of George Crispo Barbaro invoking the aforesaid grant dated 2nd September 1778 and the aforesaid rescripts dated 2nd January 1779 and 5th June 1791.
the aforesaid title of Conte di Beberrua claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Nicolo’ Gatto, LL.D. invoking the aforesaid grant dated 23rd October 1783. Another date 14th December 1783 was also invoked.
the aforesaid title of Marchese del Fiddien claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Salvatore Mallia Tabone invoking the aforesaid grant dated 15th October 1785.
the aforesaid title of Marchese della Taflia (second creation, 1790 grant) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Bernardo Alessi invoking the aforesaid grant dated 13th November 1790.
the aforesaid title of Conte di Ghain Toffieha claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Theuma Castelletti invoking the aforesaid rescript dated 7th January 1792.
the aforesaid title of Marchese di Gnien Is-Sultan claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Felicissimo Apap Pace Bologna, whose grandfather was a C.M.G. invoking the aforesaid grant dated 20th January 1792.
the aforesaid title of Barone della Grua claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Nicola Maria Delicata Carbott Asciack. invoking the aforesaid grant dated 30th December 1794.
the aforesaid title of Conte della Senia claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Luigi Fontani. invoking the aforesaid grant dated 6th June 1795.
the aforesaid title of Marchese di Ghain Kajet claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gaetano Delicata invoking the aforesaid grant dated 4th June 1796.
the aforesaid Fief of Ghariescem and Tabia claimed by the Committee of Nobles as a barony on behalf of Gio Francesco Sant Cassia invoking a grant by Frederick of Aragon and Sicily dated 12 November 1372 and the aforesaid grant of 14 April 1638
the aforesaid Fief of Djar il-bniet and Bucana claimed by the Committee of Nobles as a barony on behalf of Alessandro Sceberras Testaferrata Damico Inguanez invoking a grant dated 13th November 1372 by King Frederick of Aragon and Sicily
the unregistered foreign title of Barone di Cicciano in the Kingdom of Naples, (exact date of creation unknown but held by Fabrizio Testaferrata by Royal Assent on the 11 July 1695) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Alessandro Sceberras Testaferrata Damico Inguanez invoking a grant dated 11th June 1695;
the unregistered foreign title of Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri in the Kingdom of Naples, (conferred upon Mario Testaferrata on the 10 November 1716 by Philip V, King of Spain and Naples) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Emmanuele Testaferrata Bonici Asciack invoking the said grant dated 10th November 1716
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same grant dated 10th November 1716
the unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata, (conferred upon Mario Testaferrata on the 13 July 1717 by Victor Amadeus, King of Sicily and Duke of Savoy) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Emmanuele Testaferrata Bonici Asciack invoking the said grant dated 13 July 1717
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same grant dated 13 July 1717
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giuseppe Testaferrata Viani invoking the same grant dated 13 July 1717
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier invoking the same grant dated 13 July 1717
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same grant dated 13 July 1717
the same unregistered foreign title of Marchese Testaferrata claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Ignazio Testaferrata Bonici invoking the same grant dated 13 July 1717
the aforesaid registered foreign title of Conte Preziosi claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Amedeo Preziosi invoking the said registered grant dated 19th October 1718
the same registered foreign title of Conte Preziosi claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Antonio Preziosi M.D invoking the same grant dated 19th October 1718
the same registered foreign title of Conte Preziosi claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Camillo Preziosi LL.D. invoking the same grant dated 19th October 1718
the aforesaid registered title of Conte di Mont’ Alto claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Monsignor Salvatore Manduca Piscopo Macedonia, Domestic Prelate to H.H. the Pope Apostolic Pronotary and Canon of the Cathedral whose predecessor is described as K.C.M.G invoking the said registered grants dated 10th July 1720 and 19th September 1724.
the foreign title of Conte enjoyed by the Wzzini family, (exact date of creation unknown to the Commission but held by Ignazio Wzzini in the year 1722) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giorgio Serafino Duca Comninoe Lascaris invoking the aforesaid registered entry dated 4th July 1744
the aforesaid registered foreign title of Marquis De Piro, together with the titles of Count De Piro and Viscount de Cartely claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Saverio De Piro, Captain in the Royal Malta Fencible Artillery invoking the aforesaid registered grant of 6th November 1742
the unregistered foreign title of Barone Fournier de Pausier (granted on the 31 March 1768 by Empress Maria Theresa, Empress of Austria, upon Giorgio Fournier de Pausier) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lazzaro Sant Fournier de Pausier invoking the aforesaid grant of 31 March 1768;
the aforesaid registered foreign title of Conte Fournier claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lazzaro Sant Fournier de Pausier invoking the aforesaid registered grant of 29th January 1770
the aforesaid registered title of Conte Sant claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Francesco Sant Cassia invoking the aforesaid registered grant of 22 December 1770
the unregistered foreign title of Conte presumed (by the Commission) to have been granted to Salvatore Manduca on the 28 December 1776 by one of the Dukes of Parma (probably Don Ferdinand) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Monsignor Salvatore Manduca Piscopo Macedonia, Domestic Prelate to H.H. the Pope Apostolic Pronotary and Canon of the Cathedral whose predecessor is described as K.C.M.G. invoking a grant dated 28 December 1776.
the aforesaid registered foreign title of Barone di San Giovanni claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giorgio Serafino Duca Comninoe Lascaris invoking a grant dated 20th August 1657 and the aforesaid registered grant dated 6th July 1777
the unregistered foreign title of Conte di Casandola (presumed, by the Commission, to have been granted by Charles II, King of Spain and Sicily, on the 6th January 1685) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Antonio Stagno Navarra Muscati Falsoni invoking the aforesaid grant dated 6th January 1685.
the unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire (granted motu proprio at Vienna to Giacomo Testaferrata de Robertis on the 6 November 1637 by Ferdinand 3rd Emperor Elect of the Romans and of Germany) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Emmanuele Testaferrata Bonici Asciack invoking the said grant dated 6th November 1637
the same unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same grant dated 6th November 1637
the same unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giuseppe Testaferrata Viani invoking the same grant dated 6th November 1637
the same unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier invoking the same grant dated 6th November 1637
the same unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same grant dated 6th November 1637
the same unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Ignazio Testaferrata Bonici invoking the same grant dated 6th November 1637
the unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina (granted to Mariano Testaferrata on the 20th December 1553 by the Jurats of the city or municipality of Messina) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela Moroni invoking the said grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Augusto Testaferrata Abela invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Monsignor Salvatore Grech Delicata Testaferrata Cassia, Domestic Prelate to H.H. the Pope and Hon. Canon of the Gozo Cathedral invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Emmanuele Testaferrata Bonici Asciack invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Ignazio Testaferrata Bonici invoking the same grant dated 20th December 1553
another unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina (granted to Marchese Don Mario Testaferrata Castelletti, Don Daniele and Don Pandolfo Testaferrata De Noto, and the Barone P.P. Testaferrata Abela on the 28 August 1792 by the Senate of Messina) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela Moroni invoking the said grant dated 28th August 1792
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Augusto Testaferrata Abela invoking the same grant dated 28th August 1792
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same grant dated 28th August 1792
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier invoking the same grant dated 28th August 1792
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same grant dated 28th August 1792
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Patrician of Messina claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Ignazio Testaferrata Bonici invoking the same grant dated 28th August 1792
another unregistered foreign title of Patrician of Messina, (confirmed together with the title of Marquis by the Senate of Messina to Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier’s father Giuseppe Enrico on the 12th July 1791) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Gio Paolo Testaferrata Olivier invoking the same act dated 12th July 1791 as well as the aforesaid grant dated 28th August 1792
the unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician (conferred upon Monsignor Don Leonardo Abela, Bishop of Sidonia, Placido and Alessandro Abela his brothers, and upon his three nephews ex sorore Pietro di Ferro, Ascanio Surdo and Paolo Testaferrata on the 11th day of the calends of June of the year 1590 by the Roman Senate) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela Moroni invoking the aforesaid grant dated 11th June 1590
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Augusto Testaferrata Abela invoking the same grant dated 11th June 1590
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Monsignor Salvatore Grech Delicata Testaferrata Cassia , Domestic Prelate to H.H. the Pope and Hon. Canon of the Gozo Cathedral invoking the same grant dated 11th June 1590
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same grant dated 11th June 1590
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Saverio De Piro invoking the same grant dated 11th June 1590
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Felicissimo Apap Pace Bologna, whose grandfather was a C.M.G invoking the same grant dated 11th June 1590
another unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician (reputed to date 6 July 1674, origins unknown to the Commission) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Emmanuele Testaferrata Bonici Asciack invoking the aforesaid date 6 July 1674
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Testaferrata invoking the same date 6 July 1674
the same unregistered foreign dignity of Roman Patrician claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Lorenzo Antonio Cassar Desain (ne’ Testaferrata) invoking the same date 6 July 1674
the foreign dignities of Noble, Roman Patrician and Roman Senator (reputed to date 4 July 1744, origins unknown to the Commission) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Giorgio Serafino Duca Comninoe Lascaris invoking the aforesaid registered entry dated 4th July 1744
the unregistered foreign dignity of Venetian Patrician, (origins unknown to the Commission) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of George Crispo Barbaro -
the unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the 1st class of Charles III, King of Spain (origins unknown to the Commission) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Luigi Fontani -
the unregistered foreign dignity of Messinese Patrician (origins unknown to the Commission) claimed by the Committee of Nobles on behalf of Antonio Stagna Navarra Muscati Falsoni -
To this list one adds the following titles which were claimed by individuals without the assistance of the Committee of Nobles (see Table 5, below). (see Table 5, below).


TABLE 5. Analysis of private representations to the Royal Commissioners: (source: Report of the Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility):- (N.b. For explanations of variances of 1 year, see Table 1 above)
Description of title claimed Name of Claimant Basis of claim
the aforesaid title of Barone della Marsa (Third creation) claimed by Maria Apap for herself invoking the aforesaid grant of the 10th March 1775.
the aforesaid title of Barone di Benuarrat claimed by Angiolino Attard for himself invoking the aforesaid grant of the 18th August 1737.
the unregistered foreign title of Barone di San Paolino granted to Matteo de Ribera on the 16 July 1638, by the President and Captain-General of Sicily by authority of Philip IV, King of Spain and Sicily claimed by Angiolino Attard for himself invoking the aforesaid grant of the 16th July 1638
the unregistered foreign distinction of Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire (granted motu proprio at Vienna to Massimiliano Balzano on the 19 November 1698 by Leopold I Emperor Elect of the Romans and of Germany) claimed by Luisa Strickland for herself and her sons invoking the aforesaid grant of the 19 November 1698


Results of the Royal Commission

The right to be styled Illustrissimo e Nobile conferred at various times between 1725 and 1798 by the Grand Masters on some families was not claimed as a title before the Commission. However, it served as the basis for ascertaining direct recognitions of the fief (Barone) of Djar il-Bniet and Buqana and the unregistered foreign titles of Barone di Castel Cicciano, and Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri. A direct recognition of the title of Conte enjoyed by the family Wzzini Paleologo was based on a private correspondence dated 1722.

Of the claims to the titles created by the Grand Masters, three titles were found to be extinct, namely both 1725 and 1776 creations of the title of Barone della Marsa, the personal title of Conte di Beberrua and the originally personal title Barone di Buleben.

Another three titles with singular remainder were found to be claimed by more than one person for different reasons namely the titles of Barone di Gomerino, Barone di Budac and Conte della Catena. The title of Barone di Gomerino was claimed by Pietro Paolo Testaferrata Abela Moroni on the basis that he contended that that title was made subject to a private entail dated 7 March 1714 in favour of Ercole Martino and now possessed by him, whilst Augusto Testaferrata Abela contended that it was he who held the allodial property previously held by Fabrizio; the title of Barone di Budac was claimed by Monsignor Salvatore Grech Delicata Testaferrata Cassia who explained that he had been nominated to succeed by the last holder of it; however, Giuseppe De Piro called the Monsignor’s claim into question by contending that the title had been extinct for a long time and the estate annexed to that title had devolved upon him (De Piro) by title of a Primogenitura. The primogenitura to which the title of Conte della Catena was annexed was already indicated by the Committee of Nobles as “sub judice”. The primogenitura was being claimed by Felicissimo Apap Pace Bologna and Luisa/Gerald Strickland. Because of these contestations, the Commissioners decided not to hear the competing claimants and no decision was reached by the Royal Commissioners.

Of the claims to the only two Maltese fiefs considered by the Commissioners, it resulted that neither was originally granted as a noble fief. However the Commission concluded that over time both the tenure of the fief of Djar il-Bniet and Bucana and the tenure of the fief of Ghariescem and Tabia had come to be regarded by the Grand Masters as noble fiefs. The Commission accorded both fiefs a date of precedence which predates the date it was first acknowledged as a noble fief.

Strictly speaking the claims to the titles of Barone di Djar il-Bniet and Bucana and Marchese di San Giorgio (and that of Venetian Patrician) were dismissed. However the Commissioners note that the first was a fief which was in fact held a the time by that claimant's aunt Maria D'Amico, whilst in the case of the second the Commissioners noted that the claimant's father Gustavo Barbaro was still alive. Neither Maria D’Amico nor the older Barbaro claimed those titles but the Commissioners instead of dismissing the claims before them decided to award those two titles to D’Amico and Barbaro senior respectively. The title of Venetian patrician was dismissed as explained below.

Of the claims to the registered foreign titles, the claim to the title of Conte di Mont’ Alto was disallowed by the Commission because it resulted that it had become extinct. All the other registered foreign titles were allowed by the Royal Commission with the exception of Conte Fournier and decision was referred to the British Secretary of State for the Colonies.

The following foreign titles were disallowed by the Commission because no proof was provided of their registration or direct recognition by the Grand Masters:

a. Marchese Testaferrata,

b. Barone Fournier de Pausier,

c. Barone di San Paolino,

d. Conte di Casandola,

e. Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire (Testaferrata); (see Commisioners' observation that this was directly recognised, but Commisioner of State for the Colonies decided otherwise)

f. Knight of the Order of Noble Tornearii and Armigers of the Holy Roman Empire (Balzano), (see Commisioners' observation that this was directly recognised, but Commisioner of State for the Colonies decided otherwise)

g. Patrician of Messina (Testaferrata, 1553),

h. Patrician of Messina (Testaferrata 1792),

i. Patrician of Messina, (Testaferrata 1791),

j. Roman Patrician (Abela, di Ferro, Surdo and Testaferrata, 1590),

k. Roman Patrician (1674(?)),

l. Noble, Roman Patrician and Roman Senator (see registered entry dated 4th July 1744);

m. Venetian Patrician (?),

n. Knight of the 1st class of Charles III, King of Spain (?), and

o. Messinese Patrician (?).

No decision was reached by the Commission on the unregistered foreign titles of Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri and that of Conte presumed to have been granted to Salvatore Manduca. This was so because the first was found to have been claimed by more than one claimant whilst the documentation for the second had not arrived in time.

The Colonial Office could not reconsider the rejected claims as the Commissioners, who were judges, having already expressed their views, could not be asked to reconsider the same claims which they had already dismissed.


Separate recommendations of a Committee of Privileges of the Maltese Nobility

A portrait of Grand Master Manuel Pinto da Fonseca. He created the first Maltese comital titles of Bahria and Catena. He granted anew the title of Barone della Marsa and also oversaw the succession of the title of Barone di San Marciano. In 1883, a separate committee credited Pinto with having created the marchional titles of Testaferrata Olivier and Cassar Desain.

By a Despatch dated 16 August 1882, issued by the British Secretary of State for the Colonies, through the intervention of Sir George Bowyer, a Special Committee was set up namely a Committee “with functions analogous to those of the Committee of Privileges in the House of Lords (of the United Kingdom)”. The first Committee was composed of the Conte Ciantar Paleologo, the Marchese Apap Bologna di Gnien is-Sultan, the Marchese de Piro, the Marchese Delicata di Ghajn Qajjet and the Monsignor Count Manduca di Mont’ Alto. The stated purpose of the committee was to take into consideration the cases of those title-holders ('Titolati') who were not included by the Commissioners Judges Naudi and Pullicino, in the list of Titolati prepared by them for the local government. In addition the Committee was allowed to report from time to time to the Secretary of State for the Colonies on any matter affecting the Maltese Nobility or their rights, claims or privileges, or to bring such matter to the foot of throne by petition to the British Sovereign.

The Special Committee revisited the respective claims of Calcedonio Azopardi to the title of Barone di Buleben (erstwhile erroneously declared extinct by the Commissioners), that of Nicolo’ Gatto to the title of Conte di Beberrua, that of Giovanni Paolo Testaferrata Olivier to the title of Marchese dating it to 1745, and that of Lorenzo Cassar Desain to a similar title of Marchese dated to 1749 and recommended that these four claims be approved. Special grace and favour from the Queen was received in 1883.

As a result of a debate held in the House of Lords on the 20th April 1885 the Colonial Secretary was urged to ‘do all he could to recognize the nobility still further, as it would smooth the intercourse …between English and Maltese societies and to strengthen British rule in the Island’. Following this intervention, there was a complete reversal of attitude towards the Nobles of Malta, some of whom were even received in the private Drawing-room of Queen Victoria.

The British Colonial Administration issued a recognition to the following titles according to the perceived date taken for precedence:

TABLE 6. Analysis of titles approved by British Colonial office:-
Name of title Date for Precedence
Baron of Djar il-Bniet and Buqana 4th January, 1350
Baron of Gheriexem and Tabia 16th April, 1638
Baron of Gomerino 24th December, 1710
Baron of Budach 23rd April, 1716
Count Preziosi 20 June 1720
Count W.Paleologo 1722
Baron of Cicciano 11 May 1725
Marquis of San Vincenzo Ferreri 9 July 1725
Baron of San Marciano 14th June, 1726
Baron of Tabria 11th December, 1728
Baron of Culeja 2nd June, 1737
Baron of Benwarrad 18th August, 1737
Marquis Depiro 6th November, 1742
Count of Bahria 16th May, 1743
Count of Catena 20th January, 1745
Marquis Testaferrata Olivier 1745
Marquis Cassar Desain 1749
Count Fournier 2 December 1775
Count Sant 12 December 1775
Count of Mont’Alto Manduca) 28th December, 1776
Baron of Buleben 23rd July, 1777
Baron of San Giovanni 17 January 1778
Marquis of San Giorgio (St. George) 6th September, 1778
Count of Beberrua 23rd October, 1783
Marquis of Fiddien 15th October, 1785
Marquis of Taflia 13th November, 1790
Count of Ghajn Tuffieha 7th January,1792
Marquis of Gnien is-Sultan 1st December, 1792
Baron of Grua 30th December,1794
Count of Senia 6th June, 1795
Marquis of Ghajn Qajjed 4th June, 1796

Later changes to the Maltese Nobility

File:BnietBuq.JPG
A photograph , circa 1890, of The Baroness of Djar el Bniet et Bucana, Maria Francesca Sceberras D'Amico Inguanez (1865-1947) wife of Colonel Alexander Chalmers McKeon. The Royal Commissioners ante-dated the title of Djar il-Bniet et Bucana to 1350 and awarded it to her great-aunt Maria D’Amico.

Historians criticize the final list approved by the British Colonial Administration for being various reasons including anachronisms, perpetuation of some extinct titles, and historically inaccurate and/or incomplete data, e.g. although it results (see table 7 below) that the fief of Djar il-Bniet was held by the Gacto family in 1350/51, that same fief appears to have been held by the Osa family in 1376.

The Committee as a recognized official body continued to elect its members once a year. The Colonial Government’s position was not to issue any provisional recognition by the Government of any of the aforesaid titles unless the Committee of Privileges has reported.

All recognitions by the Government were issued provisionally as the decisions of the Committee were made subject to any subsequent decision of a Court of law. In his dispatch of the 30 April 1878 the Secretary of State laid down “It is only necessary to point out to you that no public officer, not even a Secretary of State, has the power of conferring titles of honour, for which the personal sanction of Her Majesty is each case is necessary; and even assuming such acts to have been done by British officials with full knowledge that the titles were non-existent, their want of power would prevent these acts of supposed recognition from having the slightest effect.”

The effect of the 1739 and 1795 legislation meant that the Maltese nobility would rank amongst itself according to the date of creation of title and not according to the degree/rank of the title. No changes to this system was made by either the Commission or the Special Committee. However, an attempt to change the rule of precedence first established by Grand Master Despuig in 1739, was made by the Maltese Committee of Privileges in 1886. However this was strongly resisted by the Assembly of Nobles as soon as the Governor (John Simmons) made these intentions known justifying his disclosure on his view that the cadets had an interest equal to that of the Titolati. A secondary issue arose on who of the two enjoyed the representation of the Maltese Nobility. Lord Granville ended the dispute on 19 May 1886 when he communicated his decision that in view of the considerable opposition and the small support which the proposal received, that he was “not prepared to reconsider the decision of Grand Master Rohan”. Granville did not commit on the secondary issue but it appears that after this incident the Assembly of Maltese Nobility lost its political significance with the result that the Committee of Privileges took up all representation of the Maltese “Titolati” whilst the cadetti were unrepresented.

The effect of the 1725 legislation meant that only some families, not necessarily titled-families, are entitled to the titles of “Most Illustrious” and “Noble”. However, in 1886 the Committee of Privileges was successful to obtain for each of the British-acknowledged titolati the right to the style “The Most Noble”.

As at 1910, the pedigrees and the right to bear two of the titles (Barone di Cicciano and Conte della Catena) approved by the Royal Commission had been investigated by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. It was then anticipated that similar investigations would follow, including questions of precedence inter se, and of dates of legal “creation”, on some Special Reference, or directly in England on a Petition of Right. This expectation was short-lived as the Privy Council did not make any other decision directly on a title of nobility. However, the Privy Council did make some decisions on succession of property entailments which were established during the Magistral period.

Although politically the nobles declined, nevertheless the two Constitutions of 1887 and 1921 provide for representatives from the nobility. In the earlier constitution, four members in the Council of members were to represent the clergy, the nobility and landed proprietors, university graduates and the merchants. By classifying the nobility with landed proprietors, the Constitution effectively restored a position of status to the cadet lines who albeit untitled lost their historic nobility under the 1878 Royal Commission.

The later constitution which provided for a bicameral legislature allowed for ten special members in the senate to represent the above-mentioned groups, and also the Trade Unions. Some nobles were elected to the Lower House or Legislative Assembly and one prominent nobleman, Count Sir Gerald Strickland was Prime Minister of Malta.

No provision was made for the nobility in the later Constitutions.

Present day

A photograph of Lord Gerald Strickland (1861-1940). In 1883, the Privy Council upheld his claim to the private entail governing the title of Conte della Catena by reason of his being the most senior male descendant in terms of the grant, thereby dismissing claims based only on proximity to the last holder.

The last vestiges of the nobility under the Grand Masters, were steadily done away with. In 1950, succession by entail was abolished in Malta under the Premiership of Paul Boffa by Act 12 of 1950 dated 5 May 1950. This was followed in 1969, under the Premiership of Giorgio Borg Olivier by an abolition of succession by fief by Act 30 of 1969 dated 21 November, 1969. Provision is made in the later law that nothing shall affect any title of nobility, and the laws in force concerning any such titles shall continue to have effect.

Finally, in 1975 the Maltese Government under the Premiership of Dom Mintoff brought in a Bill for the purpose of abolishing titles of nobility. On the 25 June 1975, the President of the Republic of Malta. Sir Anthony Mamo, gave his assent to Act No. XXIX. Although titles of nobility were not abolished ‘for historical reasons’, a general duty was imposed to no longer recognize them.

Montalto reports that although the nobles still exist, their numbers have certainly dwindled, and some titles have fallen into abeyance – for instance the Counts of Bahria and Senia and Marquises of Taflia and Ghajn Qajjet. He continues, saying that it is usual for Petitions to be presented to the Committee of Privileges by claimants, but it is unusual for decisions to be taken. He reports that the Committee still meets, but its function is now a little obscure.

A revival of interest in the subject was noted in the early 1980s with a feted publication by John Attard Montalto and a series of articles and books by Charles A. Gauci, and since then it appears that that Committee has revived a number of titles. Moreover, the Gauci publications reports how that Committee has revisited the criteria of recognition of other titles which did not form part of the list approved by the British Colonial Authorities.

Two related lawsuits decided in the early 21st century, one “Ramsay vs Bugeja” the other “Bugeja Viani vs Attorney General” regarding claims to the title of Barone della Tabria highlights the obligation not to recognize any title of nobility.


TABLE 7. LIST OF KNOWN FIEFS GRANTED PRE-1530 (source: Montalto ‘Nobles of Malta’):-
the Alagona family fiefs of Bungemi (1408), Davaracia (1408) and Benuarrat (date of grant unknown);
the Amodeo family the fief of Petra Lunga (1371);
the Arescula family the fiefs of Hayntufegha (1399) and the money grants of 12 unc. (1402) and 15 unc (1407).
the Armenia family the fiefs of Benuarrat (unknown) and Tal-Baccar;
The Astis family the fief of Maccalibim (140?).
the Attardo family the fiefs of Ginelfar (1361), Misulup (1361) and Saqqajja (1361);
The Augnica/Stugnica/Scimica family the fiefs of Saqqaja (1506) and Friginuini (1513);
The Aulesa/Olesia family the fief of Budac.
The Bagna family the fief of Chabelville (1372);
The Bandino family the money grants of 7 unc. (1398) and 2 unc (1400).
The Barba family the fiefs of Tabria (1316), Fontana (1347), Vilaliamitu (1399), Budacco (unknown) and the money grants of 8 unc. (1399), 8unc. (1402) and 8 unc. (1413).
The Bava family the fiefs of Bucana (unknown), Djar il-Bniet (unknown) and Hemsija (unknown);
The Bellera/Bontempo family the money grant of 6 unc.
The Bernardo family the fiefs of Barberi (1398) and Mejmun (1398);
The Blundo/Blundus family the fief of Tabia/Gariexem (1416);
The Bochio family the fief of Grua (1372);
The Bordino family the fief of La Chalca di Ayn Cuffutu (1399) and the money grant of 12 unc. (1485);
The Buginac/Unginat family the fief of Nigret/Mojdu (1372).
The Buscheri/Cuskeri family the fiefs of Frigenuini (1375) and Barberi (unknown).
The Busco/Bosco family the fiefs of Gnien il-Firen (1399), Qattara (1439), Hayntufegha (1440) and Marsa ((1441);
The Cadumi family the fiefs of Canfudi (1398) and San Marciano (1398);
The Calafato family the money grant of 6 unc. (1398);
The Cardona family the fief of La Guardia (1437).
The Carraffa family the fief of Marsa (1450);
The Carretto family the fief of Rayava (1408), Salamuni (1408) and Tabria (1408);
The Castelli family the fief of Buqana (unknown).
The Catalanu family the fief of San Cosmo (unknown).
The Caxaro family the money grant of 4 unc. (1409).
The Desguanes/Inguanez family the the fiefs of Budacco (1408), Tabia/Gariexem (1416), Bucana (1432), Djar il-Bniet (1432), Hemsija (1432), Tabria (1441), Marsa (1441), Saqqajja (1442), Gnien il-Firen (14?), Hayntufegha (14?), Hayntufegha (14?), Qattara (14?), Irdum Sancto Georgio et Mizel Xiri (1447);
The Falsone family the fief of Jurihando (1399) and the money grant of 12 unc. (1493);
The Fanato/Favato family the fief of Musebi (1372);
The Forregioni family the fiefs of Gnien il-Firen (1465), Hayntufegha (1465) and Qattara (1465).
The Franco/Auri family the money grant of 4 unc. (1399).
The Gatto/Gactu family the fiefs of Djar il-Bniet (1351), Buqana (1397), Budach (1398) Hemsija (1398) and Tabria (1407);
The Girbinus family the money grant of 4 unc (1398);
The Gomez family the fiefs of Il-Scardo (1374) and Scajscach (1374).
The Grayera family the fief of Marsa (1452);
The Gruno/Grugno family the fiefs of Jardum Grandi (1510) and Petra Longa (1513);
The Guantis family the fief of Tabia/Gariexem (unknown);
The Gueraldi family the fief of Tabria (1398);
The Guevara/Guara/Grayera family the fiefs of Gnien il-Firen (1446), Hayntufegha (1446), Qattara (1446) and Marsa (1446);
The Habela/Abela family the fief of Petra Lunga (unknown);
The Imbroglio family the fiefs of Chabuch/Chalkia (1372) and Charmine/Chalmira (1372);
The Impax/Pax family the fiefs of Bucelli (1372), Culeja (1472) and 6 unc. (1372);
The Landolina family the fief of Tabria (1453);
The Lavagna family the money grant of 2 unc (1373).
The Lemmo family the money grant of 6 unc. (1416);
The Malta/Pullichino family the fief of La Guardia (unknown);
The Mileto family the fief of Ajnastasi (1372);
The Monbron family the money grant of 12 unc (1514).
The Mundellus family the money grants of 8 florins (1373) and 6 unc. (1374);
The Murina family the fief of Bucana (1372);
The Nava family the fief of Marsa (1465) and Benuarrat (1472/75);
The Navarro family the money grant of 4 unc (1413);
The Osa family the fief of San Cosmo (164), Tabia/Gariexem (1372), Bucana (1376), Djar il-Bniet (1376) and the money grant of 4 unc. (1373);
The Parera family the fief of La Guardia (1448) and the money grant of 6 unc. (1448);
The Perollo family the fiefs of Biebirua (1465), Buleben (1465), Buonchale (1465), San Martino (1466) and Gomerino (1481);
The Perregrino family the fiefs of Baccuni (1347), Aynalcayd (1361), Benuarrat (1361), Cabelville/Suletti (1361), Jardino de lo Re (1361), Lachase (1361), Viridarium Magnum (1361) and Lu Zacuni (1372).
The Plusasco family the fief of Maccalibim (1408);
The Ragusa family the fief of Gomerino (1328);
The Sancheta family the number of fiefs (15?);
The Sancto Philippo family the fiefs of Antulinu (1372) and Galca (1372);
The Santa Sophia family the fiefs of Dechandum (1361), Hayntufiegha (1361), Bajjada (1372), Cabelsulla (1372), Mechalcadetrin (1372), Rifutu (1372), Sintina (1372), Gomerino (1398) and Mayaliel (1408);
The Sardo family the fief of Petra Lunga (1417);
The Solimella family the fief of Gomerino (unknown);
The Spetere/Speteri family the fief of Sancta Maria Magdalena (1439);
The Surdo family the fief of Gomerino (1317);
The Tarento family the fief of Petra Lunga (1408);
The Tarsia family the money grant of 40 unc (1418);
The Torres family the fief of Fiddien (unknown);
The Vaccaro family the fiefs of Benuarrat (1398) and Culeja (1400) and the money grants of 24 unc. (1399) and 12 unc. (1409);
The Xiberras family the money grant of 12 unc. (1520);
The Zavallos/Bavallos family the fief of Milecha del Zoncol (1509).




TABLE 8A Simplified list showing persons ennobled by Maltese titles of nobility between 1530-1798 (Table shows Name, Date of Creation of title, and Date of formal receipt of title)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation Year of Formal receipt of title
Paolo and Beatrice Testaferrata 1710 1711
Gio Pio De Piro 1716 1716)
Milite Barone Marc' Antonio Inguanez and his wife Baroness Inguanez 1725 1725
Barone di Cicciano Fabritio Testaferrata 1725 1725
Baronessa di Gomerino Beatrice Cassia Testaferrata 1725 1725
Ferdinando Castelletti 1725 1725
Marchese di San Vincenzo Ferreri Mario Testaferrata 1725 1725
Carlo Falzon 1725 1725
Eleonora Testaferrata 1725 1725
Diego Antonio Galea Feriolo 1726 1726
Barone di San Marciano Diego Galea Feriolo 1725 1726
Barone Gio Pio de Piro 1725 1727
Isidoro Viani 1728 1728
Canon Giuseppe di Costanzo 1725 1729
Donna Rosa widow of Gio Battista di Costanzo 1725 1729
Barone Isidoro Viani 1725 1730
Baldassare Bonnici 1725 1732
Calcerano Mompalao 1725 1732
Giuseppe and Caterina Cuschieri 1725 1732
D. Vincenzo Platamone 1725 1730-1732
Antonio Bonnici 1725 1730 – 1732
Noble Ercole Martino Testaferrata 1710 1737
Ignazio Bonnici 1737 1737
Saverio Gatto 1737 1737
Barone Saverio Gatt 1725 1737
Alessandro Mompalao 1737 1737
Signor Ludovico Bianchi 1725 1741
Ignazio Muscati Falsone Navarra 1743 1743
Pietro Gaetano Perdicomati Bologna 1745 1745
Noble Lorenzo Galea Feriol 1726 1749
Giovanni Antonio Azzopardi Castelletti 1753 1754
Gaetano Pisani 1773 1773
Claudio Muscati Xiberras 1776 1776
Gio Francesco Dorell Falzon 1776 1776
Gaetano Azzopardi 1777 1777
Barone di Buleben (extension) 1777 1778
Carlo Antonio Barbaro 1778 1778
Marchese di San Giorgio extension 1778 1779
Francesco Gauci 1781 1781
Emmanuele and Paola Muscati 1737 1783
Luigi (Ludovico) Gatt 1783 1783
Gio Battista Mompalao 1783 1783
Giuseppe Testaferrata Viani 1728 1784
Salvatore Mallia Tabone 1785 1785
Calcedonio Azopardi 1777 1788
Saverio Alessi 1790 1790
Noble Giovanni Galea Feriolo 1726 1791
Ferdinando Teuma Castelletti 1792 1792
Marchese di San Giorgio (extension) 1778 1792
Ugolino Calleja 1792 1792
Filippo Apap 1792 1792
Marchese del Fiddien (extension) 1785 1793
Romualdo Barbaro 1794 1794
Saverio Marchesi 1794 1794
Dr. Ugolino Bonnici 1725 1794
Saverio Carbott Testaferrata 1794 1795
Vincenzo Fontani 1795 1795
Geronimo Delicata 1796 1796
Dr. Saverio Crispo 1725 1794-1798



TABLE 8B Simplified list showing persons in receipt of a fief between 1530-1798 (Table shows Name, Date of Creation and Date of Investiture)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation Year of Investiture
Giacinto Cassia 1638 1638
Nicolo Cilia 1644 1644
Silvestro Fiteni on behalf of his wife Generosa daughter of Cesara Passalacqua 1646 1646
Gio. Antonio Cassia 1638 1655
Pietro Cassia 1638 1658
Domenica Cassia, wife of Stanislao Xara, 1638 1689
Petrum Paulum Xara 1638 1721
Nobilis Stanislaus Xara 1638 1749
Felicita Chiara Sant 1638 1797
TABLE 8C Simplified list showing persons ennobled by foreign titles of nobility and registered in Malta between 1530-1798 (Table shows Name, Date of Creation and Date of Registration)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation Year of Registration
Giuseppe Preziosi 1718, 1720)
Bernardo Piscopo 1720 1721
Bernardo Piscopo 1724 1744
Barone Gio Pio De Piro 1742 1743)
Documentation relative to the reception of The Patrician of Rome Don Salvatore Wzzini Paleologo, a professed knight of the Military Order of Saint James in Portugal, and the Count Ignazio Francesco Wzzini Paleologo, descendants of the most august Paleologo family of Comneno Angelo Lascaris and Duca, of the Emperors of the East unknown origin 1744)
Baldassare Fenech Bonnici 1748 1750
Giorgio Fournier de Pausier 1770 1775
Salvatore Baldassare Sant 1770 1775
Serafino Ciantar 1777 1778


TABLE 8D Simplified list showing persons ennobled by foreign titles of nobility and recognized between 1530-1798 according to 1878 Report of Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility (Table shows Name, Date of Creation and Date of Recognition)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation Year of Recognition
Francesco Gatto 1350 1725
Fabrizio Testaferrata 1695 1725
Mario Testaferrata 1716 1725
Ignazio Wzzini unknown 1722
TABLE 8E Simplified list showing persons ennobled by foreign titles of nobility but proof of creation pending, according to 1878 Report of Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility and according to British Secretary of State for the Colonies (Table shows Name and Date of Creation)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation
Salvatore Manduca 1776



TABLE 8F Simplified list showing persons ennobled by foreign titles of nobility and recognized between 1530-1798 according to 1878 Report of Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility but subsequently dismissed by British Secretary of State for the Colonies as “not recognized” (Table shows Name and Date of Creation)
Name of Recipient Date of Creation
Giacomo Testaferrata 1637
Massimiliano Balzano 1698
TABLE 8G Simplified list showing persons ennobled by foreign titles of nobility between 1530-1798 but not registered/recognized according to 1878 Report of Royal Commission appointed to enquire into the claims of the Maltese Nobility (Table shows Name and Date of Creation)
Mariano Testaferrata 1553
Monsignor Don Leonardo Abela, Bishop of Sidonia 1590
Placido and Alessandro Abela 1590
Pietro di Ferro 1590
Ascanio Surdo 1590
Paolo Testaferrata 1590
Matteo de Ribera 1638
N.N. Testaferrata (?) 1674
Conte di Casandola 1685
Mario Testaferrata 1717
Giorgio Fournier de Pausier 1768
Noble, Roman Patrician and Roman Senator (origins unknown to the Commission but see registered entry dated 4th July 1744) (unknown)
Marchese Giuseppe Enrico Testaferrata 1791
Marchese Don Mario Testaferrata Castelletti 1792
Don Daniele and Don Pandolfo Testaferrata De Noto 1792
Barone P.P. Testaferrata Abela 1792
N.N. Barbaro (?) (unknown)
N.N. Fontani (?) (unknown)
N.N. Stagno (?) (unknown)


[edit] References

1. Correspondence and Report of the Commission appointed to enquire into the claims and grievances of the Maltese Nobility, May 1878, presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of Her Majesty (C.-2033.) For full text see http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/Maltese%20Nobility%201878%20Correspondence%20Commissioners%20report%20and%20Supplemental%20Page%201%20to%2014.pdf http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/Maltese%20Nobility%201878%20Correspondence%20Commissioners%20report%20and%20Supplemental%20Page%2015%20to%2032.pdf http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/Maltese%20Nobility%201878%20Correspondence%20Commissioners%20report%20and%20Supplemental%20Page%2033%20to%2046.pdf http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/Maltese%20Nobility%201878%20Correspondence%20Commissioners%20report%20and%20Supplemental%20Page%2047%20to%2060.pdf

2. Report of the Committee of Privileges of the Maltese Nobility on the claims of certain members of that body with the Secretary of State’s Reply, August 1883, presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of Her Majesty (C-3812) For full text see http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/Maltese%20Nobility%201883%20Report%20of%20Special%20Committee%20and%20Correspondence.pdf

3. Copies or Extracts of Correspondence with reference to the Maltese Nobility (In continuation of C3812, August 1883), presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of Her Majesty May 1886 (C-4628a) For full text see http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/1886%20report%20no%204628a.pdf

4. Montalto, John, The nobles of Malta, 1530-1800 / John Mantalto Midsea Books, Valletta, Malta : 1979 ASIN: B0000EE028

5. Charles Gauci "The Genealogy and Heraldry of the Noble Families of Malta" (Gulf Publishing, Malta, 1981)" ASIN: B0000EDUI4

6. Charles Gauci A Guide to the Maltese Nobility" (PEG Publications, Malta, 1986) ISBN 999900122X

7. Charles Gauci "The Genealogy and Heraldry of the Noble Families of Malta VOLUME TWO " (PEG Publications, Malta, 1992) ASIN: B0018V7SUA

8. Charles Gauci "The Genealogy and Heraldry of the Noble Families of Malta VOLUME ONE " (PEG Publications, Malta, 2002) ASIN: B0018W7TVM

9. Anon “The Family of Inguanez” (Malta, 1888) - reprinted in 1979 to form part of Marcel DINGLI ATTARD, “The Family of Inguanez”(Interprint Malta, 1979) ASIN: B0000EEAZL

10. Cassar Desain, Marchese L.A., " Genealogia della famiglia Testaferrata di Malta." Malta, 1880

11. Abela Della Descrittione di Malta del Commendatore Abela, 1647 ASIN: B000VDOSF4

12. Abela & Ciantar, Malta Illustrata, Malta 1780 ASIN: B000VDMIRY

13. Farrugia Randon, Marquis Nicolo Testaferrata de Noto, 1993 ISBN 9990941092

14. Farrugia Randon, Cardinal Fabrizio Sceberras Testaferrata, 1988 ASIN: B0006EVTVO

15. Frendo, Maltese Political Development 1798-1964, 1993 ASIN: B000Q5P9RI

16. Galea, Malta's Timeline, Malta.

17. Goodwin, Stefan MALTA MEDITERRANEAN BRIDGE, 2002 ISBN 0-89789-820-6

18. Marquis de Ruvbigny, “The Nobilities of Europe” 1910 (reprint 2005) ISBN 1-4021-8561-8

19. The British claim to rule Malta 1800-1813 by Howard Davis and Barry Hough in Melita Historica (new series), 14(2007)4(387-407)

20. Desmond Gregory Malta, Britain, and the European powers, 1793-1815 ISBN 978-0838635902

21. Melita Historica: http://www.geocities.com/melitahistoricab/19579.html;

22. Melita Historica: http://www.geocities.com/melitahistoricab/19597.html

23. Melita Historica:http://www.geocities.com/melitahistoricab/195213.html

24. Strickland v. Apap Bologna [1883], Privy Council A.C. 106

25. Sceberras D’Amico v. Sceberras Trigona [1888], Privy Council A.C. 806

26. Cassar Desain v. Testaferrata Moroni Viani [1925] Privy Council A.C. 416

27. Sammut v Strickland [1938] Privy Council A.C. 678, 701.

28. George Cassar Desain v. James Cassar Desain Viani [1948] Privy Council A.C. 18

29. Chesney Sceberras D’Amico vs Cuschieri Malta Court of Appeal [1957] 10 June 1957

30. Ramsay v Bugeja [2004] Malta Civil Court 1722/2001/1

31. Bugeja Viani v Attorney General Malta Constitutional Court [2007] 57/2006, [2007] 57/2006/1

32. Maltagenealogy.com http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/SME1.htm http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/maltesenobility/biograghyofmaltesetitles.htm http://www.saidvassallo.com/SME/SME2.htm

33. A.O.M. refers to Archives of the Order found at the National Library, Malta.