Jump to content

Talk:Freddie Mercury: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by DrStrangelove64 - "→‎Intro section: "
Line 61: Line 61:


[[Special:Contributions/213.136.61.140|213.136.61.140]] ([[User talk:213.136.61.140|talk]]) 14:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/213.136.61.140|213.136.61.140]] ([[User talk:213.136.61.140|talk]]) 14:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

: I'm talking about reference #4. Is it possible to fix it somehow? [[Special:Contributions/213.136.61.140|213.136.61.140]] ([[User talk:213.136.61.140|talk]]) 14:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


== Intro section ==
== Intro section ==

Revision as of 14:27, 26 July 2010

Good articleFreddie Mercury has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 25, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 1, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article
WikiProject
General
Project Page
Article Overview
Participants
Portal
Tasks
To-Do List
Article Quality
Quality Log
Assessment
Useful Stuff
Media
Books
Templates
edit

Discography

After providing a link to both a Queen Discography article and a Freddie Mercury solo discography article, the section then lists his complete solo discography. Either it should be deleted, or the article on the solo discography is unnecessary. 98.221.124.80 (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ashes

I'd like to see the part about his ashes being scattered in Montreux cited or removed. Mary Austin has spesifically stated she was to keep Freddies final restingplace a secret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.110.137.7 (talk) 17:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is located at http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/;kw=[3857,12126,12232], it doesn't work to put it as a link.

213.136.61.140 (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about reference #4. Is it possible to fix it somehow? 213.136.61.140 (talk) 14:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intro section

Could we possibly avoid hyperbole like 'four-octave range'? It's not true, and makes the page look amateurish. It seems to be used as a synonym for 'good voice'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.84.79.142 (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, he did have a range close to four octaves if you include falsetto, so it's correct. Forgive me if I'm wrong. DrStrangelove64 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStrangelove64 (talkcontribs) 18:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]