Jump to content

Lightning: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Electrostatic induction hypothesis: restore good edit lost amidst morass of recent undetected vandalism
Line 205: Line 205:
{{Main|Upper-atmospheric lightning#Blue jets}}
{{Main|Upper-atmospheric lightning#Blue jets}}


'''Blue jets''' differ from sprites in that they project from the top of the cumulonimbus above a thunderstorm, typically in a narrow cone, to the lowest levels of the [[ionosphere]] {{mi to km|25}} to {{mi to km|50}} above the earth.<ref>UNIVERSE: ''Cosmic Phenomena''(2009), History Channel, aired 9-10am MDT</ref> They are also brighter than sprites and, as implied by their name, are blue in colour. They were first recorded on October 21, 1989, on a video taken from the [[space shuttle]] as it passed over Australia, and subsequently extensively documented in 1994 during aircraft research flights by the University of Alaska.<ref name="holo" /><ref name="nature">{{Cite web|url=http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020311/pf/020311-6_pf.html|title=Blue jets connect Earth's electric circuit|accessdate=September 24, 2007|publisher=Nature.com|year=2002|author=Tom Clarke}}</ref>
'''Blue jets''' differ from sprites in that they project from the top of the cumulonimbus above a thunderstorm, typically in a narrow cone, to the lowest levels of the [[ionosphere]] {{mi to km|25}} to {{mi to km|50}} above the earth.<ref>UNIVERSE: ''Cosmic Phenomena''(2009), History Channel, aired 9-10am MDT</ref> They are also brighter than sprites and, as implied by their name, are blue in color. They were first recorded on October 21, 1989, on a video taken from the [[space shuttle]] as it passed over Australia, and subsequently extensively documented in 1994 during aircraft research flights by the University of Alaska.<ref name="holo" /><ref name="nature">{{Cite web|url=http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020311/pf/020311-6_pf.html|title=Blue jets connect Earth's electric circuit|accessdate=September 24, 2007|publisher=Nature.com|year=2002|author=Tom Clarke}}</ref>


On September 14, 2001, scientists at the [[Arecibo Observatory]] photographed a huge jet double the height of those previously observed, reaching around {{mi to km|50}} into the atmosphere. The jet was located above a thunderstorm over the ocean, and lasted under a second. Lightning was initially observed traveling up at around 50,000 m/s in a similar way to a typical ''blue jet'', but then divided in two and sped at 250,000 m/s to the ionosphere, where they spread out in a bright burst of light.<ref name="pennst">{{Cite web| url=http://www.engr.psu.edu/news/News/2002_Press_Releases/March/blue-jet.html|title=Researchers capture unusual sprite-like blue jet|accessdate=September 24, 2007|publisher=Penn State College of Engineering|year=2002|author=Penn State College of Engineering}}</ref> On July 22, 2002, five gigantic jets between 60 and 70&nbsp;km (35 to 45 miles) in length were observed over the [[South China Sea]] from [[Taiwan]], reported in ''Nature''.<ref name="nature" /> The jets lasted under a second, with shapes likened by the researchers to giant trees and carrots.{{Citation needed|date=June 2007}}
On September 14, 2001, scientists at the [[Arecibo Observatory]] photographed a huge jet double the height of those previously observed, reaching around {{mi to km|50}} into the atmosphere. The jet was located above a thunderstorm over the ocean, and lasted under a second. Lightning was initially observed traveling up at around 50,000 m/s in a similar way to a typical ''blue jet'', but then divided in two and sped at 250,000 m/s to the ionosphere, where they spread out in a bright burst of light.<ref name="pennst">{{Cite web| url=http://www.engr.psu.edu/news/News/2002_Press_Releases/March/blue-jet.html|title=Researchers capture unusual sprite-like blue jet|accessdate=September 24, 2007|publisher=Penn State College of Engineering|year=2002|author=Penn State College of Engineering}}</ref> On July 22, 2002, five gigantic jets between 60 and 70&nbsp;km (35 to 45 miles) in length were observed over the [[South China Sea]] from [[Taiwan]], reported in ''Nature''.<ref name="nature" /> The jets lasted under a second, with shapes likened by the researchers to giant trees and carrots.{{Citation needed|date=June 2007}}

Revision as of 14:45, 26 July 2010

Lightning striking a tower in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Lightning cloud-to-sea over Miramare di Rimini, Italy.
Lightning animation depicting intercloud lightning in Toulouse, France

Lightning is an atmospheric discharge of electricity accompanied by thunder, which typically occurs during thunderstorms, and sometimes during volcanic eruptions or dust storms.[1] In the atmospheric electrical discharge, a leader of a bolt of lightning can travel at speeds of 60,000 m/s (130,000 mph)*, and can reach temperatures approaching 30,000 °C (54,000 °F), hot enough to fuse silica sand into glass channels known as fulgurites which are normally hollow and can extend some distance into the ground.[2][3] There are some 16 million lightning storms in the world every year.[4]

Lightning can also occur within the ash clouds from volcanic eruptions, or can be caused by violent forest fires which generate sufficient dust to create a static charge.[1][5]

How lightning initially forms is still a matter of debate:[6] Scientists have studied root causes ranging from atmospheric perturbations (wind, humidity, friction, and atmospheric pressure) to the impact of solar wind and accumulation of charged solar particles.[4] Ice inside a cloud is thought to be a key element in lightning development, and may cause a forcible separation of positive and negative charges within the cloud, thus assisting in the formation of lightning.[4]

The irrational fear of lightning (and thunder) is astraphobia. The study or science of lightning is called fulminology, and someone who studies lightning is referred to as a fulminologist.

Historical scientific research

Lightning strikes the Eiffel Tower, France in 1902.

Benjamin Franklin (1706–1790) endeavored to test the theory that sparks shared some similarity with lightning by using a spire which was being erected in Philadelphia. While waiting for completion of the spire, he got the idea to use a flying object such as a kite. During the next thunderstorm, which was in June 1752, it was reported that he raised a kite, accompanied by his son as an assistant. On his end of the string he attached a key, and he tied it to a post with a silk thread. As time passed, Franklin noticed the loose fibers on the string stretching out; he then brought his hand close to the key and a spark jumped the gap. The rain which had fallen during the storm had soaked the line and made it conductive.[7]

Franklin was not the first to perform the kite experiment. Thomas-François Dalibard and De Lors conducted it at Marly-la-Ville in France, a few weeks before Franklin's experiment.[8][9] In his autobiography (written 1771–1788, first published 1790), Franklin clearly states that he performed this experiment after those in France, which occurred weeks before his own experiment, without his prior knowledge as of 1752.[10]

Lightning 1882
(c) Photographer: William N. Jennings, c. 1882

As news of the experiment and its particulars spread, others attempted to replicate it. However, experiments involving lightning are always risky and frequently fatal. One of the most well-known deaths during the spate of Franklin imitators was that of Professor George Richmann of Saint Petersburg, Russia. He created a set-up similar to Franklin's, and was attending a meeting of the Academy of Sciences when he heard thunder. He ran home with his engraver to capture the event for posterity. According to reports, while the experiment was under way, ball lightning appeared and collided with Richmann's head, killing him.[11][12]

Although experiments from the time of Benjamin Franklin showed that lightning was a discharge of static electricity, there was little improvement in theoretical understanding of lightning (in particular how it was generated) for more than 150 years. The impetus for new research came from the field of power engineering: as power transmission lines came into service, engineers needed to know much more about lightning in order to adequately protect lines and equipment. In 1900, Nikola Tesla generated artificial lightning by using a large Tesla coil, enabling the generation of enormously high voltages sufficient to create lightning.

Properties

World map showing frequency of lightning strikes, in flashes per square kilometer (km²) per year (equal-area projection). Lightning strikes most frequently in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Combined 1995–2003 data from the Optical Transient Detector and 1998–2003 data from the Lightning Imaging Sensor.

An average bolt of negative lightning carries an electric current of 30,000 amperes ("amps") — 30 "kiloamps" (kA), and transfers five coulombs of electric charge and 500 million joules — 500 "megajoules" (MJ) of energy. Large bolts of lightning can carry up to 120 kA and 350 coulombs.[13] The voltage is proportional to the length of the bolt.

An average bolt of positive lightning carries an electric current of about 300 kA — about 10 times that of negative lightning.[citation needed]

Lightning leader development is not just a matter of the electrical breakdown of air, which is about 3 megavolts per meter (MV/m). The ambient electric fields required for lightning leader propagation can be one or two orders of magnitude (10−2) less than the electrical breakdown strength. The potential ("voltage") gradient inside a well-developed return-stroke channel is on the order of hundreds of volts per meter (V/m) due to intense channel ionization, resulting in a true power output on the order of one megawatt per meter (MW/m) for a vigorous return stroke current of 100 kA.[14] The average peak power output of a single lightning stroke is about one trillion watts — one "terawatt" (1012 W), and the stroke lasts for about 30 millionths of a second — 30 "microseconds".[15]

Lightning rapidly heats the air in its immediate vicinity to about 20,000 °C (36,000 °F) — about three times the temperature of the surface of the Sun. This compresses the surrounding clear air and creates a supersonic shock wave which decays to an acoustic wave that is heard as thunder.[15]

The return stroke of a lightning bolt follows a charge channel about a centimeter (0.4 in) wide.[citation needed]

Different locations have different potentials ("voltages") and currents for an average lightning strike. In the United States, for example, Florida experiences the largest number of recorded strikes in a given period during the summer season ,[citation needed] has very sandy soils in some areas, and electrically conductive water-saturated soils in others.[citation needed] As much of Florida lies on a peninsula, it is bordered by the ocean on three sides. The result is the daily development of sea and lake breeze boundaries that collide and produce thunderstorms.[citation needed]

NASA scientists have found that electromagnetic radiation created by lightning in clouds only a few miles high can create a "safe zone" in the Van Allen radiation belts that surround the earth. This zone, known as the "Van Allen Belt slot", may be a safe haven for satellites in "middle Earth orbits" (MEOs), protecting them from the Sun's intense radiation.[16][17][18]

Formation

Note
Positive lightning (a rarer form of lightning that originates from positively charged regions of the thundercloud) does not generally fit the preceding pattern.

Electrostatic induction hypothesis

View of lightning from an airplane flying above a system

According to the electrostatic induction hypothesis charges are driven apart by as-yet uncertain processes. Charge separation appears to require strong updrafts which carry water droplets upward, supercooling them to between -10 and -20 °C. These collide with ice crystals to form a soft ice-water mixture called graupel. The collisions result in a slight positive charge being transferred to ice crystals, and a slight negative charge to the graupel. Updrafts drive the less heavy ice crystals upwards, causing the cloud top to accumulate increasing positive charge. Gravity causes the heavier negatively charged graupel to fall toward the middle and lower portions of the cloud, building up an increasing negative charge. Charge separation and accumulation continue until the electrical potential becomes sufficient to initiate a lightning discharge, which occurs when the distribution of positive and negative charges forms a sufficiently strong electric field.[15]

Polarization mechanism hypothesis

The mechanism by which charge separation happens is still the subject of research. Another hypothesis is the polarization mechanism, which has two components:[19]

  1. Falling droplets of ice and rain become electrically polarized as they fall through the Earth's natural electric field;
  2. Colliding ice particles become charged by electrostatic induction (see above).

There are several additional hypotheses for the origin of charge separation.[20] [21]

Leader formation and the return stroke

Illustration of a negative streamer (blue) meeting a positive counterpart (red) and the return stroke. Click to watch the animation.


As a thundercloud moves over the surface of the Earth, an electric charge equal to but opposite the charge of the base of the thundercloud is induced in the Earth below the cloud. The induced ground charge follows the movement of the cloud, remaining underneath it.

An initial bipolar discharge, or path of ionized air, starts from a negatively charged mixed water and ice region in the thundercloud. Discharge ionized channels are known as leaders. The negatively charged leaders, generally a "stepped leader", proceed downward in a number of quick jumps (steps). 90 percent of the leaders exceed 45 m (148 ft) in length, with most in the order of 50 to 100 m (164 to 492 feet).[22] As it continues to descend, the stepped leader may branch into a number of paths.[23] The progression of stepped leaders takes a comparatively long time (hundreds of milliseconds) to approach the ground. This initial phase involves a relatively small electric current (tens or hundreds of amperes), and the leader is almost invisible when compared with the subsequent lightning channel.

When a stepped leader approaches the ground, the presence of opposite charges on the ground enhances the strength of the electric field. The electric field is strongest on ground-connected objects whose tops are closest to the base of the thundercloud, such as trees and tall buildings. If the electric field is strong enough, a conductive discharge (called a positive streamer) can develop from these points. This was first theorized by Heinz Kasemir.[24][25] As the field increases, the positive streamer may evolve into a hotter, higher current leader which eventually connects to the descending stepped leader from the cloud. It is also possible for many streamers to develop from many different objects simultaneously, with only one connecting with the leader and forming the main discharge path. Photographs have been taken on which non-connected streamers are clearly visible.[26]

Once a channel of ionized air is established between the cloud and ground this becomes a path of least resistance and allows for a much greater current to propagate from the Earth back up the leader into the cloud. This is the return stroke and it is the most luminous and noticeable part of the lightning discharge.

Discharge

Lightning sequence (Duration: 0.32 seconds)

When the electric field becomes strong enough, an electrical discharge (the bolt of lightning) occurs within clouds or between clouds and the ground. During the strike, successive portions of air become a conductive discharge channel as the electrons and positive ions of air molecules are pulled away from each other and forced to flow in opposite directions.

The electrical discharge rapidly superheats the discharge channel, causing the air to expand rapidly and produce a shock wave heard as thunder. The rolling and gradually dissipating rumble of thunder is caused by the time delay of sound coming from different portions of a long stroke.[27]

Gurevich's runaway breakdown theory

A theory of lightning initiation, known as the "runaway breakdown theory", proposed by Aleksandr Gurevich[28] of the Lebedev Physical Institute in 1992 suggests that lightning strikes are triggered by cosmic rays which ionize atoms, releasing electrons that are accelerated by the electric fields, ionizing other air molecules and making the air conductive by a runaway breakdown, then "seeding" a lightning strike.[29][30][31][32]

Gamma rays and the runaway breakdown theory

Double lightning

It has been discovered in the past 15 years that among the processes of lightning is some mechanism capable of generating gamma rays, which escape the atmosphere and are observed by orbiting spacecraft. Brought to light by NASA's Gerald Fishman in 1994 in an article in Science,[33] these so-called terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) were observed by accident, while he was documenting instances of extraterrestrial gamma ray bursts observed by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO). TGFs are much shorter in duration, however, lasting only about 1 ms.

Professor Umran Inan of Stanford University linked a TGF to an individual lightning stroke occurring within 1.5 ms of the TGF event,[34] proving for the first time that the TGF was of atmospheric origin and associated with lightning strikes.

CGRO recorded only about 77 events in 10 years; however, more recently the RHESSI spacecraft, as reported by David Smith of UC Santa Cruz, has been observing TGFs at a much higher rate, indicating that these occur about 50 times per day globally (still a very small fraction of the total lightning on the planet). The energy levels recorded exceed 20 MeV.

Scientists from Duke University have also been studying the link between certain lightning events and the mysterious gamma ray emissions that emanate from the Earth's own atmosphere, in light of newer observations of TGFs made by RHESSI. Their study suggests that this gamma radiation fountains upward from starting points at surprisingly low altitudes in thunderclouds.

Steven Cummer, from Duke University's Pratt School of Engineering, said, "These are higher energy gamma rays than come from the sun. And yet here they are coming from the kind of terrestrial thunderstorm that we see here all the time."

Early hypotheses of this pointed to lightning generating high electric fields at altitudes well above the cloud, where the thin atmosphere allows gamma rays to easily escape into space, known as "relativistic runaway breakdown", similar to the way sprites are generated. Subsequent evidence has cast doubt, though, and suggested instead that TGFs may be produced at the tops of high thunderclouds. Though hindered by atmospheric absorption of the escaping gamma rays, these theories do not require the exceptionally high electric fields that high altitude theories of TGF generation rely on.

The role of TGFs and their relationship to lightning remains a subject of ongoing scientific study.

Re-strike

Lightning is a highly visible form of energy transfer.

High speed videos (examined frame-by frame) show that most lightning strikes are made up of multiple individual strokes. A typical strike is made of 3 to 4 strokes. There may be more.[27]

Each re-strike is separated by a relatively large amount of time, typically 40 to 50 milliseconds. Re-strikes can cause a noticeable "strobe light" effect.[27]

Each successive stroke is preceded by intermediate dart leader strokes akin to, but weaker than, the initial stepped leader. The stroke usually re-uses the discharge channel taken by the previous stroke.[27]

The variations in successive discharges are the result of smaller regions of charge within the cloud being depleted by successive strokes.[citation needed]

The sound of thunder from a lightning strike is prolonged by successive strokes.

Types

Cloud to Ground Lightning

Some lightning strikes exhibit particular characteristics; scientists and the general public have given names to these various types of lightning. The lightning that is most-commonly observed is streak lightning. This is nothing more than the return stroke, the visible part of the lightning stroke. The majority of strokes occur inside a cloud so we do not see most of the individual return strokes during a thunderstorm.

Cloud-to-ground lightning

This is the best known and second most common type of lightning. Of all the different types of lightning, it poses the greatest threat to life and property since it strikes the ground. Cloud-to-ground lightning is a lightning discharge between a cumulonimbus cloud and the ground. It is initiated by a leader stroke moving down from the cloud.

Bead lightning

Bead lightning is a type of cloud-to-ground lightning which appears to break up into a string of short, bright sections, which last longer than the usual discharge channel. It is relatively rare. Several theories have been proposed to explain it; one is that the observer sees portions of the lightning channel end on, and that these portions appear especially bright. Another is that, in bead lightning, the width of the lightning channel varies; as the lightning channel cools and fades, the wider sections cool more slowly and remain visible longer, appearing as a string of beads.[35][36]

Ribbon lightning

Ribbon lightning occurs in thunderstorms with high cross winds and multiple return strokes. The wind will blow each successive return stroke slightly to one side of the previous return stroke, causing a ribbon effect.

Staccato lightning

Staccato lightning is a cloud to ground lightning strike which is a short-duration stroke that appears as a single very bright flash and often has considerable branching.[37]

Forked lightning

Forked lightning is a name, not in formal usage, for cloud-to-ground lightning that exhibits branching of its path.

Ground-to-cloud lightning

Ground-to-cloud lightning is a lightning discharge between the ground and a cumulonimbus cloud initiated by an upward-moving leader stroke. This type of lightning forms when negatively charged ions called the stepped leader rises up from the ground and meets the positively charged ions in a cumulonimbus cloud. Then the strike goes back to the ground as the return stroke. [citation needed]

Cloud-to-cloud lightning

Multiple paths of cloud-to-cloud lightning, Swifts Creek, Australia
Cloud-to-cloud lightning, Victoria, Australia

Lightning discharges may occur between areas of cloud without contacting the ground. When it occurs between two separate clouds it is known as inter-cloud lightning and when it occurs between areas of differing electric potential within a single cloud, it is known as intra-cloud lightning. Intra-cloud lightning is the most frequently occurring type.[15]

These are most common between the upper anvil portion and lower reaches of a given thunderstorm. This lightning can sometimes be observed at great distances at night as so-called "heat lightning". In such instances, the observer may see only a flash of light without hearing any thunder. The "heat" portion of the term is a folk association between locally experienced warmth and the distant lightning flashes.

Another terminology used for cloud-cloud or cloud-cloud-ground lightning is "Anvil Crawler", due to the habit of the charge typically originating from beneath or within the anvil and scrambling through the upper cloud layers of a thunderstorm, normally generating multiple branch strokes which are dramatic to witness. These are usually seen as a thunderstorm passes over the observer or begins to decay. The most vivid crawler behavior occurs in well developed thunderstorms that feature extensive rear anvil shearing.

Sheet lightning

Sheet lightning is an informally applied name to cloud-to-cloud lightning that exhibits a diffuse brightening of the surface of a cloud caused by the actual discharge path being hidden.

Heat lightning

Heat lightning is a common name for a lightning flash that appears to produce no thunder because it occurs too far away for the thunder to be heard. The sound waves dissipate before they reach the observer.[38]

Dry lightning

Volcanic material thrust high into the atmosphere can trigger lightning.
Lightning strikes during the eruption of the Galunggung volcano, Indonesia in 1982

Dry lightning is a term in the United States for lightning that occurs with no precipitation at the surface. This type of lightning is the most common natural cause of wildfires.[39] Pyrocumulus clouds produce lightning for the same reason that it is produced by cumulonimbus clouds. When the higher levels of the atmosphere are cooler, and the surface is warmed to extreme temperatures due to a wildfire, volcano, etc., convection will occur, and the convection produces lightning. Therefore, fire can beget dry lightning through the development of more dry thunderstorms which cause more fires (see positive feedback).

Rocket lightning

It is a form of cloud discharge, generally horizontal and at cloud base, with a luminous channel appearing to advance through the air with visually resolvable speed, often intermittently.[40]

Positive lightning

Anvil-to-ground (Bolt from the blue) lightning strike

Positive lightning is a type of lightning strike that comes from apparently clear or only slightly cloudy skies; they are also known as "bolts from the blue" because of this trait. Unlike the more common negative lightning, the positive charge is carried by the top of the clouds (generally anvil clouds) rather than the ground. The leader forms in the sky travelling horizontally for several miles before veering down to meet the negatively charged streamer rising from below. Positive lightning makes up less than 5% of all lightning strikes.[41] Because of the much greater distance they must travel before discharging, positive lightning strikes typically carry six to ten times the charge and voltage difference of a negative bolt and last around ten times longer.[42] During a positive lightning strike, huge quantities of ELF and VLF radio waves are generated.[43]

As a result of their greater power, as well as lack of warning, positive lightning strikes are considerably more dangerous. At the present time, aircraft are not designed to withstand such strikes, since their existence was unknown at the time standards were set, and the dangers unappreciated until the destruction of a glider in 1999.[44] The standard in force at the time of the crash, Advisory Circular AC 20-53A, was replaced by Advisory Circular AC 20-53B in 2006,[45] however it is unclear whether adequate protection against positive lighting was incorporated.[46][47]

Positive lightning is also now believed to have been responsible for the 1963 in-flight explosion and subsequent crash of Pan Am Flight 214, a Boeing 707.[48] Due to the dangers of lightning, aircraft operating in U.S. airspace have been required to have lightning discharge wicks to reduce the damage by a lightning strike, but these measures may be insufficient for positive lightning.[49]

Positive lightning has also been shown to trigger the occurrence of upper atmosphere lightning. It tends to occur more frequently in winter storms, as with thundersnow, and at the end of a thunderstorm.[15]

Ball lightning

File:Ball lightning appears cropped.jpg
A photo purportedly depicting natural ball lightning, taken in 1987 by a student in Nagano, Japan.

Ball lightning may be an atmospheric electrical phenomenon, the physical nature of which is still controversial. The term refers to reports of luminous, usually spherical objects which vary from pea-sized to several meters in diameter.[50] It is sometimes associated with thunderstorms, but unlike lightning flashes, which last only a fraction of a second, ball lightning reportedly lasts many seconds. Ball lightning has been described by eyewitnesses but rarely recorded by meteorologists.[51] Scientific data on natural ball lightning is scarce owing to its infrequency and unpredictability. The presumption of its existence is based on reported public sightings, and has therefore produced somewhat inconsistent findings.

Laboratory experiments have produced effects that are visually similar to reports of ball lightning, but at present, it is unknown whether these are actually related to any naturally occurring phenomenon. One theory is that ball lightning may be created when lightning strikes silicon in soil, a phenomenon which has been duplicated in laboratory testing.[52] Given inconsistencies and the lack of reliable data, the true nature of ball lightning is still unknown[53] and was often regarded as a fantasy or a hoax.[54] Reports of the phenomenon were dismissed for lack of physical evidence, and were often regarded the same way as UFO sightings.[53]

One theory that may account for this wider spectrum of observational evidence is the idea of combustion inside the low-velocity region of spherical vortex breakdown of a natural vortex (e.g., the 'Hill's spherical vortex').[55] Natural ball lightning appears infrequently and unpredictably, and is therefore rarely (if ever truly) photographed. However, several purported photos and videos exist. Perhaps the most famous story of ball lightning unfolded when 18th-century physicist Georg Wilhelm Richmann installed a lightning rod in his home and was struck in the head - and killed - by a "pale blue ball of fire."[56]

Upper-atmospheric lightning

Representation of upper-atmospheric lightning and electrical-discharge phenomena

Reports by scientists of strange lightning phenomena about storms date back to at least 1886. However, it is only in recent years that fuller investigations have been made. This has sometimes been called megalightning.[57][58]

Sprites

Sprites are large-scale electrical discharges that occur high above a thunderstorm cloud, or cumulonimbus, giving rise to a quite varied range of visual shapes. They are triggered by the discharges of positive lightning between the thundercloud and the ground.[43] The phenomena were named after the mischievous sprite (air spirit) Puck in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. They normally are coloured reddish-orange or greenish-blue, with hanging tendrils below and arcing branches above their location, and can be preceded by a reddish halo.[57] They often occur in clusters, lying Template:Mi to km to Template:Mi to km above the Earth's surface. Sprites were first photographed on July 6, 1989 by scientists from the University of Minnesota and have since been witnessed tens of thousands of times.[59] Sprites have been mentioned as a possible cause in otherwise unexplained accidents involving high altitude vehicular operations above thunderstorms.[60]

Blue jets

Blue jets differ from sprites in that they project from the top of the cumulonimbus above a thunderstorm, typically in a narrow cone, to the lowest levels of the ionosphere Template:Mi to km to Template:Mi to km above the earth.[61] They are also brighter than sprites and, as implied by their name, are blue in color. They were first recorded on October 21, 1989, on a video taken from the space shuttle as it passed over Australia, and subsequently extensively documented in 1994 during aircraft research flights by the University of Alaska.[58][62]

On September 14, 2001, scientists at the Arecibo Observatory photographed a huge jet double the height of those previously observed, reaching around Template:Mi to km into the atmosphere. The jet was located above a thunderstorm over the ocean, and lasted under a second. Lightning was initially observed traveling up at around 50,000 m/s in a similar way to a typical blue jet, but then divided in two and sped at 250,000 m/s to the ionosphere, where they spread out in a bright burst of light.[63] On July 22, 2002, five gigantic jets between 60 and 70 km (35 to 45 miles) in length were observed over the South China Sea from Taiwan, reported in Nature.[62] The jets lasted under a second, with shapes likened by the researchers to giant trees and carrots.[citation needed]

Elves

Lightning strikes the Space Shuttle Challenger before the launch of STS-8.

Elves often appear as dim, flattened, expanding glows around Template:Mi to km in diameter that last for, typically, just one millisecond.[64] They occur in the ionosphere Template:Mi to km above the ground over thunderstorms. Their colour was a puzzle for some time, but is now believed to be a red hue. Elves were first recorded on another shuttle mission, this time recorded off French Guiana on October 7, 1990. Elves is an acronym for Emissions of Light and Very Low Frequency Perturbations from Electromagnetic Pulse Sources.[65] This refers to the process by which the light is generated; the excitation of nitrogen molecules due to electron collisions (the electrons possibly having been energized by the electromagnetic pulse caused by a discharge from the Ionosphere).[58]

Triggered lightning

Rocket-triggered

Lightning has been triggered by launching lightning rockets carrying spools of wire into thunderstorms. The wire unwinds as the rocket ascends, providing a path for lightning. These bolts are typically very straight due to the path created by the wire.[66]

Lightning has also been triggered directly by other human activities: Flying aircraft can trigger lightning.[67] Furthermore, lightning struck Apollo 12 soon after takeoff, and has struck soon after thermonuclear explosions.[68]

Volcanically triggered

There are three types of volcanic lightning:

  • Extremely large volcanic eruptions, which eject gases and material high into the atmosphere, can trigger lightning. This phenomenon was documented by Pliny The Elder during the AD79 eruption of Vesuvius, in which he perished.[69]
  • An intermediate type which comes from a volcano's vents, sometimes 1.8 miles (3 kilometers) long.
  • Small spark type lightning about 3 feet (1 meter) long lasting a few milliseconds.[70]

Laser-triggered

Since the 1970s,[71][72][73][74][75] researchers have attempted to trigger lightning strikes by means of infrared or ultraviolet lasers, which create a channel of ionized gas through which the lightning would be conducted to ground. Such triggered lightning is intended to protect rocket launching pads, electric power facilities, and other sensitive targets.[76][77][78][79][80]

In New Mexico, U.S., scientists tested a new terawatt laser which provoked lightning. Scientists fired ultra-fast pulses from an extremely powerful laser thus sending several terawatts into the clouds to call down electrical discharges in storm clouds over the region. The laser beams sent from the laser make channels of ionized molecules known as "filaments". Before the lightning strikes earth, the filaments lead electricity through the clouds, playing the role of lightning rods. Researchers generated filaments that lived too short a period to trigger a real lightning strike. Nevertheless, a boost in electrical activity within the clouds was registered. According to the French and German scientists, who ran the experiment, the fast pulses sent from the laser will be able to provoke lightning strikes on demand.[81] Statistical analysis showed that their laser pulses indeed enhanced the electrical activity in the thundercloud where it was aimed—in effect they generated small local discharges located at the position of the plasma channels.[82]

Extraterrestrial lightning

Lightning requires the electrical breakdown of a gas, so it cannot exist in a visual form in the vacuum of space. However, lightning has been observed within the atmospheres of other planets, such as Venus, Jupiter and Saturn. Lightning on Venus is still a controversial subject after decades of study. During the Soviet Venera and U.S. Pioneer missions of the 1970s and '80s, signals suggesting lightning may be present in the upper atmosphere were detected.[83] However, recently the Cassini-Huygens mission fly-by of Venus detected no signs of lightning at all. Despite this, it has been suggested that radio pulses recorded by the spacecraft Venus Express may originate from lightning on Venus.[84]

Trees and lightning

A green tree which was struck by lightning
A eucalyptus tree that was struck by lightning but 2 pine trees next to the tree are untouched, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia

Trees are frequent conductors of lightning to the ground.[85] Since sap is a poor conductor, its electrical resistance causes it to be heated explosively into steam, which blows off the bark outside the lightning's path. In following seasons trees overgrow the damaged area and may cover it completely, leaving only a vertical scar. If the damage is severe, the tree may not be able to recover, and decay sets in, eventually killing the tree. In sparsely populated areas such as the Far East and Siberia, lightning strikes are one of the major causes of forest fires.[86] The smoke and mist expelled by a forest fire can cause electric charges, multiplying the intensity of a forest fire.[86] It is commonly thought that a tree standing alone is more frequently struck, though in some forested areas, lightning scars can be seen on almost every tree.

The two most frequently struck tree types are the oak and the elm.[87] Pine trees are also quite often hit by lightning. Unlike the oak, which has a relatively shallow root structure, pine trees have a deep central root system that goes down into the water table.[88] Pine trees usually stand taller than other species, which also makes them a likely target. Factors which lead to its being targeted are a high resin content, loftiness, and its needles which lend themselves to a high electrical discharge during a thunderstorm.

Trees are natural lightning conductors, and are known to provide protection against lightning damages to the nearby buildings. Tall trees with high biomass for the root system provide good lightning protection. An example is the teak tree (Tectona grandis), which grows to a height of 45 metres (147.6 ft). It has a spread root system with a spread of 5 m and a biomass of 4 times that of the trunk; its penetration into the soil is 1.25 metres (4.10 ft) and has no tap root. When planted near a building, its height helps in catching the oncoming lightning leader, and the high biomass of the root system helps in dissipation of the lightning charges.[89]

Lightning currents have a very fast risetime, on the order of 40 kA per microsecond. Hence, conductors of such currents exhibit marked skin effect, causing most of the currents to flow through the conductor skin.[90] The effective resistance of the conductor is consequently very high and therefore, the conductor skin gets heated up much more than the conductor core. When a tree acts as a natural lightning conductor, due to skin effect most of the lightning currents flow through the skin of the tree and the sap wood. As a result, the skin gets burnt and may even peel off. The moisture in the skin and the sap wood evaporates instantaneously and may get split.

Fulgurites

Lightning strikes on sandy soil can produce fulgurites. These root-shaped tubes of melted and fused sand grains are sometimes called petrified lightning.

High energy radiation emissions due to lightning

The production of X-rays by a bolt of lightning was theoretically predicted as early as 1925 but no evidence was found until 2001/2002,[91] when researchers at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology detected X-ray emissions from an induced lightning strike along a wire trailed behind a rocket shot into a storm cloud. In the same year University of Florida and Florida Tech researchers used an array of electric field and X-ray detectors at a lightning research facility in North Florida to confirm that natural lightning makes X-rays in large quantities. The cause of the X-ray emissions is still a matter for research, as the temperature of lightning is too low to account for the X-rays observed.[92]

A number of observations by space-based telescopes have revealed even higher energy gamma ray emissions, and new challenges are posed to current theories of lightning formation by the recent discovery of antimatter positron signatures in these types of emissions.[2]

Sound

Because the electrostatic discharge of terrestrial lightning superheats the air to plasma temperatures along the length of the discharge channel in a short duration, kinetic theory dictates gaseous molecules undergo a rapid increase in pressure and thus expand outward from the lightning creating a shock wave audible as thunder. Since the sound waves propagate not from a single point source but along the length of the lightning's path, the sound origin's varying distances from the observer can generate a rolling or rumbling effect. Perception of the sonic characteristics are further complicated by factors such as the irregular and possibly branching geometry of the lightning channel, by acoustic echoing from terrain, and by the typically multiple-stroke characteristic of the lightning strike.

File:LIRM anomaly with archaeological hearths.jpg
Lightning induced remanent magnetization (LIRM) mapped during a magnetic field gradient survey of an archaeological site located in Wyoming, United States

Since light travels at a significantly greater speed than sound through air, an observer can approximate the distance to the strike by timing the interval between the visible lightning and the audible thunder it generates. At standard atmospheric temperature and pressures near ground level, sound will travel at roughly 343 m/s (1125 ft/sec); a lightning flash preceding its thunder by five seconds would be about one mile distant. A flash preceding thunder by three seconds is about one kilometer distant. Consequently, a lightning strike observed at a very close distance (within 100 meters) will be accompanied by the sound of a loud snap, instant thunder, and the smell of Ozone (O3).

Lightning-induced magnetism

The movement of electrical charges produces a magnetic field (see electromagnetism). The intense currents of a lightning discharge create a fleeting but very strong magnetic field. Where the lightning current path passes through rock, soil, or metal these materials can become permanently magnetized. This effect is known as lightning-induced remanent magnetism, or LIRM. These currents follow the least resistive path, often horizontally near the surface[93] but sometimes vertically, where faults, ore bodies, or ground water offers a less resistive path.[94] Lightning-induced magnetic anomalies can be mapped in the ground,[95][96] and analysis of magnetized materials can confirm lightning was the source of the magnetization[97] and provide an estimate of the peak current of the lightning discharge.[98]

Records and locations

An old estimate of the frequency of lightning on Earth was 100 times a second. Now that there are satellites that can detect lightning, including in places where there is nobody to observe it, it is known to occur on average 44 ± 5 times a second, for a total of nearly 1.4 billion flashes per year;[99][100] 75% of these flashes are either cloud-to-cloud or intra-cloud and 25% are cloud-to-ground.[101]

The map below shows that lightning is not distributed evenly around the planet. Approximately 70% of lightning occurs in the tropics where the majority of thunderstorms occur. The place where lightning occurs most often is near the small village of Kifuka in the mountains of eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the elevation is around 975 metres (3,200 ft). On average this region receives 158 lightning strikes per square kilometre (approx. 0.4 square mile) a year.[100] Above the Catatumbo river, which feeds Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela, Catatumbo lightning flashes several times per minute, 140 to 160 nights per year, accounting for 25% of the world's production of upper-atmospheric ozone. Singapore has one of the highest rates of lightning activity in the world.[102] The city of Teresina in northern Brazil has the third-highest rate of occurrences of lightning strikes in the world. The surrounding region is referred to as the Chapada do Corisco ("Flash Lightning Flatlands").[103] In the US, Central Florida sees more lightning than any other area. For example, in what is called "Lightning Alley", an area from Tampa, to Orlando, there are as many as 50 strikes per square mile (about 20 per km²) per year.[104][105] The Empire State Building is struck by lightning on average 23 times each year, and was once struck 8 times in 24 minutes.[106]

Global map of lightning frequency
  • In July 2007, lightning killed up to 30 people when it struck a remote mountain village Ushari Dara in northwestern Pakistan.[108]
  • On 31 October 2005, sixty-eight dairy cows, all in full milk, died on a farm at Fernbrook on the Waterfall Way near Dorrigo, New South Wales after being struck by lightning. Three others were paralysed for several hours but they later made a full recovery. The cows were sheltering under a tree when it was struck by lightning and the electricity spread onto the surrounding soil killing the animals.[109]

Lightning rarely strikes the open ocean, although some sea regions are lightning "hot spots". Winter storms passing off the east coast of the United States often erupt with electrical activity when they cross the warm waters of the Gulf Stream. The Gulf Stream endures about the same number of lightning strikes as the southern plains of the USA.

Lightning detection

The earliest detector invented to warn of the approach of a thunder storm was the lightning bell. Benjamin Franklin installed one such device in his house.[110] The detector was based on an electrostatic device called the 'electric chimes' invented by Andrew Gordon in 1742.

Lightning discharges generate a wide range of electromagnetic radiations, including radio-frequency pulses. The times at which a pulse from a given lightning discharge arrive at several receivers can be used to locate the source of the discharge. The United States federal government has constructed a nation-wide grid of such lightning detectors, allowing lightning discharges to be tracked in real time throughout the continental U.S.[111][112]

In addition to ground-based lightning detection, several instruments aboard satellites have been constructed to observe lightning distribution. These include the Optical Transient Detector (OTD), aboard the OrbView-1 satellite launched on April 3, 1995, and the subsequent Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) aboard TRMM launched on November 28, 1997.[113][114][115]

Notable lightning strikes

File:NYC lightning.jpg
Lightning strike in midtown Manhattan

Some lightning strikes have caused either numerous fatalities or great damage. The following is a partial list:

  • A particularly deadly lightning incident occurred in Brescia, Italy in 1769. Lightning struck the Church of St. Nazaire, igniting the 100 tons of gunpowder in its vaults; the resulting explosion killed 3000 people and destroyed a sixth of the city.[116]
  • 1902: A lightning strike damaged the upper section of the Eiffel Tower, requiring the reconstruction of its top[117]
  • December 8, 1963: Pan Am Flight 214 crashed as result of a lightning strike, and 81 people were killed.
  • July 1970, the central mast of the Orlunda radio transmitter collapsed after a lightning strike destroyed its basement insulator.
  • December 24, 1971: LANSA Flight 508 crashed as a result of lightning in Peru, with 91 people killed.[118]
  • November 2, 1994, lightning struck fuel tanks in Dronka, Egypt and caused 469 fatalities.[119][120][121][122]

Harvesting lightning energy

Since the late 1980s there have been several attempts to investigate the possibility of harvesting energy from lightning. While a single bolt of lightning carries a relatively large amount of energy, this energy is concentrated in a small location and is passed during an extremely short period of time (milliseconds); therefore, extremely high electrical power is involved.[123] It has been proposed that the energy contained in lightning be used to generate hydrogen from water, or to harness the energy from rapid heating of water due to lightning.[124]

A technology capable of harvesting lightning energy would need to be able to capture rapidly the high power involved in a lightning bolt. Several schemes have been proposed, but the low energy involved in each lightning bolt render lightning power harvesting from ground based lightning rods as impractical.[125] According to Northeastern University physicists Stephen Reucroft and John Swain, a lightning bolt carries a few million joules of energy, enough to power a 100-watt bulb for 5.5 hours. Additionally, lightning is sporadic, and therefore energy would have to be collected and stored; it is difficult to convert high-voltage electrical power to the lower-voltage power that can be stored.[124]

In the summer of 2007, an alternative energy company called Alternate Energy Holdings (AEH) tested a method for capturing the energy in lightning bolts. The design for the system had been purchased from an Illinois inventor named Steve LeRoy, who had reportedly been able to power a 60-watt light bulb for 20 minutes using the energy captured from a small flash of artificial lightning. The method involved a tower, a means of shunting off a large portion of the incoming energy, and a capacitor to store the rest. According to Donald Gillispie, CEO of AEH, they "couldn't make it work," although "given enough time and money, you could probably scale this thing up... it's not black magic; it's truly math and science, and it could happen."[126]

According to Dr. Martin A. Uman, co-director of the Lightning Research Laboratory at the University of Florida and a leading authority on lightning,[127] a single lighting strike, while fast and bright, contains very little energy, and dozens of lighting towers like those used in the system tested by AEH would need to operate five 100-watt light bulbs for the course of a year. When interviewed by The New York Times, he stated that the energy in a thunderstorm is comparable to that of an atomic bomb, but trying to harvest the energy of lightning from the ground is "hopeless".[126]

In culture

As expressions and symbols

The expression "Lightning never strikes twice (in the same place)" is similar to "Opportunity never knocks twice" in the vein of a "once in a lifetime" opportunity, i.e., something that is generally considered improbable. Lightning occurs frequently and more so in specific areas. Since various factors alter the probability of strikes at any given location, repeat lightning strikes have a very low probability (but are not impossible).[106][128] Similarly, "A bolt from the blue" refers to something totally unexpected.

In French and Italian, the expression for "Love at first sight" is Coup de foudre and Colpo di fulmine, respectively, which literally translated means "lightning strike". Some European languages have a separate word for lightning which strikes the ground (as opposed to lightning in general); often it is a cognate of the English word "rays". The name of New Zealand's most celebrated thoroughbred horse, Phar Lap, derives from the shared Zhuang and Thai word for lightning.[129]

The bolt of lightning in heraldry is called a thunderbolt and is shown as a zigzag with non-pointed ends. This symbol usually represents power and speed. In Hindu mythology the thunderbolt (Sanskrit Vajra) is an attribute of the Hindu god Indra. The lightning bolt or thunderbolt appears also as a heraldic charge.

Ceraunoscopy

This is divination by observing lightning or by listening to thunder.[130] It is a type of aeromancy. People have also sought to control lightning by conducting rituals or casting spells.

Religion

Over the centuries, lightning in cultures was viewed as part of a deity or a deity in of itself. One of the most classic portrayals of this is of the Greek God Zeus. An ancient story is when Zeus was at war against Cronus and the Titans, he released his brothers, Hades and Poseidon, along with the Cyclopes. In turn, the Cyclopes gave Zeus the Thunderbolt as a weapon, which was near the beginning of Zeus himself. The thunderbolt became a popular symbol of Zeus and continues to be today.

The Aztecs also portrayed Lightning as a supernatural power of a god, the god Tlaloc. In mythology, the god was the bringer not only of beneficial rain but of storms, killer lightning bolts, flood, and disease.

In Slavic mythology the highest god of the pantheon is Perun, the god of thunder and lightning. Perkūnas was the common Baltic god of thunder, one of the most important deities in the Baltic pantheon. In both Lithuanian and Latvian mythology, he is documented as the god of thunder, rain, mountains, oak trees and the sky.

In Norse mythology, Thor is the god of thunder and the sound of thunder comes from the chariot he rides across the sky. The lightnings come from his hammer Mjölnir.

In Finnish mythology, Ukko (engl. Old Man) is the god of thunder, sky and weather. The Finnish word for thunder is ukkonen; derived from the god's name.

In the Jewish religion, a blessing "...He who does acts of creation" is to be recited, upon sighting lightning. The Talmud refers to the Hebrew word for the sky, ("Shamaim") - as built from fire and water ("Esh Umaim"), since the sky is the source of the inexplicable mixture of "fire" and water that come together, during rainstorms. This is mentioned in various prayers[131] and discussed in writings of Kabbalah.

In Islam, God has said in the Quran, "Have you not seen how God makes the clouds move gently, then joins them together, then makes them into a stack, and then you see the rain come out of it.... (Quran, 24:43)" The preceding verse, after mentioning clouds and rain, speaks about hail and lightning, "....And He sends down hail from mountains (clouds) in the sky, and He strikes with it whomever He wills, and turns it from whomever He wills. The vivid flash of its lightning nearly blinds the sight. (Quran, 24:43)"

The Hindu god Indra is considered the God of rains and lightning and the king of the Devtas in Hindu mythology.

See also

References

Notes

  1. ^ a b NGDC - NOAA. "Volcanic Lightning". National Geophysical Data Center - NOAA. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
  2. ^ Munoz, Rene (2003). "Factsheet: Lightning". University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Retrieved November 7, 2007.
  3. ^ Rakov, Vladimir A. (1999). "Lightning Makes Glass". University of Florida, Gainesville. Retrieved November 7, 2007.
  4. ^ a b c National Weather Service (2007). "Lightning Safety". National Weather Service. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
  5. ^ USGS (1998). "Bench collapse sparks lightning, roiling clouds". United States Geological Society. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
  6. ^ Micah Fink for PBS. "How Lightning Forms". Public Broadcasting System. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
  7. ^ Benjamin Franklin: The Kite Experiment and the Invention of the Lightning Rod
  8. ^ Krider, E. Philip (2004). "Benjamin Franklin and the First Lightning Conductors". Proceedings of International Commission on History of Meteorology. 1 (1): 1–13. ISSN 1551-3580. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) Pages 3-4.
  9. ^ E. Philip Krider (2004). pdf file "Benjamin Franklin and the First Lightning Conductors" (.pdf). Proceedings of International Commission on History of Meteorology. Retrieved September 24, 2007. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  10. ^ Wåhlin, Lars; Wh̄lin, Lars (1986). Atmosphere electrostatics. Forest Grove, Ore: Research Studies Press. ISBN 0-86380-042-4. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Amarendra Swarup (2006). "Physicists create great balls of fire". New Scientist. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  12. ^ E. Philip Krider (2006). "Benjamin Franklin and Lightning Rods". Physics today.org. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  13. ^ Hasbrouck, Richard. Mitigating Lightning Hazards, Science & Technology Review May 1996. Retrieved on 2009-04-26.
  14. ^ Rakov, V; Uman, M, Lightning: Physics and Effects, Cambridge University Press, 2003
  15. ^ a b c d e Dr. Hugh J. Christian. "A Lightning Primer - Characteristics of a Storm". NASA. Retrieved 2009-02-08. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ NASA (2005). "Flashes in the Sky: Lightning Zaps Space Radiation Surrounding Earth". NASA. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  17. ^ Robert Roy Britt (1999). "Lightning Interacts with Space, Electrons Rain Down". Space.com. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  18. ^ Demirkol, M. K. (1999). (abstract) "Ionospheric effects of relativistic electron enhancement events". Geophysical Research Letters. 26 (23): 3557–3560. doi:10.1029/1999GL010686. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. ^ "Electric Ice". NASA. Retrieved 2007-07-05.
  20. ^ Theories of lightning formation
  21. ^ Frazier, Alicia (December 12, 2005 (dead link)). "Theories of lightning formation". Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved 2007-07-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  22. ^ Goulde, R.H., 1977: The lightning conuctor. Lightning Protection, R.H. Goulde, Ed., Lightning, Vol. 2, Academic Press, 545-576.
  23. ^ Ultra slow motion video of stepped leader propagation: http://www.ztresearch.com/ .
  24. ^ Kasemir, H. W., "Qualitative Übersicht über Potential-, Feld- und Ladungsverhaltnisse bei einer Blitzentladung in der Gewitterwolke" (Qualitative survey of the potential, field and charge conditions during a lightning discharge in the thunderstorm cloud) in Das Gewitter (The Thunderstorm), H. Israel, ed. (Leipzig, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1950).
  25. ^ Obituary: Heinz Wolfram Kasemir (1930-2007), German-American physicist: http://www.physicstoday.org/obits/notice_157.shtml .
  26. ^ http://web.archive.org/web/20050416080351/http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/lwx/lightning/lgtng-hits-tree.jpg
  27. ^ a b c d Martin A. Uman (1986). All About Lightning. Dover Publications, Inc. pp. 103–110. ISBN 0-486-25237-X. Cite error: The named reference "uman" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  28. ^ A. V. Gurevich, G. M. Milikh, and R. Roussel-Dupre (1992) "Runaway electron mechanism of air breakdown and preconditioning during a thunderstorm," Physics Letters A, vol. 165, pages 463-468.
  29. ^ Gurevich (2003-12-04). "How Lightning Works Is Still A Mystery". The Economist.
  30. ^ Dwyer, Joseph R., "A bolt out of the blue," Scientific American, vol. 292, no. 5, pages 64-71 (May 2005)
  31. ^ Shrope, Mark (September 9, 2004). "Lightning research: The bolt catchers" ([dead link]). Nature. 431 (7005): 120–121. doi:10.1038/431120a. PMID 15356600. Retrieved 2007-07-27. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  32. ^ New Scientist, 7 may 2005, p. 30.
  33. ^ G. J. Fishman, P. N. Bhat, R. Malozzi, J. M. Horack, T. Koshut, C. Kouvelioton, G. N. Pendleton, C. A. Meegan, R. B. Wilson, W. S. Paciesas, S. J. Goodman, and H. J. Christian (1994) "Discovery of intense gamma-ray flashes of atmospheric origin," Science, vol. 264, pages 1313-1316.
  34. ^ U.S. Inan, S.C. Reising, G.J. Fishman, and J.M. Horack. On the association of terrestrial gamma-ray bursts with lightning and implications for sprites. Geophysical Research Letters, 23(9):1017-20, May 1996. As quoted by http://elf.gi.alaska.edu/spr20010406.html#InanUS:theatg Retrieved 2007-03-06.
  35. ^ "Beaded Lightning". Glossary of Meteorology, 2nd edition. American Meteorological Society (AMS). 2000. Retrieved 2007-07-31.
  36. ^ Uman (1986) Chapter 16, pages 139-143
  37. ^ "Glossary". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Weather Service. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  38. ^ "What is heat lightning?".
  39. ^ Scott, A (2000). "The Pre-Quaternary history of fire". Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 164: 281. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00192-9. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  40. ^ "Definition of Rocket Lightning, AMS Glossary of Meteorology". Retrieved 2007-07-05.
  41. ^ "NWS JetStream - The Positive and Negative Side of Lightning". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 2007-09-25.
  42. ^ Lawrence, D (2005-11-01). "Bolt from the Blue". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
  43. ^ a b Boccippio, DJ; Williams, ER; Heckman, SJ; Lyons, WA; Baker, IT; Boldi, R (1995). "Sprites, ELF Transients, and Positive Ground Strokes". Science. 269 (5227): 1088–1091. doi:10.1126/science.269.5227.1088. PMID 17755531. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  44. ^ "Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) Bulletins 1999 December: Schleicher ASK 21 two seat glider".
  45. ^ FAA Advisory Circulars
  46. ^ Hiding requirements = suspicion they're inadequate, Nolan Law Group, January 18, 2010
  47. ^ A Proposed Addition to the Lightning Environment Standards Applicable to Aircraft, J. Anderson Plumer Lightning Technologies, Inc, published 2005-09-27
  48. ^ "Aviation Safety Network". Retrieved 2006-06-12.
  49. ^ http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/design/q0234.shtml
  50. ^ Singer, Stanley (1971). The Nature of Ball Lightning. New York: Plenum Press. ISBN 0306304945.
  51. ^ Kirthi Tennakone (2007). "Ball Lightning". Georgia State University. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
  52. ^ "Lightning balls created in the lab". New Scientist. Retrieved 2007-12-08.
  53. ^ a b ABC.net.edu: Ball lightning bamboozles physicist
  54. ^ "Ball lightning scientists remain in the dark". New Scientist. 2001-12-20.
  55. ^ Coleman, PF (1993). "An explanation for ball lightning?". Weather. 48: 30. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  56. ^ "Great balls of fire!". The Economist. 2008-03-27.
  57. ^ a b Sterling D. Allen - Pure Energy Systems News (2005). "BLAM-O!! Power from Lightning". Pure Energy Systems. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  58. ^ a b c Holoscience.com. "Image of lightning types and altitudes" (.jpg). Holoscience.com. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  59. ^ Walter A. Lyons and Michey D. Schmidt (2003). P1.39 The Discovery of Red Sprites as an Opportunity For Informal Science Education. American Meteorological Society. Retrieved on 2009-02-18.
  60. ^ STRATOCAT - Stratospheric balloons history and present. "Full report on the uncontrolled free fall of a stratospheric balloon payload provoked by a Sprite".
  61. ^ UNIVERSE: Cosmic Phenomena(2009), History Channel, aired 9-10am MDT
  62. ^ a b Tom Clarke (2002). "Blue jets connect Earth's electric circuit". Nature.com. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  63. ^ Penn State College of Engineering (2002). "Researchers capture unusual sprite-like blue jet". Penn State College of Engineering. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  64. ^ W. Wayt Gibbs for Scientific American. "Lightning's strange cousins flicker faster than light itself". Scientific American. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  65. ^ William L. Boeck, Otha H. Vaughan Jr., R. J. Blakeslee, Bernard Vonnegut and Marx Brook, 1998. The role of the space shuttle videotapes in the discovery of sprites, jets and elves. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 60, Issues 7-9, p. 669-677.
  66. ^ Chris Kridler (2002). "July 25, 2002 - Triggered lightning video" (video). requires QuickTime. Chris Kridler's Sky Diary. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  67. ^ Uman (1986), chapter 4, pages 26-34
  68. ^ Colvin, J. D.; Mitchell, C. K.; Greig, J. R.; Murphy, D. P.; Pechacek, R. E.; Raleigh, M. (1987). "An empirical study of the nuclear explosion-induced lightning seen on IVY-MIKE". Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 92, no. D5. pp. 5696–5712. doi:10.1029/JD092iD05p05696.
  69. ^ Pliny the Younger. "Pliny the Younger's Observations". Retrieved 2007-07-05. Behind us were frightening dark clouds, rent by lightning twisted and hurled, opening to reveal huge figures of flame.
  70. ^ Dell'Amore, Christine. New Lightning Type Found Over Volcano?. National Geographic News, February 3, 2010.
  71. ^ Koopman, David W.; Wilkerson, T. D. (1971). "Channeling of an Ionizing Electrical Streamer by a Laser Beam". Journal of Applied Physics. 42 (5): 1883–1886. doi:10.1063/1.1660462. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help). See also Saum, K. A.; Koopman, David W. (1972). "Discharges Guided by Laser-Induced Rarefaction Channels". Physics of Fluids. 15 (11): 2077–2079. doi:10.1063/1.1693833. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help).
  72. ^ Schubert, C. W. (1977). "The laser lightning rod: A feasibility study". Technical report AFFDL-TR-78-60, ADA063847, [U.S.] Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB [Air Force Base] Ohio. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help). For abstract, see [1].
  73. ^ Schubert, Charles W.; Lippert, Jack R. (1979). "Investigation into triggering lightning with a pulsed laser". In Guenther, A. H.; Kristiansen, M. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Pulse Power Conference, Lubbock, Texas, 1979. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. pp. 132–135. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  74. ^ Lippert, J. R. (1977). "A laser-induced lightning concept experiment". Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab., Wright-Patterson AFB. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  75. ^ Rakov, Vladimir A.; Uman, Martin A. (2003). "Lightning: Physics and effects" (Document). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 296–299. {{cite document}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help). Online version.
  76. ^ "UNM researchers use lasers to guide lightning". Campus News, The University of New Mexico. January 29, 2001. Retrieved 2007-07-28.
  77. ^ Khan, Nasrullah; Mariun, Norman; Aris, Ishak; Yeak, J. (2002). "Laser-triggered lightning discharge". New Journal of Physics. pp. 61.1–61.20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  78. ^ Rambo, P.; Biegert, J.; Kubecek, V.; Schwarz, J.; Bernstein, A.; Diels, J.-C.; Bernstein, R.; Stahlkopf, K. (1999). "Laboratory tests of laser-induced lightning discharge". Journal of Optical Technology. 66 (3): 194–198. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  79. ^ Ackermann, R.; Stelmaszczyk, K.; Rohwetter, P.; Méjean, G.; Salmon, E.; Yu, J.; Kasparian, J.; Méchain, G.; Bergmann, V. (2004). "Triggering and guiding of megavolt discharges by laser-induced filaments under rain conditions". Applied Physics Letters. 85 (23): 5781–5783. doi:10.1063/1.1829165. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  80. ^ Wang, D.; Ushio, T.; Kawasaki, Z.-I.; Matsuura, K.; Shimada, Y.; Uchida, S.; Yamanaka, C.; Izawa, Y.; Sonoi, Y. (1995). "A possible way to trigger lightning using a laser". Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics. 57 (5): 456–466. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(94)00073-W. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  81. ^ "Terawatt Laser Beam Shot in the Clouds Provokes Lightning Strike". {{cite web}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help), news report based on: Kasparian, Jérôme; Ackermann, Roland; André, Yves-Bernard; Méchain, Grégoire; Méjean, Guillaume; Prade, Bernard; Rohwetter, Philipp; Salmon, Estelle; Stelmaszczyk, Kamil (2008). "Electric events synchronized with laser filaments in thunder clouds". Optics Express. 16 (8): 5757–5763. doi:10.1364/OE.16.005757. PMID 18542684. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help).
  82. ^ "Laser Triggers Electrical Activity in Thunderstorm for the First Time". Newswise. Retrieved August 6, 2008. {{cite web}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help). News report based on Kasparian et al. 2008, pp. 5757–5763.
  83. ^ Robert J. Strangeway - Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics UCLA (1995). "Plasma Wave Evidence for Lightning on Venus". Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, vol. 57, pages 537-556. Retrieved September 24, 2007. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  84. ^ S&T, Mar. 2008
  85. ^ National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. "Image of lightning hitting a tree" (.jpg). National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  86. ^ a b "Lightning as a source of forest fires". Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 32 (5). Springer New York: 134–142. September, 1996. ISSN 0010-5082. Retrieved 2009-07-25. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  87. ^ Ribert E. Cripe. "Lightning protection for trees and related property" (pdf). Journal of Arboriculture. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  88. ^ Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory (2004). "Silviculture and Forest Models Team - Oak Root Research". USDA Forest Service. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  89. ^ Gopalan (2005-11-01). "Lightning protection of airport runway". ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 19 (4). {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |quotes=, |laydate=, |laysource=, and |laysummary= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  90. ^ Nair, Zinnia (May 1, 2005). "Failure of 220 kV double circuit transmission line tower due to lightning". Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 19 (2). {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  91. ^ Newitz, A. (2007) Educated Destruction 101. Popular Science magazine, September. pg. 61.
  92. ^ Scientists close in on source of X-rays in lightning, Physorg.com ,July 15, 2008. Accessed July 2008
  93. ^ Graham KWT. 1961. The Re-magnetization of a Surface Outcrop by Lightning Currents. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron Soc., 6, p.85-102; Cox A. 1961. Anomalous Remanent Magnetization of Basalt. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1038-E, p. 131-160.
  94. ^ Bevan B. 1995. Magnetic Surveys and Lightning. Near Surface Views (newsletter of the Near Surface Geophysics section of the Society of Exploration Geophysics. October 1995, p.7-8.
  95. ^ Sakai, H. S.; Sunada, S.; Sakurano, H. (1998). "Study of Lightning Current by Remanent Magnetization". Electrical Engineering in Japan. 123 (4): 41–47. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6416(199806)123:4<41::AID-EEJ6>3.0.CO;2-O. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help).
  96. ^ Archaeo-Physics, LLC | Lightning-induced magnetic anomalies on archaeological sites
  97. ^ Maki, David (2005). "Lightning strikes and prehistoric ovens: Determining the source of magnetic anomalies using techniques of environmental magnetism". Geoarchaeology: an International Journal. 20 (5): 449–459. doi:10.1002/gea.20059. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help).
  98. ^ Verrier, V.; Rochette, P. (2002). "Estimating Peak Currents at Ground Lightning Impacts Using Remanent Magnetization". Geophysical Research Letters. 29 (18): 1867. doi:10.1029/2002GL015207. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help).
  99. ^ John E. Oliver (2005). Encyclopedia of World Climatology. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. ISBN 9781402032646. Retrieved February 8, 2009.
  100. ^ a b "Annual Lightning Flash Rate". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved February 8, 2009.
  101. ^ "Where LightningStrikes". NASA Science. Science News. December 5, 2001. Retrieved July 5, 2010.
  102. ^ National Environmental Agency (2002). "Lightning Activity in Singapore". National Environmental Agency. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  103. ^ Paesi Online. "Teresina: Vacations and Tourism". Paesi Online. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  104. ^ NASA (2007). "Staying Safe in Lightning Alley". NASA. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  105. ^ Kevin Pierce (2000). "Summer Lightning Ahead". Florida Environment.com. Retrieved September 24, 2007.
  106. ^ a b Uman (1986), chapter 6, page 47
  107. ^ "Roy Sullivan". The New York Times Archives (from UPI). September 30, 1983. Retrieved July 28, 2007.
  108. ^ "Lightning kills 30 people in Pakistan's north". Reuters. July 20, 2007. Retrieved July 27, 2007.
  109. ^ Lightning kills 106 cows
  110. ^ The Franklin Institute.Ben Franklin's Lightning Bells. Accessed 2008-12-14
  111. ^ "Lightning Detection Systems". Retrieved 2007-07-27. NOAA page on how the U.S. national lightning detection system operates
  112. ^ "Vaisala Thunderstorm Online Application Portal". Retrieved 2007-07-27. Real-time map of lightning discharges in U.S.
  113. ^ NASA (2007). "NASA Dataset Information". NASA. Retrieved September 11, 2007.
  114. ^ NASA (2007). "NASA LIS Images". NASA. Retrieved September 11, 2007.
  115. ^ NASA (2007). "NASA OTD Images". NASA. Retrieved September 11, 2007.
  116. ^ Rakov, A., Vladimir (2003). Page 2 of Lightning: Physics and Effects. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Limited preview available at http://books.google.ca/books?id=NviMsvVOHJ4C&printsec=frontcover#PPA2,M1.
  117. ^ La Tour Eiffel - The Eiffel Tower - Paris Things To Do - www.paris-things-to-do.co.uk
  118. ^ Aviation Safety Net Accident Record
  119. ^ Evans, D. "An appraisal of underground gas storage technologies and incidents, for the development of risk assessment methodology" (PDF). British Geological Survey. Health and Safety Executive: 121. Retrieved 2008-08-14. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  120. ^ Mogil, H., Michael. "Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Floods, Heat Waves, Snow Storms, Global Warming and Other Atmospheric Disturbances". New York: BlueRed Press Ltd.
  121. ^ Environmental Assessment Services for Permanent Aviation Fuel Facility Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Section H4.2: Incidents Involving Aviation Fuel. Available: http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_1272006/EIA_Report/appendix/Appendix_H4.pdf
  122. ^ Oil and Gas article at http://www.ogj.com/display_article/13681/7/ARCHI/none/none/1/INDUSTRY-BRIEFS/ (subscription required)
  123. ^ "The Electrification of Thunderstorms," Earle R. Williams, Scientific American, November 1988, pp. 88-99
  124. ^ a b Knowledge, Dr. (October 29, 2007). "Why can't we capture lightning and convert it into usable electricity?". The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  125. ^ Various companies have publicized their intent to industrially harvest lightning power, but most seem to be internet hoaxes. When discussing energy harvesting the numbers are typically misquoted.
  126. ^ a b Glassie, John (December 9, 2007). "Lightning Farms". The New York Times. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
  127. ^ http://www.agu.org/inside/awards/bios/uman_martina.html
  128. ^ "Jesus actor struck by lightning". BBC News International Version. October 23, 2003. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
  129. ^ "Lightning". Phar Lap: Australia's wonder horse. Museum Victoria.
  130. ^ "cerauno-, kerauno- + (Greek: thunderbolt, thunder, lightning". WordInfo.com. Retrieved 2010-06-11.
  131. ^ i.e. Iמ the prayer for rain, The angel that fought Jacob was a rainstorm "minister angel, mixed of fire and water". Other examples: Extra recitings for 2nd day of Passover, and many more. See for example Hebrew book Shekel Aish discussing lightning.

Bibliography

Jets, sprites & elves

Template:Link GA