Parwan Detention Facility: Difference between revisions
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
In May 2010, nine Afghan former detainees reported to the ICRC that they had been held in a separate facility (known as the [black jail]) where they had been subject to isolation in cold cells, sleep deprivation, and other forms of torture. The U.S. military denies there is a separate facility for detainees.<ref name="BBC20100511Andersson">[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8674179.stm Red Cross confirms 'second jail' at Bagram, Afghanistan], ''BBC''', May 11, 2010</ref> |
In May 2010, nine Afghan former detainees reported to the ICRC that they had been held in a separate facility (known as the [[black jail]]) where they had been subject to isolation in cold cells, sleep deprivation, and other forms of torture. The U.S. military denies there is a separate facility for detainees.<ref name="BBC20100511Andersson">[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8674179.stm Red Cross confirms 'second jail' at Bagram, Afghanistan], ''BBC''', May 11, 2010</ref> |
||
==High profile escapes== |
==High profile escapes== |
Revision as of 13:24, 21 September 2010
The Bagram Theater Internment Facility -- named for the Bagram theater of war -- is a United States detention facility located at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.[1][2] It was formerly known as the Bagram Collection Point. While initially intended as a temporary location, this facility now has lasted longer and accumulated more detainees than the Guantanamo Bay detention camp [3].
The treatment of inmates at the facility is under scrutiny since the 2002 deaths at Bagram of two Afghan detainees. These incidents led to prisoner abuse charges against several American troops. Concerns about lengthy detentions also have drawn comparisons with U.S. detention centers in Guantanamo Bay on Cuba and Abu Graib in Iraq [4]. In January 2010, Afghan officials agreed to take over responsibility for the detention center [5].
Physical site
During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan the Red Army built Bagram Air Base.[6][7][8] The airfield included large hangers that fell into disrepair after the Soviets left.
When the US military and their allies ousted the Taliban, US forces took possession of the former Soviet base. The US military didn't need the volume of hangar space, so a detention facility was built inside the large unused hangars. Like the first facilities built at Guantanamo's Camp X-Ray, the cells were built of wire mesh. However, only captives held in solitary confinement have a cell of their own.[9] The other captives share larger open cells with other captives.
According to some accounts, captives were provided with shared buckets to use as toilets, and did not have access to running water. [10] Although captives share their cells with dozens of other captives, there are also reports that they are not allowed to speak with one another, or even to look at one another.[9]
During an interview on PBS, Chris Hogan, a former interrogater at Bagram, described the prisoner's cells in early 2002.[11]
"I can't speak to what the conditions may be like now. But in my tenure, the prison population lived in an abandoned Soviet warehouse. The warehouse had a cement floor and it was a huge square-footage area.
"On the floor of that, what must have been some sort of an airplane hangar, six prison cages were erected, which were divided by concertina wire ... Those prison cages had a wooden floor, a platform built above the cement floor of the hangar. Each prisoner had a bunch of blankets, a small mat, and in the back of each one of those cages was a makeshift toilet, the same type of toilet that the soldiers used, which was a 50-gallon drum, halved with diesel fuel put in the bottom of it and a wooden kind of seat to that platform ... It's very similar, incidentally, to the conditions that the soldiers lived in; almost identical."
According to an article by Tim Golden, published in the January 7, 2008 issue of the New York Times, captives in the Bagram facility were still being housed in large communal pens.[12]
Torture and prisoner abuse
At least two deaths have been verified: captives are known to have been beaten to death by GIs manning the facility, in December 2002.[13]
Captives who were confined to both Bagram and the Guantanamo Bay detention camp have recounted that, while in Bagram, they were warned that if they didn't cooperate more fully, they would be sent to a worse site in Cuba.[14][15] Captives who have compared the two camps have said that conditions were far worse in Bagram.[16]
In May 2010, nine Afghan former detainees reported to the ICRC that they had been held in a separate facility (known as the black jail) where they had been subject to isolation in cold cells, sleep deprivation, and other forms of torture. The U.S. military denies there is a separate facility for detainees.[17]
High profile escapes
When the GIs implicated in the December 2002 homicides were about to face court martial, four prisoners escaped from Bagram. At least one of these was a prosecution witness, and was thus unable to testify[7][18].
Legal status of detainees
The George W. Bush administration avoided using the label "prisoner of war" when discussing the detainees held at Bagram, preferring to immediately classify them as "unlawful enemy combatants". This way, it is not necessary under the Geneva Conventions to have a competent tribunal determine their classification. (In previous conflicts such as the Vietnam War, Army Regulation 190-8 Tribunals determined the status of prisoners of war.)
The administration also initially argued that these detainees could not access the US legal system. However, the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Rasul v. Bush confirmed that captives in US jurisdiction did indeed have the right to access US courts. Rasul v. Bush determined that the Executive Branch did not have the authority, under the United States Constitution, to suspend the right for detainees to submit writs of habeas corpus.
Another consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling in Rasul v. Bush was the establishment of Combatant Status Review Tribunals to review and confirm the information that initially lead each captive to be classified as an enemy combatant. The Department of Defense (DoD) convened these tribunals for every captive in Guantanamo Bay, but they did not apply to Bagram. The current legal process governing the status of Bagram captives is the Enemy Combatant Review Board, described by Eliza Griswold in The New Republic[2]:
Prisoners don't even have the limited access to lawyers available to prisoners in Guantánamo. Nor do they have the right to Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which Guantánamo detainees won in the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. Instead, if a combat commander chooses, he can convene an Enemy Combatant Review Board (ECRB), at which the detainee has no right to a personal advocate, no chance to speak in his own defense, and no opportunity to review the evidence against him. The detainee isn't even allowed to attend. And, thanks to such limited access to justice, many former detainees say they have no idea why they were either detained or released.
On February 20, 2009, the Department of Justice under President Barack Obama announced it would continue the policy that detainees in Afghanistan could not challenge their detention in US courts.[19]
On April 2, 2009 US District Court Judge John D. Bates ruled that those Bagram captives who had been transferred from outside Afghanistan could use habeas corpus.[20]
The BBC quoted Ramzi Kassem, lawyer for one of the men:
"Today, a US federal judge ruled that our government cannot simply kidnap people and hold them beyond the law."
The Obama administration appealed the ruling. A former Guantanamo Bay defense attorney, Neal Katyal, led the government's case.[21][22]
The decision was reversed on May 21, 2010, the appeals court unanimously ruling that Bagram detainees have no right to habeas corpus hearings.[23]
There is a reason we have never allowed enemy prisoners detained overseas in an active war zone to sue in federal court for their release. It simply makes no sense and would be the ultimate act of turning the war into a crime.
— Senator Lindsey Graham
Captives access to video link
On January 15, 2008 the International Committee of the Red Cross and the US military set up a pilot project to allow prisoners in Bagram to communicate with visitors over a videolink.[24] The ICRC will provide captives' families with a subsidy to cover their travel expenses to the video-link's studio.
General Douglas Stone's report on the Bagram captives
According to National Public Radio a General in the United States Marine Corps Reserve recently filed a 700 page report on the Bagram internment facility and its captives.[25][26] According to senior officials who have been briefed by Major General Douglas Stone, he reports, "up to 400 of the 600 prisoners at the U.S.-run prison at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan have done nothing wrong and should be released." According to Daphne Eviatar, writing in the Washington Independent, Stone recommended that the USA should try to rehabilitate any genuine enemies it holds, rather than simply imprisoning them.
General Stanley McChrystal's assessment
According to Chris Sands, writing in The National, in a leaked report General Stanley McChrystal wrote: “Committed Islamists are indiscriminately mixed with petty criminals and sex offenders, and they are using the opportunity to radicalise and indoctrinate them... hundreds are held without charge or without a defined way ahead”.[27]
According to The Guardian McChrystal wrote[28]: “There are more insurgents per square foot in corrections facilities than anywhere else in Afghanistan. Unchecked, Taliban/al-Qaida leaders patiently co-ordinate and plan, unconcerned with interference from prison personnel or the military.”
Detainees
On August 23, 2009 the United States Department of Defense reversed its policy on revealing the names of its captives in Afghanistan and Iraq, including the Bagram Theater Internment Facility.[29][30] and announced that heir names would be released to the International Committee of the Red Cross. In January 2010, the names of 645 detainees were released. This list was prompted by a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed in September 2009 by the American Civil Liberties Union, whose lawyers had also demanded detailed information about conditions, rules and regulations [31][32].
Reports of new Bagram review boards
On September 12, 2009 it was widely reported that unnamed officials told Eric Schmitt of the New York Times that the Obama administration was going to introduce new procedures that would allow the captives held in Bagram, and elsewhere in Afghanistan, to have their detention reviewed.[33][34][35][36][37] Josh Gerstein, of Politico, reported Tina Foster, director of the International Justice Network, and a lawyer who represents four Bagram captives, was critical of the new rules:
“These sound almost exactly like the rules the Bush Administration crafted for Guanatmamo that were struck down by the Supreme Court or at least found to be an inadequate substitute for judicial review. They’re adopting this thing that [former Vice President] Cheney and his lot dreamt up out of whole cloth. To adopt Gitmo-like procedures seems to me like sliding in the wrong direction.”
According to Radio Free Europe, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific director, Sam Zia Zarifi, paraphrasing Major General Douglas M. Stone's report on the USA's detentions in Afghanistan: "pointed out that the lack of a legal structure for Bagram means that it is undermining the rule of law in Afghanistan and it has caused a lot of resentment among Afghans.".[38]
New facilities
Permanent replacement facilities for the original temporary facilities constructed in 2001 were completed in September 2009.[39] According to The Nation transfer of the 700 captives to the new facilities will begin in late November 2009 completed by the end of 2009. Brigadier General Mark Martins, Bagram's commandant, told reporters that the facility had always met international and domestic standards.
Although the new facility is near the previous facility, it DoD sources sometimes refer to it as the Parwan facility, as if it had no link to the original Bagram facility.[40]
Captives reported to have been held in Bagram
According to Tim Golden of the New York Times the number of captives held in Bagram has doubled since 2004, while the number of captives held in Guantanamo has been halved.[12] The Department of Defense stopped transferring captives apprehended in Afghanistan to Guantanamo following the Supreme Court's ruling in Rasul v. Bush.
A graphic published to accompany Golden's article showed approximately 300 captives in Bagram, and approximately 600 in Guantanamo, in May 2004, and showed the reverse in December 2007.[41]
Guantanamo ISN |
Name | Notes |
762 | Abaidullah |
|
307 | Abd Al Nasir Mohammed Abd Al Qadir Khantumani | |
489 | Abd Al Rahim Abdul Rassak Janko |
|
686 | Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim |
|
1463 | Abdul Al Salam Al Hilal | |
963 | Abdul Bagi | |
502 | Abdul Bin Mohammed Bin Abess Ourgy | |
1032 | Abdul Ghaffar | |
954 | Abdul Ghafour | |
1007 | Abdul Halim Sadiqi |
|
Abdul Jabar |
| |
1002 | Abdul Matin | |
874 | Abdul Nasir | |
Abdul Razaq |
| |
306 | Abdul Salam Zaeef |
|
Abdul Salaam |
| |
753 | Abdul Zahir | |
897 | Abdur Rahim | |
Abdul Wahid |
| |
332 | Abdullah Al Tayabi | |
Abdullah Shahab | ||
452 | Oybek Jamoldinivich Jabbarov | |
Abu Yahia al-Libi | ||
940 | Adel Hassan Hamad | |
Ahmaddullah |
| |
845 | Akhtar Mohammed | |
Amanullah |
| |
Amanullah |
| |
948 | Anwar Khan (Guantanamo detainee 948) | |
152 | Asim Thahit Abdullah Al Khalaqi |
|
256 | Atag Ali Abdoh Al-Haj | |
782 | Awal Gul | |
817 | Richard Belmar | |
975 | Bostan Karim | |
BT421[60] | Dilawar |
|
680 | Emad Abdalla Hassan | |
888 | Esmatulla | |
688 | Fahmi Abdullah Ahmed | |
Fazal Ahmad |
| |
987 | Ghalib | |
516 | Ghanim Abdul Rahman Al Harbi | |
Ghanum Gul |
| |
1021 | Gul Chaman | |
Gul Mohammed |
| |
Gul Rehman |
| |
907 | Habib Rahman | |
Habibullah |
| |
1001 | Hafizullah Shabaz Khail | |
Hameedullah |
| |
Hakkim Shah |
| |
Hamid Ullah |
| |
1119 | Haji Hamidullah | |
Hasan Balgaid |
| |
940 | Hassan Adel Hussein | |
94 | Ibrahim Daif Allah Neman Al Sehli | |
Jan Baz Khan |
| |
Jawed Ahmad | ||
1095 | Jumma Jan | |
586 | Karam Khamis Sayd Khamsan | |
589 | Khalid Mahomoud Abdul Wahab Al Asmr | |
831 | Khandan Kadir |
|
Khoja Mohammad |
| |
660 | Lufti Bin Swei Lagha | |
1052 | Mahbub Rahman |
|
519 | Mahrar Rafat Al Quwari | |
Malik Abdual Rahim |
| |
939 | Mammar Ameur | |
558 | Moazzam Begg | |
909 | Mohabet Khan | |
333 | Mohamed Atiq Awayd Al Harbi | |
Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah | ||
900 | Mohamed Jawad | |
7 | Mohammad Fazil | |
849 | Mohammed Nasim | |
681 | Mohammed Mohammed Hassen | |
1008 | Mohammed Mustafa Sohail | |
Mohammad Naim |
| |
955 | Mohammed Quasam | |
Mohammed Salim |
| |
532 | Mohammed Sharif | |
Mohammed Yaqoub Akhounzada |
| |
1004 | Mohammed Yacoub | |
Mohibullah |
| |
Mubibbullah Khan |
| |
Muhammed Dawood |
| |
839 | Musab Omar Ali Al Mudwani | |
Maulvi Naeem |
| |
967 | Naserullah | |
1019 | Nasibullah | |
Nazar Mohammed |
| |
727 | Omar Deghayes |
|
Parkhudin |
| |
591 | Qari Esmhatulla | |
Qibullah |
| |
Raheem Ullah |
| |
835 | Rasool Shahwali Zair Mohammed Mohammed |
|
Raz Mohammad |
| |
Redha al-Najar |
| |
945 | Said Amir Jan | |
1035 | Sada Jan | |
1056 | Said Mohammed | |
1154 | Said Mohammed Ali Shah | |
311 | Saiid Farhi | |
Salih | ||
Samoud Khan | ||
Sardar Khan |
| |
Sardar Mohammad |
| |
Saud Memon |
| |
914 | Shardar Khan | |
944 | Sharifullah | |
899 | Shawali Khan | |
834 | Shahwali Zair Mohammed Shaheen Naqeebyllah |
|
Sherbat |
| |
933 | Swar Khan | |
902 | Taj Mohammed | |
535 | Tariq Mahmoud Ahmed Al Sawah | |
Wakil Ahmed Muttawakil |
| |
550 | Walid Said Bin Said Zaid | |
Haji Wazir |
| |
Haji Wazir |
| |
898 | Zakim Shah |
|
Zafir Khan |
| |
Zalmay Shah |
See also
- Black jail, a nearby jail run by U.S. Special Ops
- Joint Task Force 435
- Task Force 373, who supplied many of the prisoners
References
- ^ Tim Golden, Eric Schmitt (February 26, 2006). "A Growing Afghan Prison Rivals Bleak Guantánamo". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-12-09.
- ^ a b Eliza Griswold (May 2, 2007). "The other Guantánamo. Black Hole". The New Republic. Retrieved 2007-05-05.
- ^ "Bagram detention center now twice the size of Guantanamo"
- ^
Vice Admiral Albert T. Church III (Thursday, March 10, 2005). "ISTF Final Report" (PDF). Department of Defense. Retrieved 2007-12-09.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Afghans agree to take over U.S. prison at Bagram"
- ^ "Afghanistan — Bagram Airbase". Global Security. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- ^ a b "Bagram: US base in Afghanistan". BBC. February 27, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- ^ Sanjeev Miglani (June 8, 2002). "Afghan air force ready for take off, just needs planes". Daily Times (Pakistan). Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- ^ a b c d Ron Synovitz (October 5, 2006). "Afghanistan: Kabul Seeks Release Of More Bagram Detainees". Radio Free Europe. Retrieved 2007-04-27. Cite error: The named reference "RadioFreeEurope20061005" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^
"Moazzqam Begg v. George W. Bush" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. July 2, 2004,. p. 62. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ "Interview: Chris Hogan on U.S. Detention Facilities". NOW (PBS). July 28, 2006. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- ^ a b Tim Golden (January 7, 2008). "Defying U.S. Plan, Prison Expands in Afghanistan". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
- ^ "Army completes investigations of deaths at Bagram and forwards to respective commanders for action". United States Department of Defense. October 14, 2004. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- ^ Allegations and response (.pdf), from Abdullah Khan's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 59-63
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdullah Khan's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 14-20
- ^ a b c d e Tim Golden (May 20, 2005). "In U.S. Report, Brutal Details of 2 Afghan Inmates' Deaths". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-03-27.
- '^ Red Cross confirms 'second jail' at Bagram, Afghanistan, BBC, May 11, 2010
- ^
"Afghanistan: Manhunt Continues For Four Suspected Al-Qaeda Fighters". Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. 2005-07-12.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Obama admin. backs Bush: No constitutional rights for detainees at Afghanistan base, Associated Press, February 20, 2009
- ^ "Foreign detainees 'have US right'". BBC News. 2009-04-02. Retrieved 2009-04-02.
- ^ Shapiro, Ari (2009-09-15). "Rights Groups Decry U.S. Stand On Bagram Detainees". National Public Radio. Retrieved 2010-03-08.
- ^ Gerstein, Josh (2010-01-05). "A Gitmo bar turncoat?". The Politico. Retrieved 2010-03-08.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (2010-05-21). "Detainees Barred From Access to U.S. Courts". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-05-22.
- ^ "Visual chat facility for Afghan prisoners". One World South Asia. January 15, 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ Tom Bowman, Steve Inskeep and Renee Montagne (2009-08-20). "U.S. Gen. Urges Release Of Bagram's Detainees". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on 2009-08-22.
- ^ Daphne Eviatar (2009-08-20). "U.S. General: Most Bagram Detainees Should Be Released". Washington Independent. Archived from the original on 2009-08-22.
- ^ Chris Sands (2009-10-15). "Prisons' legacy haunts Afghanistan". The National. Archived from the original on 2009-10-25.
- ^ Jon Boone (2009-10-14). "US to tackle breeding ground for insurgents in Afghan jails: Ex-Taliban officials advise taskforce on ways to de-radicalise inmates and reform prisons". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 2009-10-25.
- ^ Eric Schmidt (2009-08-22). "U.S. Shifts, Giving Detainee Names to the Red Cross". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-08-23.
- ^ Greg Miller (2009-08-23). "US backdown on secret suspects in camps". Western Australia Today. Archived from the original on 2009-08-23.
- ^ "Bagram Detainees Named by U.S."
- ^ "US releases names of prisoners at Bagram, Afghanistan"
- ^ Eric Schmitt (2009-09-12). "U.S. to Expand Review of Detainees in Afghan Prison". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
- ^ "US plans Afghan prisoner overhaul". BBC News. 2009-09-13. Retrieved 2009-09-13.
- ^ Karen DeYoung, Peter Finn (2009-09-13). "U.S. Gives New Rights To Afghan Prisoners Indefinite Detention Can Be Challenged". Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-09-13.
- ^ Josh Gerstein (2009-09-12). "Pentagon debuts new process for Bagram prisoners". Politico. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
- ^ "Obama to change policy on detainees at Afghan base-NYT". Reuters. 2009-09-12. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
- ^ Ron Synovitz (2009-09-14). "New U.S. Plan Reportedly To Let Afghan Prisoners Challenge Incarceration". Radio Free Europe. Archived from the original on 2009-09-14.
- ^ "New US Afghan prison unveiled". The Nation (Pakistan). 2009-11-16. Archived from the original on 2009-11-16.
- ^
Lisa Daniel (2010-08-06). "Task Force Ensures Fair Detainee Treatment, Commander Says". American Forces Press Service. Retrieved 2010-08-12.
For those transferred to the detention center at Parwan, a detainee review board must be held within 60 days, and every 60 days thereafter, to determine whether the person still poses a threat that warrants continued detention.
mirror - ^ Tim Golden (January 7, 2008). "Where the Detainees Have Been Held". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abaidullah's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 219
- ^ written statement (.pdf), from Abd Al Nasir Mohammed Abd Al Qadir Khantumani's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - page 97
- ^ a b c d list of prisoners (.pdf), US Department of Defense, May 15, 2006
- ^ Paul Haven (June 30, 2007). "From Taliban jail to Gitmo – hard-luck prisoners tell of unending ordeal". San Diego Union Tribune. Retrieved 2007-07-01.
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdel Ghalib Ahmad Hakim's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 15-21
- ^ Al-Hila: Another 'ghost prisoner' rendered, Al Jazeera
- ^ Cairo to Kabul to Guantanamo, Human Rights Watch
- ^ U.S. Operated Secret 'Dark Prison' in Kabul, Reuters, December 19, 2005
- ^ John Sifton (2005-12-19). "U.S. Operated Secret 'Dark Prison' in Kabul". Archived from the original on 2009-05-06.
- ^ a b Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdul Bagi's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 1-12
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdul Halim Sadiqi's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 81-88
- ^ a b c d e
Carlotta Gall, David Rohde, Eric Schmitt (September 17, 2004). "THE REACH OF WAR: THE PRISONS; Afghan Abuse Charges Raise New Questions on Authority". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-09-21.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Taliban ambassador Zaeef freed from Guantanamo Bay, Pajhwok Afghan News
- ^ a b Olaf Ihlau (April 12, 2007). "Ex-Taliban Official Calls for Unity Government in Afghanistan". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 2007-07-01.
- ^ a b c "Medical Investigations of Homicides of Prisoners of War in Iraq and Afghanistan". Medscape. Retrieved 2007-09-13.
- ^ a b c d e "Violations by U.S. Forces". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 2007-09-25.
- ^ a b c Matthew Pennington (October 1, 2006). "Inmates Detail U.S. Prison Near Kabul". Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-09-25.
- ^
OARDEC (4 November 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Khalaqi, Asim Thahit Abdullah" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. page 52. Retrieved 2007-12-04.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Richard Leiby (April 27, 2007). "Down a dark road: Movie Uses Afghan's Death to Ask Tough Questions About U.S. and Torture". Washington Post. p. C01. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
- ^ a b Kathy Gannon (2009-02-07). "Guantanamo prisoner returns, and is arrested again". Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-02-07. mirror
- ^ a b c Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Khandan Kadir's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 9-31
- ^
"Afghan journalist detained at Bagram Air Base". Committee to Protect Journalists. February 18, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
New York, February 18, 2008—The Committee to Protect Journalists is greatly concerned by the detention of Canadian Television (CTV) journalist Jawed Ahmad by U.S. military forces at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, for almost three months without charge.
- ^
"U.S. should grant rights to detained CTV journalist: groups". CBC News. February 19, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
We are deeply troubled that Jawed Ahmad has been secluded in a U.S. military base for nearly three months without charge," Joel Simon, executive director of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, said in a statement."The United States military must explain the reason for his detention and accord him due process. If he is not charged with any crime then he must be released immediately.
- ^
"Pentagon detains CTV's Afghan journalist". Toronto Sun. February 27, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
A military spokesman says a review board has determined that Jawed Ahmad, an Afghan national, is a danger to foreign troops and the Afghan government.
- ^
Tang, Alisa (February 27, 2008). "Afghan CTV journalist declared enemy combatant". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
The U.S. military said today a journalist working for Canada's CTV television network, who has been held for four months without being charged, has been designated an unlawful enemy combatant.
- ^ a b c Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mahbub Rahman'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 93-108
- ^ "Ex-Prisoners: Bagram more Horrible than Gitmo". Fars News Agency. 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2009-02-28. mirror
- ^ a b c d
OARDEC (date redacted). "Summarized Statement" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. 22–28, 64–76. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Mark Thompson (2009-01-05). "Another Gitmo Grows in Afghanistan". Time magazine. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
- ^ a b Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Habib Rahman's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 84-89
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mohabet Khan's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 14-24
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Shardar Khan's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 1-9
- ^ a b c d Jay Solomon, Steve LeVine (November 12, 2007). "Suspect in Pearl Murder Was Held, Covertly Questioned Before Death". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
- ^ a b c d "Pearl`s murder suspect died after interrogation: Report". Zee News, India edition. November 19, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
- ^ a b c d "Suspect in Pearl's killing dies after interrogation: report". Agence France Presse. November 13, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
- ^ "Confusion over 'freed' Taleban figure". BBC. 2003-10-08. Retrieved 2007-07-01.
- ^
Kate Clark (2002-09-02). "Taleban 'warned US of huge attack'". BBC. Retrieved 2007-01-16.
An aide to the former Taleban foreign minister, Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, has revealed that he was sent to warn American diplomats and the United Nations that Osama bin Laden was due to launch a huge attack on American soil.
mirror - ^ Del Quentin Wilber (2008-06-29). "In Courts, Afghanistan Air Base May Become Next Guantanamo". Washington Post. p. A14. Retrieved 2008-09-28.
- ^ Carlotta Gall, Ruhullah Khapalwak (2006-06-08). "Some Afghans Freed from Bagram Cite Harsh Conditions". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-01-12.
External links
- Why Bagram is Guantanamo's evil twin and Britain's dirty secret
- Allegations of abuse and neglect at a US detention facility in Afghanistan - BBC video
- "Prisoner Abuse Continues at Bagram Prison in Afghanistan". Der Spiegel. September 21, 2009.
- Ron Synovitz (October 5, 2006). "Afghanistan: Kabul Seeks Release Of More Bagram Detainees". Radio Free Europe. Retrieved 2007-09-24.
- Human Rights First; Arbitrary Justice: Trial of Guantánamo and Bagram Detainees in Afghanistan
- Human Rights First; Undue Process: An Examination of Detention and Trials of Bagram Detainees in Afghanistan in April 2009(2009)
- William Fisher (January 16, 2008). "Bagram: The other Gitmo". Asia Times. Retrieved 2008-01-22.
- "US military deny that new prison is planned as 'Guantanamo Two'". Sunday Herald. June 21, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-21. mirror