Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review

IMPORTANT: If you wish to make a peer-review request, please follow the instructions here.

The peer review department of the India WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the India WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.

Instructions

Requesting a review

If you wish to request for a review, you need to follow the following steps.

1. Go to the article you wish to nominate for peer review, then click on the "talk page" tab, then click on the "edit this page" tab.
2. At the top, you should find the {{WP India}} project banner which looks something like {{WP India|class=|importance=}}
3. Add peer-review=yes to the banner so that it looks like code>{{WP India|class=|importance=|peer-review=yes}} (see the project banner instructions if you need more details)
4. Click on the "save page" button.
5. Click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the WikiProject India banner now. This will open a (new) page to discuss the review of your article.
6. Place === [[Name of nominated article]] === at the top. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign your request by using four tildes (~~~~).
7. Go to the list of requests, and click the "edit" tab. Add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} at the top of the requests, and click on the "save page" button.
8. Check regularly to see if your article has been peer-reviewed, so that you can see the comments given, and be sure to thank any editors who have spent their time and effort peer-reviewing your article. Make any of the suggested changes in your article.
9. If you have received no response to your peer-review request for quite some time, feel free to contact one of the bolded members of the WikiProject India peer-review department, listed at the bottom of these instructions.

Responding to a request

Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible. Make sure to sign your requests too by using four tildes (~~~~).

Archiving

Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, but must have had at least 1 peer review. However, at least 2 different peer-reviews (by at least 2 different editors) is ideal. Reviews can also be archived if the article has been successful as a featured article candidate.

To archive:

1. Replace peer-review=yes with old-peer-review=yes in the {{WP India}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page
2. Move {{Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} from this page to the current archive page.

Peer-reviews that have been conducted prior to this year can be found at the 2006 WikiProject India peer-review and 2007 WikiProject India peer-review pages.

Peer-review Team

If you would like to join the peer-review team, please add your name below. Members of the team who are bolded (below) are currently active members of the peer review team and are likely to peer-review articles, and answer any queries you have in relation to their peer review. Particularly if you have received no response for some time on your peer-review request, please feel free to contact the members that are bolded and listed here.

1. Anupam (talk · contribs)
2. Bakasuprman (talk · contribs)
3. DaGizza (talk · contribs)
4. Faizhaider (talk · contribs)
5. Ganeshk (talk · contribs)
6. Kanchanamala (talk · contribs)
7. Kensplanet (talk · contribs)
8. Ncmvocalist (talk · contribs)
9. Nishant_shobhit (talk · contribs)
10. RegentsPark (talk · contribs)
11. Rohit_klar (talk · contribs)
12. Sachinvenga (talk · contribs)
13. Salilb (talk · contribs)
14. Tinucherian (talk · contribs)
15. Legolas2186 (talk · contribs) - developing any new film article with all the news, neutral reviews and rearranging according to WP:FILM
16. Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs)
17. Datlaravivarma (talk · contribs)
18. Rijz (talk · contribs)

Requests

K. Subrahmanyam

Article expanded substantially from stub, with copious and reliable references. Adheres to print encyclopedia/paper standards - hopefully. Crucial to Indian foreign policy and military history, especially nuclear program. Suggestions welcome Jokester99 (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Jokester99, May 10, 2009

Good work, I can't find much fault in the content, but it would be good if you checked some refs and the styles of refs. I am referring to Refs 61,66, 68 (a dead link).

Also, if you could find something more about his personal life, it would be better. Lynch7 17:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Indian Air Force

Previous Peer Review (2009)

We made quite a few changes and wanted to hear about other contributers' comments so that we can get it to GA or A status. Sumanch (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

AustralianRupert

I can see that a lot of effort has been put into this article so far. These are my suggestions for improvements to the article:

• According to the Featured article tools there are two disambig links that should be fixed: [1];

 DoneSumanch (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• the final sentence in the Mission section needs a citation;

Found a citation for assistance during natural disasters. Couldn't find one for assistance to maintain internal security. --Gremaldin (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• in the History section, you have the abbrievation "RAF" (for Royal Air Force), but haven't introduced the abbrievation yet. Thus, I feel here you should replace "RAF" with "Royal Air Force (RAF)";

Didn't see any such use, may be it was fixed. Sumanch (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• there is a mixture of terminology, e.g in the lead you have "World War II" then later in the History section you have "Second World War";

 DoneSumanch (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• the final sentence in the first paragraph of the History section needs a citation ("After the war, they were interned..."
• in the final sentence of the first paragraph of the History section "allies" should be capitalised as it is a proper noun, while "Couter-martialed" shouldn't be as it isn't;

 DoneSumanch (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• in the History section, I think you should break up the paragraph beginning with "The IAF saw significant conflict" - I think you should split it at the end of the sentence ending with "when the UN mission ended";

 Done Sumanch (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• in the History section, this sentence needs a citation: "At the same time, the IAF also started inducting Mach 2 capable Soviet MiG-21 and Sukhoi Su-7 fighters."

 DoneSumanch (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last part of the Bases section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 05:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• the first paragraph in the Squadrons section needs a citation;

Found a citation for "All fighter squadrons are headed by a Commanding Officer with the rank of Wing Commander." Couldn't find one for "Some Transport squadrons and Helicopter Units are headed by a Commanding Officer with the rank of Group Captain." --Gremaldin (talk) 10:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last sentence in the Garud Commando Force section needs a citation;

 Done Unvarifiable. Sumanch (talk) 02:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• in the IAF personnel section this should be fixed "F H MAJOR" - I think this is meant to be a wikilink, can you please fix the capitalisation?

 DoneSumanch (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last part of the Officers subsection needs a citation: "The IAF selects candidates for officer training from these applicants. After completion of training, candidate are commissioned as Flying Officers";

 DoneSumanch (talk) 23:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

• the Non Combatants Enrolled and civilians section needs a citation;

 Done Sumanch (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last sentence in the Airborne Early Warning aircraft section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 04:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last part of the Transport section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last part of the Tanker aircraft section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• the last part of the Training aircraft section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 05:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• the Helicopters section needs a citation;

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• in the Footnotes section, some of your web citations are just bare urls (e.g. Citation # 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90 - these should be formatted as the others are with the {{cite web}} template.

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Good work so far and good luck with improving the article. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Sumanch

Need some clarification of this usage policy for images.
Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. However, the permission to reproduce this material does not extend to any material on this site, which is explicitly identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned. - Indian Air Force - Usage Policy Sumanch (talk) 21:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like the IAF maintains the copyright but the images can be used with a Fair use rationale. In terms of Wikipedia's image policy, this means basically that you need to be certain that you can't find a free (or non copyrighted) image to replace it. If a free image is available (i.e. one that's in the public domain), or it is reasonable that one might exist, then you can't use a copyrighted image with a claim of fair use. That's my take, but I might be wrong. This might help: Wikipedia:Non-free content. Anyone, please correct me if I am wrong. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Kirk

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I couldn't find any other articles about an Air Force which are FA (or A) quality for comparison. The United States Marine Corps is FA, so its probably a better template than the RAF article; in comparison to the structure to the USMC and USAF articles:

• mission section is just a paragraph instead of having multiple subsections

Romanian Land Forces is a GA and it has a similar mission section.Sumanch (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

If you think that section meets A or FA quality, be my guest and use it, but I certainly don't. Also, Australian Defence Force is another FA article you can look at which has a different structure. Kirk (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 13:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

• history section should have subsections

It used to have one. But this new structure was advised in the previous peer review.Sumanch (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I scanned your review and I didn't notice that anywhere other than a desire for the article to be shorter in this section. Look at the United States Marine Corps article and the History article. The USMC article has some high level subheadings in the History section which summarize mutltiple sections in the USMC History Article. Origins, Partition of India, Summary of conflict 1961-1971 (I don't know what to call this), etc. would make it easier to read. Kirk (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I divided the history section into subsections in my sandbox. I will wait for opinions before applying the changes to the main page. --Gremaldin (talk) 12:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done --Gremaldin (talk) 09:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

• personnel include 'the IAF', which probably isn't needed, and probably should use the same sub-sections as USAF: consider adding training, awards and uniform. The USMC article has uniform in a separate section.

Added a training susection. --Gremaldin (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

• My understanding is Junior Commissioned Officer is a Indian Army term; I think the proper term in the IAF is Warrant Officer. Its distinct enough it probably should have its own subsection to explain why the IAF has Warrant officers when the Indian Army has Junior Commissioned Officers.

Junior Commissioned Officer is a rank category. The Warrant officers in the IAF, Subedars in the Army, and Petty Officers in the Navy fall in this category. The category of JCO was created by the british because at that time Indians were not allowed to be an officer. Sumanch (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I know what you are saying, but you need to back that up with a reference and its probably only worthwhile as a footnote. Just looking over the IAF website, I can't find any reference to Junior Comissioned Officers, so I'd remove that subheading on the table with Junior Commissioned Officers and Enlisted. Example: [2] Kirk (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

• Structure or Organization; seems to me organization is better since that's what the USMC article uses. And why does Aerospace command get its own section?

It is a work in progress. Right now we are open to suggestions. Sumanch (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Made Integrated Space Cell a subsection of the Structure section. --Gremaldin (talk) 16:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

• The future section is mostly a bullet list...not sure I recall seeing that in a FA article before. Note both USAF and USMC article have a culture section.

 Done Converted it into prose. --Gremaldin (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

• The USMC article doesn't have a very detailed equipment section, i've noticed most air force articles devote a lot of space to detailing each aircraft in use, which probably isn't in line with WP:SUMMARY

 Done Made the "aircraft inventory" section much more concise and comprehensive. --Gremaldin (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

• The info box could more stuff in there, but this seems to vary widely between Air Force articles. Maybe add engagements, I would guess the commander section could be more extensive, the personnel section could be more detailed with active, reserve, guard numbers.

No, I think over-corwding the infobox creates distraction. Infobox should contain only the absolutely need to know and nothing more. USMC infobox is a bad example. Sumanch (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure why its a bad example, I guess you don't think its an FA article? Also, I'd like to know how many personnel are active vs reserve, but the article doesn't contain that information & it would be nice in the infobox. Kirk (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Added engagements. --Gremaldin (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Added the Vice chief of air staff under the commander section. --Gremaldin (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

This is just high level stuff, hope this helps! Kirk (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC) I have witnessed the pravachans delivered by Swami Krishna Dutt ji, in person.Starting from his childhood, his illeteracy and downtrodden background to his fame and following resulting into establishing Ashram at Barnawa(UP,India) the myth of continuous neck shaking and delivering speech clearly in light of Vedic tradition is something beyond explanation of modern science. Let us not focus to raise controversies but to concentrate what he told in his speeches and its link to modern science, which directionally is moving the way he uttered is peak of scientific evolution. Thanks and regards Sanjeev K Tyagi

My family (My Nana and NaNi) has witnessed Shringi Rishi's rebirth (as Krishna Dutt Ji Maharaj) and section on this needs to be added. For Individual to make their own judgement a link to Video's which shows proof of his rebirth are available at https://archive.org/details/PRAVACHANAA including all Pravachana given by him during his re-incarnation. The section titled "Shringi Rishi's rebirth (as Krishna Dutt ji Maharaj) needs to be brought back in with content added from the pravachana's of his re-incarnation

English Translation of following: "ईश्वरीय सृष्टि का अद्भुत चमत्कार एक पुरातन ऋषि का दिव्य जन्म १४ सितम्बर सन् १९४२, में उत्तर-प्रदेश के गाजियाबाद जिले के, ग्राम खुर्रमपुर-सलेमाबाद में एक विशेष बालक का जन्म हुआ। बालक जन्म से ही एक विलक्षणता से युक्त था। और विलक्षणता यह कि जब भी यह बालक सीधा, श्वासन की मुद्रा में, कुछ अन्तराल लेट जाता या लिटा दिया जाता, तो उसकी गर्दन दायें-बायें हिलने लगती, कुछ मन्त्रोच्चारण होता और उसके उपरान्त विभिन्न ऋषि-मुनियों के चिन्तन और घटनाओं पर आधारित ४५ मिनट तक, एक दिव्य प्रवचन का प्रसारण होता। पर एक अपठित ग्रामीण बालक के मुख से ऐसे दिव्य प्रवचन सुनकर जन-मानस आश्चर्य करने लगा, बालक की ऐसी दिव्य अवस्था और प्रवचनों की गूढ़ता के विषय में कोई भी कुछ कहने की स्थिति में नहीं था। इस स्थिति का स्पष्टीकरण भी दिव्यात्मा के प्रवचनों से ही हुआ। कि यह आत्मा सृष्टि के आदिकाल से ही विभिन्न कालों में, शृङ्गी ऋषि की उपाधि से विभूषित और सतयुग के काल में आदि ब्रह्मा के शाप के कारण इस युग में जन्म लेने का कारण बनी। इस जन्म में अपठित रहने की स्थिति में जैसे ही यह शरीर श्वासन की मुद्रा में आता तो कुछ अन्तराल बाद इस दिव्यात्मा का पूर्व जन्मों का ज्ञान उद्बुद्ध हो जाता और अन्तरिक्ष में उपस्थित सूक्ष्म शरीरधारी दिव्यात्माओं के समक्ष एक सत्संग सदृश्य स्थिति बन जाती जिसमें इस महान आत्मा का सूक्ष्म शरीरधारी आत्माओं के लिए प्रवचन होता। जिसमें इस आत्मा के पूर्व जन्मों के शिष्य महर्षि लोमश मुनि पूज्य महानन्द के प्रवचन भी होते। क्योंकि इस दिव्यात्मा का स्थूल शरीर यहां मृत्यु लोक में स्थित होने के कारण वहां सत्संग में दिये जाने वाला दिव्य प्रवचन इस शरीर के माध्यम से यहाँ उपस्थित जन-मानस को भी सुनाई देते हैं। इन प्रवचनों में ईश्वरीय सृष्टि का अद्भुत रहस्य समाया हुआ है, जो किसी भी मनुष्य को, समाज और राष्ट्र को उच्च कोटि का जीवन जीने का कारण पैदा करने का सामर्थ्य रखते हैं।"

should be added to this article

== Shringi Rishi === THIS IS WRONG INFORMATION ABOUT RISHI SHRING

This article needs to be peer-reviewed for containing a disputed section titled "Shringi Rishi's rebirth (as Krishna Dutt Ji Maharaj) in recent years" which makes reincarnation claims for mythological Shringi Rishi whose name appears in connection with Ramayana, as stated in the first section of this page. The claims are made as if these are proven facts with a seemingly obvious propagandist tendency. The article even contains self-promotional links right in the middle of the article. An apparent attempt to make the article more neutral in the form of adding a para of views in conflict with those making reincarnation claims, although equally unsubstantiated by authentic reference sources, was later edited by the propagandists and tagged as comment with its answer included there. Usually, a conflicting opinion is not to be tagged as comment in the article. Talk page should be used to discuss any issues. The section making reincarnation claims seemingly requires to be removed but it is better if peers make their own unbiased assessment. --MazeOfThoughts (talk) 04:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

MazeOfThoughts, You are absolutely right. I have removed the section citing the same reasons. I have also suggested a merge with Rishyasringa. Shringi Rishi and Rishyasringa are same.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking appropriate action, if you are sure that Rishyashringa and Shringi Rishi are same, I think it is only logical to merge the pages.--MazeOfThoughts (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Asaram Bapu

The article apparently does not cite any third-part references to support the biographical assertions made therein and there is a lack of neutrality in the tone of the article. Describing a self-proclaimed saint as a self-realized saint can only be termed as an exaggeration. Still, that is my opinion. But in other areas too, instead of stating that he is "claimed" to have gained spiritual powers by meditation etc. it clearly says that he "did" attain spiritual powers which is not a neutral description in any way. In my view, describing these ideas in a neutral way won't take away anything from the significance of the person, if he has any. Self-sourced biographical assertions can also not be relied upon and additionally, I wonder, why is there no mention of the contra-claims and scandals surrounding the new-age guru where people have questioned his activities and Ashram also came under scrutiny for some criminal activities. This article either needs to be completely removed for total lack of neutrality and no verifiability of facts or needs to be thoroughly revamped to make it look more neutral and factual. --MazeOfThoughts (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Bhekuli Biya

Would appreciate advice on how to proceed in improvement of this article.

Judicatus | Talk | Contributions

08:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Panchanan Mitra

A new article which I have expanded and copy-edited. Although the subject is fairly ancient, there seem to be a good amount of sources about him, which has resulted in sufficient material to be added. Hope to bring this to a GA status perhaps. prashanthns (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Vasudev Balwant Phadke

Need comments to check on POV issues as well as tips to improve the article. The intention is to achieve GA status. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talk • contribs) 19:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Pankh (film)

I want this article to be passed as a B-class article. "Legolas" (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Raaz - The Mystery Continues

I want this article to be rated an A-class article. Please review it and let it be known your review comments at the talk page. "Legolas" (talk) 12:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Bhaṭṭikāvya

This is my first article for Wikipedia, I would like some help to get it to featured article status. I also intend to contribute many more articles, so need to learn how to do it properly.
The article is based on the intro to my edition and translation of the Bhaṭṭikāvya[3] of which I am the copyright holder. It was written with the approval of the publisher (Clay Sanskrit Library[4]). The published work of the Clay Sanskrit Library is peer-reviewed.
opfallon (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Redtigerxyz's comments:

• More Citations needed
• Please give more emphasis on facts, than opinions
• Write about the chief subject of the poem: It writes about Ravana's death, what else, expand, how did he die, any background, after death. Is it covered.
• Use Normal English spellings then IAST, WP:Featured Articles (wiki's best work) Ganesha uses Ganesha, NOT Ganeśa as Readers may not be aware of IAST format. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  
  

Thank you for your help Redtigerxyz. I will implement these improvements. The only one I'm doubtful about is the use of IAST. In my opinion it is preferable to use the full diacritics for rendering Sanskrit words, but i will experiment.opfallon (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I've looked at the Ganesha page and I'm unclear about what principles are being applied with regard to IAST. Some words are given in IAST and others aren't. There are even variant spellings of Ganesh/Ganesha. Should i apply the tag IAST to all Sanskrit words? Should I give an anglicises rendering in the first instance followed by IAST and then subsequently use IAST? opfallon (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

IMO, the following will be the most ideal format for key terms: Bhalachandra (IAST: bhālacandra; "Moon on the Forehead"), Ganapatya, (Sanskrit: गाणपत्य; gāṇapatya). I will prefer the way it is done in Ganesha. Render the normal English - anglicises spelling and IAST, then use the anglicises rendering throughout. Though IAST is frequently used in scholarly works, NOT everyone knows it (read "ONLY some know it), NOT in India, NOT in the world. Ganesha or Shiva is more familar than Ganeśa or Śiva, atleast in India. Before wiki (Researching for Hinduism articles), even I didn't know of it. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• "one of the boldest experiments in classical literature" is an opinion, rather than a fact. The sentence gives a sense of hyperbole. The lead sentence should be some thing like "Bhaṭṭikāvya is a ____ th century Sanskrit poem/text by Bhatti, (about) _____" In analysis of the poem, one can have statements like ""one of the boldest experiments in classical literature, according to _____". (ref) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

S. A. Dange

I wish to take this article to FL class. I would really aprreciate your comments.Weblogan (talk) 08:06, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Governors of Tamil Nadu

I would like to take this to FL. I would really appreciate your comments on how to further improve it. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 01:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Nishant_shobhit

Ganesh, here are some suggestions

> Like all states, the governor is a nominal head and representative of the President of India. He or she is appointed by the president for a five year term

• Why don't you link this to the federal system in the Indian government. Readers can immediately learn about the state-central system in the country.

• We need citations for governing spans for each of the governors.

• I'm sure there must be photographs of S.S. Barnala available under CC.

Nishant shobhit (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Vijayawada

This article has never been peer-reviewed. It needs reviewing and also deserves B-Class rating, but it has been assessed as Start-Class (probably two or three years back). I also request to re-access the article.

Vijay Sai (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War

I just went over this article, from virtually nothing to add a whole lot of info + references, which didn't exist before. I also added an infobox for better/easier navigation. I was wondering if someone could review this? Thanks, Lihaas (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I will add a standard response.

• This article lacks inline citation, three isn't enough. For example, a citation is needed right after The party was founded in Andhra Pradesh in 1980, another one right after development out of Central Organizing Committee, CPI(ML) (which had been dissolved in 1977), etc. etc. Per manual of style, don't tell something, show it! So to show something, you need to cite it from somewhere(ofcourse from somewhere reputable).
• Lead — Lead of the article is not an introduction to the article but it is a summary of the article. It is like when you read an article in a journal, it has an abstract which summerises the article.

Hope that helps. Sumanch (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

List of Indian states by the etymology of their name

People, I created this list a while back. A similar list for the US states has been a featured article. How can we bring this to that level ? I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

India House

I wish to have this article peer review for language, spelling, NPOV, structure and scope and improve this, as far a possible, to FA status since I wish to nominate it once review is done.

Thanks, rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 19:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

DLF Universal Limited

This company was just featured on CNBC, so I looked at the page, only to find an advertisment competing with a political slant. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

• Introduction needs to be trimmed down. too much text. Provide references to facts like "DLF, is India's largest real estate developer based in New Delhi, India." or policy statements like "the government assumed the control of real estate development activities in Delhi and the role of private real estate developers was restricted". Too many statements made as facts without prorper references
• Recent History? Rephrase with a clearer title
• Developments and Joint Ventures sections have a lot of NPOV issues. What is definition of "high quality residential, office and retail properties"? These sections sounds like a advertisement for DLF
• Provide references to statements made throughout the sections.
• Non existant or fictional stuff bring down quality of the article, "Together DLF-Laing O' Rourke shall build the expressways, ports and other megastructures of India's new economy."

--Kedar (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Foreign relations of India

I have restructured the whole article and added some countries & international organisations. So I am requesting for peer review so that it can be improved to a featured article.

Vijay Sai (talk) 12:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Valparai

Blocks of text on "History of Valparai" alongwith some texts were removed in accordance with Neutrality, Verifiability and NOR issues. Also, more reliable sources, such as newspaper articles and information form government departments have been added with references.Dilli2040 (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Faruqi dynasty

I believe the peer review will help in improving the style, reference and presentation of the article.Joy1963 (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

S. Kumarasamy

I honestly beleive that a good Peer review will furthermore improve this article. --Logic riches (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hemu

This article has a lot of POV issues. Can anyone check them? Salilb (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

ICFAI

Hi, I have re-written the article and tried to cover the different entities under the ICFAI umbrella. Also tried to cover the grievances aired by a lot of students against Icfai, specifically the regarding DLP. Would like to get a comment on the same. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh Technical University

This article now has more matter than a stub-class article. deltaG (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Kerala High Court

For the greater benefit of all Wikipedians, I feel that this article has undergo a peer review... Adv. Ranjith Xavier (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Attokaran

The Great Indian Novel

This is an important novel in historical, satirical, literary, and political terms. The article lay dormant for a long time and I've tried to give it some meat. However, it is a very complex and at times subtle satire. Editors should in particular pay attention to allusions and connections that have been missed. The tables of character, place, event connections should also be worked on. Acsenray (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Anand (2004 film)

This article (currently B-class) has been substantially developed over the past couple of weeks by me. I'd love critique from my fellow-editors so that I can bring it further up on quality. Regards, Mspraveen 08:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Historical definitions of races in India

Various fringe views are being aired, and more input/review from Indian editors would be helpful. --JWB 08:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Dravidian people

Various fringe views are being aired, and more input/review from Indian editors would be helpful. --JWB 08:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

North South Foundation

I think this should be nominated because we as a community have worked hard to make it a nice article from a 2-4 sentence stub. Whaatt 19:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Tata Elxsi

It would be very helpful if someone peer-review this article. Kiran Nair 12:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Krishna Institute of Engineering and Technology

The article is now B class. Please help improve its level --deltaG 20:13, 08 July 2007 (UTC)

Combined Defence Services Examination

i created this page with the intention of providing info to the aspirants who wish get into the armed forces....i would like to know about what the fellow wikipedians think of it.... Gprince007 15:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Union Public Service Commission

i feel that a peer review will help us improve this page and make it more informative...constructive criticisms welcome ... Gprince007 14:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• This Article does not have a single line citation.
• Lead should be a summary of the entrie article. My opinion is, read the lead sentence by sentence and write a few lines in the article body on the facts stated. Or visa versa.Sumanch (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Chhath

The articles has been considerably wikified by:

• restructuring as per holiday template
• complete holiday infobox
• addition of relevant references and citation
• extensive copy-editing.

Please review this article. I am primarily interested in identifying the areas of improvement for this article. Myaoon (talk) 20:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)