Jump to content

Talk:The Walt Disney Company: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 66.92.42.220 - ""
Line 39: Line 39:


== NPOV ==
== NPOV ==
This article should be the poster child for corporate spin in Wikipedia. What a joke. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.92.42.220|66.92.42.220]] ([[User talk:66.92.42.220|talk]]) 16:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This article should be the poster child for corporate spin in Wikipedia. What a joke.

== Featured Article ==
== Featured Article ==

Revision as of 16:29, 14 December 2010

Former featured article candidateThe Walt Disney Company is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 2, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted

Disney Princess

From what I've seen, Disney doesn't want to end the franchise yet since it's their biggest money-maker. I've heard their planning two more movies. I'll ask Disney what their plans are so until then, please don't say anything until Disney makes an official statement not from what one animator says says since he doesn't make the big top decisions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.6.162.200 (talk) 02:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted in my edit summary when reverting your removal of this statement, that's not how WP:V works. One one side we have a reliable source saying one thing. On the other side we have you saying that that statement is likely untrue. To quote the very first sentence of WP:V, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." --Mepolypse (talk) 09:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article should be the poster child for corporate spin in Wikipedia. What a joke.

Featured Article