Phaistos Disc: Difference between revisions
→List of deciphering attempts: (no personal research on WP. No references given) |
→Attempted decipherment: (There are other ways to verify an attempt than applying the grid to a text) |
||
Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
While many enthusiasts still believe the mystery can be solved, scholarly attempts at decipherment are thought to be unlikely to succeed unless more examples of the glyphs turn up somewhere, as it is generally thought that there isn't enough context available for meaningful analysis. |
While many enthusiasts still believe the mystery can be solved, scholarly attempts at decipherment are thought to be unlikely to succeed unless more examples of the glyphs turn up somewhere, as it is generally thought that there isn't enough context available for meaningful analysis. |
||
This general opinion was nevertheless disputed on the basis of the work of the mathematician [[Claude Shannon]]. Shannon's theory of [[unicity distance]] implies that, in theory, the text's length is sufficient for reaching only one decipherment that makes sense.{{fact}} However, once this valid solution has been found, it would be necessary to prove it by deciphering another text in the same script. As no second disc has been found, no solution can be verified. |
This general opinion was nevertheless disputed on the basis of the work of the mathematician [[Claude Shannon]]. Shannon's theory of [[unicity distance]] implies that, in theory, the text's length is sufficient for reaching only one decipherment that makes sense.{{fact}} However, once this valid solution has been found, it would be necessary to prove it, normally by deciphering another text in the same script. As no second disc has been found, no solution can be verified with absolute certainty. |
||
=== List of deciphering attempts === |
=== List of deciphering attempts === |
Revision as of 19:39, 20 February 2006
The Phaistos Disc (Phaistos Disk, Phaestos Disc, Festos Disc, Greek: Δίσκος της Φαιστού) is a curious archaeological find, most likely dating from about 1700 BC. Its purpose and meaning, and even its original geographical place of manufacture, remain disputed, making it one of the most famous mysteries of archaeology. This unique object is now on display at the archaeological museum of Heraklion in Crete, Greece.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3d/PhaistosDiskLarge.jpg/320px-PhaistosDiskLarge.jpg)
Discovery
The Phaistos Disc was discovered in the basement of room XL-101 of the Minoan palace-site of Phaistos, near Hagia Triada, on the south coast of Crete. Italian archaeologist Luigi Pernier recovered this remarkably intact "dish", about 15 cm in diameter and uniformly just over 1 cm thick, on July 3 1908.
Archaeological context
Luigi Pernier discovered the disc during his excavation of the first Minoan palace. It was found in the main cell of an underground "temple depository". These basement cells, only accessible from above, were neatly covered with a layer of fine plaster. Their context was poor in precious artifacts but rich in black earth and ashes, mixed with burnt bovine bones. In the northern part of the main cell, a few inches south-east of the disk, and about twenty inches above the floor, linear A tablet PH-1 was also found. The site apparently collapsed as a result of an earthquake, possibly linked with the explosive eruption of the Santorini volcano that affected large parts of the Mediterranean region ca. 1628 BC.
Uniqueness
The uniqueness of this archaeological object may be invalidated by at least two other apparently related specimens - a votive double axe found by Spyridon Marinatos in the Arkalohori Cave, Crete, and a fragment of a smaller clay disk, found at Vladikavkaz, North Ossetia. But both inscriptions were engraved, not made with stamps. Moreover, the first contains only superficially similar hieroglyphics, and the second, interesting as it might prove, disappeared mysteriously. So far, the Phaistos Disc remains a hapax.
The inscription
The inscription was made by pressing pre-formed hieroglyphic "seals" into the soft clay, in a clockwise sequence spiralling towards the disc's center. It was then baked at high temperature.
Glyphs
There are a total of 241 figures on the disc. Many of the 45 different glyphs represent easily identifiable every-day things. In addition to these, there is a small diagonal line that occurs underneath the final sign in a group a total of 18 times. The disk shows traces of corrections made by the scribe in several places. The 45 symbols have been numbered by Arthur Evans from 01 to 45, and this numbering has become the conventional reference used by most researchers. Some symbols have been compared with Linear A characters and assigned Linear B values by Fischer, Timm (2005) and others.
- 01: a walking human figure, occurring 11 times.
- 02: The most frequent symbol, the "Mohican" head in profile, occurring 19 times.
- 03: a bald head in profile, with "tatoo" or jewelery on the cheek, occurring twice.
- 04: "captive", a standing human figure with bound arms, occurring once (A.V)
- 05: child, occurring once
- 06: woman, occurring four times
- 07: "breast", a bell-shaped symbol, occurring 18 times
- 08: "hand-glove", occurring 5 times
- 09: "tiara", occurring twice
- 10: corn ear or arrow, ocurring four times (on side A only)
- 11: bow, occurring once (A.XIII)
- 12: dotted circle, "shield", occurring 17 times, compared with Linear B qe
- 13: "club", occurring six times
- 14: "yoke", occurring twice
- 15: pickaxe, occurring once
- 16: dagger/saw, occurring twice
- 17: "tool for cutting leather", occurring once
- 18: angle, occurring 12 times, compared with AB 37, Linear B ti
- 19: Y-shaped branch, occurring 3 times, compared to Linear B sa
- 20: "drinking vase, made from a shell", occurring twice
- 21: "floor plan" or "double comb", occurring twice
- 22: "bridle", ocurring five times (on side B only)
- 23: "pillar", occurring 11 times, compared to AB 05 or AB 06, Linear B to or na
- 24: "building", occurring six times, compared to Linear B wa
- 25: boat, occurring seven times
- 26: horn, occurring six times
- 27: hide or ingot, occurring 15 times
- 28: hoof, occurring twice
- 29: feline head, occurring 11 times
- 30: ram's head, occurring once
- 31: bird of prey in flight, occurring five times (on side A only)
- 32: dove, occurring three times
- 33: fish, occurring six times
- 34: fly or bee, occurring three times
- 35: branch, occurring 11 times, compared to Linear B te
- 36: bush, occurring four times, compared to Linear B ni (fig tree)
- 37: plant (thistle), occurring four times
- 38: flower, occurring four times
- 39: "crokos"/Ψ-shape, occurring four times
- 40: occurring six times
- 41: occurring twice
- 42: occurring once
- 43: dotted triangle, occurring once, compared to Linear B ta2
- 44: occurring once
- 45: wave or double strap, occurring six times, compared to Linear B ra2
yielding a frequency distribution of
- 19-18-17-15-12-11-11-11-11-7-6-6-6-6-6-6-5-5-5-4-4-4-4-4-4-3-3-3-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1
Strokes
There are a number of glyphs marked with an oblique stroke, the strokes are not imprinted but carved by hand and are attached to the first or last sign of a "word", depending on the direction of reading chosen. Their meaning is a matter of discussion. One hypothesis, supported by Evans, Duhoux, Ohlenroth and others, is that they were used to subdivide the text into paragraphs, but alternative meanings have been offered by other scholars.
Direction
These can be determined by reconstructing the movements of the scribe. It can be shown from various epigraphical facts (overcuts, angular points on the spiral, corrections, etc.), that the text was written, spire by spire, alternating tracing of the spiral and printing of the signs, from the exterior to the center. Moreover, these epigraphical facts (for instance, the fact that most of the corrections were done on the spot by the scribe himself) show that the scribe was "composing" the text as he was printing it. There is therefore no way to dissociate the direction of reading from the direction of printing. All the scholars who have read the text in a counter-clockwise direction have been unable to present a reconstruction of the scribe's movements, coherent both with their hypothesis and with the epigraphical facts.[citation needed]
Inscription text
There are 61 "words", 31 on side A and 30 on side B, here read outside-to-inside (putting the "Mohican" glyphs word-initially and the strokes word-finally. . The shortest words are two symbols in length, the longest seven symbols. The strokes are transcribed as '.
Side A: 02-12-13-01-18' 24-40-12 29-45-07' 29-29-34 02-12-04-40-33 27-45-07-12 27-44-08 02-12-06-18 31-26-35 02-12-41-19-35 01-41-40-07 02-12-32-23-38' 39-11 02-27-25-10-23-18 28-01' 02-12-31-26' 02-12-27-27-35-37-21 33-23 02-12-31-26' 02-27-25-10-23-18 28-01' 02-12-31-26' 02-12-27-14-32-18-27 06-18-17-19 31-26-12 02-12-13-01 23-19-35' 10-03-38 02-12-27-27-35-37-21 13-01 10-03-38
Side B: 02-12-22-40-07 27-45-07-35 02-37-23-05' 22-25-27 33-24-20-12 16-23-18-43' 13-01-39-33 15-07-13-01-18 22-37-42-25 07-24-40-35 02-26-36-40 27-25-38-01 29-24-24-20-35 16-14-18 29-33-01 06-35-32-39-33 02-09-27-01 29-36-07-08' 29-08-13 29-45-07' 22-29-36-07-08' 27-34-23-25 07-18-35 07-45-07' 07-23-18-24 22-29-36-07-08' 09-30-39-18-07 02-06-35-23-07 29-34-23-25 45-07'
Attempted decipherment
A great deal of speculation developed around the disc during the 20th century. The Phaistos Disc captured the imagination of amateur archeologists. Alas, some of the more fanciful interpretations of its meaning are living classics of pseudoarchaeology. Many attempts have been made to decipher the code behind the disc's glyphs. Historically, almost anything has been proposed, including prayers, a narrative or an adventure story, a "psalterion", a call to arms, a board game, and a geometric theorem. While many enthusiasts still believe the mystery can be solved, scholarly attempts at decipherment are thought to be unlikely to succeed unless more examples of the glyphs turn up somewhere, as it is generally thought that there isn't enough context available for meaningful analysis.
This general opinion was nevertheless disputed on the basis of the work of the mathematician Claude Shannon. Shannon's theory of unicity distance implies that, in theory, the text's length is sufficient for reaching only one decipherment that makes sense.[citation needed] However, once this valid solution has been found, it would be necessary to prove it, normally by deciphering another text in the same script. As no second disc has been found, no solution can be verified with absolute certainty.
List of deciphering attempts
Attempts sorted by date :
- George Hempl, 1911 (interpretation as Ionic Greek, syllabic writing)
- George Hempl also published an interpretation of Hittite as Doric Greek.
- Florence Stawell, 1911 (interpretation as Homeric Greek, syllabic writing);
- Albert Cuny, 1914 (interpretation as ancient Egyptian document, syllabic-ideographic writing);
- Paolo Ballotta, 1974 (interpretation as ideographic writing);
- Jean Faucounau, 1975 (interpretation as Greek dialect, syllabic writing).
- Review: Yves Duhoux, How not to decipher the Phaistos Disc(PDF 5.9 Mb) , American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 104, n° 3, p. 597-600.
- Leon Pomerance, 1976 (interpretation as astronomical document);
- Vladimir Georgiev, 1976 (interpretation as Hittite language, syllabic writing);
- Peter Aleff, 1982 (interpretation as ancient gameboard);
- Steven R. Fischer, 1988 (interpretation as Greek dialect, syllabic writing);
- Ole Hagen, 1988 (interpretation as calendar)
- Harald Haarmann, 1990 (interpretation as ideographic writing);
- Kjell Aartun, 1992 (interpretation as Semitic language, syllabic writing);
- Derk Ohlenroth, 1996 (interpretation as Greek dialect, alphabetic writing);
- Sergei V. Rjabchikov 1998 (interpretation as Slavonic dialect, syllabic writing);
- Friedhelm Will, 2000 (interpretation as document with atlantic origin);
- Keven & Keith Massey, 2003 (interpretation as Greek dialect, syllabic writing);
- Marco Corsini, 2003 (interpretation as Greco-Creto-Egyptian document)
- Torsten Timm, 2005 (reading attempt based upon the hypothesis of a Cretan Script).
- Based on the Linear A character distribution patterns collected by Facchetti (1999) Timm concludes that the language of the Disk inscription is the same as the language of Linear A.
Character encoding
Although there is no official Unicode encoding for the symbols on the disk, the ConScript Unicode Registry has assigned a block of the Unicode Private Use Area to be used for the script. Two fonts include support for this area; Code2000 and Everson Mono Phaistos. The text on the disk is given on the second of these links; you can read that text if you have either of them installed.
References
- Giulio M. Facchetti, Statistical data and morphematic elements in Linear A in: Kadmos, XXXVIII (1999)
- Torsten Timm, Der Diskos von Phaistos - Anmerkungen zur Deutung und Textstruktur, IF 109 (2005), 204-231.
Selected bibliography
General
- Thomas Balistier, The Phaistos Disc - an account of its unsolved mystery, Verlag Thomas Balistier, 2000.
- John Chadwick, The Decipherment of Linear B, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
- Yves Duhoux, Le disque de phaestos, Leuven, 1977.
- Louis Godart, The Phaistos Disc - the enigma of an Aegean script, ITANOS Publications, 1995.
Attempted decipherments
This list contains off-line accounts of various decipherments mentioned above
- Hempl, George. "The Solving of an Ancient Riddle: Ionic Greek before Homer". Harper's Monthly Magazine (122, no. 728 (Jan 1911)): 187–198.
- Stawell, F. Melian. "An Interpretation of the Phaistos Disk". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs (Vol. 19, No. 97. (Apr., 1911)): 23–29, 32–38.
{{cite journal}}
:|issue=
has extra text (help) JSTOR URL - Jean Faucounau, Le déchiffrement du Disque de Phaistos, Paris 1999.
- Thomas Balistier, The Phaistos Disc - an account of its unsolved mystery, Verlag Thomas Balistier, 2000 (as above); describes Aarten's and Ohlenroth's decipherments.
- Torsten Timm, Der Diskos von Phaistos – Fremdeinfluss oder kretisches Erbe?, BoD, 2005.