User talk:62.30.140.42

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

14:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
62.30.140.42 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Asperger syndrome appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Kansan (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asperger syndrome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Asperger syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 19:41, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Asperger's Syndrom

Please see the talk page for a discussion of adding the material you wish to. The onus is on you to show that your version is better, within the rules of wikipedia, especially WP:MEDRS and WP:NPOV. You should look up WP:CIVIL while you are at it. Dbrodbeck (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JNW (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruptive editing/edit summaries. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 19:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

---

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Neurotypical appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Y'know, I kinda sympathise with your views. But here's not the place for them. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duel (ride), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I reverted it instantly

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Duel (ride) with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  18:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Duel (ride), you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 20:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Duel (ride) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. _{@ d \/\/ | | |}^Talk 13:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

please im sorry

Please no. Dont block me, im only editing it from a NPOV pleeease. Dont block me from wikipedia. Im so sorry, i can change i can change. I promise.

I wont do it again, i promise pleeeease, please dont block me. Pleasse pretty please

Tell me how im vandalising wikipedia and once im unblocked i wont do it...