Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple: Difference between revisions
Sachinvenga (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Redtigerxyz (talk) to last version by Edison |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
:::kind of surprised mercenaries don't mount a military mission to steal the treasure {{unsigned|Mongreilf|21:46, 3 July 2011}} |
:::kind of surprised mercenaries don't mount a military mission to steal the treasure {{unsigned|Mongreilf|21:46, 3 July 2011}} |
||
:::: It seems they are very good at securing treasures. The Hindi temples have existed for hundreds of years and many of them must have a few tons of gold. --[[User:Marc Kupper|Marc Kupper]]|[[User talk:Marc Kupper|talk]] 04:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC) |
:::: It seems they are very good at securing treasures. The Hindi temples have existed for hundreds of years and many of them must have a few tons of gold. --[[User:Marc Kupper|Marc Kupper]]|[[User talk:Marc Kupper|talk]] 04:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
<big> |
|||
Isn't this enough to feed all of India's poor for over a month?</big> |
|||
== Chronology is wrong. == |
== Chronology is wrong. == |
Revision as of 18:03, 5 July 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Padmanabhaswamy Temple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | India: Kerala Start‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Hinduism Start‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | A news item involving Padmanabhaswamy Temple was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on Error: Invalid time.. | ![]() |
Needs references and MAJOR revision
This article has improved steadily, but really needs work as it is still a mess. There was only one reference listed; I tried to add several more, but folks who have access to original texts could seriously improve the quality of the article by referencing them. Anyone who has access to references for this article, please appropriately document things.
The overall tone of this article is written from the point of view of a worshipper; it needs to be revised for encyclopedic tone in a big way. As it stands, much of it is unsupported, tonally inferior and could be easily deleted. I am certain that someone out there is attatched enough to the topic to fix this and make it appropriate for wikipedia standards of tone.
I deleted the "easy Sloka to learn" not because it might not have merit, but because A) no translation was provided, b)the relevance to this article was not made clear, and c)Wikipedia is not a prayer learning site, but an encyclopedia. If one wishes to include Sloka or other literary sources, please REFERENCE them and document in a non-biased fashion why they are relevant to the article as a whole. Otherwise, put them in a separate article.
This is a valuable article. Let's make it better. Transcendentalstate (talk) 13:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Other dieties
Sri Padmanabha swami temple doesnt have any saivite dieties (still ganapathi is not included in that catagory). Shiva is only in the dias under the arm of perumal. a dias for subrahmania is also not there to my knowledge(And I strongly believe so). I've removed these things.
In the eastern entrance, near flag post, hanuman and garuda are there.
Santhoshj 13:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Ettuvettil Pillamar and Ettara Yogam
Nothing is mentioned about the true rulers of Sree Padmanabha Temple.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.236.136.18 (talk) 11:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The scientific reference of the Valampiri Sangu given is not correct. Valampiri Sangu is a Sinistral Variety of the Indian Conch Turbinella pyrum L. The History part mentions it as a Dextral Shell. Valampiri is not a Dextral Conch, it is a Sinistral Conch. Dextral conch is known as Idampiri or Idampuri (Tamil). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.163.216.80 (talk) 06:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Photo
This article needs a photo.
Sloka and Paasuram
The section on "Easy Sloka and Paasuram" seems irrelevant to the article. I don't see the point in adding a section on a salutation verse to a deity on the page about the temple. Not to mention, there are several typographic errors in the sloka, plus no cited source. Bark4nai 08:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)PANASELVAM
lakhs of billions of worth treasure unearthed from sacred chambers of the temple making it one of the, if not the richest temples in the world.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13994351
116.202.151.158 (talk) 04:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- The BBC says, "Unofficial estimates say that the treasure discovered so far over four days of inspections may be valued at more than 25 billion rupees ($500m)", so why do we have $11 billion and $25 billion as its worth? Ericoides (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- kind of surprised mercenaries don't mount a military mission to steal the treasure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongreilf (talk • contribs) 21:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- It seems they are very good at securing treasures. The Hindi temples have existed for hundreds of years and many of them must have a few tons of gold. --Marc Kupper|talk 04:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- kind of surprised mercenaries don't mount a military mission to steal the treasure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongreilf (talk • contribs) 21:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Isn't this enough to feed all of India's poor for over a month?
Chronology is wrong.
"In July 2011 a review of the temple's underground vaults... was begun. ...unofficial estimates on the sixth day of the inventory placed the value..."
Since today is July 3rd, a review that began in July cannot be at its sixth day. Perhaps someone can fix this.
(I'm not being bold on this because I don't think I should edit news items.) Wanderer57 (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Per this article the work started on June 27, 2011. Other reports, such as about the sixth day of work, have been consistent with this starting date. --Marc Kupper|talk 20:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Unintelligible number
I understand that "lakh" is some kind of large number used in India, and I assume "crore" is some kind of money, or maybe another word for a number in India, but what is "B9;1" intended to mean in the "Treasure trove" section in the sentence "On 3 July, the total stands at B9;1 lakh crore (US $22 billion).?" Edison (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Top-importance
- Start-Class Kerala articles
- Top-importance Kerala articles
- Start-Class Kerala articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Kerala articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class Hinduism articles
- Top-importance Hinduism articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles