User talk:99.88.78.94

Plots

Numerous users have told you to stop adding unnecessary plot details to articles such as Disturbia (film). If you continue to add it back, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You need to provide a summary of the plot. See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary for more. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

If you read the above link, you would know that that is very unnecessary. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Deftonesderrick

Whenever I receive your messages, I read them. Sometimes, I reply to your messages. Now on, I'm going to read your messages & I'm going to reply to your messages. On your talk page, you say that I don't read your messages. You sent message to my talk page. That's why I'm replying. After I'm done editing, I want to use sandbox to check if my edits are beneficient. Problem's that I don't know how to use sandbox. That's why I save my edits so you & other users could check if my edits are good. Tim Songs blocked me from editing for 3 months. I'm trying to send request if I could get unblocked, but I don't know how to send request. Are you able to unblock me? I'm sorry for vandalizing. I won't vandalize again. I'm going to college next yr & I might not get chance to edit wikipedia next yr.

Well, I have nothing to do with unblocking, so i can't help you there. The facts are, you ignored numerous requests by a number of editors to stop editing without adhering to Wiki policies. We tried several times to get you to read the guidelines and you simply didn't do it. With regards to using the sandbox, there are a number of pages that outline how to use it. I won't give my personal opinion on this matter, because the facts speak for themselves, sorry. (Deftonesderrick 05:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC))

Oh my gosh, Deftonesderrick! I received your message from above. Tim Songs said that I've to convince other adminstrators to accept my request for unblock. If you're an adminstrator, then are you supposed to look at my request for unblock?

No, because I'm not an admin. (Deftonesderrick 23:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC))

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Disturbia (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is a courtesy notice: you were given a final warning yesterday, and yet you again added that "plot summary"--after thrice posting on my talk page. Vandalism report is in the mail. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unconstructive edits & plot summaries

Assuming that your recent questions on various users' talk pages are sincere attempts to understand what people are complaining about: It is unconstructive to create an excessively long and detailed plot summery. In general a plot summery should cover the major elements of the plot, in enough detail that people can understand the nature of the film and any critical comments (based on cited reliable sources) that are made, and no more. See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary for explanation and examples. Most films can be covered in 4-5 short paragraphs, say 800 words or less. But that is only a very rough rule of thumb -- a simple plot needs less, and a complex plot may need more.

More importantly, when you make additions to a plot summery, or indeed any part of an article, and another editor reverts them, it is unhelpful and unconstructive to simply repeat the edits or similar ones. If you still think the edits are needed or desirable, start a discussion on the article's talk page, explaining what you want to add or change, and why, and pay attention to any responses that other editors make, and respond to them. Simply revert-warring or edit-warring is very unhelpful and will lead to blocks. DES ^(talk) 04:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tim Song (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Tim Song

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi Tim, you said that I won't be able to edit for 3 months. Please unblock me right now. I can't wait for 3 months. I'm going to college next year. I'm sorry for vandalizing. I promise that I won't put too much info. I was told that if I edit, then I need to put 800 words or less. If you don't unblock me right now, then can you please unblock me 1 week later

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Message for Tim Songs

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Tim Song, my first request wasn't good, so I'm going to write a new request for unblock. Do I've to convince other administrators to accept my request for unblock? Please unblock me. I understand why I've been blocked. I'm sorry for vandalizing. I promise that I won't do it again. I won't put more than 700 words in plot summary.

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your contributions, but I'm not convinced that you will be able to keep your promise to make appropriate edits in the future; your discussions seem to indicate that you haven't yet mastered the skill of distinguishing between major and minor details. On a more personal note, I strongly suggest that you get a favorite English teacher or a tutor to help you with this- besides interfering with your ability to edit Wikipedia, this is also going to interfere with your college success. Your college professors will expect you to already know how to write a clear, concise summary when you arrive in their classrooms. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Message for Fisherqueen

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm really sorry for vandalizing. Last time I edited other article, I thought I put important details. I forgot to check the total amount of words. I didn't mean to vandalize again. Block's no longer necessary because I understand what I'm blocked for. I won't do it again & I'll make productive contributions instead. Sometimes I've hard time writing essays, summaries, etc. I'll make sure I write better in college. Please unblock me. If I'm blocked until 7/10/2010, then I can't wait that long. If you feel I should be blocked still, then can you please block me for 1 week only. If it's 07/10/2010, then I might not be able to continue editing wikipedia articles. It's because I'm going to have summer classes.

Decline reason:

Denying this one (multiple open unblock requests) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Message for User talk:99.88.78.94

• The history of this IP gives me no reason to believe they'll change their behavior: they've been blocked before for the same offense. Drmies (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Drmies

I swear that I won't vadalize again. Please, I want to get unblocked.

You realize that not being able to edit does not affect your ability to use Wikipedia to actually learn things, right? I have removed your multiple requests - you're allowed one open at a time. Because you have so brutally abused the unblock requests, I would suspect that if it is denied, your ability to request them will be removed. Read WP:BLOCK and WP:GAB while you wait. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Bwilkins

Hi Bwilkins, did you say that I was abusing the unblock requests procedure? Sorry, I didn't mean to abuse the unblock requests procedure. How am I abusing the unblock requests procedure? Am I abusing the unblock requests procedure by sending multiple requests at a time? I thought I could send multiple requests at a time. Now I know that I can only send 1 unblock request at a time.

On the "number of words"

I teach seventh graders. At the beginning of the year, it's not uncommon for me to meet students who decide where to start a new paragraph by simply counting five sentences, then starting a new paragraph. They know that they get in trouble when they don't break an essay into paragraphs, but they don't understand how to divide the paragraphs by their main ideas yet. I spend time teaching them how to focus each paragraph on one main idea, rather than just assuming that every five sentences is a paragraph. Your promise to keep your summary 'less than 700 words' reminds me of that. It's true that a summary that's more than 700 words is too long, but just counting 700 words doesn't communicate the most important main ideas, while omitting unnecessary details. For that, you need more than word-counting: you need to learn how to recognize the important main ideas, and how to choose which details are important, and which aren't. Until you can do that, counting words won't help you to write better summaries. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Fisherqueen

Oh my gosh, last time I edited, I added unnecessary details. I'm really sorry for adding unnecessary details. I promise that when I edit next time, I'm not going to put too much info. I'll make sure that the info's 700 words or less. I'll put main ideas. I'm not going to add unimportant details.

Message for me

Basically per FisherQueen. It has nothing to do with the length and everything to do with the quality. Wikipedia is not therapy, and unless you can demonstrate your ability to contribute productively you are simply generating clean up work for others with no gain to the encyclopedia. Since you've been blocked three times (not counting this block) for the same issue, I have little confidence in your ability to edit productively. Tim Song (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Tim Songs

Are you the only 1 who looks at my unblock request?

Message for Tim Songs

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Oh my gosh, last time I edited, I added unnecessary details. I'm really sorry for adding unnecessary details. I promise that when I edit next time, I'm not going to put too much info, I'll make sure that the info's 700 words or less, & I'll put main ideas. I'm not going to add unimportant details. I understand what I've done wrong. Please unblock me. If you unblock me, then can you please give me 3 chances. If I fail each of those 3 tries by giving a bad edit, then you can block me from editing for the rest of my life.

Decline reason:

Per the comment below, your record, and the general unseemliness of begging. To prevent from further assaults on your own dignity, I am protecting the page for the duration of the block. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--99.88.78.94 (talk) 00:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Three more chances? You've already had four, including the three unblock requests that were all declined. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblock Request for Amalthea

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know at least one reason why you extended my block to September 7, 2010. I swear that I didn't create any accounts from my IP Address. My cousin, Joe's the person who created more than 1 wikipedia account from my IP Address. For some of the accounts, Joe lied that his name was Hudson, Cardoza, etc. When he created accounts, he used my computer at my home. My name is Robert. First you extended my block to July 10. Next, you extended it to July 28. Last, you extended my block to September 7. I'm telling you the truth about what Joe did. Also, the truth's that I'm Robert. I won't vandalize wikipedia anymore. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

For crying out loud, you do NOT post unblocks to specific admins: once the unblock request is up, any admin may check your contributions, and determine your status - all admins are of equal rank. There is absolutely nothing in your contributions, editing style, history, abilities or otherwise that has convinced me to actually unblock you - nor do I see anything in the near future. WP:BROTHER clearly applies here as well. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Helpme

: {{I need to know all of the reasons why you extended my block to 9/07/10? First, I got blocked until 7/10/10. Next, it got pushed to 7/28/10. Last, it got pushed to 9/07/10. As far as I know, you said that I created more than 1 account at my IP. I never created an account at my IP. How come you don't believe me? My cousin, Joe's the person who made more than 1 wikipedia account at my IP. Please believe me.}}

{{adminhelp}} This needs to be addressed by an admin --Wolfnix • Talk • 07:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

The block on this IP has expired. I advise you to create an account and keep the password secure, which will avoid My little brother did it-type problems with your cousins or whoever, and not to repeat the conduct that got you blocked in the first instance. JohnCD (talk) 07:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Batman: Mask of the Phantasm. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-5- (talk) 18:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

In the plot summary you wrote, "It’s obvious the mysterious man wanted revenge by killing Chuckie." This is an opinionated statement because it's based on what you have ascertained, not necessarily what every other viewer will gather from the scene.-5- (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, how do you know at that point in the movie that the character has a reason for his or her actions?-5- (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

It's still your own personal analysis. Unless it's stated outright in the scene, what you want to add to the plot summary is what you are taking from the scene and not necessarily what someone else will take from it.-5- (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Is it stated outright by the Phantasm in that scene why he or she is killing him?-5- (talk) 22:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Message for User:5

I still don't understand your responses. I want to make sure. Can please answer my questions? Is it okay to type that Chuckie got killed because he's an evil man? Is it okay to type that the mysterious person killed Chuckie because Chuckie was an evil man? Is it okay to type the mysterious person killed Chuckie because Chuckie did injustice to the mysterious person? Is it okay to type since Chuckie's a bad man, Chuckie did a bad thing along time ago, which made the mysterious person mad. (99.88.78.94 (talk) 22:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)).

Message for User Talk: 99.88.78.94

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to I Know What You Did Last Summer, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning for adding unnecessary plot details to articles. If you do it again, you will be blocked. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of One Year for Repeated Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Message for Fastly Talk

It said if I add unnecessary details to plot summaries, then I was going to get blocked. When I edited Law & Order: Criminal Intent Season 7 episode offense, I added true details from the episode. I didn't add unnecessary details to the episode offense.

Please answer my questions: Why did you block me? What did I do now? If you're saying that I added unnecessary details to the episode offense, then how are those unnecessary details.(99.88.78.94 (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)).

Hi, User:Timmy Polo. We aren't exactly sure why, after so many months of editing, you aren't able to distinguish between major and minor details. We aren't sure whether you simply don't have the necessary skills, or whether pretending to not know the difference is a game you're playing. Either way, though, it's time for us to give up on our attempts to teach you, and simply block you from editing. Cleaning up after you is just too much work to continue like this. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. If you unblock me, then I'll ask one of the users if I could add a particular sentence into a wikipedia article. For example, if I want to put a particular sentence in an article, then I'll come to my user talk page 1st. When I come to my User Talk Page, is it okay for me to ask if I can put a particular sentence into a wiki article. I won't vandalize again. If you're saying that I added unnecessary details into the episode Offense, then please tell me how are they unnecessary details. I just want to know how are they unnecessary details. What unnecessary details did I add? In the episode Offense, is it okay to type that the girl named Carla said that she got raped by the football players.

Decline reason:

For a record of far too many block and unblock requests, you have worn out the patience of the community, and for the reason stated in the section above, your block should remain. Furthermore, nothing prevents you from making edit requests while you are blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I forgot to mention that I'm not Timmy Polo. My name's Leo. My cousin, Joe created every account including Timmy Polo at my IP. Joe is the not the person, who edited wikipedia today and last night. I edited wikipedia last night & today. I won't vandalize again. If you unblock me, then I'll ask you if I can put a certain sentence in a wikipedia article? When I ask, is it okay to put helpme sign on my talk page? For example, in Batman:Mask of Phantasm, I'll ask if it is okay for me to put it's revealed that Andrea didn't tell Bruce her father died? I like the word revealed. When I edited Law and Order: Criminal Intent Season 7 episode Offense, if I put unnecessary details, then what unnecessary details did I put and how are they unnecessary details?

Decline reason:

No. Your edit history indicates you are the same person who has changed names too many times. You have promised many times in prior unblock requests that you will not vandalize again, and each time broken the promise. A few requests ago, you asked for three chances, and you've had more than that. Enough. Please cease and desist from posting these endless unblock requests or your ability to edit talk pages will be blocked also. You can always register your own account that other people can't use, if that is a problem with this IP address. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I give up. I'm Joe, who created Timmy Polo account & other accounts. If you unblock me, then will you let me ask you & other users if I can put particular sentences in the Wikipedia articles? If you & other users won’t let me, then why? If I ask you & other users what particular sentences I can put, then it’ll be lot easier for me to edit wiki. For example, in the movie, Homam, is it okay for me to say that Chandu informs Daddy that Vishwanath & the undercover cop are on top of a building? If you refuse to unblock me, then is it okay for me to create an account? When I click on create account, it won't let me. If you allow me to create account, then I'll still ask you & other users if I can add particular sentences into the Wikipedia articles?

Decline reason:

No. Sorry, but your whole history shows that you are not able to edit here without causing more trouble than it is worth. Forget about Wikipedia and find some other interest. JohnCD (talk) 08:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Advice

Congratulations, you are now blocked from editing your own talk page. You were warned that this would happen if you post another unblock request.

Otherwise, to answer your questions:

• Yes, feel free to ask other editors to add information to articles, either here or on the article talk pages.
• Regarding your question on the movie Homam, that seems like unnecessary detail. A Wikipedia article need not convey every detail of a story.
• You aren't prevented from creating an account from another IP address. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not create a new account, because you've already gone through several accounts without solving the problem. You should pursue interests and hobbies other than Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You can't come back after a 1 year block, cause the same type of disruption, and expect things to go differently this time. Do not abuse the unblock priviledge or talk page access will be removed as well. --Floquenbeam (talk) 12:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

99.88.78.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Few days ago, my user talk page said that I was going to get blocked for 1 day ONLY. Now, my user talk page says that I'm blocked for 1 year & this seems betrayal. WHy are you betrayding me? Please allow me to edit. Sean Archer123 is my cousin's wikipedia account. 1 of my cousins is Sean. I never logged into the account Sean Archer123. Please believe me.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Few days ago, my user talk page said that I was going to get blocked for 1 day ONLY. Now, my user talk page says that I'm blocked for 1 year & this seems betrayal. WHy are you betrayding me? Please allow me to edit. Sean Archer123 is my cousin's wikipedia account. 1 of my cousins is Sean. I never logged into the account Sean Archer123. Please believe me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Few days ago, my user talk page said that I was going to get blocked for 1 day ONLY. Now, my user talk page says that I'm blocked for 1 year & this seems betrayal. WHy are you betrayding me? Please allow me to edit. Sean Archer123 is my cousin's wikipedia account. 1 of my cousins is Sean. I never logged into the account Sean Archer123. Please believe me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Few days ago, my user talk page said that I was going to get blocked for 1 day ONLY. Now, my user talk page says that I'm blocked for 1 year & this seems betrayal. WHy are you betrayding me? Please allow me to edit. Sean Archer123 is my cousin's wikipedia account. 1 of my cousins is Sean. I never logged into the account Sean Archer123. Please believe me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(99.88.78.94 (talk) 06:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)).