Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports: Difference between revisions

Username: Blahblah123456753 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Labyrinth (film) (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 07:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The filter was workig correctly, and prevented vandalism from getting into the article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

86.188.183.146

Username: 86.188.183.146 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Peak District (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 10:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

I was being a silly banana

Even a silly banana isn't allowed to replace the text of an article wit the word "Lol". עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

46.166.128.110

Username: 46.166.128.110 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Danes dutch people etc.... (filter log)
Description: I was trying to insert "germanic ethnic group" in the among others articles above and i got stopped by Edit Filter 439 , i do not know where to post this but i request that Edit Filter 439 is to be removed because inserting facts or non-vandalism text cannnot be censored or filtered and removed automatically (that is NOT what edit filters in wikipedia are for) , atleast tell how long this edit filter is going to last ?!
Date and time: 11:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Us blocking all your accounts and creating an edit filter to stop you is designed to give you a clear message - you shouldn't be doing any edits here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

216.79.193.52

Username: 216.79.193.52 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Green computing (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 16:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

71.175.53.239

Username: 71.175.53.239 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Eoghan Quigg (filter log)
Description: I reverted the previous IP's edit as vandalism, and checked the page history to see if the edit got through, but apparently I triggered filter 364, "Changing the name in a BLP infobox". See Special:AbuseLog/5776895 and [1]. Note: I have a user account but did not log in, apparently, when I edited. Can the issue with the edit filter be addressed? Thanks!
Date and time: 18:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The filter was working correctly. Checking for a revert is not practical, and even if it were, it might be a bad idea - keep in mind, for example, that some IP hoppers will create a version which they prefer, and then undo anyone who reverts them. Keep in mind that merely having edit filter entries, or tagged edits, doesn't immediately mean anything - any possible consenquence goes through human users (usually admins) before any action is taken. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

174.57.146.172

Username: 174.57.146.172 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Pilot (Once Upon A Time _ (filter log)
Description: I am trying to make the plot more detailed and specific. That is all.
Date and time: 00:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: You deleted the entire article, repeatedly, and the filter will no longer allow you to edit this article. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

INTI.edu

Username: INTI.edu (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: INTI International University (filter log)
Description: updated external links
Date and time: 21:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The filter quite properly stopped you from adding spamlinks to a Facebook "fanpage"; it is functioning as it should. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DatPersonUDontKno

Username

DatPersonUDontKno (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Afro-Puerto Rican (filter log)

Description

marine reverted my edits, im trying to revert my edits back

Date and time

04:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

You are abusing multiple accounts right now. Warning you for that.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TattelTales1

Username

TattelTales1 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Afro-Puerto Rican (filter log)

Description

im trying to make "African immigration to Puerto Rico" redirect to "Afro-Puerto Rican", simply because they are not African immigrants if they lived there for centuries, they Afro-Puerto Ricans, it isnt allowing to redirect it though

Date and time

05:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Abusing multiple accounts.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

68.36.86.15

Username

68.36.86.15 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Isogram (filter log)

Description

Tried to add the word "motherfucking", with reference to Merriam-webster entry verifying it as a word.

Even as a piece of information? It has no vulgar context, and merely appears as a jumble of letters among other jumbles of letters.

So a profane quote from history would be acceptable; but this instance of a legitimate word, devoid of any context, which is of interest to fans of logology and the like, is not acceptable? Please excuse me if I am not using this "Report" correctly.

Some quotes can be justified because they are quotes.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For goodness sake, there is an entire list of ethnic slurs on Wikipedia! And some of those words have entire articles dedicated to them. I have provided this entry with just as much justification (a reference to a legitimate source) as any of those words. By the precedent set by that list existing, my edit must be allowed, or, you must dismantle that list.

Those articles are different from this. This page isn't about slang.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. The page is about words that do not have repeated letters, of which this word fits the description. One of these pages is a concentration of hateful language, while the other, is an enumeration of lexical oddities: words that are only interesting for the arrangement of their letters. Both pages are justified as collections of facts and history.

Date and time

23:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

I don't think we need that.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The f-word should not be used except when necessary.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

85.23.32.64

Username: 85.23.32.64 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Biosafety level (filter log)
Description: Linking to an external JPEG with {{Citation | url=… | format=JPEG}} resulted in an unnecessary warning. The same URL was already there without the template.
Date and time: 12:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

76.70.50.26

Username

76.70.50.26 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Federal Communications Commission (filter log)

Description

i was editing the controversies

Date and time

01:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Right. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

134.191.232.69

Username: 134.191.232.69 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: iptables (filter log)
Description: Changed the capitalization of the 'i' in iptables - Iptables (incorrect)->iptables.
Date and time: 09:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Unfortunately, even the best filters can have false positives. On the other hand, this filter doesn't prevent the edit - if you save it after the warning, it does update the page (as I see you did). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

95.252.246.223

Username: 95.252.246.223 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Italian profanity (filter log)
Description: cannot revert a section blanking by restore an old version
Date and time: 16:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

92.24.196.238

Username: 92.24.196.238 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Sanctity of life (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 17:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam gazey

Username: Adam gazey (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: adam gazey (filter log)
Description: adam gazey
Date and time: 19:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

trying to create a document on the decomposing of rocks and cell walls

Your comment is clearly inconsistent with the edits that the filter caught. What I see in the filter log is a series of inappropriate page creation attempts. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

91.52.164.64

Username: 91.52.164.64 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: User talk:Jarry1250 (filter log)
Description: enter this toolserver link for a bug report; and/or enter this result for the same bug report: Time taken to execute command: 1 {{PLURAL: $1|second|seconds}}.

Date and time: 21:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Now I successfully managed to enter my bug report after 4 tries, leaving out the base information and referring to here instead ... -- Juergen 91.52.164.64 (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the report for you the way you wanted it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

But what could have been the reason(s) for my inability to enter it that way ? Are they fixable ? -- Juergen 91.52.190.87 (talk) 08:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the nature of these filters (they are designed against specific users who create lots of accounts to cause trouble), I can't give you much details; however, I don't think that we can fix these. Please note, however, that most of our filters effect only anonymous users or new users ("new" being defined differently for different filters); if you create an account, you will hit many fewer filters. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I have an account that I use for protected pages only (mainly dewiki). Changing the IP every day keeps my interest profile (pages that I read and edit) private.

Does Prolific sockpuppeteers mean that there are many sock puppets generated on the English Wikipedia from here, Germany, near Duesseldorf (this is where 91.52.0.0/16 is located) ??

Those filter rules should be public so I can read and work around them. -- Juergen 91.52.190.87 (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then vandals can find ways around it too. Wikipedia is very open, and your editing activity is something the community needs to be able to see. Changing IP addresses this often does not allow that. No-one, however can see your reading history.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reading history becomes editing history for me as most pages contain any typos. Using an accout for everyday work would mean to reveal my interest profile. -- Juergen 91.52.168.83 (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BJ23

Username: BJ23 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Nguyen Khanh (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 01:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: For this frivolous report and your disallowed vandalism attempt, you have earned a vandalism warning. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:16, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

12.219.49.66

Username: 12.219.49.66 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Oh My Goddess! (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 14:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Your recent editing attempt did not appear to be helpful; therefore, the filter acted correctly. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

129.11.231.83

Username: 129.11.231.83 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Lynne Perrie (filter log)
Description: wanted to change "sex act" to "removed thong and licked penis". Sex act isn't descriptive and is a rather pointless and misleading euphemism, in my opinion. It doesn't tell you what happened, and is abstract and vague. Plus, it doesn't appear that it was a sex act: licking a penis doesn't always have to be.
Date and time: 15:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

199.235.148.232

Username: 199.235.148.232 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: David Irving (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 16:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

I was trying to educate the world on how evil David Irving really is please approve of the edits otherwise you are helping the Holocaust deniers

Per Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, we cannot accept any controversial or negative statement about a living person that is not directly supported by a reliable source. Furthermore, the falsification of quotes (in part or in whole) is a big no-no. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

168.8.212.133

Username

168.8.212.133 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Newton's law of universal gravitation (filter log)

Description

i was trying to add to the page do make it more descriptive.

Date and time

20:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Yeah right.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Secretmodigliani

Username: Secretmodigliani (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Amedeo_Modigliani (filter log)
Description: adding a complete source for paintings year by year, a new biography, crital essay, etc. etc.
Date and time: 22:04, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Not a false positive - you did add a URL containing your username. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

46.246.240.232

Username: 46.246.240.232 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Kim Philby (filter log)
Description: I tried to put the stamp to the infobox. If putting a stamp for the main image is not allowed please tell me. The log says "Long-term pattern abuse". And then when I went to put the stamp to its old position it again prevented me from doing it and now the stamp is not in the article.
Date and time: 23:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The problem is that the filename of the stamp happens to match what appears to be a "Long-term pattern abuse" patern. An other user did what you had tried to do; and if you had moved it in a single edit, the edit would have been fine. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

128.114.59.178

Username: 128.114.59.178 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Tony Stewart (filter log)
Description: Tried to undo the vandalism of this edit.
Date and time: 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Unfortunately, people editing anonymously adding these words to articles, especially articles about living people, are almost always vandalism. Note, however, that the revert you tried to do was done later on. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

216.59.230.156

Username

216.59.230.156 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (filter log)

Description

Date and time

23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Frivolous report.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

106.71.21.112

Username

106.71.21.112 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

The Getaway Plan (filter log)

Description they have removed important details about their child rapist band manager

Date and time

12:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Absolutely not a false positive, edit was vandalism - TBloemink (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

71.221.181.76

Username

71.221.181.76 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Citroën 2CV (filter log)

Description

I tried to voice my descrption

Date and time

23:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

It had better stay off Wikipedia though. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

69.234.27.127

Username: 69.234.27.127 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Ifa (filter log)
Description: To show, with references to substantiate my assertions, that the the idea that woman can become a divining priest, which requires initiation in the presence of the deity Odu (whom does not allow women in her presence), by virtue of having a womb, is not traditional.
Date and time: 05:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Jasonisanahole

Username: Jasonisanahole (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Origins of rock and roll (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 13:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colour King

Username: Colour King (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: User talk:Colour King (filter log)
Description

I was trying to post a note explaining I am the new account of a username softblocked user.

Date and time: 21:43, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: If your other account has a username soft block, you don't need to announce that account here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

89.243.219.80

Username: 89.243.219.80 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Natural fiber (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 19:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

i am sorry i did notin wrong

No you did. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

173.81.144.39

Username: 173.81.144.39 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Chad Ochocinco (filter log)
Description: I ws tellin the truth brah
Date and time: 19:58, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Nothing but pure vandalism. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rileymcgurn

Username: Rileymcgurn (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Timberlane Regional Middle School (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 02:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The edits in question did not appear to be helpful. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

67.148.129.98

Username: 67.148.129.98 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Marker (telecommunications) (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 03:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

i wanted to edit and it wouldn't let me so im kind of pissed so im going to sleep bye for now!  But im not goinng to sleep well

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 04:13, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polar568

Username

Polar568 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Navy WALRUS (filter log)

Description

Date and time

21:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Advertising is prohibited.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tim25013

Username

Tim25013 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Ryan Reynolds (filter log)

Description

Date and time

00:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Nope. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

77.23.161.117

Username: 77.23.161.117 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Southwestern United States (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 10:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

166.249.192.212

Username

166.249.192.212 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

Uncle Kracker (filter log)

Description

I was trying to indicate that Uncle Kracker dissed Faygo brand soda, by saying in the song "If Heaven Ain't Alot Like Detroit.", "Fuck Faygo bitch we pound cans of Strohs.". Now he is featured on the Faygo website. I pointed out the hypocrisy of the situation. Not that my opinion matters, I wasnt going to express it, but he does not deserve to be featured on their website, the Insane Clown Posse is the reason why there company does so well, its unjust that someone like Uncle Kracker is on there.

Date and time

19:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

This violates Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

168.11.60.243

Username: 168.11.60.243 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: [[]] (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 20:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Your pure vandalism attempts have just earned you a warning. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

68.55.112.31

Username

68.55.112.31 (talk · contribs) (filter log)

Page you were editing

User talk:Dan653 (filter log)

Description

Express disagreement with User:Dan653's determination that one of my other edits was unconstructive

Date and time

22:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Your <nowiki> tag triggered the filter. Try {{tlx|context}} instead.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

99.236.209.80

Username: 99.236.209.80 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Strauss-Howe generational theory (filter log)
Description: In the last cell of the table under Timing of generations and turnings, I tried to change "Global Finnacial Crisis" to "Global Financial Crisis", fixing the misspelling in the second word. This is especially important as this was supposed to be a link.
Date and time: 04:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

False positive. You can make the edit now. Sole Soul (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kdjones23

Username: Kdjones23 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Childhood phobias (filter log)
Description: I was trying to create this page
Date and time: 08:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Fixed, please try again. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

68.171.95.241

Username: 68.171.95.241 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: User:EntetroImmortal (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 15:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

74.73.191.124

Username: 74.73.191.124 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Boeing 787 Dreamliner (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 20:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

This report has been determined to be bogus. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not continue to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia articles or you may be blocked from editing. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

81.104.144.158

Username: 81.104.144.158 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Bix Beiderbecke (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 21:06, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Your report has been determined to be bogus. Do not continue your vandalism edits or you will be blocked from editing without further notice, even if the filter stops you again. (A courtesy copy of this message will be placed on your user talk page.) --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Klaasbaas

Username: Klaasbaas (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Mink oude Breuil (filter log)
Description: I was making a page about Mink but, i looked at an other page how to do this. so i coppyd that page, and paste it on 'Mink oude Breuil' page. and then i removed the wrong information.
Date and time: 10:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: The page that you had created was an attack page and has already been speedily deleted. Furthermore, the information that you tried to add in the filtered edits was obviously bogus. After examining your other contributions, I've decided to give you an "only" warning. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

107.0.29.81

Username: 107.0.29.81 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Chickasaw (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 13:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hondo1123

Username: Hondo1123 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Radioactive waste (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 16:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Frivolous report; final warning issued to filer. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gunar89

Username: Gunar89 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Nasty As I Wanna Be (Dirt Nasty Album) (filter log)
Description: I was trying to create a page for his newest album.
Date and time: 19:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments: Look at the name of track 13 - this is used so commmonly by vandals that most new accounts using it are actually vandals. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

78.158.168.89

Username: 78.158.168.89 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Busta Rhymes (filter log)
Description: I have corrected some incorrect red links but this filter prevented me from saving the correction.
Date and time: 12:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments

2.106.167.212

Username: 2.106.167.212 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: [[]] (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 15:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments: False report. The fact that you made a successful blatant vandalism edit after your failed page blanking attempts has made it very difficult (if not impossible) for me to assume good faith. Hence, I have chosen to issue a vandalism warning. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

71.204.62.240

Username: 71.204.62.240 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: [[]] (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 00:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments

99.99.166.46

Username: 99.99.166.46 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Subject matter in South Park (filter log)
Description: I was attempting to edit a quote in the "Religion" section of this article for grammatical correctness and fullness of content. My addition to the quote includes a somewhat vulgar phrase, so clearly it was picked up by the automated filter. This is not vandalism. The quote, taken directly from the show in question, does indeed end with a fairly vulgar slang term. The addition of this statement at the end of the quote completely alters the quote's tone and meaning, therefore making its inclusion mandatory if the quote is to be properly understood and not misinterpreted by the reader. Given the nature of South Park and the fact that the word "balls" is already used in a slang manner multiple times on this page, often in episode titles, I do not see a problem with this edit, but clearly the filter is not capable of such reasoning and can only do its job. So I would request that this edit be allowed.

On a side note, I might add that it's a little ridiculous that I cannot write out the "questionable" phrase itself, even on this page. Why would you word censor a page that is meant to be used for reporting false instances of word censoring? Doesn't make an ounce of sense to me, but then again, I'm just a programmer.

Date and time: 06:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments

@@ Line 735: / Line 735: @@
 ;Date and time
 : 00:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
+;Comments
+<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->
+===99.99.166.46===
+;Username
+: {{user|99.99.166.46}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:99.99.166.46}}|NAME=filter log}})
+;Page you were editing
+: {{#ifexist: {{page}}| [[{{page}}]]| [[Subject matter in South Park]] }} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode:Subject matter in South Park}}|NAME=filter log}})
+;Description
+: I was attempting to edit a quote in the "Religion" section of this article for grammatical correctness and fullness of content. My addition to the quote includes a somewhat vulgar phrase, so clearly it was picked up by the automated filter. This is not vandalism. The quote, taken directly from the show in question, does indeed end with a fairly vulgar slang term. The addition of this statement at the end of the quote completely alters the quote's tone and meaning, therefore making its inclusion mandatory if the quote is to be properly understood and not misinterpreted by the reader. Given the nature of South Park and the fact that the word "balls" is already used in a slang manner multiple times on this page, often in episode titles, I do not see a problem with this edit, but clearly the filter is not capable of such reasoning and can only do its job. So I would request that this edit be allowed.
+On a side note, I might add that it's a little ridiculous that I cannot write out the "questionable" phrase itself, even on this page. Why would you word censor a page that is meant to be used for reporting false instances of word censoring? Doesn't make an ounce of sense to me, but then again, I'm just a programmer.
+;Date and time
+: 06:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 ;Comments
 <!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->