User talk:Legolas2186

Hi all!!! This is Legolas and welcome to my talk page. Leave a message for me. Assume good faith Archives 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43 January 2012 Why is my edit a vandalism? In my opinion the new videography looks way better than the old one (that's active now), the video description on the main page doesn't make sense, since there are descriptions on the singles pages... Cheszy 12 January 2012 (UTC) Hey Do you have access to Billboard.biz? Would you be able to tell me when Raining Men (song) charted at number 11 please? ([1]) Aaron • You Da One 18:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC) I don't think you saw this? Lol. Aaron • You Da One 12:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Oh lol.. ya I did miss this. Aaron, give me another day. I can't log in billboard.biz from my phone. I have to do tomorrow after I return home and login in my laptop. :( — Legolas (talk2me) 12:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Okay thanks. 17:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) I reverted an edit by an IP address as I questioned the sources and they reverted me as a vandlist so I reverted theirs as vandalism and left them a warning on their talk page. I'm signing off for the day and wondered if you can keep an eye on the page if they do it again and possibly warn them again and if they persist on it well you know what usually happens then. lol! Hope you are doing okay. Swifty*talkcontribs 18:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Donttellmemusicvideo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Donttellmemusicvideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Whosthatgirlmusicvideo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Whosthatgirlmusicvideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Query Hi Avi. Do you think I can use this? As you know, reviews for BHG have been quite limited and I finally found this one; it says stripped down, back to basics music vid, reminiscent of Madonna's Cherish. So what do you think? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Is that website reliable? Jivoo, it would be better if you direct your queries to my FB. I'm active there more than here. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Okay Avi. And yes for the reliability. It think it should be. Excite is owned by IAC (company). Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Super Bowl Was just fucking awesome!! Imagine seeing the queen from the front! LAP was orgasmic. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Hehe, where have you been Lego? You leave a lot of works to update her articles. Yes, the Super Bowl performance was epic. "Vogue" was a very good opening number :) Bluesatellite (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Wow, it must be an awesome moment, I just saw her on YouTube *poor me* MDNA covers are amazing, though I prefer the deluxe edition. I think there's a wrong strategy for this era, GMAYL should be at the top-ten with all these hypes :( But let's see, I hope it still peak higher. Bluesatellite (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC) No way did you go to the Super Bowl. I have never been so jealous of anyone in my life. I'm glad you liked LAP, have to say that was the most incredible moment! I stayed up until 1am in the UK to watch it! Did you get any good pictures? -FeuDeJoie (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Checkuser of Berbah Nope. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 03:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Madonna's ninth concert tour Getting annoyed with this "She's famous WTF this deserves to have an article! Even though it's only dates and has no name or anything else!" comments. (Over dramatic, but still -.-') — Status {talkcontribs 03:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Also, yeah, I like the standard cover, but the deluxe is so much better! — Status {talkcontribs 03:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC) IKR? Why the hell she didn't announce the name? And that poster with the announcement wasn't that flattering either. But the single and album covers are orgasmic simply. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC) After my initial gripes, I am now giving Madge's song all my luvin'. —Andrewstalk 05:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Lucky for your guys, I'm still not sold on it. :( — Legolas (talk2me) 05:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Same here Legolas. Wouldn't consider this a comeback. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 10:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC) I like the poster, it's different. But I'd rather the poster be in the same vein as the covers, yeah. I really hope there IS a title. Fansites have been saying that it won't have one. I really like the song, but I would never consider it her best. THIS is a comeback. The song may not be comeback worthy, but everything else is spot on! — Status {talkcontribs 12:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Agree with Status on the poster and the name thing. But then again, its too early to gauge it as a comeback or not. Remember, the eighth day rolling effect will be terrible and the song is already a flop-territory in Aus, Nz and UK, three strong markets. This has a high chance of being a commercial comeback, but a critical low-point. I hope I made my point clear. If there are more gems like "Masterpiece" I will be happy. But then again, "Gang Bang"? — Legolas (talk2me) 12:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC) The singly might grow on me, (e.g. I don't mind Nicki Minaj as much on it as I initially did) but I still don't get M.I.A. Is she trying to be all provocative again? Hasn't she done enough of that (Ugh, "Born Free" music video)? And I feel Madonna could have sung a bit stronger on the verses, which have a really catchy tune. Her singing is a bit faint here. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Seeing as how "Gang Bang" is produced by Orbit, I see it being a metaphor, and not about the obvious. I guess the tour is officially untitled, so I think a common name would be best to use in this situation. I've been trying to keep the article clean, even though it may be deleted (but most likely merged). "Girls Gone Wild" as second single, hmm... I was hoping for "Turn Up the Radio", or a ballad. — Status {talkcontribs 04:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC) in realatn to gangulypage why did you delete my lines?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virinchi523 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia requires third party sources for verifying its content and as you can see from what you added here, they were either unsourced, or referencing Wikipedia itself which is not allowable. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Legolas2186. You have new messages at (CK)Lakeshade's talk page. Message added 10:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 10:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Scooby-Doo's Snack Tracks: The Ultimate Collection Can you review this and give it a rating? Thanks! Swifty*talkcontribs 14:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Born This Wall Ball I feel like you are the only one I can have an intelligent conversation about this with...In regards to Lady Gaga's Born This Way Ball Tour page, I was thinking the name of the page should be moved. Currently it's labeled "The Born This Wall Ball Tour". However, I think i should just be "Born This Wall Ball Tour". Usually "the" is not part of a tour's official name and I don't see anything besides a poster (which doesn't even say tour on it) that says "the" is part of the name. Was curious as too what you thought. --Shadow (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC) I party agree. "The" is clearly a part of the title, but "tour" is not. Look at the poster. ;) It's most telling. — Status {talkcontribs 04:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Move it. I do agree. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC) WHITNEY She's gone ='( Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 03:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Virinchi523 (talk) 05:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC) hiii! how are you  ?? can you respond to my plea  ?? why are my edits deleted? Talkback Hello, Legolas2186. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page. Message added 13:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Don't think you saw this lol. Aaron • You Da One 13:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Source problem at Madonna: Like an Icon I closed the GAN at Talk:Madonna: Like an Icon/GA1 without listing the article because of the serious problem with the supposed Christina Jansen article in People magazine. That notional cite has been in the article since your first edit. It appears that you fabricated this source, a very serious violation of WP:V. You listed the cite in the following manner: Jansen, Christina (2008-01-05). "Meeting the Woman behind She-Bop". People. 581 (50). Time Inc.: 21–22. ISSN 0093-7673. The problem with that is manifold: Christina Jansen is a photographer who took a photo of Lucy O'Brien. Jansen is not a writer. A search of People magazine's online archives shows that there was never an article bearing the title, "Meeting the Woman behind She-Bop". Further searches confirm that Jansen never authored an article at People. The quotes and facts that you ascribe to Jansen are instead found in the online interview page at madonnatribe.com: "Like an Icon: MadonnaTribe meets Lucy O'Brien". (Online here, archived here from November 2007.) This fansite article is not signed and thus it is a weak source. It upsets me greatly that you would choose to bolster a weak source by fabricating a seemingly substantial source. I have begun to look through your other contributions to see if this harmful practice has been repeated. Binksternet (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC) I have serious questions about a notional Paul Zollo article that you used recently as a reference in two Madonna song articles, as part of GA expansion efforts. Please respond at Talk:Oh_Father#Unverifiable_source and at Talk:Keep_It_Together_(Madonna_song)#Problem_with_source. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Questionable sources at RSN There is a thread discussing your questionable sources at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Legolas2186_possibly_falsifying_references. Please feel free to respond there. Binksternet (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Legolas, hopefully you can make time to answer these concerns soon. It will be much easier to handle any concerns if we have your help looking up sources and making any necessary corrections. --Laser brain (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC) You are mentioned at WP:AN You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard specifically in this thread Fifelfoo (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Cherish Hello, here a cover for Cherish in a mash-up with Cherish (The Association song). I ask to you because they do not edit very well in this wiki.--Flores,Alberto (talk) 05:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)