Attack helicopter: Difference between revisions
→Comparison: Add AH1G Cobra... further round figures, add headings |
→Comparison: add flagicons |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
==Comparison== |
==Comparison== |
||
===Dimensions=== |
===Dimensions=== |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:96%; text-align:center;" width=" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:96%; text-align:center;" width="870px" |
||
! width=" |
! width="150px"| Helicopter |
||
! First Flight |
! First Flight |
||
! Length |
! Length |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
! Power |
! Power |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Agusta A129 Mangusta]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|ITA}} [[Agusta A129 Mangusta]] |
||
| 1983 |
| 1983 |
||
| {{convert|12.3|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|12.3|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| 2×{{convert|664|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|664|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Bell AH-1 Cobra|Bell AH-1G Cobra]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Bell AH-1 Cobra|Bell AH-1G Cobra]] |
||
| 1966 |
| 1966 |
||
| {{convert|16.2|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|16.2|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
| 1×{{convert|820|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 1×{{convert|820|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Bell AH-1Z Viper]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Bell AH-1Z Viper]] |
||
| 2000 |
| 2000 |
||
| {{convert|17.8|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|17.8|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| 2×{{convert|1340|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|1340|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Boeing AH-64 Apache]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Boeing AH-64 Apache]] |
||
| 1975 |
| 1975 |
||
| {{convert|17.7|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|17.7|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
| 2×{{convert|1490|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|1490|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Denel AH-2 Rooivalk]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|RSA}} [[Denel AH-2 Rooivalk]] |
||
| 1990 |
| 1990 |
||
| {{convert|18.7|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|18.7|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
| 2×{{convert|1420|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|1420|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Eurocopter Tiger]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|EU}} [[Eurocopter Tiger]] |
||
| 1991 |
| 1991 |
||
| {{convert|14.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|14.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
| 2×{{convert|873|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|873|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Kamov Ka-52]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|RUS}} [[Kamov Ka-52]] |
||
| 1982 (Ka-50) |
| 1982 (Ka-50) |
||
| {{convert|16.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|16.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
| 2×{{convert|1641|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|1641|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Mil Mi-24]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USSR}} [[Mil Mi-24]] |
||
| 1969 |
| 1969 |
||
| {{convert|17.5|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|17.5|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| 2×{{convert|1600|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
| 2×{{convert|1600|kW|shp|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Mil Mi-28]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USSR}} [[Mil Mi-28]] |
||
| 1982 |
| 1982 |
||
| {{convert|17.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|17.0|m|ft|abbr=on|0}} |
||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
===Performance=== |
===Performance=== |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:96%; text-align:center;" width=" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:96%; text-align:center;" width="870px" |
||
! width=" |
! width="150px"| Helicopter |
||
! Max. Speed |
! Max. Speed |
||
! Cruise Speed |
! Cruise Speed |
||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
! [[Rate of Climb]] |
! [[Rate of Climb]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Agusta A129 Mangusta]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|ITA}} [[Agusta A129 Mangusta]] |
||
| {{convert|280|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|280|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|230|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|230|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
| {{convert|10.2|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|10.2|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Bell AH-1 Cobra|Bell AH-1G Cobra]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Bell AH-1 Cobra|Bell AH-1G Cobra]] |
||
| {{convert|230|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|230|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
| {{convert|6.3|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|6.3|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Bell AH-1Z Viper]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Bell AH-1Z Viper]] |
||
| {{convert|410|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|410|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|300|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|300|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
| {{convert|14.2|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|14.2|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Boeing AH-64 Apache]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Boeing AH-64 Apache]] |
||
| {{convert|290|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|290|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
| {{convert|12.7|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|12.7|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Denel AH-2 Rooivalk]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|RSA}} [[Denel AH-2 Rooivalk]] |
||
| {{convert|310|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|310|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|280|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|280|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
| {{convert|13.3|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|13.3|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Eurocopter Tiger]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|EU}} [[Eurocopter Tiger]] |
||
| {{convert|290|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|290|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
| {{convert|10.7|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|10.7|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Kamov Ka-50]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|RUS}} [[Kamov Ka-50]] |
||
| {{convert|315|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|315|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
| {{convert|10.0|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
| {{convert|10.0|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on|0}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Mil Mi-24]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USSR}} [[Mil Mi-24]] |
||
| {{convert|335|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|335|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| align="left"| [[Mil Mi-28]] |
| align="left"| {{flagicon|USSR}} [[Mil Mi-28]] |
||
| {{convert|320|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|320|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
||
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
| {{convert|270|km/h|abbr=on|-1}} |
Revision as of 12:22, 26 April 2012
![]() | The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and Soviet Union/Russia and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (December 2010) |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/CSA-2006-02-24-095553.jpg/300px-CSA-2006-02-24-095553.jpg)
An attack helicopter is a military helicopter with the primary role of an attack aircraft, with the capability of engaging targets on the ground, such as enemy infantry and armored vehicles. Due to their heavy armament they are sometimes called helicopter gunships.
Weapons used on attack helicopters can include autocannons, machine-guns, rockets, and guided missiles such as the Hellfire. Many attack helicopters are also capable of carrying air to air missiles, though mostly for purposes of self-defense. Today's attack helicopter has two main roles: first, to provide direct and accurate close air support for ground troops, and the second, in the anti-tank role to destroy enemy armor concentrations. Attack helicopters are also used to supplement lighter helicopters in the armed scout role. In combat, an attack helicopter is projected to destroy around 17 times its own production cost before it is destroyed.[1]
History and development
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Bell_209.jpg/220px-Bell_209.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d3/Ah56a-lc1_b.jpg/220px-Ah56a-lc1_b.jpg)
In the mid-1960s the U.S. Army concluded that a purpose-built attack helicopter with more speed and firepower than current armed helicopters was required in the face of increasingly intense ground fire (often using heavy machine guns and anti-tank rockets) from Viet Cong and NVA troops. Based on this realization, and with the growing involvement in Vietnam, the U.S. Army developed the requirements for a dedicated attack helicopter, the Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS). The aircraft design selected for this program in 1965, was Lockheed's AH-56 Cheyenne.[2]
As the Army began its acquisition of a dedicated attack helicopter, it sought options to improve performance over the continued use of improvised interim aircraft (such as the UH-1B/C). In late 1965, a panel of high-level officers was selected to evaluate several prototype versions of armed and attack helicopters to determine which provided the most significant increase in capability to the UH-1B. The three aircraft ranked highest during the evaluation; the Sikorsky S-61, Kaman H-2 Tomahawk, and the Bell AH-1 Cobra, were selected to compete in flight trials conducted by the Army's Aviation Test Activity. Upon completion of the flight evaluations, the Test Activity recommended Bell's Huey Cobra to be an interim armed helicopter until the Cheyenne was fielded. On 13 April 1966, the U.S. Army awarded Bell Helicopter Company a production contract for 110 AH-1G Cobras.[2] The Cobra had a tandem cockpit seating arrangement (vs UH-1 side-by-side) to make the aircraft a smaller frontal target, increased armor protection, and greater speed.
In 1967, the first AH-1Gs were deployed to Vietnam, around the same time that the Cheyenne successfully completed its first flight and initial flight evaluations. And while the Cheyenne program suffered setbacks over the next few years due to technical problems, the Cobra was establishing itself as an effective aerial weapons platform, despite its performance shortcomings compared to the AH-56,[2] and design issues of its own. By 1972, when the Cheyenne program was eventually cancelled to make way for the Advanced Attack Helicopter (AAH),[2] the interim "Snake" had built a solid reputation as an attack helicopter.
After Vietnam, and especially into the 1990s, the missile-armed attack helicopter evolved into a primary anti-tank weapon. Able to quickly move about the battlefield and launch fleeting "pop-up attacks", helicopters presented a major threat even with the presence of organic air defenses. The gunship became a major tool for both the US Army and their Warsaw Pact counterparts in tank warfare, and most attack helicopters became more and more optimized for the antitank mission.[3] The US Marine Corps continued to see the helicopter, as well as its fixed-wing aviation assets, in the close support role, although the Marines did dedicate a close-support helicopter in the form of the AH-1 Super Cobra. Soviet helicopters retained troop transport capability rather than being attack only.
While helicopters were effective tank-killers in the Middle East, attack helicopters are being seen more in a multipurpose role. Tactics, such as tank plinking, showed that fixed-wing aircraft could be effective against tanks, but helicopters retained a unique low-altitude, low-speed capability for close air support. Other purpose-built helicopters were developed for special operations missions, including the MH-6 for extremely close support.
Modern attack helicopters
During the late 1970s the U.S. Army saw the need of more sophistication within the attack helicopter corps, allowing them to operate in all weather conditions.[4] With that the Advanced Attack Helicopter program was started.[5] From this program the Hughes YAH-64 came out as the winner. The Soviet armed forces also saw the need of a more advanced helicopter. Military officials asked Kamov and Mil to submit designs. The Ka-50 officially won the competition, but Mil decided to continue development of the Mi-28 that they had originally submitted.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/Eurocopter_Tiger_2.jpg/220px-Eurocopter_Tiger_2.jpg)
Today, the attack helicopter has been further refined, and the AH-64D Apache Longbow demonstrates many of the advanced technologies being considered for deployment on future gunships. The recently fielded AH-1Z upgrades the twin-engine AH-1W Super Cobra currently operated by the US Marines. The Russians are currently deploying the Ka-50, Ka-52 and Mi-28, which are roughly equivalent to the AH-64D and the AH-1Z. Many students of ground attack helicopter warfare feel that linking into a network is a requirement of today's modern armies, since attack helicopters are being increasingly incorporated as part of a linked support element system by most of the armies of the world. This doctrine is known a Network-centric warfare in US military circles.[6][7]
In action
The 1990s could be seen as the coming-of-age for the U.S. attack helicopter. The AH-64 Apache was used extensively during Operation Desert Storm with great success. Apaches fired the first shots of the war, destroying enemy early warning radar and SAM sites with their Hellfire missiles. They were later used successfully in both of their operational roles, to direct attack against enemy armor and as aerial artillery in support of ground troops. Hellfire missile and cannon attacks by Apache helicopters destroyed many enemy tanks and armored cars.
In 1999 during the Kargil War, the Indian Air Force and the Indian Army found that there was a need for helicopters that can operate at such high altitude conditions with ease.[8] The limitations of attack helicopters from operating with high payloads and restricted maneuverability led India to the develop the Light Combat Helicopter that can operate in high altitudes.[9] These helicopters will be used by the Indian Air Force and the Indian Army aviation wing.
The "deep attack" role of independently operating attack helicopters came into question after a failed mission, during the 2003 Gulf War attack on the Karbala Gap.[10] A second mission in the same area, four days later, but coordinated with artillery and fixed-wing aircraft,[11] was far more successful with minimal losses.
In 2011, France and Britain sent Eurocopter Tiger and AgustaWestland Apache attack helicopters to Libya. The primary objective of the 2011 military intervention was to protect civilians in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1973. Within days of the Apaches deployment, it had completed a variety of tasks such as destroying tanks, checkpoints held by pro-Gaddafi forces and vehicles carrying ammunitions loyal to Muammar Gaddafi. The attack helicopters were reported to be far more effective than the fighter jets which had previously been given the task of completing the aforementioned tasks.
Types
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Ka-50_helicopters_over_Moscow.jpg/220px-Ka-50_helicopters_over_Moscow.jpg)
Modern examples include:
- AgustaWestland AW129
- Bell AH-1 Cobra
- Boeing AH-64 Apache
- CAIC WZ-10
- Denel AH-2 Rooivalk
- Eurocopter Tiger
- HAL Light Combat Helicopter
- Kamov Ka-50/Ka-52
- Kazan Ansat-2RC[12]
- Mil Mi-24[13][14][15]
- Mil Mi-28
Comparison
Dimensions
Helicopter | First Flight | Length | Rotor diameter | Height | Empty weight | Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1983 | 12.3 m (40 ft) | 11.9 m (39 ft) | 3.4 m (11.2 ft) | 2,500 kg (5,500 lb) | 2×664 kW (890 shp) |
![]() |
1966 | 16.2 m (53 ft) | 13.4 m (44 ft) | 4.1 m (13.5 ft) | 2,600 kg (5,700 lb) | 1×820 kW (1,100 shp) |
![]() |
2000 | 17.8 m (58 ft) | 14.6 m (48 ft) | 4.1 m (13.5 ft) | 5,600 kg (12,300 lb) | 2×1,340 kW (1,800 shp) |
![]() |
1975 | 17.7 m (58 ft) | 14.6 m (48 ft) | 3.9 m (12.8 ft) | 5,200 kg (11,500 lb) | 2×1,490 kW (2,000 shp) |
![]() |
1990 | 18.7 m (61 ft) | 15.6 m (51 ft) | 5.2 m (17.1 ft) | 5,700 kg (12,600 lb) | 2×1,420 kW (1,900 shp) |
![]() |
1991 | 14.0 m (46 ft) | 13.0 m (43 ft) | 3.8 m (12.5 ft) | 3,100 kg (6,800 lb) | 2×873 kW (1,170 shp) |
![]() |
1982 (Ka-50) | 16.0 m (52 ft) | 14.5 m (48 ft) | 4.9 m (16.1 ft) | 7,700 kg (17,000 lb) | 2×1,641 kW (2,200 shp) |
![]() |
1969 | 17.5 m (57 ft) | 17.3 m (57 ft) | 6.5 m (21.3 ft) | 8,500 kg (18,700 lb) | 2×1,600 kW (2,150 shp) |
![]() |
1982 | 17.0 m (56 ft) | 17.2 m (56 ft) | 4.7 m (15.4 ft) | 8,600 kg (19,000 lb) | 2×1,636 kW (2,190 shp) |
Performance
Helicopter | Max. Speed | Cruise Speed | Range | Ceiling | Rate of Climb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
280 km/h (170 mph) | 230 km/h (140 mph) | 510 km (320 mi; 280 nmi) | 4,700 m (15,000 ft) | 10.2 m/s (33 ft/s) |
![]() |
230 km/h (140 mph) | 570 km (350 mi; 310 nmi) | 3,500 m (11,000 ft) | 6.3 m/s (21 ft/s) | |
![]() |
410 km/h (250 mph) | 300 km/h (190 mph) | 690 km (430 mi; 370 nmi) | 6,100 m (20,000 ft) | 14.2 m/s (47 ft/s) |
![]() |
290 km/h (180 mph) | 270 km/h (170 mph) | 480 km (300 mi; 260 nmi) | 6,400 m (21,000 ft) | 12.7 m/s (42 ft/s) |
![]() |
310 km/h (190 mph) | 280 km/h (170 mph) | 740 km (460 mi; 400 nmi) | 6,100 m (20,000 ft) | 13.3 m/s (44 ft/s) |
![]() |
290 km/h (180 mph) | 800 km (500 mi; 430 nmi) | 4,000 m (13,000 ft) | 10.7 m/s (35 ft/s) | |
![]() |
315 km/h (200 mph) | 270 km/h (170 mph) | 550 km (340 mi; 300 nmi) | 5,500 m (18,000 ft) | 10.0 m/s (33 ft/s) |
![]() |
335 km/h (210 mph) | 450 km (280 mi; 240 nmi) | 4,500 m (15,000 ft) | ||
![]() |
320 km/h (200 mph) | 270 km/h (170 mph) | 440 km (270 mi; 240 nmi) | 5,700 m (19,000 ft) | 3.6 m/s (12 ft/s) |
See also
References
- ^ Frank Barnaby (2010). "main+battle+tank"#v=onepage&q="main battle tank"&f=false The role and control of weapons in the 1990's. Psychology Press. p. 15. ISBN 0-203-16831-3. Retrieved 14 February 2011.
{{cite book}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ a b c d Office of the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (1973). "An Abridged History of the Army Attack Helicopter Program". Department of the Army.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Mazarella, Mark N. "Adequacy of U.S. Army Attack Helicopter Doctrine to Support the Scope of Attack Helicopter Operations in a Multi-Polar World". Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1994. Accessed on 12 December 2007.
- ^ ADVANCED ATTACK HELICOPTER OPERATIONS IN ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTS - Official US Army video at Real Military Flix
- ^ Advanced Attack Helicopter (AAH) (1970-1981) - Global Security
- ^ Changing Roles: Attack Helicopters As the Dominant Maneuver Force at DTIC
- ^ Joint Vision 2010 and the Attack Helicopter: An Effective Dominant Maneuver Force for the Operational Commander at DTIC
- ^ Light combat copter’s maiden flight a success
- ^ Aero India: India's indigenous combat chopper
- ^ Scarborough, Ryan (April 2003). "Apache operation a lesson in defeat; Army choppers hit without air cover". Washington TimesTemplate:Inconsistent citations
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: postscript (link) - ^ O'Rourke, Ryan (June 4, 2003). "Iraq War: Defense Program Implications for Congress" (Document). Congressional Research Service. p. CRS–36Template:Inconsistent citations
{{cite document}}
: Unknown parameter|accessdate=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|format=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|url=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link) - ^ Kazan Asat-2rc Display
- ^ Sikorsky, S. "From Hind to Havoc." Air Force Magazine (Mar. 1985). Vol. 68, pp. 88-92, 95.
- ^ Gordon, Y. and Komissarov, D. "20/20 Hindsight: The Hind attack helicopter has surfaced again - as the Mi-24VM." Defence Helicopter (1999). Vol. 18, Num. 4, pp 29-32.
- ^ Frawley, Gerard (2002). The International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002–2003. Fyshwick, ACT, Australia: Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd. p. 127. ISBN 1-875671-55-2.
Type: Armed assault/attack helicopter
Further reading
- Duke, R.A., Helicopter Operations in Algeria [Trans. French], Dept. of the Army (1959)
- France, Operations Research Group, Report of the Operations Research Mission on H-21 Helicopter (1957)
- Leuliette, Pierre, St. Michael and the Dragon: Memoirs of a Paratrooper, New York:Houghton Mifflin (1964)
- Riley, David, French Helicopter Operations in Algeria Marine Corps Gazette, February 1958, pp. 21–26.
- Shrader, Charles R. The First Helicopter War: Logistics and Mobility in Algeria, 1954-1962 Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers (1999)
- Spenser, Jay P., Whirlybirds: A History of the U.S. Helicopter Pioneers, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press (1998)