User talk:Status: Difference between revisions
→Notice: re |
→My edit: new section |
||
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
I understand that you're a good content contributor and work well with articles. I advise that you return to the article namespace and continue your work there, and leave this all this Malleus nonsense behind. [[User:Basalisk|<font color="green">'''Basa'''</font><font color="CC9900">'''lisk'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Basalisk|<sup><font color="green">inspect damage</font></sup>]]⁄[[User talk:Basalisk|<sub><font color="CC9900">berate</font></sub>]] 06:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
I understand that you're a good content contributor and work well with articles. I advise that you return to the article namespace and continue your work there, and leave this all this Malleus nonsense behind. [[User:Basalisk|<font color="green">'''Basa'''</font><font color="CC9900">'''lisk'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Basalisk|<sup><font color="green">inspect damage</font></sup>]]⁄[[User talk:Basalisk|<sub><font color="CC9900">berate</font></sub>]] 06:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
: I can assure you that is not the case, as you suggest. I was confused by his statement, and responded. Just because there's been an overhaul of other users baiting Malleus, doesn't mean that I am one of them. I believe he is a great editor, but he has a very poor attitude, which he has shown in the comment in which I replied to. A little harsh, possibly, but baiting? That wasn't my intention. {{User|Nikkimaria}} removed the whole comment herself, and I simply restored the part in which was deemed acceptable, in her eyes. This user comes along and restores my comment without any given reason, so I revert it. Once. But anyways, I understand your main point and I already left that discussion an hour ago. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — [[User:Status|<span title="User page" style="color:black;">Statυs</span>]] ([[User talk:Status|<span title="Talk">talk</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Status|<span title="Contributions">contribs</span>]])</font> 06:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
: I can assure you that is not the case, as you suggest. I was confused by his statement, and responded. Just because there's been an overhaul of other users baiting Malleus, doesn't mean that I am one of them. I believe he is a great editor, but he has a very poor attitude, which he has shown in the comment in which I replied to. A little harsh, possibly, but baiting? That wasn't my intention. {{User|Nikkimaria}} removed the whole comment herself, and I simply restored the part in which was deemed acceptable, in her eyes. This user comes along and restores my comment without any given reason, so I revert it. Once. But anyways, I understand your main point and I already left that discussion an hour ago. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — [[User:Status|<span title="User page" style="color:black;">Statυs</span>]] ([[User talk:Status|<span title="Talk">talk</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Status|<span title="Contributions">contribs</span>]])</font> 06:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
== My edit == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I was editing the justin bieber discography page by taking of a sentence that said that only gay people like him. This is completely innacurate and a form of cyberbullying. |
|||
Thank you for making wikipedia better! |
|||
Revision as of 06:59, 31 December 2012
 | This user is in school. This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. |
Over the past few months...
...Y'all have been annoying the hell out of me.† I don't have the time, effort or energy to put up with this any longer. On top of my own issues, there's also the recent inappropriate blocks of several users and the failure to block several users who deserve it. I believe that we have a big issue with administrations on this project, that really needs to be resolved. Wikipedia is a mess. As Scottywong (talk · contribs) said, I feel "disgusted" at Wikipedia right now. I'll be back when I get myself back together and figure out what I should do next (if anything at all). Otherwise, I hope everybody is having a happy holiday and will enjoy their New Year! DEATH TO WIKIDRAMA! — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- † However, this is not the case with everybody. I just want to make myself clear. There's some amazing people here, but the bad ones just make it impossible!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Notice
Your comments on various talk pages are becoming disruptive, and I would advise you to take a break and tone it down a bit.
More specifically, your attempts at baiting another editor into a reaction at User talk:Malleus Fatuorum, and then slyly removing your baiting comments after you've induced such a reaction, is rankly deceitful and disruptive. As has been pointed out to you by another editor on that page, a strikeout will suffice if you wish to indicate that you've withdrawn the comment. If you remove it again, I will block you for disruptive editing.
I understand that you're a good content contributor and work well with articles. I advise that you return to the article namespace and continue your work there, and leave this all this Malleus nonsense behind. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 06:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- I can assure you that is not the case, as you suggest. I was confused by his statement, and responded. Just because there's been an overhaul of other users baiting Malleus, doesn't mean that I am one of them. I believe he is a great editor, but he has a very poor attitude, which he has shown in the comment in which I replied to. A little harsh, possibly, but baiting? That wasn't my intention. Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) removed the whole comment herself, and I simply restored the part in which was deemed acceptable, in her eyes. This user comes along and restores my comment without any given reason, so I revert it. Once. But anyways, I understand your main point and I already left that discussion an hour ago. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 06:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
My edit
Hello,
I was editing the justin bieber discography page by taking of a sentence that said that only gay people like him. This is completely innacurate and a form of cyberbullying.
Thank you for making wikipedia better!