User talk:ObscureReality: Difference between revisions
Strike Eagle (talk | contribs) cmnt |
→February 2013: reply |
||
| Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
:Just for information, Anir1uph is not the only user you must apologize.There are many other users whom you have accused of POV pushing(that includes me too).Morever, if you feel that ''little brown people'' are not eligible to use computers, please find some other place for your ideology. '''<span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 3px #6698FF;">[[User:Strike Eagle|<font color="#F62817">TheStrike</font>]][[User talk:Strike Eagle|<font color="#1673F5">Σagle</font>]] </span>''' 14:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
:Just for information, Anir1uph is not the only user you must apologize.There are many other users whom you have accused of POV pushing(that includes me too).Morever, if you feel that ''little brown people'' are not eligible to use computers, please find some other place for your ideology. '''<span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 3px #6698FF;">[[User:Strike Eagle|<font color="#F62817">TheStrike</font>]][[User talk:Strike Eagle|<font color="#1673F5">Σagle</font>]] </span>''' 14:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
::I have not forgotten my actions and my apologies are intended for all those affected. I only placed more emphasis on my apology towards Anir1uph as my injustice towards him was greater. Please Strike Eagle, accept my apologies towards you too. Furthermore I put no weight behind my malicious behavior and despite my words - as represent above in early February - maintain no racist ideology. I will accept any decision made by the Administrators regarding my request. But I do hope they will exercise a measure of kindness in acknowledgement that my recent actions are disproportionate to my otherwise good history of behavior on Wikipedia. ObscureReality. [[Special:Contributions/194.46.226.154|194.46.226.154]] ([[User talk:194.46.226.154|talk]]) 15:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== ''The Bugle'': Issue LXXXIII, February 2013 == |
== ''The Bugle'': Issue LXXXIII, February 2013 == |
||
Revision as of 15:48, 19 March 2013
|
April 2010 - December 2010 |
|
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| For this edit, which help to make my headache go away because I've been looking long and hard trying to figure out how to reformat/reword since day 1 of the messy text dump by an ignorant but helpful (good faith, nonetheless) newbie. Good job~! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
Appreciated mate! TalkWoe90i 21:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Thanks for your message on my talk page, in the section Re: Edit warring. I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Page Curation newsletter
Hey ObscureReality. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 03:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
.
Editings of Blue-water navy
Thank you for your instruction in Blue-water navy. I made proposition at Talk:Blue-water navy#Korea, Russia, Japan? to add the JMSDF, so if you are OK, I would appreciate your opinions.--Panda 51 (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
UK great power status
I'm afraid some editors are now trying to get rid of the mention of great power status in the United Kingdom article, or at least water it down. Seems like a typical POV attack by these editors (though they pretend otherwise). Could you chip in? David (talk) 23:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:New BAE-Systems Type 26.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:New BAE-Systems Type 26.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
You and my talk page
Non-native english speakers don't know english? Are you a racist? It really does not make any difference if its Description or Characteristics. I have seen Description used in a lot of similar articles here. Please don't bring your observations to my talk page in future, or I will simply remove them. Thanks. --Anir1uph | talk | contrib 14:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
It really does make a difference, it really does. I would say just because you have seen it before doesn't necessarily make it right. No please, no need to thank me, it was my pleasure. Obscure Reality Ping me 14:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)It was not a personal attack, but rather a racist remark about Indians in general. No, I did not accuse Anir1uph of being unfamiliar with the English language because he is Indian, his nationality was irrelevant. Anir1uph showed failure to use the English language correctly, common practice among non-native English speakers. I am fed up with uneducated third world citizens who edit Wikipedia according to their own POV. Anir1uph is a pretentious editor and forms fart of a larger Indian demographic who subtly edit Wikipedia pushing their own POV, using weasel words and do not adhere to consensus. There is a growing concern among a considerable number of White Western editors that due to the increased availability of computers and the internet around the world - the number of uneducated third world citizens with a POV agenda to their edits is rising rapidly. Nationalism is a large factor in this and it isn't healthy for the Wikipedia community. There is an ongoing clash of culture and outlooks, Asians view the world differently than Europeans and North Americans. In my opinion the sooner editors are restricted to editing Wikipedia in their native tongue the better.
I will hold my hands up for my disliking of India and the Indian population, I have a ferocious and bitter attitude towards them, but not hatred. I pity India and its misfortune - 5,000 Children die every day in India under the age of 5, how sad.
I find it amazing that inept little brown people can even use computers.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
As a side note, when a router is reset a new IP is given... so even though I may not be able to edit from this user name, whats stopping me from editing Wikipedia if i create a new user? Even regional blocks don't work! Wikipedia needs to find real solutions to real problems.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
ObscureReality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Because it is in violation of free speech, so what if it is a privately owned website? It is illegal for a privately owned business to violate freedom of speech. Why should a website that invites the public to make contributions be exempt from those rules? Racism is not a crime. Anyway, I request that my user page and user talk page be replaced with a blocked user template please. Ill be back on a different user I guess.Obscure Reality Ping me 16:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not only making despicably racist comments about other editors; you are also trying to insert grossly tendentious personal opinion into articles [1]. Having the gall to then go accusing Indian editors of POV editing the next moment [2] marks you as not merely a despicable racist, but a very stupid and hypocritical racist. People like you are not welcome on this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Re: "It is illegal for a privately owned business to violate freedom of speech": No, it is not - your First Amendment applies to government only. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
ObscureReality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I regret and offer apologies for my actions in early February. Up until this incident I had been active on Wikipedia for almost three years, all of which without incident and throughout this time, I have been genuinely seeking to do my best for the project. I know that the damage is now done, my three years of being a Wikipedian tarnished by my poor show of behavior, and trust in me lost - but I understand my actions were totally unacceptable and humbly request that I may be allowed to prove my words true. [[User:Anir1uph|Anir1uph]] I hope you accept this sincere apology and it finds you in good health. Apologies and thank you. ObscureReality.[[Special:Contributions/194.46.226.154|194.46.226.154]] ([[User talk:194.46.226.154|talk]]) 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I regret and offer apologies for my actions in early February. Up until this incident I had been active on Wikipedia for almost three years, all of which without incident and throughout this time, I have been genuinely seeking to do my best for the project. I know that the damage is now done, my three years of being a Wikipedian tarnished by my poor show of behavior, and trust in me lost - but I understand my actions were totally unacceptable and humbly request that I may be allowed to prove my words true. [[User:Anir1uph|Anir1uph]] I hope you accept this sincere apology and it finds you in good health. Apologies and thank you. ObscureReality.[[Special:Contributions/194.46.226.154|194.46.226.154]] ([[User talk:194.46.226.154|talk]]) 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I regret and offer apologies for my actions in early February. Up until this incident I had been active on Wikipedia for almost three years, all of which without incident and throughout this time, I have been genuinely seeking to do my best for the project. I know that the damage is now done, my three years of being a Wikipedian tarnished by my poor show of behavior, and trust in me lost - but I understand my actions were totally unacceptable and humbly request that I may be allowed to prove my words true. [[User:Anir1uph|Anir1uph]] I hope you accept this sincere apology and it finds you in good health. Apologies and thank you. ObscureReality.[[Special:Contributions/194.46.226.154|194.46.226.154]] ([[User talk:194.46.226.154|talk]]) 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Just for information, Anir1uph is not the only user you must apologize.There are many other users whom you have accused of POV pushing(that includes me too).Morever, if you feel that little brown people are not eligible to use computers, please find some other place for your ideology. TheStrikeΣagle 14:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have not forgotten my actions and my apologies are intended for all those affected. I only placed more emphasis on my apology towards Anir1uph as my injustice towards him was greater. Please Strike Eagle, accept my apologies towards you too. Furthermore I put no weight behind my malicious behavior and despite my words - as represent above in early February - maintain no racist ideology. I will accept any decision made by the Administrators regarding my request. But I do hope they will exercise a measure of kindness in acknowledgement that my recent actions are disproportionate to my otherwise good history of behavior on Wikipedia. ObscureReality. 194.46.226.154 (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)