Jump to content

User talk:Cambalachero: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Poiche (talk | contribs)
Line 174: Line 174:


:Yo no me haría muchas ilusiones. Al principio había una autorización por e-mail. Después pusieron un ícono de CC con la variante no comercial (o sea, incompatible con Commons). Se les mandó un par de e-mails mencionando el problema, y no hicieron nada. Hizo falta que, después de más de un año, se empezaran a borrar las fotos de commons posteriores al relicenciamiento para que se pusieran las pilas y pusieran la licencia que hay ahora, para que las imágenes vuelvan a su lugar. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero#top|talk]]) 23:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
:Yo no me haría muchas ilusiones. Al principio había una autorización por e-mail. Después pusieron un ícono de CC con la variante no comercial (o sea, incompatible con Commons). Se les mandó un par de e-mails mencionando el problema, y no hicieron nada. Hizo falta que, después de más de un año, se empezaran a borrar las fotos de commons posteriores al relicenciamiento para que se pusieran las pilas y pusieran la licencia que hay ahora, para que las imágenes vuelvan a su lugar. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero#top|talk]]) 23:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Si podés intentá comunicarte, avisame. Gracias :) [[User:Alakasam|Alakasam]] ([[User talk:Alakasam|talk]]) 00:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:16, 3 August 2013

FYI, if you have the time. NW (Talk) 03:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I had confused the terms "libel" and "libelle" (a pamphlet written against a public figure). By the way, if someone tries to tell you that such a text was a reliable, impartial and trustworthy report, read the subtitle again: "It is a holy action to kill Rosas". Do reliable sources get names like that? I don't think so. Cambalachero (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine History: Proposed decision posted

Hello Cambalachero. I am sending you this message to let you know that the proposed decision of the Argentine History arbitration case in which you are a party, has been posted and is now being discussed by the Arbitration Committee.

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 03:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pisco Sour & Arbcomm comments

Dear Cambalachero,
The uncomfortable situation with ArbComm aside, I was wondering if you could please vote either "oppose" or "support" at the Pisco Sour FAC. I know this sounds a tad blunt, but User:Ian Rose asked me to send you a comment about it.
Regarding the ArbComm case, we have done so much to contribute to a variety of topics in Wikipedia that some of the ArbComm votes are quite surprising to me (particularly Tim's and Roger's). The other party has only focused on over-glorifying the Brazilian monarchy, and yet that somehow makes him an expert on Latin American history (despite that is the characteristic of a WP:SPA).
Alas, all humans make mistakes. I hope that those who in this time prefer to vindicate the windmill opposite to Don Quixote will eventually see their error and correct it for the benefit of the encyclopedia.
Best wishes.--MarshalN20 | Talk 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Roberto Carnaghi

Hello! Your submission of Roberto Carnaghi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding the article Juan Manuel de Rosas has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Cambalachero is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.
  2. MarshalN20 is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.
  3. Lecen is reminded to conduct himself in accordance with Wikipedia's behavioral guidelines.

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 04:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Cambalachero

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

Dear Cambalachero,
Thank you very much for the advice.
Yes, the aforementioned little incident seems to be a good indication that the lad wants to see us blocked indefinitely. Best to avoid him. However, the problems he had with us are not the first time he is involved in this kind of situation (as mentioned by Sandy at NW's talk page). How many more warnings does a troll need before it is stopped?
I regret my actions at War of the Triple Alliance, which I still openly admit were guilty of exhibiting a pushy behavior (nothing more). But, you were there, and know that the move request was filled with Brazilian/Portuguese editors (most, if not all, "friends" of the other editor). Anyhow, I don't think that I deserved anything more than a warning, especially since I did not do that again for over a year.
I also don't think that we deserved the ugly name of "civil POV-pushers" from AGK (who even had originally recused himself from the case due to his involvement), which now is being used to mock my writing style. In any case, my writing style is really not that great, and I don't see anything wrong with being friendly and respectful toward others.
What bothers me the most is that you also received the punishment for no other reason than having a different point of view from the other editor. It's completely ludicrous!
Moving on, I know that we have never actually interacted closely (aside from having similar perspectives on two articles; although apparently that means we are "friends" in the view of some), but I would enjoy working with you on an article. NuclearWarfare recommended me to focus on a controversial topic (specifically more controversial than "Pisco Sour", which I thought was pretty controversial) to demonstrate I am not a POV-pusher. Falkland Islands might be a good start, but I was also giving some thought to Peru v Austria (1936). I think our interests tend to be different, but if you find any common ground topic which you think I can be of help, please do notify me and I will provide editorial help.
Cordially.--MarshalN20 | Talk 18:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice Cambalachero. I have now read Wikipedia:Banning policy, and have a better idea of what not to do. I think the other side is trying to bait me into further discussing the topic, but I will not fall for it this time.
Best wishes.--MarshalN20 | Talk 17:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roberto Carnaghi

The DYK project (nominate) 16:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Slavery by Another Name

Hello, Cambalachero. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Slavery by Another Name.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Khazar2 (talk) 03:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Farsantes

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About "La ruta del dinero K"

Estimado Cambalachero: Le escribo para recomendarle una modificación. Al leer el articulo sobre el caso de Lanata (no se para que se me ocurrió leerlo en Ingles si soy Argentino) noté que traduce "La ruta del dinero K" como "The road of the money K" tal vez parezca un tanto sonsa mi observación pero debería ser traducida como "The road of the K Money" puesto que en este caso la K actúa como adjetivo para "money" y en Inglés los adjetivos van adelante del sustantivo. Dado que no se puede editar el título quería remarcarle directamente a ud. esta observación. Espero que lo tenga en cuenta para proximas publicaciones, vi que posee una vasta cantidad de aportes realizados. Muchas gracias. Santiago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiago Petrungaro (talkcontribs) 22:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sos mi hombre

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

I see you're interested in some Brazilian and Argentine issues. I've always been fascinated by their military forces, and particularly the Brazilian units which went overseas in World War II.

Yesterday you provided a DYK review for Agenda of the Tea Party movement. As you've suggested, I've added citations to all the unreferenced paragraphs. Each paragraph now has at least one refcite, unless its purpose is only to introduce a major research author and a blockquote from that author. In these cases the blockquotes that follow have the refcites. I've also added the categories from the parent article, Tea Party movement. Please review. regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not interested in Brazilian issues. There must be some confusion there. Cambalachero (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to your concern about the apparent contradiction. Please review. There is one academic author named Perrin who explores this apparent contradiction. I haven't added him to the article yet, since I'm still looking for the perfect blockquote. But this doesn't have to be Good Article quality to satisfy DYK. Should I just rewrite the hook? The contradiction does make a great hook. But if you prefer I can avoid mentioning it. regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 15:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luciano Castro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mariano Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture tagging

Hello, and thanks for your DYK review of Bunge church! I'll try to add the tag as you suggested - but do you mean that I add them at the file where I found it, on commons? Just want to make it clear. Thanks a lot! Cheers, Yakikaki (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine television

Hello, Cambalachero. A reply to your request at the Illustration workshop has been made. You may view your reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

(Your request was copied from the Photograhy workshop) - Begoontalk 04:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC).[reply]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Illustration reply}} template.

Deleting bad dab pages

Hi Cambalachero, I closed your MfD nomination a bit early, since it seemed unlikely that there would be consensus to delete, and also because AfD is the usual forum if you want to delete a dab. However, a dab that only links to a single actual article can be tagged for G6 speedy deletion, specifically {{db-disambig}}. So don't be shy about tagging any such dabs you come across in the future. --BDD (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK? Nomination

I have now fixed what you told me to fix here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Salustiano Sanchez. Please take a look at this DYK? nomination of mine whenever you are able to and tell me if it is good to go at this point. Thank you very much. Futurist110 (talk) 03:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for approving that Salustiano Sanchez DYK? nomination of mine. If you don't mind me asking, are you able to please quickly review another DYK? nomination of mine -- Template:Did you know nominations/Jokichi Ikarashi? If not, that's okay. Reviewing it should take only a minute or so, though. Also, I had some friends and acquaintances who know some Japanese do the translation for this article. If you want, I can review a DYK? nomination of yours in exchange. Thank you very much. Have a good day and take care. Futurist110 (talk) 05:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mónica Ayos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mujeres Asesinas
Rodolfo Rojas D.T. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carlos Calvo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Solamente Vos

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mónica Ayos

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Fotos Néstor Kirchner

Hola Cambalachero todo bien ? viste las fotos de Casa Rosada que están publicadas bajo la licencia cc-by-sa, hay posibilidad de gestionar con algún administrador subir con la misma licencia todas las fotos que le tomaron a Kirchner durante su presidencia ? un saludo grande Alakasam (talk) 22:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no me haría muchas ilusiones. Al principio había una autorización por e-mail. Después pusieron un ícono de CC con la variante no comercial (o sea, incompatible con Commons). Se les mandó un par de e-mails mencionando el problema, y no hicieron nada. Hizo falta que, después de más de un año, se empezaran a borrar las fotos de commons posteriores al relicenciamiento para que se pusieran las pilas y pusieran la licencia que hay ahora, para que las imágenes vuelvan a su lugar. Cambalachero (talk) 23:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si podés intentá comunicarte, avisame. Gracias :) Alakasam (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]