Talk:Mordechai Elon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Lead: new section |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[MOS:INTRO]]: "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article..." - Should we be repeating such details "in response to revelations by Takana, a religious forum that was set up to deal with allegations of sexual harassment in the religious Zionist community" etc, which are contained in the main article? [[User:Chesdovi|Chesdovi]] ([[User talk:Chesdovi|talk]]) 15:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
[[MOS:INTRO]]: "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article..." - Should we be repeating such details "in response to revelations by Takana, a religious forum that was set up to deal with allegations of sexual harassment in the religious Zionist community" etc, which are contained in the main article? [[User:Chesdovi|Chesdovi]] ([[User talk:Chesdovi|talk]]) 15:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Seams important enough to me, not as important as the fact that Elon is an outspoken opponent of homosexuality convicted of having had same sex sexual contact with a minor - though. But admittedly, the "sexual misconduct" section could be more concise. Cheers, [[User:Ajnem|Ajnem]] ([[User talk:Ajnem|talk]]) 17:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:24, 8 August 2013
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. |
Please use English references
I happened on this and was annoyed to see no English references when a quick news.google search showed lots of english sources from Feburary 2010, and updated material which I then ended up putting in the article. Feel free to use as references ones like the relevant article I put in external links. CarolMooreDC (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Why annoyed? Please AGF. There is no problem with using foreign references. And external links is not the right place to put links to news. If you cannot be bothered to edit the article yourself, you should move the links to the discussion page so that someone else might do that work. From experience, I can't see how anyone expects someone else to do 'their' work. --Shuki (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:V#Non-English_sources Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources should be used in preference to non-English ones, except where no English source of equal quality can be found that contains the relevant material. If there are articles in English, why use foreign languages?
- Anyway, FYI here's one of many articles in ENglish about the earlier allegations: *Yair Ettinger, Rabbi Elon accused of 'long-term' sexual relationship with student Rabbi Elon accused of 'long-term' sexual relationship with student, Haaretz, February 18, 2010.
- One can point out problems with articles without having to fix every one. And I did do work of updating info. CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Again, this is nice, but the issue here is not a preference of non-english references, but a lack of editors to insert English ones instead. If you can contribute to the article, that is valiant. But the external links is not a repository of 'see also' news reports. --Shuki (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Lead
MOS:INTRO: "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article..." - Should we be repeating such details "in response to revelations by Takana, a religious forum that was set up to deal with allegations of sexual harassment in the religious Zionist community" etc, which are contained in the main article? Chesdovi (talk) 15:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Seams important enough to me, not as important as the fact that Elon is an outspoken opponent of homosexuality convicted of having had same sex sexual contact with a minor - though. But admittedly, the "sexual misconduct" section could be more concise. Cheers, Ajnem (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class Judaism articles
- Unknown-importance Judaism articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Israel-related articles
- Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
- Automatically assessed Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel articles