Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals: Difference between revisions
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
:::It's a recurring problem, so I guess sometimes people get tired of dealing with it. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
:::It's a recurring problem, so I guess sometimes people get tired of dealing with it. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
:I've left a warning for [[User:حسن علي البط ]] who has been blocked in the past over this issue. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
:I've left a warning for [[User:حسن علي البط ]] who has been blocked in the past over this issue. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
== [[Fluorodeoxyglucose]] vs [[Fludeoxyglucose]] - [[WP:MEDMOS]] vs [[WP:COMMONNAME]] == |
|||
Please consider commenting [[Talk:Fludeoxyglucose_(18F)#Undiscussed_move_from_fludeoxyglucose|over there]]. -- [[User:Scray|Scray]] ([[User talk:Scray|talk]]) 06:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:53, 15 August 2013
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Chemicals NA‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 15 October 2012. |
A-list discussions · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Chemicals page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
Chemicals Discussion
The discussion here concerns all parts of the Chemicals WikiProject, including the infoboxes, lists, standards, includes/excludes, tools, contributors, etc etc etc. Feel free to add your comments to any section here, or start a new topic. Topics not specifically related to the Chemicals WikiProject would be better served at other wikipages.
Actual wikiproject info: statistics and alerts
|
The worklist shows the actual work to be done to achieve the goals of the Chemicals wikiproject. The choice of important compounds articles to work on has been finalized in an earlier stage of the wikiproject (around mid 2005), and no further articles are added, although we remain open for strong suggestions on this talkpage. The work these days focuses on improving the articles, from Chem Stub all the way to Chem A-Class articles. The table below shows that progress.
Worklist historical status | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||
Grade |
Jun | Oct | May | Oct | Mar | Oct | Feb | Aug | Apr | Dec |
Template:Chem A-Class | 29 | 26 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 25 | 25 | 23 | 18 | 18 |
Template:Chem B-Class | 71 | 84 | 101 | 130 | 148 | 156 | 158 | 180 | 185 | 188 |
Template:Chem Start | 112 | 131 | 199 | 190 | 174 | 174 | 180 | 153 | 160 | 161 |
Template:Chem Stub | 97 | 130 | 46 | 29 | 27 | 27 | 19 | 26 | 19 | 18 |
unclassified | 76 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 385 | 371 | 378 | 381 | 382 | 382 | 382 | 382 | 382 | 382 |
percentage ≥Chem Start |
55.1 | 65.0 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 92.9 | 92.9 | 95.0 | 94.0 | 95.0 | 95.3 |
weighted progress, % |
42.2 | 50.4 | 57.8 | 60.8 | 62.2 | 61.7 | 62.4 | 63.1 | 63.2 | 63.9 |
The percentage ≥ Chem Start was indicative of the initial effort. Now that we are progressing to more advanced progress, the weighted progress indicator is used, calculated as (Unclass*0 + Stub*1 + Start*2 + B-Class*3 + A-Class*4) / (Articles*4).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the statistics for all chemicals, as registered by the bot, also see complete list
Article alerts |
---|
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions Redirects for discussion
Good article reassessments
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
should be splitted into Residue (chemistry) and residue (molecular biology) since everything after "In biochemistry and molecular biology, a residue ..." is definitely totally different from the rest!.--141.58.45.38 (talk) 11:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- You raise an interesting point, but it doesn't really fall within the WP:PHYSICS realm of interest. I would suggest starting a discussion on Talk:Residue (chemistry) and then asking participants in WP:CHEM and WP:BIOLOGY to comment. Personally I agree that the two definitions are essentially separate, but I don't think there is enough out there talking specifically about biochemical/molecular bio residues to warrant its own article - a simple definition would be in violation of WP:DICDEF. It seems, on the other hand, that there is enough material for an article on chemical residues. Corvus coronoides talk 13:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Moved here from WikiProject Physics --141.58.45.38 (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
There are some questions at Talk:Theaflavin digallate about the chemical structure and ChemBox data in Theaflavin digallate. Input from other chemists would be appreciated. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Fetish categorizers are at it again
Do we really sanction the creation of so many new highly specialized categories. Example: "removed Category:Acridines; added Category:Quinoacridines" --Smokefoot (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- This reminds me... Salicylaldehyde was recently added to 'Category:Phenolic compounds found in castoreum', which is itself a sub-subsection of 'Category:Chemical compounds found in castoreum'. I'd of done something about it sooner - expect I saw it on my way to bed and then forgot all about it. Project Osprey (talk) 13:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- That's funny, because I notified the Chemistry Project a while ago about these highly specific categories, and no one so much as breathed my way. Plasmic Physics (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's a recurring problem, so I guess sometimes people get tired of dealing with it. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- That's funny, because I notified the Chemistry Project a while ago about these highly specific categories, and no one so much as breathed my way. Plasmic Physics (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've left a warning for User:حسن علي البط who has been blocked in the past over this issue. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Please consider commenting over there. -- Scray (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)