User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:51, 13 December 2013

: 632

: 82

: 6

: 22

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Worm That Turned 2	199	2	2	99	09:47, 18 November 2024	5 days, 6 hours	no	report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

Last updated by ^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} at 02:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tb

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FAR Rus' Khaganate

Hi

I noticed you on some of the discussions on the talk page, so thought I would inform you of the FAR. Chaosdruid (talk) 01:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jan Henryk Dąbrowski

The article Jan Henryk Dąbrowski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jan Henryk Dąbrowski for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, when I listed this article at Wikipedia:Good articles/History, I wasn't sure how to fit "Dąbrowski" into the alphabetization there. Do you know whether the "ą" should be treated like an "a", or like a separate letter after "Dz", or what?

@User:Quadell - in Polish language, ą is a letter following a, before b. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battles of Krasnoi and Vyazma (1812)

Hello Sir,

I researched and wrote the Wikipedia articles about the Battles of Krasnoi and Vyazma (1812). I take your criticism and commentary (about the articles) seriously: I am impressed with your knowledge of certain aspects of those engagements: particularly the history of the Polish contingent that participated in these battles. I would like to amend the articles in order to reflect these facts (which are almost never mentioned in English language sources). Please see my replies to your comments on the battles. Also, I have discovered that you are a faculty member at a university, and that you teach a course on writing Wikipedia articles. I sent you an email about my articles, and what steps I can begin taking to improve them. I am eager to read your reply. Kenmore (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wargame: Red Dragon

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from [[{{{1}}}]], which you proposed for deletion, because I think that the deletion of this article may be controversial. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Corruption in Poland

On 8 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Corruption in Poland, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that while international rankings show corruption in Poland as steadily decreasing, over 80% of the Polish public still sees it as a significant problem for the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Poland. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Greater Poland Civil War

On 9 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Greater Poland Civil War, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that neither of the principal combatants won the bloody Greater Poland Civil War which terminated after the accession of ten-year old Jadwiga of Poland to the Polish throne? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Greater Poland Civil War. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

I am pleased that You invite me on the English Wikipedia. Thank you and best regards, --Rewa (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Old train station in Katowice

Hello, Piotrus. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Old train station in Katowice, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Neonchameleon (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is Onestar from HYU

Thank you for introducing a valuable tutorial for wikipedia. I have translated an article from English wikipedia to Korean wikipedia. The article was about K-pop and I worked on 'Characteristics', 'Marketing', 'Dance' and 'Fashion'. As Korean culture is becoming more famous among the globe, this work was interesting to me and brought me to think much as a member of Korean culture suppliers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnestarLim (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Traffic report: Deaths of Mandela, Walker top the list

In the media: Edward Snowden a "hero"; German Wikipedia court ruling

News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments—winners announced

WikiProject report: WikiProject Wine

Interview: Wikipedia's first Featured Article centurion

Featured content: Viewer discretion advised

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.22 released

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dobrilovina Monastery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Potarje

Katowice historic train station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Neoclassical

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disconfirmed expectancy

Hello,

It seems you "rated" Disconfirmed expectancy as a C-class on the Psychology WikiProject's quality scale, but you didn't leave any reasoning or comments for the rating. I can see that you're a rather significant editor here, and I hope this doesn't come across as rude, but I was relatively certain that this was at the very least B-class nearing GA (perhaps a few edits away in terms of cleaning things up). I don't have a problem with you rating the article as such, if you have some kind of rationale for it. It doesn't really help the editors coming along to improve it to not know what needs to be done to better the article.

Just a general observation, but it also doesn't look like you are well-versed in psychology research (forgive me if I'm wrong), which leads me to believe that your main issues with the article center on accessibility to a general audience, maybe?

Anyway, please let me know your thoughts. Cheers, Adam Blake (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
+== Disconfirmed expectancy ==
+Hello,
+It seems you "rated" [[Disconfirmed expectancy]] as a C-class on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology|Psychology WikiProject's]] quality scale, but you didn't leave any reasoning or comments for the rating. I can see that you're a rather significant editor here, and I hope this doesn't come across as rude, but I was relatively certain that this was ''at the very least'' B-class nearing GA (perhaps a few edits away in terms of cleaning things up). I don't have a problem with you rating the article as such, if you have some kind of rationale for it.  It doesn't really help the editors coming along to improve it to not know what needs to be done to better the article.
+Just a general observation, but it also doesn't look like you are well-versed in psychology research (forgive me if I'm wrong), which leads me to believe that your main issues with the article center on accessibility to a general audience, maybe?
+Anyway, please let me know your thoughts. Cheers, <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:AB Blake|Adam Blake]] ([[User talk:AB Blake|talk]])</font> 16:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)