User talk:MelbourneStar

Bhumihar

HI PLEASE UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH DIRTY INFORMATION IS GIVEN IN THIS ARTICLE LIKE DIRTY TALES REGARDING BHUMIHAR AND AS A PROPOGANDA POSTIVE THINGS AND VALID THINGS ARE DELETED FROM BHUMIHAR PAGE ,SO UNDERSTNAD IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs) 08:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Alex, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Firstly, when interacting with other editors, please avoid using capital letters as to not give the impression you are shouting. Secondly, your edits have been undone, as they remove content verified by reliable sources. Further, the reasons provided for those removals, are problematic – you are not allowed to remove content on the basis that you don't agree with it. When you return from your temporary block, please adhere to the advice provided. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

hi Mr X i want to make some comment on you. you are always referring the fake or defamatory stories of aswani kumar book as the origin of bhumihar brahmin. Any storis or fake rumours can not be cited as a reference. Even the author has mentioned it as a tale and i do not think that i need to tell you the meaning of this word. If u are so keen to know about bhumihar caste then gather all the clans information of bhumihar caste and their origin, that is done by noted personalities like swami sahjanand saraswati. he was a noted freedom fighter and many brahmins refer his book to know all the facts about their origin, since he has compiled it well. If ypu want to practically know the clans you should visit the village of BABHAN(Bhumihar) and ask them about clans and search for their origin. It is a nice sociological topic, you can do phd on this topic just like bibha jha has done. swami ji material will be helpful for you in this course. so i request you repeatedly not to put up some story or myth on wikipedia that is derogatory and contested. wikipedia is the collection of most credible materials not rumours or stories so please do not revert those stories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpandey89 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Friendly request

Hello Mel! I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but the <font> tag that you are using in your signature is deprecated/obsolete. With what you wanted to do, changing from font tags to proper span tags, while it would have fit, would have made your signature length push the 255 limit. As such, I've made a minor modification to the font weight to make it all bold, which is actually not a bad idea as the color contrast ration in your characters if kind of low and doesn't comply with the WCAG standard mentioned in WP:SIGAPP. If you are interested in updating your signature to use newer HTML5 compatible code, that's is a little easier for color impaired viewers to see, I suggest replacing:

—[[User:MelbourneStar|<font color="#E62020">Mel</font><font color="#FF2400">bourne</font><font color="#FF7538">Star</font>]]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup><font color="3D0376">''talk''</font></sup>]]

with:

—[[User:MelbourneStar|<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b>]]<b style="color:#FA0">☆</b>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup style="color:#407">'''''talk'''''</sup>]]

which will result in a 214 character long signature (15 characters shorter) with an appearance of: —MelbourneStar☆^talk
compared to your existing 229 character long signature of: —MelbourneStar☆^talk
— Either way. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 01:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Technical!

I was not aware of this; however, I tend to agree with you and accept your request. Accepted

I've tweaked it slightly, but henceforth my username will be bolded for the convenience of others.

Kind regards and thanks for bringing this to my attention, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 01:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Morgan Page Edit

Myself and several other fans are actually afraid of Morgan Page, I felt my contribution actually was constructive! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.64.46.68 (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

You may feel whatever it is you like; if you continue to make unconstructive edits, you may lose your editing privileges. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

125.237.180.136

Hello I am just letting you know that this IP user 125.237.180.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) keeps on vandalizing in different places as he/she did at [1]. I saw your warnings and reported at AIV. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 12:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi A.Minkowiski,

Thank you for that. Also, glad to see you made the right decision with in regards to the topic of our previous chat. If you need anything, please don't hesitate in asking. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

your suggestion and andvice regarding previous chat encouraged me alot. I just want to say Wikipedia is just a place where I want to contribute for my whole life. I can't leave it A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 13:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the Clueman article

Whats been the reason to deletion of my article ? I am the soul owner of the Brand Clueman and i got my rights to write an article on it.

Could you please kindly cooperate positively.

Thank you, Abdus salaam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abclue (talk • contribs) 09:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Abdus salaam (Clueman) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abclue (talk • contribs) 09:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Silviu Mihăilă‎

FYI, I've started a page on the editors over at SPI. --Finngall ^talk 13:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Alrighty, hopefully we'll see progress with that. I'm reverting any removal of the AfD. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

175.29.181.142

Just FYI, the ip and Arafatsourav760 (talk · contribs) are the same. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Apparantly, they assume we can't see that. Sad really. Thanks for the notif! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Removed link to an external page

Hello MelbourneStar,

You removed a link I added. My point was to add another example of lightweight application virtualization. Instead, should I proceed like CDE did [in this page], that is, by adding references to academic research papers about this [new] example?

Thanks for you attention, Cédric. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedric-vincent (talk • contribs) 13:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Cedric!

I did remove a link you had added to an article, as it was slightly spammy. With that said, the alternative you've suggested is spot on; provided that the sources are reliable and hence the content is verifiable, you may proceed with the change. Regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Stop reverting everything before me! :( Vacation9 14:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Muahahaha! thank you Vacation! and sorry too!

One will be going off soon, and it'll be all yours to conquer! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Reverted to wrong version

Thank you very much for your vandalism whacking. I just thought you'd want to know that in this edit you revered to a vandalized version of the article rather than the last good version.

Thanks again. Edison (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh thanks! I believe it was a case of one vandal being able to disguise their edits - and another, not so much. Either way, perhaps the only thing 'humiliating' as one of the Ip's say, is that I didn't notice their edit - usually I do. Anyway, I concur, and thank you! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Melbournestar

I just read your page on sleep paralysis. I am a long time sufferer of RISP (pretty much all my life) and have back to back episodes almost every night and it is terrifying and exhausting. I wanted to Thank You for contributing to the SP page because it is the most thorough information I have ever come across on the topic and I even learned some things I didn't know.

Can I ask where you learned so much about it? Because there's not a whole lot of info on the subject and that is a little discouraging. I wanted to ask your opinion on something... My SP episodes are ALWAYS at sleep onset, never upon awakening and I understand the theory between SP and REM, which explains how that would occur upon awakening, but that theory doesn't really hold water and make sense for the episodes that occur at the onset of sleep because when I (or anyone suffering from sleep onset SP) lays down to go to sleep, we're haven't actually gone to sleep yet when SP occurs we're still awake and have been since we laid down, so how can we have fallen into REM if we haven't even fallen asleep yet? It makes sense if you're having an SP episode as you are waking up and youre still in REM, but it doesn't make sense to explain how/why SP occurs at sleep onset because we are awake the whole time and therefore we never went to sleep, and accessed REM, so how does it play a role for this particular "sleep onset" type of SP?

(FYI: i heard that sleep onset SP in exclusively an symptom of narcolepsy and almost never occurs in people who are not narcoleptic, but I don't have narcolepsy and I solely experience sleep onset SP and have never had an episode upon awakening. From the information you provided on the Wikipage, it says only 3% of SP sufferers experience sleep onset SP who are not natcoleptic. Wow, that's a very small sliver of people! I can't believe I am one of them!

Thank you for your input, i appreciate it so very much, you have NO idea! ♥ Gettup (talk) 10:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

query about content removal of IPTL

Could you please explain why the content has been removed despite of right references?