User talk:Kudpung

Please sign your message.

Archives

A good 2015 to you and yours!

A very happy and productive 2015 to you and yours C. I deeply appreciate the wisdom and guidance that you have shown me. Onwards and upwards! Fond regards from Irondome (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Indeed

To you too, and your counsel at stages has been appreciated. satusuro 12:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

From me too, best wishes for 2015 and hopes that you will stick around; for me that horror named after menstruation may be the killer, but until then I'll see what I can do :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Let us make a resolution this year, let us make this place even better, more civil, and make this year the most productive year we ever saw. Looking foward to work with you this year, and make this place little better. Happy new year! Jim Carter 17:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Kudpung,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Happy New Year Kudpung!

Happy New Year!

Kudpung,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Parinoush Saniee

Hi Kudpung, me again. Just seen that you've protected the page on Iranian novelist Parinoush Saniee from recreation. The original creator, somebody with a COI, has repeatedly copy-pasted content from the author's agency website, which is annoying, but she's got enough of an international reputation that we really ought to have an article on her. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Andreas, I've unlocked it but if you want a copy of it you'll have to ask Wizardman. Remeber that if you simply go ahead and recreate it it will release a red alert and will probably just get deleted again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! --Andreas Philopater (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

need someone help

please can you help out to fix the issue .... honestly i do not really understand what i have to do on the article .... Mohammede aziz abdul (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Mohammede, I've fixed the issues for you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

thanks for the help and have a nice day Mohammede aziz abdul (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

John Dugdale (photographer)

As you wished I added two sources and removed the tag. Is everything ok now? Please reply here or on my own talk page. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Meister und Margarita. It's just enough to get the PROD tag removed but unfortunately unless you are able to provide some substantial, reliable, independent 3rd party sources such as dedicated articles in the established press that provide in-depth coverage, notability for a Wikipedia article won't be asserted and the article will probably be deleted through another of our deletion processes. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

IMHO the quote of Vince Aletti is a sufficient source, independent and definitely 3rd party. Greetings --Meister und Margarita (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, Meister und Margarita, sources are everything on Wikipedia and one is generally not sufficient. Such a subject must meet WP:CREATIVE. I'll let you be the judge of that, but there is still a risk of it going before the community at at WP:AfD. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please Do Not Delete

Please do not delete the page "Dwayne Buckle", the page was first placed on wikipedia in 2007, the page was then nominated for a deletion in 2012 under suspicious circumstances, it is now 3 years later and author has also produced many additional works since then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moviemoguls (talk • contribs) 22:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

The article needs to include some genuine claims to notability per WP:CREATIVE which then need to be supported by in-depth reliable sources in the established press. I have removed the COPYVIO tag but I have listed it again for deletion. This will probbly keep happening, so if you can eventualy meet the criteria for inclusion your recourse woud be to lodge an appeal atWP:DELREV after it gets deleted again. Please remember to sign your posts.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

RFA guide

I saw your oppose to RegistryKey with a link to your User:Kudpung/RfA criteria. This is one of most sensible such things I've seen on this topic. I often think the wiki community is its own worst enemy. I keep seeing the same topics (RFA, disruptive editors, handling wayward admins, etc) discussed ad nauseam and agreement never being reached on actually doing anything about it. So far I've mostly managed to stay out of these messes. I usually just read and move along. I think some wiki policies do more harm than good. I wonder if these things are realistically solvable. HalfGig talk 22:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi HalfGig. That, and the other essay I wrote at WP:Advice for RfA candidates have become the mainstays of advice for adminship hopefuls and have received thousands of hits. Ironically, many candidates themselves seem to be the ones who don't read them. I did my best some years ago by creating the banner which was mentioned and reproduced yesterday at WT:RfA, but while you can lead a horse to water, you can't make it drink.

Unless you were an admin, you do well to stay clear of the drama venues. Getting involved would only end up with you hating the place you once loved to edit. Nevertheless, do vote at RfA by all means. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

I started out by dabbling working on plant articles. Then I got interested in making Cucurbita as good as I could and was fortunate enough to have people help me. Right now it's at FAC. I'm happy just editing plant-related articles. I no plans to be an admin. HalfGig talk 02:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

RFPP at AN/I

It is difficult to not chuckle at the irony. :) — Ched :  ?  11:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Persakerly! See also: this and this. Oh, well, Ched, best wishes for 2015. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Interesting - and best to you in the new year too Kudpung. — Ched :  ?  11:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

MariaJaydHicky's IP

Special:Contributions/5.81.217.96 is disruptive editing with same pattern. 183.171.182.214 (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)