User talk:SpacemanSpiff

User:Daan0001

Can you keep an eye over this user's contributions? His edits are clearly problematic – in Bipasha Basu filmography and Kareena Kapoor filmography. Thanks, —Vensatry _(ping) 06:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

There are multiple editors active on these pages so I suggest taking to WP:AN3 for edit warring. I'm going to be a bit sporadic

It's not just about edit-warring. If you look a his edits they are quite problematic. —Vensatry _(ping) 18:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I see a tp discussion and it seems to go in a direction, if there's further disruption after that it would have to be handled as such. In this case I can't really take a stance on whether it's right or not as it can be a difference of opinion. The edit warring is what's problematic. I'm going to page Cyphoidbomb as he seems to like adminning the Indian films area and I'm not going to be on only very intermittently over the next few days, perhaps he can keep a watch, else, best bet is to take to WP:AN3 if an when a problem comes up after the talk page discussions. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 04:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

On what citations you reverted back my changes on Hosur page?

You had reverted my changes on Hosur page . On what basis you did it? i have attached proper citations but still you reverted and added wrong content without any citations? Justify your content added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FriendRahul (talk • contribs)

I have not added any content, I have reverted your change of adding that the population is 80% Telugu because it is solely based on the claim of a politician who has got other facts wrong within the same sentence (note: this portion is not verifiable through any WP:RS data, just that the other claims have been verified to be untrue). —SpacemanSpiff 17:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You had reverted back again my content with the data that doesnt have any citations. alos you removed my attached wikitravel data cite reference. I am a obidient user of wiki and i have been donating for it only bcz i need it to be a good source of data with proper facts. If you gain revert back my changes i will complain to wiki and it is a serious concern related to our hosur telugu community.

reverting back my appropriate content on Hosur with that of inaccurate data

I will take this seriously to the notice of wiki if at all it is reverted back with false data. you are promoting Wikipedia:Vandalism. Its a serious concern and it will not be entertained. If your data reverted is appropriate then why there is no proper reference to cite?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FriendRahul (talk • contribs)

Sigh, once again, I don't have any interest in the content but you adding stuff that is unsourced or poorly sourced is the problem here. You are likely to be blocked if you continue this behavior of adding opinion as fact and not providing reliable sources. —SpacemanSpiff 03:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Hey Spaceman, this is in relation to a content dispute on Hosur. I am not the filing party, nor currently involved in the dispute. Hope to see you soon, Dr Crazy 102 (talk) 10:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Restoring article on Dr G. Satheesh Reddy

Dear SpacemanSpiff, I feel that though there might be some repetitions of information pertaining to the article G. Satheesh Reddy, if we remove that, then the article is absolutely neutral and needs to again released in wiki. You have vast expertise and I am sure you will be able to remove the required contents and restore the article. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.157.14 (talk) 12:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The problem isn't repetition but copyright violation. I'm assuming you are the editor in question, but there's been repeated copyright violations on that article despite multiple notifications to the editor and the sockpuppets. This is clearly in violation of our policies and until that is cleaned up the contents will not be made visible. —SpacemanSpiff 14:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

• In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

• Op-ed: Can we please stop bashing Wikipedia?

• Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library

• WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?

• Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Ban Query

Hello! All the admins had problems with my History editing relating to Indian kings, dynasties and empires. But none has ever expressed any issue regarding Jainism or Digambara. The ban as you've informed has been imposed for Indian religions. I did not do anything wrong with the same, did I? I think the ban, if you feel is necessary, should be on Indian Royalty or History or something. Please reconsider. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Hist merge check please

Hello, sounds pretty good to me. I find this history-merging method to be easier in cases like this, because it doesn't create as much redirect junk; there is also the the MergeHistory special page. However, you did pretty well just using the regular method! Graham87 14:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Graham87, thanks for the check and info, I wasn't aware of the special page so this is definitely helpful for the next time I feel adventurous! cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 15:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Edits were made only on the basis of truth of the subject matter.

Half the content posted on that particular Wiki page is tampered with, I only made the necessary changes. The edits were neutral, as per the neutrality clause of Wikipedia and in accordance with the case file. The use of the word "criminal" over and over again doesn't satisfy the neutrality clause. You should probably once go through the case files and then re-edit the content you have posted. There are also many flaws in the 'career' section of the page. To point a few, it is Anwarul Haq of RJD and not BJP. Also, his early life here hasn't mentioned that before joining politics he was a member of National Cadet Corp (NCC. Bihar and Jharkhand unit). The mention of his writings fete has been removed, why? His stories have been added to CBSE course syllabus this year and has been made into a movie too. Kindly add that! The hunger strike was not because he was provided with "simple food" but because of the ill treatment meted out by the Jail Authorities, by burning his belongings.

Please do the necessary changes on your own. Do not make the Page seem so prejudiced. It should be Neutral, remember? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalpana09Singh (talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Kalpana09Singh, you need to have a read of WP:NPOV as it does not mean what you think it does. Wikipedia follows what reliable sources say. In this case what you've been doing is removing those sources, including quotes attributed to the subject and other sources. If you disagree, you should discuss it on the talk page with other editors involved in the topic. What you have done is removed content large scale, removed sources that have been included in the article and then added your own text that is unsourced and provided no reason for doing so. That is essentially the problem here. —SpacemanSpiff 12:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you and a barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For properly merging Kodambakkam related pages Bhadani (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks Bhadani. —SpacemanSpiff 18:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Shramana, Jainism

That paragraph I deleted in Shramana gives wrong information about Jainism. If such disrespectful articles regarding Jainism are published. They are bound to be deleted. Don't publish such paragraphs in name of Jainism without any information. Articles such are written to malign Jainism. So don't warn me warn those whom wrote that paragraph.

Ashvawiki (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)