Jump to content

Talk:Carly Fiorina 2016 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Primary results: new section
Line 52: Line 52:
----
----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== Primary results ==

According to The Green Papers, Fiorina placed 10th among Republicans in the primary with 40,666 votes. This is the 2nd highest vote total for a Republican woman after Margaret Chase Smith in 1964.

Revision as of 03:22, 7 November 2016

WikiProject iconUnited States: Presidential elections C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Good article

A good start; adding the See also section. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vandles

In the first paragraph:She is also a garbage human being, whom Inc. magazine editors once referred to as "the driest cum dumpster in the West".[2] Is NOT NEUTRAL and is showing a slant against fair and balanced reporting that is a bastion of WikiPediaBjhall4400 (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The aforementioned offending verbiage has now been reverted.--JayJasper (talk) 20:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More sexism and foreign policy coverage needed

http://www.buzzfeed.com/sajp/if-men-were-treated-like-women-in-the-workplace

This video, made by Fiorina in an attempt at grabbing millennial votes, generated a significant amount of press and I think it is pertinent information in an article about her run for president. I also think her various statements regarding sexism and gender should be added at a later date, as they are important talking points of her campaign. As a whole, this article focuses far too heavily on criticism of her business career. I'm not advocating for the removal of that information, but I believe it should be balanced by thorough coverage of her actual campaigning. Beetlejuicex3 (talk) 03:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Strangle" comment

That material is just a blip in the campaign. Wikipedia is not news. I a few weeks that issue will be forgotten, not encyclopedic. - Cwobeel (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about 5,000 words, and that section is taking 10% of the article. This "incident" is all but forgotten, and will be a blip in a long year of campaigning. Not to mention that the text as written is not NPOV. - Cwobeel (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed that material, given the lack of interest in discussion the issue. Please abide by WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE and do not restore without a discussion toward consensus here. - Cwobeel (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Carly Fiorina presidential campaign, 2016Carly Fiorina presidential campaign – this article indicates the campaign began in 2015 so saying 2016 can mislead people. Specifying the year also doesn't seem necessary at present. I could only see this as necessary were she to run for president a second time in the future. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 07:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Primary results

According to The Green Papers, Fiorina placed 10th among Republicans in the primary with 40,666 votes. This is the 2nd highest vote total for a Republican woman after Margaret Chase Smith in 1964.