Talk:100 Women (BBC): Difference between revisions
→Page views: new section |
→Proposed deletion: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Page views== |
==Page views== |
||
{{Graph:PageViews}} |
{{Graph:PageViews}} |
||
== Proposed deletion == |
|||
I have nominated this page for deletion. The campaign does not meet the notability requirement that 'the topic has received <b>significant</b> coverage in <b>reliable sources</b> that are <b>independent of the subject</b>'. The references on the page are just to official 'BBC 100 Women' campaign pages (certainly not independent of the subject). Searching further, there is little evidence that the campaign is influential enough to be given substantial coverage in independent third-party sources. Compare this to the attention given to [[Time Person of the Year]], for example. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:A683:6A00:C414:D65C:FA3:A059|2A00:23C4:A683:6A00:C414:D65C:FA3:A059]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C4:A683:6A00:C414:D65C:FA3:A059|talk]]) 16:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:00, 6 December 2016
Template:Friendly search suggestions
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Women in Red: BBC 100 Women (2016) | ||||
|
Comment
Should I add an infobox to this? Also was unsure whether or not to link everyone's names or not. Tingiraffe (talk) 21:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Generally only link to notable people. Most of these should be notable, but some won't. Those who come under WP:BLP1E can still be linked to, though the name might be a redirect. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC).
Page views
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Proposed deletion
I have nominated this page for deletion. The campaign does not meet the notability requirement that 'the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject'. The references on the page are just to official 'BBC 100 Women' campaign pages (certainly not independent of the subject). Searching further, there is little evidence that the campaign is influential enough to be given substantial coverage in independent third-party sources. Compare this to the attention given to Time Person of the Year, for example. 2A00:23C4:A683:6A00:C414:D65C:FA3:A059 (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- List-Class BBC articles
- Low-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- List-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- List-Class Radio articles
- Low-importance Radio articles
- WikiProject Radio articles
- List-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 29 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages