Jump to content

User talk:Longhart: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Longhart (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
{{unblock| Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies. }}
{{unblock| Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies. }}
:Please read the policy on [[WP:OWN|article ownership]], which has been linked here several times. It is not your page to delete (and you can't delete it anyway). The page is the property of the Wikipedia community, not the person who created the page, or the person who is the subject of the page. The article will either qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia and be kept, or fail to qualify and be deleted. The most likely criteria used for that purpose will be [[WP:NARTIST]]. The issue of eligibility has already been raised, but it has not yet been formally nominated for deletion. [[User:Murph9000|<span style="color:white;background-color:purple;padding:0.1em 0.1em 0.1em 1em;">Murph</span><span style="color:white;background-color:black;padding:0.1em 1em 0.1em 0.1em;">9000</span>]] ([[User talk:Murph9000|talk]]) 04:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
:Please read the policy on [[WP:OWN|article ownership]], which has been linked here several times. It is not your page to delete (and you can't delete it anyway). The page is the property of the Wikipedia community, not the person who created the page, or the person who is the subject of the page. The article will either qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia and be kept, or fail to qualify and be deleted. The most likely criteria used for that purpose will be [[WP:NARTIST]]. The issue of eligibility has already been raised, but it has not yet been formally nominated for deletion. [[User:Murph9000|<span style="color:white;background-color:purple;padding:0.1em 0.1em 0.1em 1em;">Murph</span><span style="color:white;background-color:black;padding:0.1em 1em 0.1em 0.1em;">9000</span>]] ([[User talk:Murph9000|talk]]) 04:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock| Murph9000 If you contact me again or anyone who haas already manspained how wiki works you will be reported and blocked. All of you work will be deleted and you will prosecuted. }}

Revision as of 05:25, 26 June 2017

February 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit you recently made to Video sculpture seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Video sculpture. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 22:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Longhart, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Longhart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 02:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z7

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Longhart". The reason given for Longhart's block is: "Making legal threats".


Decline reason: Autoblock is working as intended. SQLQuery me! 02:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Amanda Long. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murph9000 (talk) 03:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I felt threatened by the last people who edited my page as they didn't add any content rather they took parts away and made it an Orphan. Destruction is not the point of Wiki, creation of content is. There are too many bullies and not enough helpers here. I want to be able to create my page. I will respect the people who recently edited my page if I am respected. Otherwise, as a female I will make sure to talk with WikiMedia tomorrow about this issue as this quite serious to me and I imagine Katherine Maher would rather have people like me contribute than not as otherwise wiki is not inclusive as it intends to be. Most of my contributions have been changed and knocked down. If this is how Wiki culture is then you not making our world more aware of facts or kinder.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi, I felt threatened by the last people who edited my page as they didn't add any content rather they took parts away and made it an Orphan. Destruction is not the point of Wiki, creation of content is. There are too many bullies and not enough helpers here. I want to be able to create my page. I will respect the people who recently edited my page if I am respected. Otherwise, as a female I will make sure to talk with WikiMedia tomorrow about this issue as this quite serious to me and I imagine Katherine Maher would rather have people like me contribute than not as otherwise wiki is not inclusive as it intends to be. Most of my contributions have been changed and knocked down. If this is how Wiki culture is then you not making our world more aware of facts or kinder.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I felt threatened by the last people who edited my page as they didn't add any content rather they took parts away and made it an Orphan. Destruction is not the point of Wiki, creation of content is. There are too many bullies and not enough helpers here. I want to be able to create my page. I will respect the people who recently edited my page if I am respected. Otherwise, as a female I will make sure to talk with WikiMedia tomorrow about this issue as this quite serious to me and I imagine Katherine Maher would rather have people like me contribute than not as otherwise wiki is not inclusive as it intends to be. Most of my contributions have been changed and knocked down. If this is how Wiki culture is then you not making our world more aware of facts or kinder.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I felt threatened by the last people who edited my page as they didn't add any content rather they took parts away and made it an Orphan. Destruction is not the point of Wiki, creation of content is. There are too many bullies and not enough helpers here. I want to be able to create my page. I will respect the people who recently edited my page if I am respected. Otherwise, as a female I will make sure to talk with WikiMedia tomorrow about this issue as this quite serious to me and I imagine Katherine Maher would rather have people like me contribute than not as otherwise wiki is not inclusive as it intends to be. Most of my contributions have been changed and knocked down. If this is how Wiki culture is then you not making our world more aware of facts or kinder.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Admin, please note that the above appears to be acknowledgement that the Amanda Long page is an autobiography, and the editor's apparent ownership mentality is exactly why the policy against autobiography exists. General Ization Talk 04:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)It is not "your page". Please see WP:OWN. Furthermore, you really shouldn't edit an article about yourself, see our conflict of interest policy. Until such time as your legal threats are retracted - or settled in court, you will remain blocked here, as detailed in our policy on legal threats. SQLQuery me! 04:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I retract my legal threats. I want to be able to edit the page about me. It is important and I don't know why you are wasting your time on me. Wiki needs to have a professional on their staff resolve these issues. I don't know who you are or have your email and you have emailed me several times and it is upsetting me. Someone with more tact and politeness needs to be involved in these issues. I am not sure who you are or if you or if you are a safe person. Please remove the block. I have retracted my legal claims.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I retract my legal threats. I want to be able to edit the page about me. It is important and I don't know why you are wasting your time on me. Wiki needs to have a professional on their staff resolve these issues. I don't know who you are or have your email and you have emailed me several times and it is upsetting me. Someone with more tact and politeness needs to be involved in these issues. I am not sure who you are or if you or if you are a safe person. Please remove the block. I have retracted my legal claims. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I retract my legal threats. I want to be able to edit the page about me. It is important and I don't know why you are wasting your time on me. Wiki needs to have a professional on their staff resolve these issues. I don't know who you are or have your email and you have emailed me several times and it is upsetting me. Someone with more tact and politeness needs to be involved in these issues. I am not sure who you are or if you or if you are a safe person. Please remove the block. I have retracted my legal claims. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I retract my legal threats. I want to be able to edit the page about me. It is important and I don't know why you are wasting your time on me. Wiki needs to have a professional on their staff resolve these issues. I don't know who you are or have your email and you have emailed me several times and it is upsetting me. Someone with more tact and politeness needs to be involved in these issues. I am not sure who you are or if you or if you are a safe person. Please remove the block. I have retracted my legal claims. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Instead of blocking my page and destroying it can you help make it better? Why are you behaving like this? Wiki is giving people power complexes. It is not healthy and I feel threatened. I am very concerned at how strange this online culture of Wiki is. Boing! said Zebedee you targeted me and I am very confused as to why. Was it my edits on Roger Ailes page? I noticed you reverted my edits, they were cited. What was the issue. Are you removing the facts?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Instead of blocking my page and destroying it can you help make it better? Why are you behaving like this? Wiki is giving people power complexes. It is not healthy and I feel threatened. I am very concerned at how strange this online culture of Wiki is. Boing! said Zebedee you targeted me and I am very confused as to why. Was it my edits on Roger Ailes page? I noticed you reverted my edits, they were cited. What was the issue. Are you removing the facts?  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Instead of blocking my page and destroying it can you help make it better? Why are you behaving like this? Wiki is giving people power complexes. It is not healthy and I feel threatened. I am very concerned at how strange this online culture of Wiki is. Boing! said Zebedee you targeted me and I am very confused as to why. Was it my edits on Roger Ailes page? I noticed you reverted my edits, they were cited. What was the issue. Are you removing the facts?  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Instead of blocking my page and destroying it can you help make it better? Why are you behaving like this? Wiki is giving people power complexes. It is not healthy and I feel threatened. I am very concerned at how strange this online culture of Wiki is. Boing! said Zebedee you targeted me and I am very confused as to why. Was it my edits on Roger Ailes page? I noticed you reverted my edits, they were cited. What was the issue. Are you removing the facts?  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Ms. Long, with all due respect, this issue has arisen because you have not taken the time to read about and understand Wikipedia culture and, more importantly, policies, before undertaking to create an autobiography here. As previously explained, autobiography is strongly discouraged for the very reason that their authors tend to feel that others should not be able to contribute to the articles they have written about themselves. Further, the editors against whom you issued threats only made improvements to the article. See [1], [2], [3], [4]. General Ization Talk 04:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the {{orphan}} tag (added in the last edit I linked above) means that other editors are encouraged to identify and create potential wikilinks to a given article; no one can "make" an article into an orphan by adding to or removing content from the article itself. It is a way of improving the visibility and utility of an article in the encyclopedia. General Ization Talk 04:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Again I have a right to use Wiki now as I have retracted my legal claims. If you continue this treatment of me which is upsetting I will speak with wiki and report you for this excessive punishment. I wish you have better things to do on wiki besides be rude to me.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Again I have a right to use Wiki now as I have retracted my legal claims. If you continue this treatment of me which is upsetting I will speak with wiki and report you for this excessive punishment. I wish you have better things to do on wiki besides be rude to me.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Again I have a right to use Wiki now as I have retracted my legal claims. If you continue this treatment of me which is upsetting I will speak with wiki and report you for this excessive punishment. I wish you have better things to do on wiki besides be rude to me.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Again I have a right to use Wiki now as I have retracted my legal claims. If you continue this treatment of me which is upsetting I will speak with wiki and report you for this excessive punishment. I wish you have better things to do on wiki besides be rude to me.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Also I don't care about Amanda Long's page I am going to delete it as soon as I can as being a part of wiki is clearly not a positive experience. Wiki a waste and run by bullies.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Please read the policy on article ownership, which has been linked here several times. It is not your page to delete (and you can't delete it anyway). The page is the property of the Wikipedia community, not the person who created the page, or the person who is the subject of the page. The article will either qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia and be kept, or fail to qualify and be deleted. The most likely criteria used for that purpose will be WP:NARTIST. The issue of eligibility has already been raised, but it has not yet been formally nominated for deletion. Murph9000 (talk) 04:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Longhart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Murph9000 If you contact me again or anyone who haas already manspained how wiki works you will be reported and blocked. All of you work will be deleted and you will prosecuted.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Murph9000 If you contact me again or anyone who haas already manspained how wiki works you will be reported and blocked. All of you work will be deleted and you will prosecuted.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Murph9000 If you contact me again or anyone who haas already manspained how wiki works you will be reported and blocked. All of you work will be deleted and you will prosecuted.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Murph9000 If you contact me again or anyone who haas already manspained how wiki works you will be reported and blocked. All of you work will be deleted and you will prosecuted.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}