User talk:EU explained

EU explained, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EU explained! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:UACES, from its old location at User:EU explained/UACES. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 23:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UACES (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UACES and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

EUobserver

I'd like to thank you for your work done on this article. My objection and reason for listing at AfD was the lack of external sources. Wikipedia relies far too much on blogs that are thinly disguised as legitimate media and these need to be rooted out. These sorts of publications often use Wikipedia as a source of good incoming links to raise their page-rank, increase traffic, and make more money.

If EUobserver is as well-regarded as you say, then it's fine. You appear to have !voted twice. Perhaps you could make one a comment on the other, so as not to mislead any admin looking to close this? --Pete (talk) 06:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UACES CRN logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UACES CRN logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

File:European School logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:European School logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EU explained (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My accommodation is used by several other university students, who all also have the same IP, and are active on wiki. I live in shared accommodation.

Decline reason:

This does not account for the similarity in username with Euexperttime (talk · contribs), nor does it account for the significant overlap in articles. This is a clear violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

EU explained (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My cohabiter is euexperttime. We live in shared accommodation at university. We both study EU affairs and are working on a collaborative wiki project on the European Schools. This came about through a discussion with her counsellor as a way to overcome her reclusiveness after the death of her mother, by collaborating to wikipedia. Though I understand the need for caution, this unblock request is an invasion of our privacy and frankly humiliating. Nor, do I see any real reason you can deny it, that won't come across as frankly, heartless. In truth she has been devastated by the decision, and I cannot get her out of her room to see the counsellor. Shame on you.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= My cohabiter is euexperttime. We live in shared accommodation at university. We both study EU affairs and are working on a collaborative wiki project on the European Schools. This came about through a discussion with her counsellor as a way to overcome her reclusiveness after the death of her mother, by collaborating to wikipedia. Though I understand the need for caution, this unblock request is an invasion of our privacy and frankly humiliating. Nor, do I see any real reason you can deny it, that won't come across as frankly, heartless. In truth she has been devastated by the decision, and I cannot get her out of her room to see the counsellor. Shame on you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= My cohabiter is euexperttime. We live in shared accommodation at university. We both study EU affairs and are working on a collaborative wiki project on the European Schools. This came about through a discussion with her counsellor as a way to overcome her reclusiveness after the death of her mother, by collaborating to wikipedia. Though I understand the need for caution, this unblock request is an invasion of our privacy and frankly humiliating. Nor, do I see any real reason you can deny it, that won't come across as frankly, heartless. In truth she has been devastated by the decision, and I cannot get her out of her room to see the counsellor. Shame on you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= My cohabiter is euexperttime. We live in shared accommodation at university. We both study EU affairs and are working on a collaborative wiki project on the European Schools. This came about through a discussion with her counsellor as a way to overcome her reclusiveness after the death of her mother, by collaborating to wikipedia. Though I understand the need for caution, this unblock request is an invasion of our privacy and frankly humiliating. Nor, do I see any real reason you can deny it, that won't come across as frankly, heartless. In truth she has been devastated by the decision, and I cannot get her out of her room to see the counsellor. Shame on you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}