Talk:Ganglion

Two major groups of ganglia?

Can ganglia be divided into the groups mentioned? Where would the basal ganglia be classified under? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senaiboy (talk • contribs) 21:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

It would help this article if the first line would mention the neurological context of the tissue. The second sentence (with the dinosaur) makes no sense without that information.--PrinzMegaherz (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

I made an attempt -- does it work for you? Looie496 (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

GANGLIA DEFINITION BY DR.SHAHID JALAL WANI

The lead definition ("a biological tissue mass, most commonly a mass of nerve cell bodies.") is in need of significant revision. My medical school syllabus states that a ganglion is "a collection of neuronal cell bodies that lies outside the CNS [Central Nervous System]." Even the main reference for the current Wikipedia definition, Dorland's Medical Dictionary, states this explicitly: "a group of nerve cell bodies located outside the central nervous system." As is, the definition hedges when it should be definitive ("most commonly"), and makes no mention of ganglion lying outside the CNS (unlike nuclei, which are within the CNS). The description in its current form is a seriously inadequate. —Preceding Rexbobo comment added by Rexbobo (talk • contribs) 03:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you're right, but see ganglion cyst and basal ganglia. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I have to agree with Rexbobo here... Neither "basal ganglia" nor "ganglion cysts" are true ganglia. "Basal ganglia" is an antiquated and obsolete term... the modern term is "basal nuclei." I tried editing this stuff myself, but I made a mess of it and abandoned it... I just don't have the skills to do a decent job of it. 71.112.87.162 (talk) 02:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

It is true that the basal ganglia are not truly ganglia, but it is definitely not true that "basal nuclei" is the accepted modern term. The term has only caught on to a minimal degree and I think it is very unlikely that it will ever be dominant -- certainly not in the near future. Since 2005 there have been dozens of books published whose titles include the term "basal ganglia". How many include "basal nuclei"? Zero. Looie496 (talk) 04:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

NERVE CELLS DEFINTION BY DR SHAHID JALAL WANI

Alrighty, they're nerve cells. Biological mass. The article doesn't say a single word on what it's purpose is, how come? Can anyone add relevant information? 85.252.185.219 (talk) 04:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

PROPOSE CHANGING AUTONOMIC TO PERIPHERAL IN FIRST PARAGRAPH. Because there are ganglia involving sensory neurons as well. Leaving it to the caretakers of the page. Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisebridge (talk • contribs) 18:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Ganglia of cranial nerves?

Cranial nerve ganglia

How do we fit them into the two groups? They are not considered to be spinal ganglia.

beginner question - What is the purpose of a ganglion?

My impression is that it's a kind of mini-brain, presumably specialised for controlling particular non-conscious actions (guess: chewing, coughing, digestive peristalsis etc.) If not, what? TIA 92.25.12.115 (talk) 18:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

A couple of years later and still no answer? I'd love to hear the view of an expert. 79.75.119.75 (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ganglion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071214053205/http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au:80/Notes/Index/G.htm to http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/Notes/Index/G.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)