User talk:Narutolovehinata5

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

• Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Sasuke Uchiha's review

Sorry for bothering you in the middle of the week, but I've been wondering if you could do a source review to the article rather than prose. It's simple. Just note that they are reliable and well cited. The article is lacking this after it passed its image review. Still, if you wanna do a review on the prose, feel free to do it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I'm very sorry for the late reply, I've been busy with real-life matters lately. But I'll see if I can do a source review right now. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 250 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar with commemorative coin. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

		Geneva Drive
		For maintaining a streak of at least 50 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the Geneva drive. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

What defines a reputable source?

Hello,

You declined by submission about Flight Sim World, a simulator with a variety of sources listed from video game sites, to specialist simulation hobbyist sites.

I was wondering what I should be looking for in order to add a notable set of sources to the page.

Kindest

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Narutolovehinata5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by CryLeon (talk • contribs) 16:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@CryLeon: For video games, try sources like IGN, GameSpot, Metacritic, etc. You know, the usual sources for gaming news. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tomori Kusunoki

Hello! Your submission of Tomori Kusunoki at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Narutolovehinata5/Sandbox

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 23:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

No Additional voices; DRMIES, Sergecross73, IJBall, AngusWOOF and especially MIZUKAS, etc... for not being reasonable!!

To be frank with you, I'm not going to forgive the following users: DRMIES, Sergecross73, IJBall, AngusWOOF and especially MIZUKAS for choosing NOT to have Additional voices on the actor's pages. They still think that they are like IMDB which is NOT true, and I'm sorry but it still continues to dishearten me how incredibly cowardly they refuse to have addtional voices regardless of end credit source and resume all because of an "RFC" from this Discussion post. :(--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 00:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I don't appreciate being called a "coward" over trying to be reasonable by doing an RFC. I suggest you drop the personal attacks before you get reported by other users. MizukaS (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@AnimeDisneylover95: I understand your frustration. However, the RfC has already happened, consensus has been reached; regardless on your personal opinions, consensus has to be respected as long as it remains. While consensus can change, being upset about it and shouting will not get you anywhere. I'm sorry to say this, but if you continue to make non-neutral statements like that, you might get another discussion at WP:ANI, and you don't want that to happen, right? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

11:08:32, 13 February 2018 review of submission by SLSSLee

• SLSSLee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Scientific Laboratory Supplies (SLS) Ltd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, thank you for taking the time to review my article. Please could you help me by telling me exactly which statements in the article need references adding?

Many thanks in advance for you help! SLSSLee (talk) 11:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

hello

Could you at least tell me why my page must be deleted according to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calebharry (talk • contribs) 13:07, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Calebharry: According to the article, the company was founded just today. In addition, the company seems to lack coverage in reliable sources: that is, that there are not a lot of material (online or otherwise) that discuss the company in detail. We have guidelines for what companies can have articles on Wikipedia. In addition, the company does not even give any indication of why it should have an article in the first place. You can read WP:CSD for more details. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

why

Could you at least tell me why my page must be deleted according to you ? Please Reply About

• It appears that the company does not meet our inclusion guidelines for companies. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:29:31, 15 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Oliviajessicalee

• Oliviajessicalee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:DoodleMaths (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, last month you rejected my page for submission because you thought there was promotional material. I didn't realise there was, but I've taken some time and stripped it right back so that it's fact and only fact, backed up with a wide variety of sources. Would you kindly review again? Much appreciated. The page is for DoodleMaths.

Oliviajessicalee (talk) 15:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

RE: Draft:Dov_Levin_(Professor)

Thank you for reviewing this page!

Hello! There are a million references to this guy: [1] Is that enough to make it an article?

Your awesome, thank you. Flylikeaseagull (talk) 19:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your review of my first article on english Wikipedia!

Clowns und Kinder (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

8 December 2017 - Declined Submission Query

Hello, you previously declined the article entry (Draft: Sterling Media) because you felt it did not abide to Wikipedia’s standards and did not read like an encyclopaedia entry. I have taken steps to rectify this, removing the more unnecessary and un-sourced aspects of the article and trying to make the article as objective as possible whilst using all sources and materials available to me. Would you be able to advise what you would be looking for in the Wikipedia page as a reviewer and what you would change on the page to make it fit in with Wikipedia’s standards?

I have also worked on another draft (Draft: Natasha Mudhar) that has not been submitted yet. Would you be able to advise whether or not it requires further changes to make it more encyclopaedic?

DAL123 (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Tomori Kusunoki

On 24 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tomori Kusunoki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that because she felt she lacked acting experience, Japanese voice actress Tomori Kusunoki initially auditioned as a singer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tomori Kusunoki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tomori Kusunoki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mumbai Challengers Ready for Re-Review

Hello, last November you reviewed Draft:Mumbai Challengers and found a number of problems. I believe these have been corrected and this article is in line with the other team pages in this league.Crameraj (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for C (anime)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Undo Speedy Deletion

Good afternoon,

I am writing you becaue you were listed as the deleting administrator of my article NATO Stability Policing Centre Of Excellence. I would like this so I do not have to start all over again. Thank you in Advance

KlaasDB KlaasDB (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@KlaasDB: First of all, I am not an admin: I merely tagged the draft for speedy deletion. RHaworth was the admin who deleted the draft, you may wish to contact him instead. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

File:File-Iris cat.jpg

Dear Narutolovehinata5, thank you for reviewing the page Quark VR. Can I please, ask you to merge it with the page QuarkVR - QuarkVR turned out to be the correct new writing of the company's title :) Thank you! :)

Justtryanother (talk) 12:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)