User talk:24.180.251.38: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:01, 19 March 2018

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Wikipedia Edit Count: 1,250,876,394 ^Purge

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Calculator, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Calculator was changed by 24.180.251.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950517 on 2011-02-07T20:01:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Herman Li, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Herman Li was changed by 24.180.251.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955817 on 2011-03-11T14:22:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to S. E. Hinton with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 13:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frida Kahlo, you may be blocked from editing. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 16:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frida Kahlo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 13:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Periodic table (large version), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Periodic table (large version) was changed by 24.180.251.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935486 on 2012-01-26T18:18:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Utopia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joydeep (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Julius Caesar (play), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Julius Caesar (play) was changed by 24.180.251.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953461 on 2012-05-22T13:22:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julius Caesar (play). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zyxwv99 (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, you may be blocked from editing. Zyxwv99 (talk) 13:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Boron group, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BartłomiejB. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Inequality (mathematics) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BartłomiejB (talk) 20:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Lake Natron, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Lake Tanganyika has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lake Tanganyika was changed by 24.180.251.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956176 on 2014-01-13T14:36:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sugar glider , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Poiana has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Syllabus has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pppery (talk) 13:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Narcissism with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to TI-84 Plus series with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC) [reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to TI-84 Plus series. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.180.251.38 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

spambot.......................

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:24.180.251.38 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <font face="Impact">{{anon block}}
+Wikipedia Edit Count: [[Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFEDITS}}]] <sup>{{Purge}}</sup>
 == February 2011 ==