User talk:Mannerheimo

Hello Mannerheim, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Busy Stubber (talk) 02:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

AfC notification: Draft:List of political parties in Southern Asia by country has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of political parties in Southern Asia by country. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of political parties in Southern Asia by country (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of political parties in Southern Asia by country and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of political parties in Southern Asia by country, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 10:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Mannerheimo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Craig Davison (talk) 10:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your article Mauri Eggert

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Mauri Eggert to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

I have noticed this isse and I am working in it. If you are just patient and wait when I am ready. Thank you.--Mannerheimo (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

P.S Commenting here and same time editing my work takes more time than it is necessary --Mannerheimo (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Mannerheimo, that is an argument for why you should create articles in your sandbox or draftspace and only add them to mainspace when they are articles ready to go into the world's most-read encyclopaedia. Doing otherwise wasted Saqib's time, and probably that of other editors. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of Head of State and Governments of Indian origin

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mannerheimo, thanks for creating List of Head of State and Governments of Indian origin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? There is the same issue with List of Jewish heads of state and government. WP:V is at the heart of what we do, and you may benefit from seeing WP:BURDEN. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

I really don't know that are you trying to mesage? I haven't been active here in much. But I can put the sourchs in List of Head of State and Governments of Indian origin and List of Jewish heads of state and government. but User. Adminisrator Cullen328 has blocked me because you told him to do it. Now wikipedia is not my life and I am not able to comment every message in my talk. Thank you that you have made me life difficult. --Mannerheimo (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

A few things to note

Hi. I have noticed a few things about your contributions. You are creating very short articles with inadequate references, so the notability of the subjects may be questioned. Please go back over your contributions and add some references. Also, the standards for biographies here are not the same as on Finnish wikipedia. Please could you read these and try to conform to them? Thanks. Deb (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I notice you are still putting the place of birth inside the brackets in the intro. See the bio standards I referred you to above. Deb (talk) 10:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Please don't ignore my advice. Please familiarise yourself with the standards for biographies. Deb (talk) 10:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources and communication

Mannerheimo, can you lpease respond to my previous messages? WP:Communication is required, not optional, when other editors raise concerns. It is a matter of policy, outlined at WP:DISPUTE and WP:CONDUCT. You have been being contacted about poor referencing and creating articles of dubious notability for some time. Please also see WP:SourceList, WP:BURDEN and WP:V. If you continue to ignore messages, you risk being blocked. Please just communicate. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Any administrator can unblock you if you agree to provide references for new content that you add, and agree to communicate with fellow editors who raise concerns about your edits. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Well I dont't know that is User:Boleyn trying to tell me and his arguments are just academic. I haven't been active in wikipedia in few days. Your Blocking policy for life is just not fair. I don't see reason for Blocking me for life. I have now time to be active in wikipedia. Wikipedia is not my life and that's why I wasn't able to answer user: Boleyn. So please lift my Blocking so I can commicate with user: Boleyn.--Mannerheimo (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Also I don't think that Blocking me for life helps anything. I can't just be in wikipedia 24h in an day. Now I think there is some lack of undersdanting between users. --Mannerheimo (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

You are not blocked for life. You are blocked until you commit to providing references to reliable sources and commit to communicating with your fellow editors who have concerns. You also need to follow our policies aboyt translation. It is that simple. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

I have been blocked for life because there is no any deathline for blockade. I have communicated with User: Boleyn and I undertand his problem. I am waiting for his responds. I can't commit to providing references to reliable sources if I am blocked as simple it is. I will commit to communicate with fellow users but I have also other life than wikipedia. If you can please lift the blockade!Best wishers--Mannerheimo (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

You can communicate with Boleyn right here on your talk page. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Justlettersandnumbers comemnt in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

If good User:Justlettersandnumbers wants to communicate with User:Mannerheimo he/she shall take here because user:Mannerheimo is blocked and can't comment in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard [1] because administrator user Cullen328 has blocked mannerheimo for life.I am ready to take user:Justlettersandnumbers attribution but first some Administrator should lift my blockage. --Mannerheimo (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Mannerheimo, you have not been blocked for life. You have been blocked until the admin is sure you understand the issues. As for having not edited in a while, you edited today, yesterday, 2 days before that and daily up till then. I have sent you several messages, and every time I checked if you had edited since the last message but not responded, and that was the case. You need to look at WP:UNBLOCK to see how to get yourself unblocked. I am following this page so will see any messages here and you can also communicate with anyone else here by pinging them, by adding their name like this: Boleyn.

You have also written about that my arguments were just academic. No, I was pointing you to the guidelines and policies which were agreed by the community. That is not just academic. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

I have been blocked for life. There is no date and time how long the blocking is valid. If I edit small edits here and there in an day it dosen't mean that I am super active user. I understand you mater but admin user Cullen328 dosen't have any issue with this your problems. I can find sources in these two articles but I didn't have the time for that because I have other things to do. Now I am free. So I am sorry that I didn't respond to you but I read the message and if I don't have anything to respond I will not just respond like Yes have understand or message received singed Mannerheimo. No will just read it than continue my other work. If this is okey for you please tell administrator user Cullen328 to lift my blocking which is for life because there is no any death line.Best wishes. --Mannerheimo (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Again, you are not blocked for life. You are blocked until you change your behavior. You will be unblocked as soon as you explain that you understand the problems that led to your block and commit to following our policies in the future. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

How long I am blocked? 10 days? One week? 24h? You have blocked me not Boylen. I have understand the problems of user:Boylen I there was an misunderstanding with me and user:Boylen I have been blocked because Admin User:Cullen328 has blocked me. I understand the problems between me and user:Boylen but which is an issue which is between me and Boylen. I apologize about the misunderstanding and the miss communications with Boylen. But I don't see any necessary to block me for life. I understand the problems which led to the blocking but I don't see it necessary to block me for life. I am even ready to except blocking for 5 days but not for life. Best wishes. --Mannerheimo (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

This is the problem - you are not listening to me or Cullen328. You are not blocked for life, you just need to follow the information at WP:UNBLOCK. You are blocked until it is clear you understand the issues, which could be today or never - that is up to you. Thank you for your apology, but it is important, if someone raises a concern, that you reply, so they know it's in hand. It's also important that you add references as you create an article - not create an article and then look about for sources - it needs to be clear where your original information came from. I was contacting you as a member of New Page Patrol, and I was ticking off the articles as fine to be indexed by search engines like Google. It is important I do that job properly, and that does involve communicating with creators. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)