User talk:Dr.Koo

May 2017

Hello, I'm Nihonjoe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Russo-Japanese War‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I also reverted your edits to Japan as they were too sweeping and done without discussion. Please discuss the changes you would like to make on Talk:Japan and gain consensus before making such broad changes. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

You are now edit warring to push through your preferred version of the page. If someone reverts your edits, you should go to the talk page of the article (in this case, Talk:Japan) and gain consensus for the edits. If you continue ignoring this, you may be blocked for edit warring. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Dr.Koo and @Nihonjoe:, I'm sorry to bother you both. I thought that the discussion about this stuff was progressing well and that an "edit war" (or what I call a stubborn uncontrictive argument) had been avoided. However my participation in the discussion has brought some pretty unwelcmed bother here. The main reason why I contribute to a discussion or content is because I think I have something to contribute to the scholarship of articles or content, and I try to stick to stuff that comes from my professional life, or state when my capacity is limited and ask for help. So I'm not sure what to do about this user the TheInfernoX. Do we both have to make a case against this guy's evidence? I've pinged Nihonjoe on this because he's been very helpful to me in the past, and I'd rather not cause too much bother for everyone 本当に迷惑をかけたくないので困っています。Dr.khatmando (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@Dr.khatmando: The case was closed because there is no evidence to support the connection. The "evidence" presented boils down to "two similar-ish usernames", which is hardly evidence at all. Don't worry about it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@Nihonjoe: I appreciate that. I've looked to you for guidance since I decided to invest myself In WP and especially Wproject Japan stuff, so I don't want to wear out my welcome or my lack of know how end up being a burden. I thought the discussion was going so well and maybe took that sock puppet stuff too seriously. I've read up about it now and understand the social psych about how it works, just not the jargon used to describe it. Time to move forward a little wiser now Dr.khatmando (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@Dr.khatmando: No worries. It's a learning process for everyone. You may consider working through the various pages at Help:Getting started. There's a lot of good information there. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:51, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@Nihonjoe: Indeed. I was using tip of the day for a while, but I think I will pick one thing from the help pages a day for a bit. I try and do something from the Wproject Japan articles needing attention. Dr.khatmando (talk) 23:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@Dr.khatmando: My apologies for the bother. My main concern was related the edits you've made on the talk page of Japan, which were made just minutes after a double revert made by User:Dr.Koo with his bad edits on Tokyo. It was my mistake to presumed you might have some relations to User:Dr.Koo on the discussion in that regard. TheInfernoX (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

All good. I should have also assumed you acted in good faith too. Let's do some good and have some enjoyment! Dr.khatmando (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Nihonjoe and User:TheInfernoX, there goes Dr.Koo making sweeping changes without any discussion again. Vivexdino (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@Vivexdino: Please provide diffs. I don't have time to go hunting. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Nihonjoe, all the recent edits on Empire of Japan for example. And the unexplained image deletions on Imperial Japanese Army which was reverted by User:Dhtwiki. Vivexdino (talk) 08:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Dr.Koo: Please stop making these changes without discussion and consensus. You also need to actually discuss things with people instead of completely ignoring them. If this situation does not change, further steps may have to be taken. This encyclopedia is built by consensus, and that can only be achieved when editors discuss things together. Please start participating in these discussions rather than simply ignoring them. Thanks. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (African Chinese) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating African Chinese, Dr.Koo!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Eunuch - Coptic Involvement

Where did you obtain your information from regarding this section? I have looked up all your source documents and citations and no where does it say what you entered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diesel4982 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Prince Higashifushimi Yorihito

I was about to start a discussion on the talk page for replacing a badly cropped image with the full one, looks much better, thank you. Redman19 (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dr.Koo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of ad template

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from King's College, Hong Kong. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 11:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you recently removed content from Yuan dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 01:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! General Ization ^Talk 01:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Porcelain Tower of Nanjing, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jin dynasty (265–420), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Qing dynasty. General Ization ^Talk 17:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hi Dr.Koo, I'd like to remind you again to use edit summaries (see section above). You've made numerous edits without explanation, and it's really difficult for other editors to figure out what you've been trying to achieve. Thanks, -Zanhe (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kazakhstan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ascension Cathedral

Religion in Kazakhstan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ascension Cathedral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions!

Greetings.

I really want to personally thank you for the updates and revisions you have made to the Chinese culture page. I have been researching into Chinese and Islamic culture, and I find it really helpful that all these new images have been posted. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calore123 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

You did a beautiful edit to the Chinese Culture~! 事件在今年發生 (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazakhstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascension Cathedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Song dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Song (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Song (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please start using edit summaries

Hey there. I see you've been asked this before. Won't you please start using edit summaries? I and others are finding this to be an issue and it takes time away from valuable editing we could be doing. This is a community standard. Thanks! ☆ Bri (talk) 01:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

A discussion has been opened concerning your editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Dr.Koo. I have suggested that you might be blocked the next time you remove content from an article while leaving no edit summary. There may still be time for you to respond at ANI. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Japanese nuclear weapon program, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

• Japanese nuclear weapon program (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have continued removing content from articles with no edit summary, after being specifically warned about doing that. The information you removed appears useful and is properly referenced, which makes us wonder as to your motivation for removing it. If you are actually trying to make the article worse, that is considered WP:Vandalism. EdJohnston (talk) 13:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not communicating, not responding to the concerns of others and not responding at ANI. To be unblocked, simply acknowledge this message..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)