Jump to content

Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Danigoni (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 123: Line 123:
Boeing believes regions such as India and East Asia that have large populations within close proximity can make good use of this variant. It allows them to transport twice as many passengers than a single-aisle plane less frequently and more efficiently. Roughly 3.1 billion people live within the range of the 787-3 if used in India or China.
Boeing believes regions such as India and East Asia that have large populations within close proximity can make good use of this variant. It allows them to transport twice as many passengers than a single-aisle plane less frequently and more efficiently. Roughly 3.1 billion people live within the range of the 787-3 if used in India or China.


Boeing also believes the 787-3 may make wide-body planes popular again on North American and European domestic routes. 30 years ago it was not uncommon to fly from New York to Los Angeles in a [[Boeing 747]]. With deregulation, more and more airlines joined the route. Overcapacity led to airlines using smaller planes. Now there are around 47 direct flights per day mostly on [[Boeing 737]] or Airbus [[A320]] between the two cities usually carrying 130 passengers. This has led to congestion and higher pollution. With the 787-3, its efficiency may offset the higher landing fees and acquisition costs and make it useful on these routes.
Boeing also believes the 787-3 may make wide-body planes popular again on North American and European domestic routes. 30 years ago it was not uncommon to fly from New York to Los Angeles in a [[Boeing 747]]. With deregulation, more and more airlines joined the route. Overcapacity led to airlines using smaller planes. Now there are around 47 direct flights per day mostly on [[Boeing 737]] or Airbus [[A320]] between the two cities, which each flight usually carrying around 130 passengers. This has directly led to higher congestion and more pollution. It's possible that the 787-3 has a high enough efficiency that it could offset the higher landing fees and acquisition costs for heavier aircraft and therefore be used for popular domestic routes.


To date, however, only Japanese airlines have ordered this model for routes within East Asia.
To date, however, only Japanese airlines have ordered this model for routes within East Asia.

Revision as of 04:01, 7 November 2006

Template:Infobox Aircraft

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a mid-sized wide body, twin engined passenger airliner currently under development by Boeing and scheduled to enter service in 2008. It will carry between 210 and 330 passengers depending on the seating configuration, and will be more fuel-efficient than comparable earlier airliners. It will also be the first major airliner to use composite material for most of its construction.[1]

Prior to January 28, 2005, the 787 was known as the developmental designator 7E7. The early renderings released depicted a radical design with highly curved surfaces. On April 26, 2005, one year to the day after the launch of the program, the final look of the external 787 design was frozen with a less rakish nose and a more conventional tail.

Description

Background

When 767 sales weakened in the face of competition from the Airbus A330-200 in the late 1990s, Boeing began to consider a replacement. As the Boeing 747-400 was also beginning to lose traction, the company proposed two new aircraft — the Sonic Cruiser and the 747X. The Sonic Cruiser was intended to achieve higher speeds (approximately Mach 0.98) while burning fuel at the same rate as the existing 767 and A330 products. The 747X, intended to compete with the Airbus A380, would have stretched the 747-400 and had a composite supercritical wing to improve efficiency. The limited potential market for superjumbos was an issue, however; the earlier Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 widebodies split a similarly limited market and drove both companies out of their strong positions in the commercial aircraft market.

File:Boeing sonic.jpg
Artist's concept of the Sonic Cruiser, a proposed replacement for the 767.

Market interest for the 747X was tepid; the Sonic Cruiser had brighter prospects. Several major airlines, primarily in the United States, voiced their optimism for the concept. By decreasing travel time, they would be able to increase customer satisfaction and aircraft utilization.

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the global airline market was upended. Airlines were not able to justify large capital expenditures, and due to increased petroleum prices, were more interested in efficiency than speed. The worst-affected airlines were in the United States — those same airlines were considered the most likely customers of the Sonic Cruiser. Boeing offered airlines the option of using the airframe for either higher speed or increased efficiency. Due to high projected airframe costs, demand continued to evaporate. Eventually, Boeing switched tracks and decided to offer an alternative project, and cancelled the 747X once Airbus launched production of the Airbus A380 aircraft.[1]

On April 26, 2004, the Japanese airline All Nippon Airways (ANA) became the launch customer for the 787, then still known as the 7E7, announcing a firm order for 50 aircraft to be delivered beginning in April 28, 2008. ANA's order was for thirty 787-3, 290-330 seat, one-class domestic aircraft, and twenty 787-8, long-haul, 210-250 seat, two-class aircraft for international routes such as Tokyo Narita-Los Angeles. The aircraft will allow new routes to be opened to mid-sized cities not previously served, such as Denver and Montreal. As is common for launch customers in the aviation industry, ANA is rumored to have received a significant discount of 40-50% off the original price.

Customer-announced orders and commitments for the 787 reached 237 aircraft during the first year of sales, and exceeded 400 in June of 2006 Boeing expects to have 500 firm orders by entry into service (EIS). This will make the 787 the fastest-ever selling wide-bodied airliner upon EIS.

The 787-3 and 787-8 variants will be available first, while the 787-9 will enter service in 2010, in spite of earlier suggestions that it would be delayed as orders for the 787-3 and 787-8 sold out early production. As of June 16, 2006, five customers had placed orders for a total of 48 787-9s.

The 787-8 variant was initially priced at $US 120 million per aircraft, surprising the industry, which expected a higher price. There have been two price increases since launch and a 787-8 currently sells for $US 148-157.5 million. The 787-3 is listed at $US 138-143 million, while the 787-9 is listed at $US 178.5-188 million. [1]

Development

File:ANA-7E7.jpg
Artist's concept of the 7E7 that shows the nose and tail prior to the final '787' redesign; livery of launch customer All Nippon Airways.

The replacement for the Sonic Cruiser project was dubbed the 7E7 (with a development code name of Y2.) The "E" was said to stand for various things, depending upon the audience. To some, it stood for "efficiency," to others it stood for "environmentally friendly," etc. In the end, Boeing claimed it merely stood for "Eight," after the aircraft was eventually rechristened "787".[1]

The 787 essentially uses the technology proposed for the Sonic Cruiser in a more conventional airframe configuration (see Features). Boeing claims that the 787 will be up to 20% more fuel-efficient than current comparable aircraft. Roughly one-third of this efficiency improvement will come from the engines; another third from aerodynamic improvements and the increased use of lighter weight composite materials; and the other third from advanced systems. The most notable system advancement contributing to efficiency is a "more electric architecture" which replaces bleed air and hydraulic power with electrically powered compressors and pumps. Technology from the Sonic Cruiser and 787 will be used as part of Boeing's project to replace its entire airliner product line, called the Yellowstone Project (of which the 787 is the first stage).

Boeing selected two engine types, the General Electric (GE) GEnx and Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 to power the 787, both placed in pods under the wing. Significantly, this leaves Pratt & Whitney, which normally has an entrant in this market space, unable to offer one of its own engines to 787 customers. Boeing may have wished to rely on two evolved versions of existing engines rather than the higher-risk option of an all new Pratt & Whitney engine, particularly in light of Pratt & Whitney's recent failures in the Regional Jet market and failed PW6000 engine for the A318. For the first time in commercial aviation, both engine types will have a standard interface with the aircraft, allowing any 787 to be fitted with either a GE or Rolls-Royce engine at any time. Engine interchangeability makes the 787 a more flexible asset to airlines, allowing them to change from one manufacturer's engine to the other's in light of any future engine developments which conform more closely to their operating profile.[1] The engine market for the 787 is estimated at $40 billion USD over the next 25 years.

The launch of a new airliner can be expected to draw scathing comments from competitors, Boeing's doubt over the A380 and Airbus' mocking of the Sonic Cruiser being recent examples. The 787 is no exception, as Airbus' John Leahy has made attempts at refuting all of Boeing's claims, openly criticizing the large-scale use of composites in the 787's fuselage as being "rushed and ridiculous," although Boeing built and tested the first composite section while examining the Sonic Cruiser concept nearly five years ago [2], making the 787 a significantly refined product [3]. Airbus recently offered the competing A350 using derivatives of the turbofans developed for the 787. This new jet will make less widespread use of composites with Airbus preferring aluminium-lithium alloys for the fuselage [4].

In order to compete with the A350-900, and especially to compete for the large order from Emirates and an order from British Airways, Boeing has announced it might produce a "787-10," with seating capacity between 290 - 310. [5] This has been reported in numerous articles [6], including on ATW Online's daily news [7]. Production of this new model is projected for 2012. Formal launch may come in late 2006 or 2007.[2]

This proposed stretched variant is intended to compete with the planned Airbus A350-900.[3] The 787-10 would supersede the 777-200ER in Boeing’s current lineup, and could also be targeted to replace the Airbus A330-300 and A340-300, and McDonnell Douglas MD-11. Emirates Airlines and Qantas have shown interest in such variant which would enter service in 2012.[4] This variant has not yet been officially launched by Boeing, but Mike Bair, head of the 787 Program, has already stated that “It's not a matter of if, but when we are going to do it... The 787-10 will be a stretched version of the 787-9 and sacrifice some range to add extra seat and cargo capacity”. [5] However, while Boeing is optimizing the 787-9, many aerodynamic improvements will be found on the 787-10 [If the plane will be released]. If it is a requirement, Boeing will request a more powerful engine with higher thrust ratings.

Features

  • 18.5 in (47 cm) seat-bottom width (depending on aisle armrest widths) in 2+4+2 or 3+2+3 arrangements. Seat widths would be approximately 17.2 in (43.7 cm) for 3+3+3 seating.
  • Cabin interior width 50 in (127 cm) from the floor is 18 ft 7 in (566 cm) and was recently increased by 1 inch (2.5cm). The 787's interior cabin width, measured at seated eye level (where width is, according to Boeing studies, actually perceived) is a full 15 in (38 cm) greater than that of the Airbus A330 and A340, but 5 in (13 cm) inferior to the currently expected future competitor A350XWB. Two class configuration of 240 seats in two class domestic with 46 in (116.8 cm) first class pitch and 34 in (59.7 cm) coach class. 296 passengers can be seated in a high density 3+2+3 coach arrangement with 36 in (91.4 cm) Business and 32 in (81.3 cm) Coach pitch. Up to 234 passengers may be seated in a three-class setup that uses 61 in (154.9 cm) pitch in First Class (2+2+2 or 2+1+2), 39 in (99 cm) pitch for Business (2+3+2 or 2+2+2) and 32 in (81.3 cm) for Coach (2+4+2).
  • Cruise speed: 0.85 Mach (903 km/h or 561 mph at altitude)
  • Range of 8,500 nautical miles (15,700 km), enough to cover the Los Angeles to Bangkok or New York to Taipei routes.
  • Construction materials (by weight): 50% composite, 20% aluminum, 15% titanium, 10% steel, 5% other. Composite materials are significantly lighter and stronger than traditional aircraft materials, making the 787 a very light aircraft for its capabilities. By volume, the 787 will be 80% composite. This will allow the potential to take off from, and land on, relatively short airstrips as the 767 can, yet still have the capability to fly long-haul distances. [8]
  • The 787 production line will be able to finish an aircraft in as little as three days, compared to 11 days for the 737.
  • Larger windows than any other current in service civil air transport (27 cm by 47 cm), with a higher eye level, so passengers can see the horizon, with liquid crystal display (LCD)-based "auto-dimming" to reduce cabin glare and maintain transparency. These are to be supplied by PPG[9].
  • Light-emitting diode (LED) cabin lighting (three color) will be used instead of fluorescent tubes, allowing the aircraft to be entirely 'bulbless' and have 128 color combinations.
  • A version of EthernetAvionics Full-Duplex Switched Ethernet (AFDX) / ARINC 664 -- will be used to transmit data between the flight deck and aircraft systems.
  • Boeing has specified wireless in-flight entertainment systems, reducing wiring costs and aircraft weight.
  • LCD multi-function displays on the flight deck, all of which will use an industry standard GUI widget toolkit (Cockpit Display System Interfaces to User Systems / ARINC 661) [10]
  • Bleedless turbofans, allowing elimination of superheated air conduits normally used for de-icing, aircraft power, and other functions. These systems are to be replaced with an all-electrical system.[1]
  • Cabin air provided by electrically driven compressors (no engine bleed air).
  • Higher humidity in the passenger cabin because of the use of composites (which do not corrode).
  • The internal pressure will be increased, to the equivalent of 6000 feet (1800 m) altitude versus 8000 (2400 m) on conventional aircraft. This will significantly improve passenger comfort.
  • Boeing is experimenting with several engine noise reducing technologies for the 787. Among these are a redesigned air inlet containing sound-absorbing materials and redesigned exhaust duct covers whose rims are tipped in a toothed pattern to allow for quieter mixing of exhaust and outside air. Boeing expects these developments to make the 787 significantly quieter both inside and outside the passenger cabin.
  • Improved ride quality through Active Gust Alleviation system, similar to that Boeing built for the B-2 bomber.

Early concept images of the 787 included rakish cockpit windows, a dropped nose, and a distinctive "shark-fin" vertical stabilizer. The final styling of the aircraft was more conservative, with the fin less radical than on earlier images, but the nose and cockpit windows were retained. The nose is very similar to that of the Dornier 328Jet.

Production

File:Boeing 747-400LCF 2.jpg
Fuselage barrel sections from Alenia and Vought will be flown to Everett on modified 747s.

Boeing will manufacture the 787's tail fin at its plant in Frederickson, Washington, ailerons and flaps at Boeing Australia, and fairings at Boeing Canada. For its entire history, Boeing has jealously guarded its techniques for designing and mass producing commercial jetliner wings. Due to economic realities, the wings will be manufactured by Japanese companies in Nagoya, e.g. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, while the horizontal stabilizers will be manufactured by Alenia Aeronautica in Italy, and the fuselage sections by Vought in South Carolina (USA), Alenia in Italy, Kawasaki Heavy Industries in Japan, and Spirit AeroSystems, in Wichita, Kansas (USA). [6]

Japanese industrial participation is very important to the project, with 35% workshare, with many of the subcontractors supported and funded by the Japanese government. On April 26 2006, Japanese manufacturer Toray industries and Boeing announced a production agreement involving $6 billion worth of carbon fiber. The deal is an extension of a contract signed in 2004 between the two companies and eases some concerns that Boeing might have difficulty maintaining its production goals for the 787.[1]

From France, Messier-Dowty will build the landing gear and Thales will supply the integrated standby flight display, electrical power conversion system, and in-flight entertainment.[1]

Honeywell and Rockwell-Collins will provide flight control, guidance and other avionics systems, including standard dual head up guidance systems. Future integration of forward looking infrared is being looked at by Flight Dynamics allowing improved visibility using thermal sensing as part of the HUD system, allowing pilots to "see" through the clouds.[1]

Hamilton Sundstrand will provide power distribution and management systems to the aircraft, including manufacture and production of Generator Control Units (GCUs) as well as integration of power transfer systems that can move power from the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) and the main engines to the necessary parts and machinery of the aircraft.

File:B787 Section 41.jpg
Nose section of the 787-8, unveiled at Spirit Wichita for the first time.

The final assembly will consist of attaching fully-completed subassemblies, instead of building the complete aircraft from the ground up. This is a technique which Boeing has previously used on the 737 program, which involves shipping fuselage barrel sections by rail from Spirit's Wichita, Kansas facility to Boeing's narrowbody final assembly plant at Renton, Washington. Airbus has also used this technique in the past, although in its case it is more of a political necessity resulting from partner nations' divided workshare. After stiff competition, Boeing announced on December 16, 2003 that assembly would take place in Everett, Washington, employing 800 to 1,200 people.[1]

The 787 will undergo wind-tunnel testing at Boeing's Transonic Wind Tunnel, QinetiQ's five-meter wind tunnel based in Farnborough, UK, and NASA Ames Research Center's wind tunnel, as well as at the French aerodynamics research agency, ONERA.

The first composite section rolled out in January 2005, and final external design was set in April 2005. On June 30, 2006 Boeing celebrated the start of major assembly of the first 787 at Fuji Heavy Industries' new factory in Handa, Japan, near Nagoya.[11]

Boeing intends to deliver 118 aircraft during the first 18 months of production. Due to customer demand, Boeing is currently considering whether to open a second production line.[2] Some of the difficulty in this case revolves around the production capacity of suppliers. For example, Alenia is said to only be able to produce seven 787 fuselage sections per month.[citation needed] Difficulties in increasing production rates resulted in severe delivery delays in 1999.[2]

Technical concerns

Engine interchangeability

The two types of engines compatible with the 787 will use a standard electrical interface, potentially allowing any aircraft to be fitted with Rolls-Royce or GE engines at any time. This flexibility will allow an airline to switch from one manufacturer the other in the event of technological developments which conform more closely to their operating profile. Boeing's goal is to make changing engine types as simple as a standard same-manufacturer replacement.[7]

According to ILFC's VP-marketing, Marty Olson, changing engines on a 787 could take as long as 15 days and so be economically unfeasible. "You'd have to take all the pylon, everything from the wing down, off" Olson says. He goes on to complain that Boeing is still promoting the 24hrs change in spite of promises to alter their marketing. Current aircraft can have engines changed to those of a different manufacturer but this rarely happens due to the costs involved. Boeing's response is that the design is not yet finalised and 24hrs remains their goal.[8]

Composite Fuselage

It was suggested by many that the risks of having a composite fuselage have not been fully assessed and should not be attempted. It was also added that carbon fiber, unlike metal, does not visibly show cracks and fatigue and repairing any damage done to the aircraft would not be easy. [12]Boeing has dismissed such notions insisting that composites have been used on wings and other passenger aircraft parts for years and this is a non-issue. They have also stated that special defect-detection procedures will be put in place to negate any concern. [13] In 2006 Boeing launched the 787 GoldCare [14] program. This is a comprehensive life-cycle management service whereby all the aircraft that sign up for this program are routinely monitored and repaired if needed. This is the first program of its kind from Boeing. After sale protection programs are not new but have usually been offered by third party service centers. Boeing believes this brings them additional revenue and will also allow them to nullify any concern over maintaining this aircraft for overanxious airlines.

Variants

File:AirNZ 789.jpg
Air New Zealand will be the launch customer for the initial stretch version, the 787-9.

There are three variants of the 787 and all launched at the same time in 2004. The 787-8 will enter service in 2008. The 787-3 will enter service next in 2010. The last to enter service will be the 787-9 in 2010.

787-3

This will be a 223 seat (3 class) or 296 seat (two class) short-range version targeted at high-density flights, with a range of 3,500 nautical miles (6,500 km). It is designed to compete with and replace the Airbus A300, Boeing 757-300, Boeing 767-200 and 767-300. The 787-3's intended entry into service is 2010. This model is limited in its range, not by fuel capacity but by a low maximum take-off weight of 360,000 lb (163,290 kg). It currently has the same fuel capacity as the 787-8. With a full load of passengers and cargo, it will be limited in the amount of fuel it can take on board. This is an advantage on shorter, high-density routes, such as Tokyo to Shanghai or Osaka to Seoul. Many airports charge landing fees depending on the weight of the aircraft, thus an airliner rated at a lower MTOW would pay lower fees.

The wings of this aircraft will also be different from the other two versions; the raked wingtips, designed for long-range efficiency, are removed in the interest of a lighter aircraft. The wings will be the same except for the last 13 feet, outboard of the ailerons.

Boeing believes regions such as India and East Asia that have large populations within close proximity can make good use of this variant. It allows them to transport twice as many passengers than a single-aisle plane less frequently and more efficiently. Roughly 3.1 billion people live within the range of the 787-3 if used in India or China.

Boeing also believes the 787-3 may make wide-body planes popular again on North American and European domestic routes. 30 years ago it was not uncommon to fly from New York to Los Angeles in a Boeing 747. With deregulation, more and more airlines joined the route. Overcapacity led to airlines using smaller planes. Now there are around 47 direct flights per day mostly on Boeing 737 or Airbus A320 between the two cities, which each flight usually carrying around 130 passengers. This has directly led to higher congestion and more pollution. It's possible that the 787-3 has a high enough efficiency that it could offset the higher landing fees and acquisition costs for heavier aircraft and therefore be used for popular domestic routes.

To date, however, only Japanese airlines have ordered this model for routes within East Asia.

787-8

This variant seats 223 passengers in three classes and has a range of 8,500 nautical miles (15,700 km). EIS is 2008. Boeing is targeting the 787-8 to replace the 767-200ER and 767-300ER.

787-9

This will be a stretched variant seating 263 in three classes with a range of 8,800 nautical miles (16,300 km). The targeted EIS is set at 2010 [15]. Boeing is targeting the 787-9 to replace the Airbus A330-200 and A340-200, Boeing 767-400ER, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, and Lockheed L-1011. This model is very similar to the 787-8 except for structural strengthening and the stretched fuselage. It will have the lowest seat-mile cost of any 787. It will have a longer range and a higher MTOW than the other two. It can fly non-stop from New York to Singapore or from Moscow to Sao Paolo.

Sales of this variant have been limited by its 2010 entry into service rather than any shortcomings. The smaller size and the entry date of the 787-8 being two years earlier was a great enticement for most airlines and led to the -8 taking most orders. Now with the first two years of production completely sold out, airlines have been weighing the option of the 787-8 against the 787-9 since either one can be delivered after 2010. Qantas and Singapore Airlines have placed the largest orders for this variant.

Specifications

Orthographically projected diagram of the Boeing 787-8.
Orthographically projected diagram of the Boeing 787-8.
Model 787-3 787-8 787-9
Cockpit crew Two Two Two
Passengers 223 (3-class)
296 (2-class)
223 (3-class) 263 (3-class)
Length 57 m (186 ft) 57 m (186 ft) 63 m (206 ft)
Wingspan 52 m (170 ft) 60 m (197 ft) 60 m (197 ft)
Height 17 m (56 ft) 17 m (56 ft) 17 m (56 ft)
Cabin width 5.77 m (18 ft 9in) 5.77 m (18 ft 9in) 5.77 m (18 ft 9in)
Max. take-off weight 163,636 kg
(360,000 lb)
216,363 kg
(476,000 lb)
244,940 kg
(540,000 lb)
Cruise speed .85 Mach .85 Mach .85 Mach
Range, loaded 6,500 km
(3,500 nm)
15,700 km
(8,500 nm)
16,300 km
(8,800 nm)
Max. fuel 124,770 L (32,989 USG) 124,700 L (32,989 USG) 138,700 L (36,693 USG)
Service ceiling 13,100 m (43,000 ft)
Engines (2×) General Electric GEnx or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000

Deliveries

This plane has not yet entered service. To see all current orders please see the list of Boeing 787 orders.

Trivia

  • The all-composite fuselage makes the 787 the first twin-aisle composite aircraft in production.
  • At Mach 0.85, the 787 will be among the fastest commercial airplanes from Boeing. The upcoming 747-8 cruises at Mach 0.845 to 0.855.
  • The cockpit of Lockheed Martin's Orion spacecraft will be derived from that of the 787.[9]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Norris, Guy; Thomas, Geoffrey; Wagner, Mark and Forbes Smith, Christine (2005). Boeing 787 Dreamliner - Flying Redefined. Aerospace Technical Publications International. ISBN 0-9752341-2-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ a b c "Boeing Considers Second Assembly Line For 787 Dreamliner." Pearson, D. The Wall Street Journal. April 27, 2006.
  3. ^ "Boeing bullish on 787-10, Dreamliner production". Air Transport World. ATW Media Group. 2005-12-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ Baseler, Randy. "Dash 10". Boeing Blog. Retrieved 2006-02-08.
  5. ^ "Boeing to Build Stretch 787 Jet," The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2006.
  6. ^ "Boeing 787: Parts from around world will be swiftly integrated", The Seattle Times, September 11, 2005.
  7. ^ aviationexplorer.com
  8. ^ "787 Isn't Meeting 24hour-Engine Change Promo, lessor says"" www.leeham.net
  9. ^ Coppinger, Rob (October 6, 2006). "NASA Orion crew vehicle will use voice controls in Boeing 787-style Honeywell smart cockpit". Flight International. Retrieved 2006-10-06. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Template:Boeing Airliners Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists