Talk:Charles B. McVay III: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
::The ship was not sunk because of the failure to zigzag, but zig-zagging might have prevented the ships loss. In enemy infested waters zig-sagging would be normal practice. So why is the conviction called a "miscarriage of justice"?[[Special:Contributions/119.224.13.116|119.224.13.116]] ([[User talk:119.224.13.116|talk]]) 20:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC) |
::The ship was not sunk because of the failure to zigzag, but zig-zagging might have prevented the ships loss. In enemy infested waters zig-sagging would be normal practice. So why is the conviction called a "miscarriage of justice"?[[Special:Contributions/119.224.13.116|119.224.13.116]] ([[User talk:119.224.13.116|talk]]) 20:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Top Secret Mission? == |
|||
The first paragraph is incorrect. According to Newcomb's book, the Indianapolis' top secret mission ended when the bomb parts were delivered to Trinian. It was then ordered to report to Leyte. These orders were not secret, nor was the ship under radio silence. |
Revision as of 19:10, 27 December 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charles B. McVay III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Charles B. McVay III appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Blurb for DYK
Did You Know
- ...Charles Butler McVay III, commander of the USS Indianapolis (CA-35), blamed when it was lost at sea in 1945 with massive loss of life, was finally exonerated by the United States Congress posthumously in 2000?
Does anyone know if he had any kids?
"Service Revolver"
This article states that Captain McVay killed himself with his "service revolver". This statement needs referencing, as US Naval Officers do not have 'service' pistols. Had he illegally kept a pistol from his active duty days, it would have most likely been a Colt .45 semi-automatic. For the most part, past 1941, only aircrew were issued revolvers (I was issued a .38 revolver as late as 1991). However, regardless of the model, I don't see him as having a "service revolver".81.106.185.70 (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
In Harm's Way
Has anyone ever read the book "In Harm's Way", by Doug Stanton? If wanting to learn about the experiences McVay had on the USS Indianapolis, then I would recommend reading this book. It also contains a list at the beginning of the book of all the crew members, including its survivors. Thesomeone987 (talk) 00:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Thesomeone987
Unsourced "assertion"
Source (1) no longer goes to any meaningful page or website, so the "fact" that one of the commanders who received the distress signal was dead drunk, etc. is now an "assertion" unless otherwise sourced. I'll delete it in a few days.
Miscarriage of justice?
It is normal practice in the Royal Navy to court martial an officer whose ship sinks, to determine the cause. McVay was not treated any more harshly than an RN officer, though not as leniently as most US officers. He was found at fault in the trial. A "political" campaign to "exonerate" him followed many many years later. There was no appeal or retrial, and the campaign was not based on any alleged deficiencies with the trial. So can we say that there was a miscarriage of justice?203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- The ship was not sunk because of the failure to zigzag, but zig-zagging might have prevented the ships loss. In enemy infested waters zig-sagging would be normal practice. So why is the conviction called a "miscarriage of justice"?119.224.13.116 (talk) 20:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Top Secret Mission?
The first paragraph is incorrect. According to Newcomb's book, the Indianapolis' top secret mission ended when the bomb parts were delivered to Trinian. It was then ordered to report to Leyte. These orders were not secret, nor was the ship under radio silence.
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Connecticut articles
- Low-importance Connecticut articles
- WikiProject Connecticut articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
- C-Class Indiana Historical Society articles
- Low-importance Indiana Historical Society articles
- WikiProject Indiana Historical Society articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles