Jump to content

Talk:Unit 669: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
replied
Line 20: Line 20:
==Unit literal name==
==Unit literal name==
[https://www.iaf.org.il/4968-33506-he/IAF.aspx Please see how the unit is referred to in Hebrew official IAF website].[[Special:Contributions/77.127.83.166|77.127.83.166]] ([[User talk:77.127.83.166|talk]]) 20:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[https://www.iaf.org.il/4968-33506-he/IAF.aspx Please see how the unit is referred to in Hebrew official IAF website].[[Special:Contributions/77.127.83.166|77.127.83.166]] ([[User talk:77.127.83.166|talk]]) 20:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:In case you didn't noticed and/or forgot to check, I have reverted to an earlier version without the mentioning of the "669 children" (twice!) before you reverted it to the wrong version. In future, please check before you make any silly assumption. Thank you~! -- <small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[User talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 21:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:06, 28 June 2019

File:Coat of arms of the Israeli Air Force.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Coat of arms of the Israeli Air Force.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unit literal name

Please see how the unit is referred to in Hebrew official IAF website.77.127.83.166 (talk) 20:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't noticed and/or forgot to check, I have reverted to an earlier version without the mentioning of the "669 children" (twice!) before you reverted it to the wrong version. In future, please check before you make any silly assumption. Thank you~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 21:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]